scholarly journals The investigation of the manipulation with scores on amoral dimension of the HEDONICA inventory

Psihologija ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-148
Author(s):  
Tatjana Mentus ◽  
Goran Opacic ◽  
Goran Knezevic
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Fluid Intelligence ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Concept ◽  
Cognitive Tests ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
The Social ◽  
Fake Good ◽  
Almost All ◽  
Context Simulation

Faking on Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality inventory was incited by the context simulation instructions: fake good (S2), fake bad (S3) and be honest (S1). Simultaneously, under instruction S1, the scores of respondents were measured on the Amoral facets of Self-concept scale (GSC), the Balanced social desirability scale (BIDR) and the cognitive tests of the fluid (IT2, ALF and RM) and the crystallized (AL4, vocabulary and GSN) intelligence, supposed (Morality), or known from the literature, as possible faking determinants. The score differences on Amoral dimension facets were calculated for S2 and for S3 situations using as a baseline the score in S1 situation. The score differences between S3 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FB) were found to be larger than the ones between S2 and S1 situations (abbreviated as FG). This result indicated that a) Amoral is susceptible to faking, and b) in S3, rather than in S2 situation, respondents displayed higher tendency of faking, or in other words, they incline to make worse rather than good presentation of themselves. The Projection facet of Amoral was most sensitive toward faking. These differences are found to be correlated with the Morality dimension of Self-concept scale and the fluid intelligence factor, but not with the dimensions of Social desirability scale in both situation for almost all faking scores on Amoral facets. Only Brutality was not related to the Morality, and Viciousness was not related to the Gf. This indicated that the dimension Morality of the Self-concept scale is far more correlated with the Amoral dimension of the HEDONICA personality scale than with the Social desirability scale.

Coping, Defense and Socially Desirable Responses

1968 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 985-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry A. Alker
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Socially Desirable Responding ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Strategic Capacity ◽  
Defensive Behaviors ◽  
The Social

Coping and defensive behaviors, assessed by intensive interviews, covary, respectively, with the presence of socially desirable and socially undesirable inventory responses. Minimizing the influence of the social desirability variable consequently interferes with the strategic capacity of inventory items to index coping and defense. Furthermore, using low social-desirability scale value items most effectively discriminates between genuine and defensively distorted inventory responses. Neutral items are less efficient in this connection even though they minimize socially desirable responding.

Death Anxiety and Social Desirability among Nurses

1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas O. Martin
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Death Anxiety ◽  
Inverse Relationship ◽  
Anxiety Scale ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Significant Relationships ◽  
Scale Factors ◽  
Five Factors ◽  
The Social ◽  
Principal Axes

Registered nurses ( n = 210) from Canadian public general hospitals were administered Templer's Death Anxiety Scale and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Responses on the Death Anxiety Scale were subjected to a principal-axes factor analysis, from which were extracted five factors. In the order of their relative prominence for the sample of nurses, the identified factors were: 1) “death anxiety denial,” 2) “general death anxiety,” 3) “fearful anticipation of death,” 4) “physical death fear,” and 5) “fear of catastrophic death.” Correlation analyses indicated a statistically significant inverse relationship between the variable of social desirability and “death anxiety denial”; however, no other statistically significant relationships were found to exist between the social desirability variable and the remaining four Death Anxiety Scale factors. The inverse relationship between a particular aspect of death anxiety and the response set of social desirability for nurses in this study was discussed in light of corroborative findings by other investigators, as well as in terms of its implications for further studies of death anxiety among health professionals.

Instructional Set and Social Desirability Scale Values

1969 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Carr
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Instructional Set ◽  
The Social ◽  
Personality Item

Instructional set affects endorsement of personality items, but its effect on the social desirability scale values (SDSV) of such items is unknown. The results suggest that probability of endorsement of a personality item may be altered in response to the influence of set upon perceived SDSV of trait items.

scholarly journals The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17)

2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Stöber
Keyword(s):  
Impression Management ◽  
Social Desirability ◽  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Eysenck Personality Questionnaire ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Highly Sensitive ◽  
The Social ◽  
Job Application ◽  
Age Cohort

Summary: Four studies are presented investigating the convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age of the Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17). As to convergent validity, SDS-17 scores showed correlations between .52 and .85 with other measures of social desirability (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire-Lie Scale, Sets of Four Scale, Marlowe-Crowne Scale). Moreover, scores were highly sensitive to social-desirability-provoking instructions (job-application instruction). Finally, with respect to the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding, SDS-17 scores showed a unique correlation with impression management, but not with self-deception. As to discriminant validity, SDS-17 scores showed nonsignificant correlations with neuroticism, extraversion, psychoticism, and openness to experience, whereas there was some overlap with agreeableness and conscientiousness. With respect to relationship with age, the SDS-17 was administered in a sample stratified for age, with age ranging from 18 to 89 years. In all but the oldest age group, the SDS-17 showed substantial correlations with the Marlowe-Crowne Scale. The influence of age (cohort) on mean scores, however, was significantly smaller for the SDS-17 than for the Marlowe-Crowne Scale. In sum, results indicate that the SDS-17 is a reliable and valid measure of social desirability, suitable for adults of 18 to 80 years of age.

Further Evidence regarding the R Scale of the MMPI as a Measure of Acquiescence

1969 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 903-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allen L. Edwards ◽  
Robert D. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
True Response ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Mean

High- and low-scoring groups on the R scale of the MMPI were selected For each group the mean probability of a True response, P(T), on 26 scales was obtained. The social desirability scale values of the items increased from scale to scale. On all 26 scales, low scorers on the R scale had a higher mean probability of a True response than high scorers. The regression lines of P(T) on SDSV for the two groups had approximately the same slopes and differed only in terms of their intercepts. The study was replicated with three additional samples and comparable results were obtained in each case.

Adequacy of Socialization as an Interpretation of the Social Desirability Response Set

1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 887-892
Author(s):  
James A. Oakland
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Personality Assessment ◽  
Test Scores ◽  
Personality Test ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Individual Personality ◽  
The Social ◽  
Response Set ◽  
Cross Fertilization ◽  
Assessment Research

An interpretation of the social desirability response set as measuring, in part, the adequacy of socialization was supported in that the social desirability ratings of the 26 Ss with low scores on the Edwards Social Desirability Scale tended to be more varied than those of 26 Ss with high scores. It was suggested that this factor may be significant in the interpretation of individual personality test scores, that cross-fertilization between clinical theories and personality assessment research may be indispensible in this area, and that previous arguments for using ratings of social desirability as a means of personality assessment should be taken more seriously.

ATTITUDE, DESIRE, AND FREQUENCY OF EXTRAMARITAL INVOLVEMENT AS CORRELATED WITH SUBJECT CHARACTERISTICS

1977 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Andrus ◽  
David Redfering ◽  
Jerry Oglesby
Keyword(s):  
College Students ◽  
Social Desirability ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
College Major ◽  
Female College Students ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Number Of Children ◽  
Sexual Involvement ◽  
The Social

A study of desire for, frequency of, and attitudes towards extramarital involvement (EMI) was conducted, using 100 male and female college students ranging in age from 19 to 55. Demographic data gathered on subjects included age, sex, occupation, college major, current and past marital status and number of children, frequency of extramarital sexual involvement, and level of desire for extramarital sexual involvement. The subjects were administered a social desirability scale, a measure of conventional morality, and extramarital attitudinal scale. There were significant correlations between desire, frequency, and attitude. The response to “number of times married” had a significant effect on EMI desire. Predictive factors other than desire, frequency, and attitude were number of marriages, sex of the respondent, and the social desirability scale.

Social Desirability and Judged Frequency of Occurrence: Reanalysis and Comment on Bernhardson and Fisher

1974 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 1271-1274
Author(s):  
Robert D. Abbott
Keyword(s):  
Regression Model ◽  
Multiple Regression ◽  
Social Desirability ◽  
Multiple Regression Model ◽  
Frequency Of Occurrence ◽  
Social Desirability Scale ◽  
Probability Of Occurrence ◽  
Direct Contribution ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Common

The conclusions of Bernhardson and Fisher regarding the “direct contribution” of the social desirability scale value and judged probability of occurrence in the population to the prediction of the proportion of respondents answering True to personality items were re-examined basing new estimates of “direct contribution” upon multiple regression model comparisons which emphasize the common “contribution” between the judged probability of occurrence and social desirability and are not influenced by the ordering of variables in the regression equation.

The social desirability of the Type A behaviour pattern

1986 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 805-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Furnham
Keyword(s):  
Social Desirability ◽  
Type A ◽  
Behaviour Pattern ◽  
Type B ◽  
Lower Type ◽  
Psychological Phenomena ◽  
The Social ◽  
Fake Good ◽  
Positive Light ◽  
The Way

SynopsisNearly one hundred subjects completed two Type A behaviour questionnaires twice. First, they were asked to complete them honestly, reporting accurately on their behaviour patterns. Half of the subjects were then asked to fake good, presenting themselves in a positive light, and half to fake bad, presenting themselves in a negative light. There was only a marginal difference on one questionnaire's total score, with fake good subjects having lower Type A (i.e. higher Type B scores) yet nearly every individual question revealed large significant differences. The subjects' own A/B classification did not effect the way in which they faked the questionnaires. The results are discussed in terms of the literature on faking, lay concepts of psychological phenomena and the multidimensionality of the Type A concept.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document