scholarly journals EFFECT OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL AND MOTIVATION ON PHYSICS OUTCOMES LEARNING STUDENTS

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahlia Megawati Pardede ◽  
Sondang Rina Manurung
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Training Models ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Low Motivation

The purposes of the research are: (a) to determine differences in learning outcomes of students with Inquiry Training models and conventional models, (b) to determine differences in physics learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation, (c) to determine the interaction between learning models with the level of motivation in improving student Physics learning outcomes. The results were found: (a) there are differences in physical students learning outcomes are taught by Inquiry Training models and conventional models. (b) learning outcomes of students who are taught by Inquiry Learning Model Training better than student learning outcomes are taught with conventional model. (c) there is a difference in student's learning outcomes that have high motivation and low motivation. (d) Student learning outcomes that have a high motivation better than student learning outcomes than have a low motivation. (e) there is interaction between learning and motivation to student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students who are taught by the model is influenced also by the motivation, while learning outcomes of students who are taught with conventional models are not affected by motivation.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTS OF INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL TRAINING AND CRITICAL THINKING TOWARDS SMA STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
Ella Lady Saura ◽  
Betty M. Turnip
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Narrative Form ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Training Models ◽  
Model Training ◽  
Better Than

The purposes of the research are: (1) To determine differences in learning outcomes of students with Inquiry Training models and Direct Instruction teaching models, (2) to determine differences in physics learning outcomes of students who have high critical thinking and low critical thinking, (3) to determine the interaction between learning models with the level of critical thinking in improving student Physics learning outcomes. The sample in this study conducted in a cluster random sampling of two classes, where the first class as a class experiment applied Inquiry Training models as a class and the second class of controls implemented Direct Instruction models. The instrument is used in this study is physics learning outcomes tests in narrative form as many as 7 questions and critical thinking test in narrative form as 7 questions that have been declared valid and reliable. The results were found: (1) there are differences in physical students learning outcomes are taught by Inquiry Training models and Direct Instruction teaching models. Learning outcomes of students who are taught by Inquiry Learning Model Training better than student learning outcomes are taught with Direct Instruction Model Learning. (2) There is a difference in student's learning outcomes that have high critical thinking and low critical thinking. Student learning outcomes that have a high critical thinking better than student learning outcomes that have a low critical thinking. (3) There is interaction between learning and mastery of material Model Physics prerequisite to student learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students who are taught by the model is influenced also by the Inquiry Training critical thinking, while learning outcomes of students who are taught with Direct Instruction models are not affected by the students' critical thinking.

scholarly journals EFFECTS OF THE INQUIRY TRAINING AND MOTIVATION LEARNING AGAINST LEARNING OUTCOMES IN HIGH SCHOOL PHYSICS STUDENTS

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Vika Andini
Keyword(s):  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Motivation To Learn ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Conventional Models ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to: determine the significance of differences in physics learning outcomes of students with learning models Inquiry Training and conventional models, knowing the significance of differences in physics learning outcomes of students who have learning motivation high and low, low motivation, the interaction model of learning and motivation to learn physics in improving student learning outcomes. The sample in this study conducted in a cluster random sampling of two classes, where the first class as a class experiment applied learning models and Inquiry Training as a second grade class learning model Conventional control applied. The instrument used in this study is the result of learning physics instruments in the form of 20 multiple-choice questions and motivation questionnaire  by 25 statements has been declared valid and reliable. From the results of this study concluded that the learning outcomes of students who are taught by Training Inquiry learning model is better than conventional models of learning outcomes. Learning outcomes of students who have high motivation to learn is better than the learning outcomes of students who have a low learning motivation. Inquiry learning model training and motivation interact in affecting student learning outcomes.

PENGARUH PENGGUNAAN MEDIA AUDIO DAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR BAHASA INDONESIA SISWA KELAS VSDN 001 RUMBAI KOTA PEKANBARU

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 158
Author(s):  
Asmardi '
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Higher Learning ◽  
Motivation To Learn ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Audio Media ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to reveal the influence of the use of Media Audio and Motivation Learning students to the Indonesian student learning outcomes through four formulation of the problem: (1) whether there is any influence student learning outcomes using audio media than the conventional way students learn?, (2) whether the student that have a high motivation using audio media to obtain higher learning outcomes than students to have high motivation to study by conventional means?, (3) whether students who have low motivation to learn by using audio media to obtain higher learning outcomes than students have low motivation to learn with the conventional way?, and (4) whether there is interaction between the use of audio media and students' motivation towards learning Indonesian? This research is a quasi experimental by treatment block. This research was conducted at SDN 001 Rumbai Pekanbaru semester odd years 2010/2011. Samples were taken with Porposive random sampling technique. Data were collected through the initial test and final test. Data were analyzed using t test and analysis of variance.The results of data analysis showed that: Students who studied on the basis of audio media to obtain higher learning outcomes than students who learn by conventional means. Students who have high motivation to learn with audio media to obtain higher learning outcomes than students who have high motivation to study by conventional means. Students who have low motivation to learn based on audio media to obtain higher learning outcomes than students who have low motivation to study by conventional means. There was no interaction between the audio media and students' motivation. It can be concluded that the audio media significantly influence student learning outcomes.

The Effect of Discovery Learning Strategy and Learning Motivation on Learning Outcomes of Islamic Education Elementary School of Number 106190 Kotapari, Pantai Cermin District, North Sumatra

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 648-652
Author(s):  
Abd. Mukti ◽  
Zulheddi ◽  
Elfi Syahroini
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to determine: (1) differences in student learning outcomes taught by using the discovery learning strategy with student learning outcomes taught by expository strategies, (2) differences in the learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation by using learning learning strategies , (3) differences in learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation using expository learning strategies, and (4) the interaction between the effects of learning strategies and motivation on student learning outcomes. The research method used is quantitative with a quasi-experimental model of factorial design 2 x 2. The research sample is 1 class for discovery learning strategy learning and 1 class is expository learning strategy. Data collection instruments are tests and questionnaires. The data analysis technique is a two-way analysis of variance. The difference in value between the experimental class and the control class is not significant enough so that it can be interpreted that there cannot be a significant difference in student learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class.

scholarly journals The Effect of Discovery Learning Strategy and Learning Motivation on Learning Outcomes of Islamic Education Elementary School of Number 106190 Kotapari, Pantai Cermin District, North Sumatra

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 648-652
Author(s):  
Abd. Mukti ◽  
Zulheddi ◽  
Elfi Syahroini
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to determine: (1) differences in student learning outcomes taught by using the discovery learning strategy with student learning outcomes taught by expository strategies, (2) differences in the learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation by using learning learning strategies , (3) differences in learning outcomes of students who have high motivation and low motivation using expository learning strategies, and (4) the interaction between the effects of learning strategies and motivation on student learning outcomes. The research method used is quantitative with a quasi-experimental model of factorial design 2 x 2. The research sample is 1 class for discovery learning strategy learning and 1 class is expository learning strategy. Data collection instruments are tests and questionnaires. The data analysis technique is a two-way analysis of variance. The difference in value between the experimental class and the control class is not significant enough so that it can be interpreted that there cannot be a significant difference in student learning outcomes between the experimental class and the control class.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Motivasi dan Jenis Bahan Ajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Manasse Hasugian
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Teaching Material ◽  
Teaching Materials ◽  
Motivation Factors ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Chemistry Learning ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Low Motivation

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada interaksi antara motivasi dan bahan ajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pokok bahasan Hidrolisis Garam di SMA Negeri 15 Medan. Dalam penelitian ini dibandingkan pengaruh antara motivasi dengan jenis bahan ajar terhadap hasil belajar kimia siswa. Subjek dalam penelitan ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 15 Medan sebanyak 48 orang yang dibagi dalam 4 kelompok berdasarkan tingkat homogenitasnya. Tingkat homogenitas siswa ditentukan dari hasil pretest siswa,buku pegangan siswa, keikutsertaan dalam les belajar dan tingkat motivasi yang hampir sama. Dalam penelitian ini ada dua faktor yang diteliti yaitu faktor motivasi (A) dan faktor bahan ajar (B). Untuk faktor motivasi ada 2 taraf yaitu motivasi tinggi dan motivasi rendah, sedangkan faktor bahan ajar ada dua taraf yaitu modul dan buku teks siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukan ada interaksi antara motivasi belajar siswa dengan jenis bahan ajar terhadap rataan nilai hasil belajar kimia siswa. Pengujian sederhana dari faktor motivasi untuk taraf B1 ( bahan ajar modul) didapat hasil bahwa rataan nilai hasil belajar kimia siswa yang menggunakan bahan ajar modul dengan motivasi tinggi) tidak berbeda nyata dengan hasil belajar siswa yang menggunakan bahan ajar modul dengan motivasi rendah. Pada pengujian sederhana faktor motivasi untuk taraf B2 (bahan ajar buku paket) didapat hasil bahwa rataan nilai hasil belajar kimia siswa yang menggunakan bahan ajar buku paket dengan motivasi tinggi berbeda nyata dengan hasil belajar siswa yang menggunakan bahan ajar buku paket dengan motivasi rendah. Dengan demikian disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan nilai hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan bahan ajar modul dan buku paket yag dikombinasikan dengan tingkat motivasi tinggi dan motivasi rendah. Diperoleh bahwa siswa yang motivasi tinggi lebih cocok menggunakan bahan ajar buku paket, siswa yag motivasi rendah lebih cocok diajar dengan menggunakan modul.   The purpose of this study was to find out whether there was an interaction between motivation and teaching materials on student learning outcomes on the subject of Salt Hydrolysis in SMAN 15 Medan. This study compared the influence between motivation and the type of teaching material on student chemistry learning outcomes. The subjects in this research were 48 students of Science Class XI SMAN 15 Medan with 48 people divided into 4 groups based on the level of homogeneity. The level of homogeneity of students was determined from the results of student pretest, student handbook, participation in learning lessons and almost the same level of motivation. In this study, there were two factors analyzed; the motivation factor (A) and the teaching material factor (B). There were two levels of motivation factors; high motivation, and low motivation, while the teaching material factors had two levels; modules and textbooks of students. The results of the study showed that there was an interaction between students 'learning motivation and the type of teaching material to the students' average chemistry learning outcomes. A simple test of motivational factors for level B1 (module teaching material) showed that the average value of chemistry learning outcomes of students using high motivation module teaching materials) was not significantly different from student learning outcomes using low motivation module teaching materials. In a simple test of motivation factors for level B2 (textbook teaching material), the results showed that the average value of chemistry learning outcomes of students using textbooks with high motivation teaching material was significantly different from the learning outcomes of students who used low motivational package book teaching materials. Thus, it was concluded that there were differences in the value of student learning outcomes taught with module teaching materials and package books that were combined with high levels of motivation and low motivation. It was found that highly motivated students were more suitable to use textbook teaching materials, and students with low motivation were more suitable to be taught using modules.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry Learning Models Viewed From Physics Learning Achievements

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Syamsudin Amir ◽  
Dewi Hikmah Marisda
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Physics Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quantitative Descriptive

This study aimed to analyze the improvement in physics learning outcomes of XI MIA State Madrasah Aliyah 2 students in East Flores after being taught using the Guided Inquiry Learning model. The type of research was a pre-experimental design with one group Pretest – Post-test. The sample in this study was saturated, namely all students of class XI MIA MAN 2 Flores. The research instrument used was a learning achievement test consisting of 30 items in multiple-choice, validated by two experts. The data obtained was then analyzed in a quantitative descriptive manner for the increased learning achievement using the N-gain test. The results showed an increase in student learning achievement, as seen from the acquisition of physics learning outcomes after the guided inquiry learning was applied. Based on the N-gain value, students’ physics learning achievement was in the medium category. Also, the acquisition of student learning outcomes has increased after the guided inquiry learning model was applied--The results of this study expected to be one of the solutions in learning physics.

scholarly journals Effect of Collaborative Based Inquiry Learning Model Using Macromedia Flash and Motivation on Science Learning Outcomes of 5th Grade Students of Elementary School Angkasa 2 Lanud Soewondo Medan

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-202
Author(s):  
Wanty Astari ◽  
Retno Dwi Suyanti ◽  
Daulat Saragi
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Class V ◽  
Direct Learning ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine the differences in learning outcomes with the use of guided inquiry learning models using collaborative-based macromedia flash and based on children's learning motivation attitudes, as well as the interaction between the two models with the level of children's learning motivation in influencing student learning outcomes improvement. The research was conducted at SD Angkasa 2 LANUD Medan in the even semester of the 2020/2021 school year. The sample in this study consisted of classes V-A and V-B which were taken by purposive sampling class. Class V-A is an experimental class that is taught using the guided inquiry learning model using collaborative-based macromedia flash, while for the control class, it is taught using the selected direct learning model, class V-B. This means that student learning outcomes with the guided inquiry learning model using collaborative-based macromedia flash is better than direct learning. Acquisition of calculated F value of 5,123 is greater than the F table of 4,001, with a significance value of 0.027 <0.05. This means that the learning outcomes of students with high learning motivation are better than students with low learning motivation, and the calculated F value of 0.189 is smaller than the F table, namely 4.001 with a significance value of 0.665> 0.05, then H0 is accepted and Ha is rejected, so in the study There is no interaction between learning motivation in the application of the guided inquiry learning model using collaborative-based macromedia flash or direct learning on student learning outcomes. This study shows that the learning model and learning motivation do not influence and reject the third hypothesis.

scholarly journals EFFECT OF PROBLEM BASED LEARNING MODEL AND MOTIVATION LEARNING ON LEARNING OUTCOMES IN CLASS X SMA SINAR HUSNI

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Halimatus Sakdiah Pelawi ◽  
Karya Sinulingga
Keyword(s):  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Design Data ◽  
Physics Students ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine the effect of problem based learning model towards student learning outcomes, determine the effect learning motivation toward student learning outcomes and determine the effect of interaction between learning model with motivation toward learning outcomes of students. This research is aquasi-experimental, conducted at SMA Swasta Sinar Husni the academic year 2014/2015. Population in the study were all students of class X IPA consisting of 2 classes. Sampling was done by purposive sampling, while the determination of a with drawal carried out by random sample class. This study uses Two group pretest-posttest design. Data analysis using ANOVA two ways. From the study concluded that the results of studying physics students apply problem based learning model is better than the conventional learning models, learning outcomes Physics students who have learning high motivation is better than students with low learning motivation, and there was an interaction between the model of learning by learning motivation on student learning outcomes. That is,the result of learning with problem based learning model is always better than the conventional learning. Likewise, learning outcomes of students who have high motivation to learn will always be better than the learning outcomes of students who have low learning motivation.

The Effect of Jigsaw Methode and Motivation on Students’ of Learning Outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-30
Author(s):  
Yunita Yunita ◽  
Hidayat Hidayat ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Motivation ◽  
Learning Approaches ◽  
High Learning ◽  
Average Value ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Low Motivation

This study aims to: (1) investigate the effect of Jigsaw cooperative learning on students learning outcomes; (2) find the difference in learning outcomes between high and low learning motivation and (3) find the interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes. The population of the study is students of grade IVa, IVb, IVc at SD Kasih Ibu Patumbak and the sample in this study is grade IVa with 35 students and grade IVb with 35 students. The results show that: (1) the average student learning outcomes of jigsaw cooperative learning is 28.40 while conventional is 24.14. Thus, students learning outcomes that get cooperative learning of jigsaw type are higher than conventional learning, (2) Students who have high motivation get an average value = 30.74, while low motivation is 22.72. Thus, it can be concluded that there are differences in student learning outcomes having high learning motivation and low learning motivation, and (3) students learning outcomes  taught by jigsaw cooperative learning are high learning motivation groups (32.94), and low learning motivation groups (24.58), while students taught with conventional learning are high learning motivation groups (28.40 ), and low motivation groups (20,95). Thus, there is no interaction between learning approaches and learning motivation towards learning outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document