scholarly journals A retrospective observational study to estimate use of biomarkers to predict severity of community acquired pneumonia in children

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anam Bashir ◽  
Raheel Khan ◽  
Stephanie Thompson ◽  
Manuel Caceres
Keyword(s):  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Pneumonia Severity ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Hospital Patients ◽  
Minimal Research

Purpose: Multiple studies have investigated the role of biomarkers in predicting pneumonia severity in adults but minimal research exists for children. The aim of this study was to determine if the following biomarkers: white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil count, or band count predict community associated pneumonia (CAP) severity in children. Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on pediatric patients (aged 60 days to 18 years) diagnosed with CAP, admitted to a regional, tertiary hospital. Patients were stratified into two severity cohorts, mild (no ICU care), and moderate /severe (required ICU care). Biomarker values were then compared between the severity cohorts and area under the curve (AUC), cut-off values, performance characteristics were calculated. Results: A total of 108 patients met inclusion criteria. Among the biomarkers examined, elevated levels of CRP (51.7 mg/L in mild vs. 104.8 mg/L in moderate/severe, p = 0.003, PCT (0.29 ng/ml in mild vs. 4.02 ng/ml in moderate/severe, p = 0.001) and band counts (8% in mild vs. 15% moderate/severe, p = 0.009) were associated with increased pneumonia severity. In predicting moderate/severe CAP, PCT had the highest AUC of 0.77 (p = 0.001) followed by bands AUC of 0.69 (p = 0.009) and CRP AUC of 0.67 (p = 0.003). The cut-off for PCT of 0.55ng/ml had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 65%. A cut-off level of 53.1 mg/L for CRP had a sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 52%. A cut off level of 12.5% bands had a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 71%. Conclusion: Biomarkers, in particular PCT, obtained early in hospitalization appear to perform as predictors for CAP severity in children and may be beneficial in guiding CAP management

scholarly journals Role of Plasma Presepsin, Procalcitonin and C-reactive Protein Levels in Determining the Severity and Mortality of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Emergency Department

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Pneumonia Severity ◽  
Protein Levels ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: In this study, we aimed to explore the role of the plasma presepsin level in patients with community-acquired pneumonia during admission to the emergency department in assessing the diagnosis, severity, and prognosis of the disease. In addition, we wanted to investigate the relationship of presepsinin with procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and pneumonia severity scores. Methods: One hundred twenty-three patients over the age of 18 who presented with a diagnosis of pneumonia to the emergency department were included in the study. The vital signs, symptoms, examination findings, background information, laboratory results, and radiological imaging results of the patients were recorded. The 30-day mortality rates of the patients were determined. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the presepsin levels of the patients diagnosed with pneumonia and those of healthy subjects (p < 0.05). The plasma presepsin levels of the patients who died (8.63 ± 6.46) were significantly higher than those of the patients who lived (5.82 ± 5.97) (p < 0.05). The plasma procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels of the dead patients were significantly higher than those living (p < 0.05). A presepsin cut-off value of 3.3 ng/mL for 30-day mortality was established (AUROC, 0.65; specificity, 45%; sensitivity, 82%). Procalcitonin is the most successful biomarker in the determination of mortality (AUROC, 0.70). A significant correlation was available between presepsin and lactate, C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (p < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the Pneumonia Severity Index values and presepsin levels (p < 0.001, r = 0.311). Conclusion: The plasma presepsin level can be utilized for diagnosing community-acquired pneumonia. Plasma presepsin, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels can be used to predict the severity and mortality of community-acquired pneumonia.

INFLAMMATORY MARKERS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF COMPLICATED ACUTE APPENDICITIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Michi Campos ◽  
M Merayo Álvarez ◽  
L García González ◽  
B Carrasco Aguilera ◽  
J L Rodicio Miravalles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Complicated Appendicitis ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Surgical Emergencies ◽  
Relationship Of

Abstract INTRODUCTION Appendicitis constitutes one of the most frequent surgical emergencies. New inflammatory markers such as the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have recently emerged, which are added to others such as leukocyte count and C-reactive protein (CRP), and whose role in the diagnosis of appendicitis remains unclear. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted an observational, descriptive, longitudinal and retrospective study of 484 adults appendectomized between April 2017 and May 2019 in a tertiary hospital. Sociodemographic, clinical, laboratory, imaging and surgical variables were collected. RESULTS 32.2% of appendicitis were complicated. All patients had a complete blood count and basic biochemistry (98.5% with CRP). Complicated appendicitis had a mean of 14538 leukocytes, 12.4 CRP and 8.7 NLR, and uncomplicated appendicitis had 14667 leukocytes, 5 CRP and 10.7 NLR. When analyzing the relationship of inflammatory markers with the existence or not of complicated appendicitis, CRP yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 73.1% (95% CI: 0.684-0.779, p &lt; 0.01), while leukocytes and NLR had 52.6% and 55.9%. The CRP cut-off point was determined to be 3.5 which presented a higher discriminative power to predict complicated appendicitis, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70.1% and 65.3% respectively. CONCLUSIONS Of the inflammatory markers studied, only CRP proved to be a valid parameter to help differentiate preoperatively those appendicitis uncomplicated from complicated appendicitis.

scholarly journals Predicting value of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio and CURB-65 score for early clinical stability of adult community-acquired pneumonia

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 205873921983510
Author(s):  
Xuegui Ju ◽  
Shaoqiang Tao ◽  
Hui Zhou ◽  
Qianglin Zeng
Keyword(s):  
Pneumonia Severity Index ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Pneumonia Severity ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Clinical Instability ◽  
Combined Test ◽  
Clinical Stability

Early clinical stability has been proven to be vital for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). This research retrospectively analyzed the predictive implication of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and confusion, urea >7 mmol/L, respiratory rate ⩾30 breaths/min, low blood pressure, and age ⩾65 years (CURB-65) score to predict early clinical stability of the adult CAP. Clinical data, CURB-65 scores, pneumonia severity index (PSI) scores, NLR on admission (within 24 h) of 230 patients between January 2012 and June 2015 were obtained from the Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University. Instable patients had significantly higher CURB-65, PSI, white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and NLR than the stable patients ( P < 0.05); NLR was positively correlated with CURB-65 (r = 0.270, P < 0.001) and PSI (r = 0.316, P < 0.001). NLR and CURB-65 were screened as risk factors through the discriminant analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.662 (95% confidence interval (CI): (0.569, 0.756), P = 0.002) for NLR, 0.670 (95% CI (0.569, 0.772) P = 0.001) for CURB-65. The enhanced predictive power was observed for combining NLR-CURB-65 with the AUC of 0.704 (95% CI (0.606, 0.802), P < 0.001). The risk of early clinical instability rose significantly in patients with NLR (odds ratio (OR) = 3.440, 95% CI (1.741, 6.798) with the cut-off value of NLR = 6.161) and higher CURB-65 (OR = 3.797, 95% CI (1.801, 8.005), with the CURB-65 cut-off value of 1.5). Both NLR and CURB-65 are qualitatively accurate for predicting early clinical stability of CAP, an accuracy-enhanced predicting power was observed in the NLR-CURB-65 combined test, further large-sample studies are required to validate the conclusion.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Discrimination between Uncomplicated and Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 829
Author(s):  
Yana Kogan ◽  
Edmond Sabo ◽  
Majed Odeh
Keyword(s):  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Parapneumonic Effusion ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion

Objectives: The role of serum C-reactive protein (CRPs) and pleural fluid CRP (CRPpf) in discriminating uncomplicated parapneumonic effusion (UCPPE) from complicated parapneumonic effusion (CPPE) is yet to be validated since most of the previous studies were on small cohorts and with variable results. The role of CRPs and CRPpf gradient (CRPg) and of their ratio (CRPr) in this discrimination has not been previously reported. The study aims to assess the diagnostic efficacy of CRPs, CRPpf, CRPr, and CRPg in discriminating UCPPE from CPPE in a relatively large cohort. Methods: The study population included 146 patients with PPE, 86 with UCPPE and 60 with CPPE. Levels of CRPs and CRPpf were measured, and the CRPg and CRPr were calculated. The values are presented as mean ± SD. Results: Mean levels of CRPs, CRPpf, CRPg, and CRPr of the UCPPE group were 145.3 ± 67.6 mg/L, 58.5 ± 38.5 mg/L, 86.8 ± 37.3 mg/L, and 0.39 ± 0.11, respectively, and for the CPPE group were 302.2 ± 75.6 mg/L, 112 ± 65 mg/L, 188.3 ± 62.3 mg/L, and 0.36 ± 0.19, respectively. Levels of CRPs, CRPpf, and CRPg were significantly higher in the CPPE than in the UCPPE group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found between the two groups for levels of CRPr (p = 0.26). The best cut-off value calculated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for discriminating UCPPE from CPPE was for CRPs, 211.5 mg/L with area under the curve (AUC) = 94% and p < 0.0001, for CRPpf, 90.5 mg/L with AUC = 76.3% and p < 0.0001, and for CRPg, 142 mg/L with AUC = 91% and p < 0.0001. Conclusions: CRPs, CRPpf, and CRPg are strong markers for discrimination between UCPPE and CPPE, while CRPr has no role in this discrimination.

The role of coinfection with influenza viruses in the pathogenesis of severe infection in patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-164
Author(s):  
Tamara N. Shvedova ◽  
Olga S. Kopteva ◽  
Polina A. Kudar ◽  
Anna A. Lerner ◽  
Yuliya A. Desheva
Keyword(s):  
Influenza A ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
S Protein ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Coronavirus Infection

BACKGROUND: Despite the continuing global spread of the coronavirus infection COVID-19 caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus, the mechanisms of the pathogenesis of severe infections remain poorly understood. The role of comorbidity with other seasonal viral infections, including influenza, in the pathogenesis of the severe course of COVID-19 remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study used sera left over from ongoing laboratory studies of patients with varying degrees of severity of COVID-19. The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee of the Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution IEM (protocol 3/20 from 06/05/2020). We studied 28 paired samples obtained upon admission of patients to the hospital and after 57 days of hospital stay. Paired sera of patients with COVID-19 were tested for antibodies to influenza A and B viruses. The presence of IgG antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) protein was studied using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The serum concentration of C-reactive protein and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio on the day of hospitalization were also assessed. RESULTS: At least a 4-fold increase in serum IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 S protein was found both in patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and without PCR confirmation. It was shown that out of 18 patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 infection, six of them showed at least a 4-fold increase in antibodies to influenza A/H1N1, in one to influenza A/H3N2 and in two cases to the influenza B. Laboratory data in these two groups were characterized by significant increases in serum C-reactive protein and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio concentrations compared with the moderate COVID-19 group. CONCLUSIONS: Serological diagnostics can additionally detect cases of coronavirus infection when the virus was not detected by PCR. In moderate and severe cases of COVID-19, coinfections with influenza A and B viruses have been identified. The results obtained confirm the need for anti-influenza immunization during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Influenza virus screening can significantly improve patient management because recommended antiviral drugs (neuraminidase inhibitors) are available.

Evaluation of neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio in predicting bloodstream infection

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 1255-1261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Qu ◽  
Hai-Yan Yuan ◽  
Ying Huang ◽  
Qiang Qu ◽  
Zhan-Bo Ou-Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Gram Positive Bacteria ◽  
Diagnostic Indicator

Aim: The prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in bloodstream infection (BSI) deserves further investigation. Patients & methods: The NLR values were measured and compared in BSI patients and healthy controls. The receiver operating characteristic of NLR and cut-off values were measured in BSI patients and subgroups. Results: We have measured the NLR of study group with 2160 BSI patients and normal group with 2523 healthy controls, which was significantly high in study group (11.36 ± 21.38 vs 2.53 ± 0.86; p < 0.001) and the area under the curve was 0.834 (95% CI: 0.825–0.842; p < 0.001). The critical value of NLR for diagnosis of BSI was 3.09, with a sensitivity of 75.3%, and a specificity of 93.6%. Conclusion: NLR is an effective diagnostic indicator of including BSIs of Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and fungus.

scholarly journals Artificial Intelligence Applied to Chest X-ray for Differential Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 530
Author(s):  
Christian Salvatore ◽  
Matteo Interlenghi ◽  
Caterina B. Monti ◽  
Davide Ippolito ◽  
Davide Capra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Artificial Intelligence ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Validation Dataset ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

We assessed the role of artificial intelligence applied to chest X-rays (CXRs) in supporting the diagnosis of COVID-19. We trained and cross-validated a model with an ensemble of 10 convolutional neural networks with CXRs of 98 COVID-19 patients, 88 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients, and 98 subjects without either COVID-19 or CAP, collected in two Italian hospitals. The system was tested on two independent cohorts, namely, 148 patients (COVID-19, CAP, or negative) collected by one of the two hospitals (independent testing I) and 820 COVID-19 patients collected by a multicenter study (independent testing II). On the training and cross-validation dataset, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were 0.91, 0.87, and 0.93 for COVID-19 versus negative subjects, 0.85, 0.82, and 0.94 for COVID-19 versus CAP. On the independent testing I, sensitivity, specificity, and AUC were 0.98, 0.88, and 0.98 for COVID-19 versus negative subjects, 0.97, 0.96, and 0.98 for COVID-19 versus CAP. On the independent testing II, the system correctly diagnosed 652 COVID-19 patients versus negative subjects (0.80 sensitivity) and correctly differentiated 674 COVID-19 versus CAP patients (0.82 sensitivity). This system appears promising for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of COVID-19, showing its potential as a second opinion tool in conditions of the variable prevalence of different types of infectious pneumonia.

scholarly journals Characterizing and Developing Strategies for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia at a Community Hospital

2002 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 247-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C Fok ◽  
Zahra Kanji ◽  
Rajesh Mainra ◽  
Michael Boldt
Keyword(s):  
Peer Group ◽  
Pneumonia Severity Index ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Early Discharge ◽  
Primary Diagnosis ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Pneumonia Severity ◽  
Pneumonia Severity Index Score ◽  
Step Down

BACKGROUND: Patients admitted to Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, with a primary diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) have a mean length of stay (LOS) of 9.1 days compared with 7.9 days for peer group hospitals. This difference of 1.2 days results in an annual potential savings of 406 bed days and warranted an investigation into the management of CAP.OBJECTIVE: To characterize and provide recommendations for the management of CAP.METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients admitted with a primary diagnosis of CAP between May 1, 2000 and August 31, 2000.RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean LOS of 9.9 days and a median LOS of five days. Based on pneumonia severity index scores calculated for each patient, eight patients (16%) were admitted inappropriately. Initial empirical antibiotic choices were consistent with the Canadian CAP guidelines in 27 patients (53%), with inconsistencies arising mainly because cephalosporin or azithromycin monotherapy regimens were prescribed. Step-down from intravenous to oral antibiotics occurred in approximately 20 patients (39%). An additional 12 patients (24%) could have undergone step-down, and step-down was not applicable in 19 patients (37%). The potential annual cost avoidance from implementing admission criteria based on a pneumonia severity index score, applying step-down criteria and promoting early discharge criteria was estimated to be $220,000.CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists in the treatment of CAP. A CAP preprinted order sheet was developed to address the issues identified in the present study and provide consistency in the management of CAP at Lions Gate Hospital.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document