scholarly journals TO THE QUESTION OF THE PECULIARITIES OF LEGAL REGULATION AND DISCIPLINARY RESPONSIBILITY UNDER THE CONDITIONS OF NEW ECONOMIC POLICY

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Indira A. Shakirova ◽  
Robert R. Safin ◽  
Irina N. Fardeeva ◽  
Iskandar G. Mukhametgaliyev
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Or Methodology ◽  
Governmental Institutions ◽  
Historical Comparative ◽  
Methods Of Learning ◽  
The Given ◽  
Further Development

The given article is devoted to the features of developing separate kinds of disciplinary liability in the period of new economic policy. Some features of legislative registration of a disciplinary responsibility in days of new economic policy and also during the specified period are analyzed. There was a formation of separate types of this responsibility: disciplinary responsibility on internal regulations, disciplinary responsibility on subordination and disciplinary responsibility of employees, according to the statutes on discipline and special provisions as a special type of disciplinary responsibility on subordination. The features of legal regulation of disciplinary responsibility, considered in article, were of great importance in further development of institute of a disciplinary liability and the legislation on a disciplinary liability.The purpose of the given article is to comprehend the process of disciplinary liability institute’s development on the basis of new achievements of legal science. Method or methodology of the work: modern methods of learning, special historical, comparative and legal methods were used. Results: scientific analysis of theoretical, historical and legal sources, determining the peculiarity and the content of disciplinary liability institute. Application of results: conclusions achieved as a result of scientific research can find practical application in law-making activities of governmental institutions.

scholarly journals Subjects and Objects of Town-Planning Legal Relations

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 53-61
Author(s):  
O. A. Romanova
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Urban Planning ◽  
System Analysis ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Town Planning ◽  
Planning Activity ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Scientific Significance ◽  
Further Development

The article substantiates the relevance of scientific analysis of the composition of town-planning relations for further development of legal regulation of town-planning and increase in efficiency of law enforcement activities in the field of urban planning. Based on the study of scientific sources, the author concludes that there is insufficient legal research in the field of legal regulation of urban planning. The paper shows the legal and scientific significance of studying the composition and specifics of town-planning relations for the further development of town-planning legislation and the formation of town-planning law. On the basis of the system analysis of the current town-planning and related legislation, the author provides for the legal characteristics of subjects and objects of town-planning legal relations taking into account the specifics of urban planning activity depending on their particular type, their features, problems of definition and identification, differentiation from related legal relations. The author proposes a possible classification of subjects and objects of town-planning relations depending on the type of town-planning activity and their nature.

scholarly journals Economic Policy in Indonesia and Prospects of Russian-Indonesian Trade and Economic Cooperation

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 450-462
Author(s):  
Dame Maria-Nova Sibarani
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
The United States ◽  
Economic Cooperation ◽  
Economic Situation ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Historical Method ◽  
Current Economic Situation ◽  
Trading Partners ◽  
Further Development

The article is devoted to the analysis of the current economic situation in Indonesia and the prospects for RussianIndonesian economic cooperation. The author covers the economic development of Indonesia since 1998 Asian economic crisis, the domestic economic agenda and the policy of new President D. Widodo, as well as the history and potential for the further development of trade and economic relations between Russia and Indonesia. The relevance of the research is determined by the increasing role of Indonesia in international politics in the 21st century. Indonesia is the fourth largest country in terms of population, after China, India and the United States. Its economy is 16th in the world and first in ASEAN. It is a member of G20. It is expected that Indonesia will enter the top five largest world economies by 2030. For Russia, the development of relations with the rapidly developing Asian countries is an important element in of its foreign policy strategy of diversifying trading partners and entering the promising markets of developing countries. The main purpose of the article is to analyze current challenges faced by the Indonesian government in implementing new economic policy, to identify promising areas of bilateral cooperation of Russia and Indonesia in the context of anti-Russian sanctions. The article points out the potential of these relations and the mutual benefits for the Russian and Indonesian economy. The author used mainly the historical method, which allows tracing the history of the development of the economic situation in Indonesia and the evolution of Russian-Indonesian relations. While analyzing Indonesia’s domestic economic policy, the key research method has been a comparative analysis, which contributed to summarizing the achievements of Indonesian politics. In conclusion, the author identifies promising areas for further development of Russian-Indonesian trade and economic relations taken into account modern Indonesian economic policy’s need agenda.

scholarly journals The reasons for the institutionalization of administrative responsibility in post-revolutionary Russia (1917-1924).

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-174
Author(s):  
Olga E. Shishkina ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Criminal Responsibility ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Socialist Revolution ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
Economic Relations ◽  
Soviet Ideology ◽  
Administrative Responsibility

Introduction. The relevance of this topic is due to the ongoing reform of responsibility for administrative offenses, discussions in the scientific literature on the delimitation of crimes and administrative offenses and the grounds for their delinquency. The study of the historical stages of the normative isolation of responsibility for administrative offenses from the point of view of events taking place in political, economic and social life, in our opinion, helps in determining the development trends of this institution. In this article, the author aims to identify the reasons and conditions for administrative responsibility as an independent institution after the Great October Socialist Revolution. The gradual normative separation of responsibility for administrative offenses from criminal responsibility falls on the period of war communism and the first half of the New Economic Policy (NEP). Methods. The author uses the classical historical and legal research method, which includes both a chronological analysis of social, political and economic factors, and a study of the legal regulation of legal institutions over a period of time. Results. In the first years of Soviet power, administrative coercion, along with other measures of state coercion, was considered as one of the means of strengthening socialist legality and fundamental order and security. The normative separation of administrative responsibility from criminal responsibility during the first half of the new economic policy was due to the development of economic relations and technical progress. In general, it was associated with Soviet ideology, a permissive type of legal regulation, an increase in the number of rules issued by the state in various spheres of public life, the creation of control and supervisory bodies that required their own operational leverage on citizens and organizations, including in the form of imposing penalties.

Russian Protectionism: Problems of Institutional Heritage

2012 ◽  
pp. 96-114
Author(s):  
L. Tsedilin
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Soviet Union ◽  
Foreign Trade ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
The State ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
The Soviet Union ◽  
State Monopoly ◽  
The Times ◽  
Soviet Experience

The article analyzes the pre-revolutionary and the Soviet experience of the protectionist policies. Special attention is paid to the external economic policy during the times of NEP (New Economic Policy), socialist industrialization and the years of 1970-1980s. The results of the state monopoly on foreign trade and currency transactions in the Soviet Union are summarized; the economic integration in the frames of Comecon is assessed.

The Experience of Industrialization under NEPand Its Application in the Current Conditions

2013 ◽  
pp. 109-135
Author(s):  
Y. Goland
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
Capital Formation ◽  
Optimal Size ◽  
Popular Belief ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
Relevant Today ◽  
Domestic Capital

The article refutes popular belief about the necessity to abolish the New Economic Policy (NEP) of the 1920s for the purpose of industrialization. It is shown that it started successfully under NEP although due to a number of reasons the efficiency of the investments was low. The abolishment of NEP was caused not by the necessity to accelerate the industrialization but by the wrong policy towards the agriculture that stopped the development of farms. The article analyzes the discussion about possible rates of the domestic capital formation. In the course of this discussion, the sensible approach to finding the optimal size of investments depending on their efficiency was offered. This approach is still relevant today.

The perspective planning under NEP

2019 ◽  
pp. 149-159
Author(s):  
Yury M. Goland
Keyword(s):  
Economic Policy ◽  
National Economy ◽  
Planning Process ◽  
New Economic Policy ◽  
Political Factors ◽  
Perspective Planning ◽  
Sharp Criticism

The article reviews the implementation of the perspective planning in the USSR during the period of the New Economic Policy — NEP, from methodological discussions to the development of five-year plans — sectoral and for the entire national economy. The article analyzes the discussion of the proposal of the first five-year plan submitted by S. Strumilin at the congress of planning bodies in March, 1927. It is shown that the sharp criticism of this plan for being imbalanced by the leading economists of the country, in particular, V. Bazarov and N. Kondratiev, is valid. The author points out the influence of political factors on the planning process. The popular cliche that the forced industrialization in the five-year plan was necessary to prepare for the war is refuted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document