scholarly journals The Concept of Property in Private and Constitutional Law: The Ideology of the Scientific Turn in Legal Analysis

1982 ◽  
Vol 82 (8) ◽  
pp. 1545 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory S. Alexander
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksa Nikolić ◽  

From the creation until the adoption of the Constitution of 1921 (the so-called Vidovdan Constitution), the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes wandered aimlessly in the constitutional provisional for almost three years. The Vidovdan Constitution finally established some kind of legal organization of the newly formed state. However, the subject of this paper will not be the analysis of social and political circumstances before and after the adoption of the Vidovdan Constitution, but the author will analyze different views on the Vidovdan Constitution from the pens of the most important Serbian, Croatian and Slovenian constitutional lawyers. In that way, through a comprehensive comparative legal analysis, a big step will be made towards shedding light on all the problems that burdened the newly formed kingdom from the start, and which were a stumbling block in building stable relations between Serbs, Croats and Slovenes. Based on the analysis of the mentioned different points of view on the Vidovdan Constitution, the author will point out the most controversial elements of the biggest names in the constitutional law of Serbia, Croatia and Slovenia and report certain conclusions about the nature and character of the Vidovdan Constitution.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 367-373
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov ◽  
Tatiana N. Mikhaleva ◽  
Grigory A. Vasilevich ◽  
Sergey A. Balashenko ◽  
Artem A. Pukhov ◽  
...  

This article is devoted to the constitutional and legal analysis of the place of the Institute of public control in the mechanism of implementation of the constitutional principle of democracy in the Russian Federation. The article substantiates the position that the institutionalization of the category “public control” in constitutional law requires the study of its place and role in the compositional structure of democracy, serving in turn, the constitutional and legal guarantee for its implementation.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malaika Jores

Since 2017, Germany’s Basic Law has allowed anti-constitutional parties to be excluded from state party funding. Such exclusion from funding is at odds with the right to equal political opportunities, which derives from the principle of democracy. This thesis examines whether such exclusion from funding is permissible under German constitutional law. In particular, it takes account of the principle of democracy—guaranteed by the ‘eternity clause’—and the concept of ‘militant democracy’. The thesis also considers the issue in question from a European law perspective and, in addition to conducting a legal analysis, examines whether distorting the competition among political parties is justifiable with respect to democratic theory.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-A) ◽  
pp. 411-416
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov

This article is devoted to the constitutional and legal analysis of the place of the Institute of public control in the mechanism of implementation of the constitutional principle of democracy in the Russian Federation. The article substantiates the position that the institutionalization of the category “public control” in constitutional law requires the study of its place and role in the compositional structure of democracy, serving in turn, the constitutional and legal guarantee for its implementation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 141-158
Author(s):  
Filip Zygmunt Wichrowski

This paper aims to determine the directions of development of the profession of restructuring advisor in Poland. The analysis of the law regulating this profession will help answer the question of whether in its present form the profession of restructuring adviser has the character of a profession of public trust in accordance with Article 17(1) of the Polish Constitution. These findings are important for determining whether the legislator should create a self-governing body of restructuring advisors, which should be a key element in establishing the principles of the profession. A direction of the discussion defined in such a way first requires a historical and legal analysis of the legislation relating to a bankruptcy administrator. This analysis culminates in a description of the process of transformation of the profession of a bankruptcy administrator into the profession of a restructuring advisor and an analysis of the current legislation, which allows determining the nature of the profession of restructuring advisor. The paper deals with the issues of how the professional self-government functions, and the ethics of the profession of restructuring adviser. It discusses the problems of currently operating organizations bringing together persons performing the profession of restructuring adviser, their status, and the validity of the legal acts issued by these entities.The above remarks on Polish legislation are contrasted with the legal situation in the Federal Republic of Germany to show the extent of the changes in this legislation in Poland over the last thirty years. In this article, attention is drawn to the need to enact additional legislation in this field in Poland. Future directions of the development of the profession of restructuring advisor as a profession of public trust are also evaluated through an analysis of both Polish constitutional law and European Union law, in particular,Directive 2019/1023 of the European Parliament and the Council relating to restructuring and bankruptcy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-256
Author(s):  
U. Amanaliev

The article analyzes the constitutional law of the Kyrgyz Republic “On the suspension of certain provisions of the law on elections of the President of the Kyrgyz Republic and deputies of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic”. The author was able to scientifically show that the adopted constitutional law contradicts the provisions of the Constitution. In this case, the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic is generally recognized as the main regulator of all legal relations in society, which has supreme power. The article also examines the legality of such actions as the adoption of a constitutional law, the suspension of elections to the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic, and the implementation of constitutional reform. The author also referred to the decisions of the Central Election Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic on elections and referenda. Based on the decisions of the CEC on October 6, 2020, the Central Election Commission of the Kyrgyz Republic declared the results of the October 4 parliamentary elections invalid. In this regard, the CEC set October 21, 2020 as the date of re-election to the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic but noted that the Jogorku Kenesh adopted an unconstitutional law. In addition, it was noted that the adopted normative acts in the Kyrgyz Republic will be implemented on the basis of specially approved, adopted normative acts. This provision is enshrined in Law No. 223 “On the Regulation of the Jogorku Kenesh of the Kyrgyz Republic” dated November 25, 2011 and in no. 241 “On regulatory legal acts of the Kyrgyz Republic” dated July 20, 2009.


2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 334-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
VLAD PERJU

AbstractThis article presents a functional explanation of why proportionality has become one of the most successful legal transplants in contemporary constitutional law. It argues that proportionality helps judges mitigate what Robert Cover called the ‘inherent difficulty presented by the violence of the state’s law acting upon the free interpretative process’. More than alternative methods, proportionality calibrates the violence that the justification of state coercion inflicts on private (non-official) jurisgenerative interpretative processes in constitutional cases. The first three sections show, through an analysis of different constitutional styles which I label Doric, Ionic and Corinthian, how proportionality seeks to place a non-deontological conception of rights within a categorical structure of formal legal analysis. This method aims to synthesize fidelity to form and institutional structure (thesis) with ‘fact-sensitivity’ to contexts in which specific controversies arise (antithesis). Proportionality positions judges vis-à-vis the parties and the parties in relation to one another differently from other constitutional methods. The next sections distinguish between constitutional perception and reality. While the normative appeal of proportionality can be traced to the perception of its integrative aims, in reality, judicial technique does not entirely live up to those aims. Proportionality succumbs to pressures from the centrifugal forces of universalism and particularism that it seeks to integrate. The final section draws on the works of Kant and Arendt and discusses the implications of an approach to constitutional method such as that reflected in the advent of proportionality for the project of constitutionalism more generally.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (Extra-A) ◽  
pp. 395-401
Author(s):  
Vitaly Viktorovich Goncharov

This article is devoted to the constitutional legal analysis of the legal nature of public control of power.  We affirm that a study of the legal nature of the concept of “public control of power” in constitutional law will allow us to identify specific priorities for ensuring the exercise of the right of citizens of the Russian Federation to exercise public control.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 15-21
Author(s):  
Marina S. Savchenko ◽  
◽  
Svetlana A. Kuemzhieva ◽  
Vitaliy V. Goncharov ◽  
◽  
...  

This article is devoted to the constitutional and legal analysis of the judiciary as an object of public control in the Russian Federation. Object of research: public relations related to the organization and implementation of public control in the Russian Federation. Subject of research: the current legislation regulating both the organization and implementation of public control, and the formation and functioning of judicial authorities in Russia, as well as the Russian legal doctrine in the field of organization and implementation of public control in relation to the activities of courts. The article develops and substantiates the author’s definition of public control in the Russian Federation. The author substantiates the system of measures necessary to ensure the full organization and implementation of public control over the judiciary in Russia. This article uses a number of methods of scientific research, in particular: analysis; synthesis; historical; comparative law; classification; modeling.


Author(s):  
Yuriy Kyrychenko ◽  
Viktor Kyrychenko

The article considers the principle of equality, which is discussed in Part 4 of Art. 13; st.st.21, 24; Part 2 of Art.38; Part 2 of Art.43; Part 1 of Art.51; Part 1 of Art.52; Part 1 of Art.71; Part 2 of Art. 129 of the Constitution of Ukraine and is mentioned in most constitutions of European states, and it is proved that it is not only a principle of constitutional law, but also one of the fundamental principles on which human rights and freedoms are exercised and their place in society and state is determined. It is noted that the terms «equality» and «equality», although used interchangeably to denote the full range of rights and freedoms, are not identical. Equality is a broader concept than equality and includes the latter. It is proved that in Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine identifies three main aspects of this principle: 1) equality of citizens in rights; 2) equality of citizens before the law; 3) equality of rights of women and men, and it is emphasized that the state provides only legal, formal equality between people. That is, there is no and cannot be actual equality between people, because everyone differs in their individual abilities. Therefore, the analyzed principle legally justifies the actual inequality between people. It is substantiated that the provision, which is enshrined in Part 1 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine guarantees only the equality of citizens before the law and their equal rights and freedoms. At the same time, there are examples that this principle applies to every person who is enshrined in the constitutions of continental Europe by the term «all», «all people» or a term meaning nationality (Belgians, Greeks, Spaniards, Luxembourgers, Monegasques). In this regard, it is proposed to replace the term «citizens» in the analyzed part with the term «all people», as well as to remove the word «constitutional» from the terminological phrase «constitutional rights and freedoms». It is emphasized that there can be no privileges or restrictions on the grounds listed in Part 2 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine (eleven in total). The same and other similar features are enshrined in the constitutional market in 25 of the 42 European states belonging to the Romano-Germanic system of law. It is concluded that it is necessary to strengthen the wording of this part through the establishment of guarantees by the state. In Part 3 of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine reflected the provision, which separately emphasizes the equality of women's and men's rights through the consolidation of requirements, conditions and benefits, ie proposed a wording that does not have the vast majority of continental Europe. And therefore it is offered to state this part in other way. The expediency from the point of view of logic and legal technique, and also taking into account the constitutional practice of foreign countries and researches of domestic scientists of statement of Art. 24 of the Constitution of Ukraine in a new edition, which will give it the opportunity to have a more perfect look.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document