Turnabout Is Fair Play:

The paper examines the problem of legitimation of the privatization’s outcomes in Russia and provides a critical appraisal of various political proposals for its resolution. The analysis proceeds from a distinction between two different types of ownership illegitimacy: "definite" and "vague" ones. The paper argues that the "vague" illegitimacy that has evolved in Russia is not an absolute obstacle for economic growth but rather an institutional birth trauma which is common for all post-socialist countries and which could be cured only by piecemeal approaching of relationships between "strong" and "weak" economic actors to principles of fair play.

Download Full-text

Is economic inequality a universal evil?

Voprosy Ekonomiki ◽

10.32609/0042-8736-2019-4-91-106 ◽

2019 ◽

pp. 91-106 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Rostislav I. Kapeliushnikov

Keyword(s):

Quantitative Data ◽

Large Scale ◽

Economic Inequality ◽

The State ◽

Fair Play ◽

Left Wing ◽

Ordinary People ◽

The Public ◽

Discursive Power ◽

A Current

Using published estimates of inequality for two countries (Russia and USA) the paper demonstrates that inequality measuring still remains in the state of “statistical cacophony”. Under this condition, it seems at least untimely to pass categorical normative judgments and offer radical political advice for governments. Moreover, the mere practice to draw normative conclusions from quantitative data is ethically invalid since ordinary people (non-intellectuals) tend to evaluate wealth and incomes as admissible or inadmissible not on the basis of their size but basing on whether they were obtained under observance or violations of the rules of “fair play”. The paper concludes that a current large-scale ideological campaign of “struggle against inequality” has been unleashed by left-wing intellectuals in order to strengthen even more their discursive power over the public.

Download Full-text

Objective and parametric methods used in functional classification disabled swimmers

Physiotherapy ◽

10.2478/physio-2013-0022 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 21 (3) ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Natalia Uścinowicz ◽

Wojciech Seidel ◽

Paweł Zostawa ◽

Sebastian Klich

Keyword(s):

Medical Diagnosis ◽

Olympic Games ◽

Objective Evaluation ◽

Subjective Assessment ◽

Fair Play ◽

Functional Classification ◽

Kinematic Parameters ◽

Athletes With Disabilities ◽

Rule Out

AbstractThe recent Olympic Games in London incited much interest in the competition of disabled athletes. Various people connected with swimming, including coaches and athletes, have speculated about the fairness of competitions of disabled athletes. A constant problem are the subjective methods of classification in disabled sport. Originally, athletes with disabilities were classified according to medical diagnosis. Due to the injustice which still affects the competitors, functional classification was created shortly after. In the present review, the authors show the anomalies in the structure of the classification. The presented discovery led to the suggestion to introduce objective methods, thanks to which it would be no longer necessary to rely on the subjective assessment of the classifier. According to the authors, while using objective methods does not completely rule out the possibility of fraud by disabled athletes in the classification process, it would certainly reduce their incidence. Some of the objective methods useful for the classification of disabled athletes are: posturography, evaluation of the muscle parameters, electrogoniometric assessment, surface electromyography, and analysis of kinematic parameters. These methods have provide objective evaluation in the diagnostic sense but only if they are used in tandem. The authors demonstrate the undeniable benefits of using objective methods. Unfortunately, there are not only advantages of such solution, there also several drawbacks to be found. The conclusion of the article is the statement by the authors that it is right to use objective methods which allow to further the most important rule in sport: fair-play.

Download Full-text

Bracketed Morality in Sport

Physical Education and Sport Through the Centuries ◽

10.2478/spes-2019-0011 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 6 (2) ◽

pp. 34-45

Author(s):

Visnja Djordjic

Keyword(s):

Moral Reasoning ◽

Positive Influence ◽

Fair Play ◽

Personal Factors ◽

Moral Integrity ◽

Moral Decision Making ◽

Male Athletes ◽

Moral Atmosphere ◽

High Level ◽

And Behavior

Summary Although sport can promote moral values and prosocial behavior in youth, numerous research shows that sports engagement alone does not guarantee that outcome. Instead of striving for fair-play and sport excellence which not exclude justness, solidarity and moral integrity, contemporary sport frequently follows the Lombardian ethic, where „winning isn’t everything, it’s the only thing”. Moral pause or bracketed morality, as described in sport, refers to the phenomenon of tolerance and acceptance of aggressive behavior or cheating, that will be morally condemned outside sports arenas. Accordingly, lower levels of moral reasoning and behavior have been identified in athletes and non-athletes in the sports-related situation in comparison to other life situations; in athletes when compared to non-athletes, in more experienced athletes, high-level athletes, team-sport athletes, and male athletes. Moral reasoning and behavior of athletes are influenced by contextual and personal factors, with coaches having a particularly important role to play. The positive influence of sport on the moral development of athletes might be related to pre-service and in-service education of coaches how to develop adequate moral atmosphere, and how to plan for moral decision-making as an integral part of everyday practice.

Download Full-text

ATURAN HUKUM ATAS AZAS CONTRADICTOIR DELIMINATIE DALAM PENDAFTARAN TANAH

MAKSIGAMA ◽

10.37303/.v9i1.2 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 1-17

Author(s):

Mudji Rahayu

Keyword(s):

Fair Play

Penerapan aturan hukum atas azas contradictorie delimitatie dalam pendaftaran tanah sudah memadai dengan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran tanah.Inti dari sahnya perjanjian penetapan batas tanah adalah kesepakatan. Perjanjian bagi para pihak harus kehendak yang bebas dari cacat kehendak (wilsgebrek); yakni "dwaling" (kesesatan, kekeliruan, kekhilafan), "dwang" (tekanan, paksaan) dan "bedrog" (penipuan). Sebaliknya, bila terjadi gugatan mengenai perjanjian kebijaksanaan (kewenangan) yang dilakukan Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten/Kota. Hal yang digugat adalah; (1) isi perjanjian; (2) asas kepercayaan (het vertrouwensbeginsel), asas kejujuran atau asas permainan yang layak (fair play) dari asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AUPB). Alasan gugatan adalah keputusan tata usaha negara yang dikeluarkan bertentangan dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 53 ayat (2) huruf adalam kaitannya dengan Pasal 53 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 tahun 1986 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 9 tahun 2004 jo Undang-Undang Nomor 51 tahun 2009.Gugatan tersebut menjadi kompetensi hakim tata usaha negara karena berkaitan dengan kewenangan publiknya untuk melaksanakan penetapan batas tanah dan kewenangan pemerintahannya dengan menerbitkan besluit (keputusan tata usaha negara) berupa sertipikat. Kata kunci: azas contradictoire delimitatie, pendaftaran tanah, akibat hukumnya

Download Full-text