scholarly journals Kedudukan Hak atas Tanah Waris Warga Negara Indonesia yang Berpindah Kewarganegaraan

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36
Author(s):  
Kadek Hapsari Ika Palupi ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
I Wayan Arthanaya

A person’s citizenship status has an impact on obtaining guarantees of rights from the state. Indonesian citizens are granted the right to obtain ownership rights to land in Indonesia, but not to those who have changed their citizenship status. The case is different if a citizen acquires the rights of ownership over land due to inheritance. In this regard, this study addresses two questions: 1) how is the inheritance rights in Indonesia based on the Civil Code regulated? ) What is the position of inheritance rights of Indonesian a citizen who has changed his/her citizenship status? This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach to achieve these goals. The results indicate that the regulation of inheritance rights in Indonesia is realized through the enactment of three types of inheritance law, namely Customary Inheritance Law, Islamic Inheritance Law and Civil Code Inheritance Law. In the Civil Code of Inheritance Law there are groups that distinguish between heirs and wills whose contents shall not conflict with legitieme portie (absolute part) and shall relate to its inheritance which is land. Then, there are other rules that need to be obeyed namely Indonesian Republic Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations of Agrarian Principles. The status of ownership rights of land of an Indonesian citizen who has changed his/her citizenship status transfers to the state if the said citizen does not transfer the status of his/her land inheritance within one year from his transfer of citizenship.

Notaire ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Muhammad Setya Ady Syarifuddin

There are several factors that can cause problems in the land sector in Indonesia, one of which is inheritance. This study aims to determine: 1) the legal position of the heirs of foreign citizens in the object of inheritance in the form of land rights obtained from inheritance with Indonesian citizenship; and 2) The validity of the control of land rights by foreign countries on objects originating from the inheritance of Indonesian citizens. The research method uses a normative juridical approach to the law (statute approach), conceptual approach (conceptual approach), and case study approach (case study). The results of the study are heirs who have changed their status to foreign citizens can also be proven by their lineage or have blood relations so that if they acquire property in the form of land originating from inheritance while those who control the property are foreign nationals, if possible, do so to discuss the object. through an exchange, grant, or auction within a maximum period of 1 (one) year, the status will automatically switch. If the land has been turned into state land, then the owner is considered to have relinquished his rights but the owner is still given the opportunity by law to be able to apply for the Right to Use the land.Keywords: Inheritance Law; Legality Of Ownership Of Land Rights; Foreign Nationalilty.Terdapat beberapa faktor yang dapat menimbulkan permasalahan di bidang pertanahan di Indonesia, salah satunya adalah pewarisan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: 1) Kedudukan hukum ahli waris warga negara asing dalam pewarisan obyek waris berupa hak atas tanah yang diperoleh dari pewarisan berkewarganegaraan Indonesia; dan 2) Keabsahan penguasaan Hak Atas Tanah yang dilakukan oleh warga negara asing atas obyek yang berasal dari Pewarisan berkewarganegaraan Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach), dan pendekatan studi kasus (case study). Hasil penelitian yaitu ahli waris yang telah berubah status kewarganegaraan menjadi warga negara asing juga dapat menjadi ahli waris yang dibuktikan dengan adanya garis keturunan atau memiliki hubungan darah sehingga jika memperoleh harta berupa tanah yang berasal dari pewarisan sedangkan yang menguasai harta tersebut sudah menjadi warga negara asing maka sebaiknya dilakukan peralihan terhadap obyek tersebut melalui jual beli, tukar menukar, hibah, atau lelang dalam jangka waktu maksimal 1 (satu) tahun karena jika lebih dari jangka waktu tersebut maka status tanah akan beralih secara hukum menjadi tanah negara. Jika tanah tersebut telah beralih menjadi tanah negara maka si pemilik dianggap telah melepaskan haknya tetapi si pemilik masih diberi kesempatan oleh undang-undang untuk dapat mengajukan permohonan Hak Pakai atas tanah.Kata Kunci: Hukum Waris; Keabsahan Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah; Warga Negara Asing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-32
Author(s):  
Qurrotul Uyun

Designation (naturalization) includes giving Indonesian citizenship status of one or a number of people from foreign nationals, or gives the status as a citizen of Indonesia or the number of people who do not have citizenship (stateless) .According to the laws of the Republic of Indonesia citizens who have dual citizenship must choose one of these citizenship so until he has only one nationality. For Indonesian citizens are treated when these approvals to those Indonesian nationals, according to Indonesian citizenship legislation that called "gain" or "select" nationality of the Republic of Indonesia will be replaced with Indonesian nationality, and which are called "retained" Dutch nationality or nationality of foreign countries or "reject" Indonesian nationality. So goes the Indonesian nationality, if it has lost the nationality Indonesia automatically all matters concerned with the rights and obligations of citizens or her country also erased or lost. The problem that will be discussed are: Does the right of repudiation in the process of selecting citizenship status lead to legal consequences for those concerned? Does repudiation rights used in the process of selecting citizenship status in Indonesia? By studying this research, it is expected to find out the point of problems in selecting indonesian citizenship.This research used qualitative. Since this method is a directed and systemic method. In addition, this research study used statute approach and conceptual approach. It is an approach which comes from views and doctrines that are developed in the science of law.The findings of this research are: first, as a result of law that is rejected, rejected state has no right to force someone to reject the offer, this happens because of self-will without intervension from other sides. Since, the status of citizenship related to the existence in getting right and obligation of someone in every action.  The second problem is repudiation right that is used in Indonesia by special naturalization. It means that the state is able to offer or give citizenship status by using it, and in this session, the citizen has right to receive or reject that offer.


Author(s):  
I Putu Dwika Ariestu

Human Rights and the State could not be separated from one another. Both are interconnected in terms of how to ensure internal stability in a country. With the existence of human rights, it is hoped that state is not arbitrary to treat its people and is obliged to protect everyone in its territory including in this case Stateless persons mentioned in Article 7 paragraph 1 of the Convention relating Status of Stateless Persons in 1954. This study aims to analyze the obligations the State must take in relation to the protection of persons with stateless persons status, and to recognize the legal consequences and responsibilities of States in the event of omitting acts of human rights violations against people with stateless persons status. This paper using normative research methods with statute approach and conceptual approach. The study shows that in relation to the obligation of the state that each State shall be obliged to provide protection to persons with stateless persons status as stipulated in the 1954 Convention and the provisions of the International Human Rights Law, the obligations of state protection include the protection of the right to life, the right to employment and even the right to obtain citizenship status. The international legal consequences accepted by the state are listed in Article 39, Article 41, and 42 of the UN Charter. Then for state responsibility are listed under Article 35, Article 36, and Article 37 of UNGA 56/83 of 2001.   Hak Asasi Manusia dan Negara tidak bisa dipisahkan satu sama lain. Keduanya saling terkait dalam hal bagaimana menjamin stabilitas internal di suatu negara. Dengan adanya hak asasi manusia, diharapkan negara tidak sewenang-wenang memperlakukan rakyatnya dan berkewajiban melindungi semua orang di wilayahnya termasuk dalam hal ini para warga negara yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 7 ayat 1 Konvensi terkait Status Orang Tanpa Negara di tahun 1954. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewajiban yang harus diambil Negara sehubungan dengan perlindungan orang-orang dengan status orang tanpa kewarganegaraan, dan untuk mengakui konsekuensi hukum serta tanggung jawab negara dalam hal melakukan  tindakan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia terhadap orang-orang dengan status  tanpa kewarganegaraan. Tulisan ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil studi menunjukkan bahwa sehubungan dengan kewajiban negara bahwa setiap Negara wajib memberikan perlindungan kepada orang-orang dengan status orang tanpa kewarganegaraan sebagaimana diatur dalam Konvensi 1954 dan ketentuan-ketentuan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Internasional, kewajiban perlindungan negara termasuk perlindungan hak untuk hidup, hak untuk bekerja dan bahkan hak untuk mendapatkan status kewarganegaraan. Konsekuensi hukum internasional yang diterima oleh negara tercantum dalam Pasal 39, Pasal 41, dan 42 Piagam PBB. Kemudian untuk tanggung jawab negara tercantum di bawah Pasal 35, Pasal 36, dan Pasal 37 UNGA 56/83 tahun 2001.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Agnes Geraldine Olga Supriyana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
I Ketut Sukadana

Indonesian citizens who have transferred citizenship due to mixed marriages with other citizens who obtain property rights due to inheritance should be obliged to relinquish this right within one year. If it is not released then the right is lost because the law and the land fall to the state. However, in reality some of these property rights have not been released. This research is formulated to determine the status of land ownership rights that are not released by heirs who become foreign nationals and to find out the legal efforts taken by heirs who have transferred citizenship to become foreign citizens in releasing their ownership rights over land acquired due to inheritance. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method. The results showed that the status of land ownership rights that were not released by heirs who became foreign citizens was lost due to the law. This occurs after a period of one year, and the land becomes State land. Then, the legal effort made by the heirs in releasing ownership rights over the land obtained due to inheritance is to apply for more Indonesian citizenship or to remain a foreign citizen residing in Indonesia, so after one year they can obtain use rights or transfer of property rights. It can be done through buying and selling.


2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 122-138
Author(s):  
Ni Putu Tanjung Eka Wijayani

The nominee agreement is an agreement made between a person who by law can not be the subject of a particular land title (in this case the Right or the Right to Build). In this case a foreign national with an Indonesian citizen, which is intended for foreigners to possess the land of ownership or the right to use the building (de facto), but legally (de jure) of the land concerned on behalf of the Indonesian citizen. In other words, Indonesian citizen borrowed its name by foreigners citizen (acting as nominee). The existence of the obscurity of the norm in Article 26 paragraph (2) concerning whether the legal act of a foreigner / foreigner in a notarial deed called a nominee deed is valid for one year and thereafter if not transferred shall fall to the state having the same meaning and intent with the provision of Article 21 paragraph (3). This is particularly important to be considered since Article 26 paragraph (2) implicitly prohibits that legal acts directly or indirectly intended to transfer land rights from Indonesian citizens to foreigners / foreigners are null and void because the law and land fall to the State . Because the phrase that states other acts intended to directly or indirectly transfer the ownership rights to a stranger in Article 26 paragraph (2) of the BAL raises various interpretations (interpretations) so that there arises doubts that lead to the escape of norms (vague van normen).


Author(s):  
Saim Aksnudin

In the national development the role of land for the fulfillment of various purposes will increase, either as a place to live or for business activities. In relation to that will also increase the need for support in the form of guarantee of legal certainty in the field of land. The result of the research is the conception of the state of Indonesia is a state law, which contains the meaning in the administration of government and the state based on the law, the protection of the law is a universal concept of the rule of law. The legal certainty on land rights as intended by the UUPA encompasses three things, namely the certainty of the object of land rights, certainty on the subject of land rights and certainty about the status of landrights. Legal conception of land title certificate is a proof that issued by authorized legal institution, containing juridical data and physical data which isused as evidence of ownership of land rights in order to provide assurance of legal certainty and certainty of rights to a plot of land owned or possessed by a person or legal entity. With the certificate of rights, it is expected that the juridical can guarantee the legal certainty and the right by the state for the holder of the right to the land. This country's guarantee is granted to the owner or the holder of the certificate may be granted because the land is already registered in the state land administration system.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Masrofah Masrofah

The objectives of this research are: (1) to study and analyze the status of ownership of a modern shopping center or mall upon some tenure individual rights. (2) to study and analyze the process of grantingownership rights for apartment unit.The method used in this research was normative, that is, a legal research which was based on legal materials obtained from literature that examined legal norms related to the issue of providing ownership rights for apartment units upon some building rights.Based on the results of research and discussion, it can be concluded as follows: (1) PT. G.U. that wanted to have its apartment units certified for ownership had constraints by the absence of  implementation guidelines of Law No. 16 of 1985 (now Act No. 20 of 2011). (2) The principle of horizontal separation is the opposite of attachment principle which states that buildings and plants are integrated to land. (3) In planning the development of apartment, developers of the construction should first pay attention to the layout of the area of city/ county. (4) The construction of a housing project must meet some requirements, they are: administrative requirements, technical requirements and ecological requirements. (5) Prior to certificate of ownership registration upon an apartment unit, certificate of land rights either in the form of property rights, the right to use the land for building and the right to use and manage the land. (6) In the Act of Apartment, if it does not meet the provisions of these rules, there are some sanctions to be given. These may be in the form of administrative sanctions or criminal verdicts such as fines and imprisonment.Keywords: Granting Rights, Certificate of Ownership Rights Unit of the Flats, Broking,Transitional sale, Land Consolidation. 


Author(s):  
Marek Wierzbowski ◽  
Marek Grzywacz ◽  
Joanna Róg Dyrda ◽  
Katarzyna Ziółkowska

Before 1989, Polish courts in some cases affirmed the liability of the State on the basis of existing legislative provisions. After 1989, the Constitution admits administrative liability in very general terms, because everyone shall have the right to be awarded damages for any harm done by administrative action contrary to the law. The more detailed provisions of the Civil Code implement such general principle. More generally, the liability of administrative authorities is regarded as being subject to private law standards. However, in some cases illegality per se will not suffice for liability. This is the case, in particular, for administrative acts that are characterized by real discretion. Moreover, administrative procedures are regulated by parliamentary legislation. Another particular feature of Polish law is that, to prove the unlawfulness of the action taken by administrative authorities, on both procedural and substantive grounds, claimants must bring an action before administrative courts.


Author(s):  
I Ketut Ngastawa

Paper that had the title: "Juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the Legal Protection for the Rights to be Eelected." This explores two issues: 1) how the legal protection of the settings selected in the state system of Indonesia ; 2) what are juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected. To solve both problems, this paper uses normative legal research methods. Approach being used is the statute approach, case approach, and a conceptual approach. Further legal materials collected were identified and analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. Legal protection for the right to be elected in the state system of Indonesia can be traced from the 1945 opening, the articles in the body of the 1945 Constitution, Article 27 paragraph (1), Article 28D (1) and paragraph (3) and Article 28 paragraph (3) 1945 Second Amendment, MPR Decree Number XVII/MPR/1998, Article 43 of Law Number 39 of 1999, Article 21 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Article 25 of the International Covenant  on Civil and Political Rights. Discussion of the juridical implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 011-017/PUU-I/2003 on the legal protection for the rights to be elected have been included: a) only on the juridical implications of representative institutions no longer marked with specified requirements as stipulated in Article 60 letter g of Law Number 12 Year 2003 in Law Number 10 Year 2008; b) juridical implications of the political field for the right to be elected is the absence of any discriminatory treatment in legislative product formed by the House of Representatives and the President as well as products of other legislation forward.


2009 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-602
Author(s):  
Dan Ernst

The Article argues for a new assessment of the significance of Israel's Law of Return—that the Law of Return reflects not the sovereign prerogative of a state to control immigration, but the right of every Jew to settle in the Land of Israel. This understanding of the Law of Return explains why Section 4 proclaims that as far as the Law is concerned, the status of Jews born within the State of Israel is the same as those arriving to Israel from abroad. Resolving the anomaly of Section 4 dispels several misinterpretations of the Law of Return and the critiques of the Law which grow out of these misinterpretations. The Article also surveys and answers several liberal objections to Israel's policy of granting preference in immigration and naturalization based on ethno-national identity and presents an argument, for giving priority to Jewish immigration and naturalization based on the extra benefits (religious, political, and communal) that Jews receive from such immigration and naturalization. Finally, it is submitted that the State of Israel has an obligation of justice to admit Jews into the state as full citizens upon their demand, since this was a reasonable expectation of those in past generations who had contributed to the existence and maintenance of the state.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document