scholarly journals Corporate governance, ownership, and performance: A closer look at the Italian case

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-16
Author(s):  
Valentina Lagasio
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Industrial Sector ◽  
Historical Background ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Italian Case ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Synthetic View ◽  
Shed Light

Corporate governance of companies is a hot topic for both researchers and practitioners since the last decades. The investigations on this theme revealed the presence of many different approaches and practices in the decision-making process and managing companies among different countries. This paper is focused on Italy, where distinctive features of corporate governance can be identified (i.e., with regard to the ownership structure of companies) due to the peculiar legal and industrial framework in which Italian companies operate. The contribution of the paper is to further shed light on the historical background of the Italian industrial sector that made the Italian industrial system slightly different from the other countries and to give a comprehensive, but synthetic, view of the corporate governance of Italian listed companies. Current and further researches needed are also commented on and suggested

scholarly journals Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms: A case study in New Zealand unlisted small companies

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirosha Hewa Wellalage ◽  
Stuart Locke
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Small Businesses ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Agency Costs ◽  
Small Companies ◽  
Dynamic Panel ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
And Performance

This study investigates the linkage between agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance in small business. Eleven years of data for 100 unlisted small businesses, are collected and 1099 observations are analysed using as dynamic panel GMM estimation. Various diagnostic tests are utilised to check for stationary and convergence of variables. The results indicate that ownership concentration has the most significant governance effect and also has the largest impact on corporate governance. Moreover, this study finds U-shape relationship between internal ownership and performance, which under that agency proxy. Agency costs vary with leverage the life of the business and with its size.

scholarly journals Ownership structure and performance: A comparison of different corporate governance systems

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 76-85 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto de Miguel Hidalgo ◽  
Julio Pindado ◽  
Chabela de la Torre
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Institutional Factors ◽  
Insider Ownership ◽  
Market For Corporate Control ◽  
Governance Systems ◽  
The World ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Relationship

This paper analyses how the main institutional factors characterizing corporate governance systems around the world affect the relationship between ownership structure and firm performance. Our analysis gives rise to the following remarks. First, ownership concentration and insider ownership levels are determined by several institutional features such as investor protection, development of capital markets, activity of the market for corporate control, and effectiveness of boards. Second, the relationship between ownership concentration and performance is not directly affected by these institutional factors. Third, there is, however, a direct influence of corporate governance characteristics on the relationship between insider ownership and performance.

Editorial: Rethinking operational governance and board composition

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 4-6
Author(s):  
Mireille Chidiac El Hajj
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Organizational Effectiveness ◽  
Ethical Leadership ◽  
Board Composition ◽  
Present Issue ◽  
Weak Institutions ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Shed Light

There is a lot going on, nowadays, in terms of corporate governance (CG). The amount of discussion concerning CG and the boardroom dynamic, and behaviors is quite phenomenal; even in developing countries with weak institutions (Aguilera, 2005), where scholars are doing valuable work to shed light on what is missing to reinforce the CG practices. Poor ethical leadership, fraud, corruption, lack of cultural homogeneity, lack of diversity, and mismanagement are the main contributors to failures. Rethinking operational governance, the board composition, and how decisions are made, executed, and monitored can deeply affect organizational effectiveness and corporate performance (Wyman, 2015). The following papers published in the present issue mainly discuss how organizational effectiveness and performance are a function of the board composition, diversity, and behavior

scholarly journals The Effect of Corporate Governance and Ownership Structure on Financial Performance of Listed Companies in Nepal

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-18
Author(s):  
Surya Bahadur G. C. ◽  
Ravindra Prasad Baral
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Panel Data ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
And Performance

The paper attempts to analyze relationships among corporate governance, ownership structure and firm performance in Nepal. The study comprises of panel data set of 25 firms listed at Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE) covering a period of five years from 2012 to 2016. The econometric methodology for the study consists primarily of least squares dummy variable (LSDV) model, fixed and random effects panel data models and two-stage least squares (2SLS) model. The study finds bi-directional relationship between corporate governance and performance. Among corporate governance internal mechanisms; smaller board size, higher proportion of independent directors, reducing ownership concentration, improving standards of transparency and disclosure, and designing appropriate director compensation package are important dimensions that listed firms and regulators in Nepal should focus on. Ownership concentration is found to have positive effect on performance; however, it affects corporate governance negatively. This study raises understanding and provides empirical evidence for endogenous relationship between corporate governance and performance and offers support for principal-principal agency relationship. The results of this study lead to several practical implications for listed firms as well as policymakers of Nepal in promoting sound corporate governance practices and codes. For listed companies, the improvement in compliance with a code of corporate governance or voluntary adoption of best practices can provide a means of achieving improved performance.

The correlation between corporate governance and market value: regime or signal?

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chang Li ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Philip Chang ◽  
Shanmin Li
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
Market Value ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Econometric Methodology ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Negative Factors ◽  
Practical Implications ◽  
Negative Signal

Purpose – As literatures argue that managers’ personalities will affect both corporate governance structures and corporate performance, the correlation between them is a mixed result. The purpose of this paper is to separate different routes leading to the mixed correlation, and name the separated routes as regime effect and signal effect. Design/methodology/approach – By theoretical analysis, the authors list three routes leading to the correlation between corporate governance and corporate performance. Routes 1 and 2 show that governance can directly and indirectly change the performance; while route 3 shows that both the governance and performance are results of managers’ personalities, and the governance has no influence onto the performance, which means the correlation led by route 3 is fake. By design a new econometric methodology, this paper separates the mixed correlation between corporate governance and performance, and names the correlation led by routes 1 and 2 as the regime effect and the correlation led by route 3 as signal effect. Findings – By an empirical research on Chinese listed corporates, the authors find that the correlations between Chinese listed corporates’ market value and main corporate governance factors can be separated into regime effects and signal effects; and the authors also find that some factors (Share of Institutional Investors, Share of Real Controller and the Squared, Dummy of Identical CEO and Chairman, Ownership Concentration) only show regime effects, some factors (Separating Extent of Ownership and Controlling Right, Dummy of Provincial State-Owned Firms) only show signal effects, and some factors (Dummy of Republic State-Owned Firms, Scale of Board) show both. What’s more, the authors find out an interesting result that the state-owning has no negative regime effect on China SOEs’ performance but very significantly negative signal effect; in this paper, the authors suggest that this means the key negative factors of Chinese SOEs is not state-owning ownership structure but the managers’ corruption. Practical implications – As only the factors with regime effects can directly and indirectly affect corporates’ performance and the factors with signal effects show that there’re some managers’ personalities affecting both the governance and performance, the separation method in this paper can help shareholders knowing which governance factors will be helpful to improve the performance and which others will show managers’ hard-working or corruption intention. Originality/value – Separate the regime effect and the signal effect from the correlation between corporate governance and performance.

Fuzzy bundling of corporate governance practices and performance of Indian firms

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pankaj Kumar Gupta ◽  
Prabhat Mittal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Design Methodology ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Specific Level ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Governance Practices ◽  
And Performance ◽  
Conventional Regression

Purpose This paper aims to develop a framework that aids in achieving the desired state of financial performance for corporate enterprises based on distinct configurations of corporate governance (CG) practices. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a fuzzy-based system to arrive at a definitive configuration of CG practices that lead to a specific level of firm’s performance. Findings This analysis of the panel data of 92 National Stock Exchange–listed companies conducted for RONW on selected CG variables shows that eight fuzzy configurations lead to a particular state of RONW. The authors compare the results with the conventional regression-based scoring models. Originality/value Corporate enterprises can use the derived bundles of CG practices leading to a specific set of financial performance (RONW) to aid the decision-making process in defining and implementing their governance structures. The regulators can modify or customize the law-mandated CG practices to reduce redundancies and promote the national agenda of economic efficiency.

scholarly journals Corporate governance, control type, and performance: the New Zealand story

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 24-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianguo Chen ◽  
Dar-Hsin Chen ◽  
Ping He
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Firm Value ◽  
Profit Maximization ◽  
Management Control ◽  
Complex Nature ◽  
Corporate Managers ◽  
And Performance ◽  
And Control

This study investigates the ownership structure of New Zealand non-financial companies in terms of both ownership and management control and examines the effect of ownership structure on corporate governance and firms’ performance. The Berle and Mean’s hypothesis of separation of ownership and control does not find support in New Zealand. Further analysis tests the proposition that the diffusion of corporate ownership has allowed corporate managers to pursue goals other than profit maximization. The findings do provide evidence of a non-monotonic relation between managerial shareholdings and firm performance. This result indicates the complex nature of the relationship between ownership structure and firm value.

scholarly journals Corporate governance and ownership structure in Brazil: causes and consequences

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 36-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Rogers ◽  
Anamélia Borges Tannús Dami ◽  
Kárem Cristina de Sousa Ribeiro ◽  
Almir Ferreira de Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Public Companies ◽  
Main Determinant ◽  
Internal Mechanism ◽  
Market Instability ◽  
And Performance

The literature indicates that, mainly in countries with high stock concentration, the ownership structure is an important internal mechanism of control of the corporate governance, with effects in the companies’ value and performance. In Brazil, the existing relationship among corporate governance - ownership structure - performance is still not conclusive. The present study investigates if there is any relationship among ownership structure, financial performance and value in the Brazilian nonfinancial public companies with stocks negotiated in the São Paulo Stock Exchange, between the period of 1997 to 2001, as well as the determinant of the level of concentration of the ownership in these companies. In the empiric investigation it was used a multiple regression analysis through the estimators of the Ordinary Least Squares with heteroscedasticity in accordance with White (1980). Concerning the used methodology, the results indicate that the variables of ownership structure as defined do not have influence on the financial performance and value of the companies. Remaining to the determinant of the ownership structure of the Brazilian non-financial public companies, the results indicate that the ownership structure can be explained by the size of the firm, market instability and regulation, being the latter the main determinant of the ownership structure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document