scholarly journals Bone-anchored maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate:

2020 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 539-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eman H. Elabbassy ◽  
Noha E. Sabet ◽  
Islam T. Hassan ◽  
Dina H. Elghoul ◽  
Marwa A. Elkassaby
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Forward Movement ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Group I ◽  
Effective Treatment Modality

ABSTRACT Objectives To assess the effectiveness of bone-anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and whether it was enhanced when preceded by maxillary expansion. Materials and Methods The sample consisted of 28 growing children (9–13 years old) with UCLP and Class III malocclusion. They were divided into two equal groups. In group I, patients were treated with BAMP not preceded by maxillary expansion. In group II, patients were treated with BAMP preceded by maxillary expansion. To assess treatment changes in three dimensions, Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken 1 week after surgical placement of the miniplates (T1) and after 9 months of treatment (T2). Results BAMP produced forward movement of the maxilla in both groups (3.17 mm) and (3.37 mm) respectively, without significant differences between the two groups except for clockwise rotation of the palatal plane in group I (1.60). Conclusions BAMP is an effective treatment modality for correcting midface deficiency in patients with UCLP whether or not maxillary expansion was carried out.

scholarly journals Immediate and late follow-up effects of class III early correction in cleft lip and palate patients treated with maxillary protraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Mazon MIRANDA ◽  
Rodrigo Matos de SOUZA ◽  
Giovana Cherubini VENEZIAN ◽  
Cristina FRANZINI ◽  
William CUSTODIO
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Skeletal Pattern ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
The Stability

Abstract Introduction There is no consensus about the immediate and latte follow-up effects of maxillary protraction in cleft lip and palate patients. Objective To evaluate the stability of Class III early treatment in cleft lip and palate patients through maxillary expansion and protraction. Material and method The sample consists in three lateral cephalometric radiographs of 28 patients (mean pre-treatment age of 6.7±1.8 years) who presented cleft lip and palate and were treated with maxillary expansion and Petit facial mask. The angular (SNA, SNB, ANB, SN.GoGn, FMA, Z Angle) and linear (overjet, Co-A, Co-Gn, Nperp-A, Nperp-Pg, AO-BO) cephalometric measures were evaluated through the Dolphin® software, in three moments: T0 (initial), T1 (after treatment), and T2 (follow-up). Data were submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer test. The correlation between cephalometric measures and patient’s age was determined by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Result The SNA, ANB, and AO-BO measures increased considerably (p<0.05), and they did not present any differences compared to the initial ones after the follow-up time. The overjet measure increased (p<0.05) after treatment and, even with its decrease at the follow-up time, it was still higher than at the beginning (p<0.05). The Z angle showed improvement with treatment and remained stable at the follow-up time. Conclusion After treatment (maxillary expansion associated with protraction), there was a skeletal pattern improvement. During the follow-up period, those alterations decreased to a measure close to the beginning. There was an improvement in the dental pattern and facial profile that continued in the follow-up period.

Skeletal Response to Maxillary Protraction in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate before Age 10 Years

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 295-308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf S. Tindlund
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Poor Response ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Forward Movement ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Face Height ◽  
Lateral Cephalograms ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Maxillary Dentition

Over the last 15 years, cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients with maxillary deficiency in the care of the Bergen CLP Team have received interceptive orthopedic treatment to correct anterior and posterior crossbites during the deciduous and mixed dentition periods. The present study comprises 72 subjects of various cleft types with anterior crossbite, treated to an acceptable positive overjet by maxillary protraction using a facial mask (Delaire). Lateral cephalograms were taken immediately before and after the active treatment periods. Individuals exhibiting a favorable (fair) skeletal response to the protraction were compared with those who revealed little, (poor) skeletal response. Two cephalometric variables were chosen for the evaluation of the sagittal skeletal treatment changes: (1) the sagittal maxillomandibular change (change of angle ss-n-sm [ANB]); and (2) the forward movement of the maxilla (change of distance NSP-maxp), where maxp (maxillary point) represents the anterior contour of maxilla and NSP is the perpendicular to the naslon-sella-line (NSL) through sella. A numerical change greater than or equal to the value 1.5 (degrees or mm, respectively) was classified as fair versus poor response revealing a change less than 1.5. Fair-response (favorable response) of sagittal maxillomandibular change was found in 63 % of the cases (mean increase of angle ANB was 3.3 degrees), more often when protraction started early. The length of maxilla was increased, the skeletal maxilla was moved forward 1.8 mm, the upper dentition advanced 3.6 mm, the occlusal line was clockwise rotated, and the anterior face height was increased. Similarly, fair-response of forward movement of maxilla was found in 44% of the cases (mean increase of distance NSP-maxp was 2.4 mm), more often when protraction was started early and after long treatment duration. The maxillary prognathism increased 1.8 degrees, the angle ANB increased 3 degrees, the length of maxilla increased 1.5 mm, and the upper dentition was advanced 3.7 mm. The anterior face height increased with counterclockwise rotation of the nasal line, whereas the occlusal line was clockwise rotated. A paired fair-response of both skeletal maxillomandibular change and skeletal forward movement of maxilla was found in 35% of the cases. During protraction the mean increase of maxillary prognathism was 2.1 degrees, the maxilla moved forward 3.1 mm, the maxillary dentition advanced 4.3 mm, the maxillary length increased 1.9 mm, the ANB angle increased 3.7 degrees, and the lower anterior facial height increased 3.4 mm.

Orthodontic-Surgical Approach for Treating Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Severe Maxillary Deficiency in Isolated Cleft Palate

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 400-407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Nakatsugawa ◽  
Hiroshi Kurosaka ◽  
Kiyomi Mihara ◽  
Susumu Tanaka ◽  
Tomonao Aikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Palate ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Rapid Palatal Expansion ◽  
Isolated Cleft Palate ◽  
Maxillary Deficiency

Orthodontic treatment in patients with orofacial cleft such as cleft lip and palate or isolated cleft palate is challenging, especially when the patients exhibit severe maxillary growth retardation. To correct this deficiency, maxillary expansion and protraction can be performed in the first phase of orthodontic treatment. However, in some cases, the malocclusion cannot be corrected by these procedures, and thus, skeletal discrepancy remains when the patients are adolescents. These remaining problems occasionally require various orthognathic treatments according to the degree of the discrepancy. Here, we describe one case of a female with isolated cleft palate and hand malformation who exhibited severe maxillary deficiency until her adolescence and was treated with multiple orthognathic surgeries, including surgically assisted maxillary expansion (surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion), LeFort I osteotomy, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy in order to correct severe skeletal discrepancy and malocclusion. The treatment resulted in balanced facial appearance and mutually protected occlusion with good stability. The purpose of this case report is to show the orthodontic treatment outcome of 1 patient who exhibited isolated cleft palate and subsequent severe skeletal deformities and malocclusion which was treated by an orthodontic-surgical approach.

Protração maxilar ancorada em miniplacas na fissura labiopalatina – do diagnóstico à maturidade esquelética

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (54) ◽  
pp. 80-88
Author(s):  
Renata Mayumi Kato ◽  
Renato André de Souza Faco ◽  
Hilde Timmerman ◽  
Hugo De Clerck ◽  
Daniela Garib
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Facial Growth ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

The purpose of this study was to report a case with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) treated with bone anchored maxillary protraction (BAMP) in miniplates followed up until the end of facial growth. A 7-year-old girl with complete left side CLP started the orthodontic treatment in a rehabilitation center. She presented a Class III skeletal pattern due to maxillary deficiency, a GOSLON 4 sagittal interarch relationship, a negative overjet of 1.5mm and agenesis of left upper lateral incisor. In the mixed dentition, the patient was submitted to rapid maxillary expansion followed by the secondary alveolar bone grafting procedure. At 12y 3m two miniplates were installed in the maxilla and two in the mandible with BAMP therapy. The patient was instructed to use full time Class III elastics with force of 250g/side together with a bite lifting plate in the upper arch. BAMP therapy duration was 19 months leading to a positive overjet and GOSLON 1 sagittal interarch relationship. The cephalometric analysis demonstrated a mild maxilla advancement. Class III elastics started to be used only at night as an active retention concomitantly with Phase II orthodontic treatment. Compensatory corrective orthodontic treatment established adequate occlusion between the dental arches with significant improvement of facial aesthetics after the intervention. Le Fort 1 surgery with maxillary advancement was not necessary.

scholarly journals Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 617-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Morsani Mordente ◽  
Juan Martin Palomo ◽  
Martinho Campolina Rebello Horta ◽  
Bernardo Quiroga Souki ◽  
Dauro Douglas Oliveira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Nasal Passage ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Intergroup Comparison ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACTObjective: To evaluate the anterior and posterior maxillary width, the nasal passage volume, the oropharyngeal minimum axial area, and volume changes in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients treated with one of the following four expanders: Hyrax, Fan-Type, inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first permanent molars (iMini-M), or inverted mini-hyrax supported on the first premolars (iMini-B).Materials and Methods: A total of 40 patients with transverse maxillary deficiency who were submitted for rapid maxillary expansion were divided in four groups according to type of expander used. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken before and 3 months after expansion. One-way analysis of variance was used to analyze the differences among the groups, and paired t-tests were used to evaluate the changes in each group.Results: All groups showed a significant increase in the anterior maxillary width, with no intergroup differences. The iMini-B was the only group that did not show a significant increase in the posterior maxillary width. The intergroup comparison demonstrated differences among all groups except between Hyrax and iMini-M, which showed the greatest posterior expansions. The intragroup analysis showed a significant increase in the nasal passage volume in hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar groups, but the intergroup comparison revealed a significant difference only between Fan-Type and inverted mini-hyrax on the molars. None of the expanders caused significant changes in the oropharyngeal measurements.Conclusions: Only the Hyrax and inverted mini-hyrax on the molar expanders effectively increased the nasal passage volume, and none of the expanders evaluated in this study modified the oropharyngeal airway.

A New Protocol for Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients: Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions

2005 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Jein-Wein Liou ◽  
Wen-Ching Tsai
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Mixed Dentition ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Maxillary Advancement

Objective It was hypothesized that, through a repetitive weekly protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions (Alt-RAMEC), the maxilla in cleft patients could be protracted more effectively than with a single course of rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Methods Twenty-six consecutive unilateral cleft lip and palate patients at the age of mixed dentition were included in this prospective clinical study. The rapid maxillary expansion group included the first 16 consecutive patients undergoing 1 week of rapid maxillary expansion (1 mm/day) followed by 5 months, 3 weeks of maxillary protraction. The Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group included the next 10 consecutive patients undergoing 9 weeks of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions followed by 3 months, 3 weeks of maxillary protraction. Daily activation of the weekly expansion or constriction was 1.0 mm. Two-hinged expanders and intraoral maxillary protraction springs were used in both groups. Treatment results were evaluated cephalometrically. Results The amount of maxillary anterior displacement by the 2-hinged expander in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 3.0 ± 0.9 mm at A point, significantly greater than the 1.6 ± 1.0 mm in the rapid maxillary expansion group. The amount of maxillary advancement with intraoral protraction springs in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 2.9 ± 1.9 mm at A point, significantly greater than the 0.9 ± 1.1 mm in the rapid maxillary expansion group. The overall amount of maxillary advancement in the Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions group was 5.8 ± 2.3 mm at A point. This result remained stable, without significant relapse after 2 years. Conclusions Maxillary protraction using the 2-hinged expander, a repetitive weekly protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions, and intraoral protraction springs is most effective, with stable results at 2-year follow-up.

Maxillary Protraction Therapy in Class III Patients With and Without Cleft Lip and Palate: An Interim Report of a Prospective Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
pp. 105566562095405
Author(s):  
Yifan Lin ◽  
Zhen Fu ◽  
Runzhi Guo ◽  
Lian Ma ◽  
Weiran Li
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Lower Incisor ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Average Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After

Objective: To investigate and compare the effects of maxillary protraction therapy on Class III patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and Class III patients with noncleft. Design: Prospective controlled clinical trial. Patients: Twenty-six Class III patients with UCLP (mean age: 10.32 ± 1.29 years) and 26 Class III patients with noncleft (mean age: 9.82 ± 1.03 years) were included and treated with maxillary protraction therapy. Interventions: Maxillary protraction therapy was performed with an intraoral Hyrax appliance and extraoral facemask. Cone beam computed tomography scans were taken before and after treatment. Pretreatment skeletal and dental characteristics and treatment changes were analyzed and compared. Results: The average treatment duration was 18.44 ± 4.16 months in the UCLP group, which was substantially longer than the 12.46 ± 4.03-month average treatment duration in the noncleft group ( P < .001). No significant difference was found in the maxillary changes (length, advancement of point A, and SNA angle) and improvement of intermaxillary relationship (ANB angle) between the 2 groups. The UCLP group had 1.40° more mandibular clockwise rotation ( P = .034). Regarding dental changes, the UCLP group had more upper incisor proclination ( P = .006) and less lower incisor retroclination ( P = .023). Conclusions: Approximately extended maxillary protraction therapy in patients with UCLP could be as effective as in patients with noncleft. Further study is required to follow patients until completion of growth to elucidate the long-term stability of the treatment.

Short- and Long-Term Effects of Late Maxillary Advancement With the Liou-Alt-RAMEC Protocol in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Costanza Meazzini ◽  
Laura B. Zappia ◽  
Chiara Tortora ◽  
Luca Autelitano ◽  
Roberto Tintinelli
Keyword(s):  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Short And Long Term

Objective: The objective of this retrospective longitudinal study was to evaluate short- and long-term results of the application of the Liou Alt-RAMEC (alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction) technique, a late orthopedic maxillary protraction technique, with intraoral anchorage, in patients with cleft. Materials and Methods: Twenty-six patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) were consecutively treated with the Alt-RAMEC technique. The average age of the patients was 11.7 years (10.3-13.2 years) before protraction and 18.3 years (17.4-21.1 years) at long-term follow-up. A sample of nontreated patients with UCLP was used as a control group. It was matched for sex, skeletal class III, and age (11.3 years). The control sample had records at the end of growth (18.7 years). Results: The sagittal advancement of A-point, after the application of the technique, was 5.7 (2.17) mm. Some mandibular dentoalveolar and positional adaptation was noted. The position of the maxilla was stable in the long term. On the other hand, the UCLP control group showed hardly any growth at the maxillary level during the long-term follow-up period. Conclusion: Our results showed that the Alt-RAMEC technique, performed at the correct time, with a double-hinged expander, followed by class III spring or elastic traction, 24 hours per day, allows for satisfactory maxillary protraction, with, at this stage, apparently stable long-term results. Nevertheless, as only 50% of the patients had long-term follow-up data, we are still unable to predict the percentage of patients which will not eventually need orthognathic surgery.

Dentoskeletal Effects of Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients with Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions

2009 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavoda Luz Vieira ◽  
Luciane Macedo de Menezes ◽  
Eduardo Martinelli S. de Lima ◽  
Susana Rizzatto
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Cleft Lip ◽  
Cleft Lip And Palate ◽  
Covariance Structure ◽  
Face Mask ◽  
Rapid Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Expansion ◽  
Maxillary Protraction ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2

Objective: To evaluate the amount of maxillary protraction with face mask in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate patients submitted to two distinct rapid maxillary expansion (RME) protocols. Material and Methods: The sample consisted of 20 individuals (nine boys and 11 girls; mean age of 10.4 ± 2.62 years) with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate who had a constricted maxilla in the vertical and transverse dimensions. Ten patients underwent 1 week of RME with screw activation of one complete turn per day, followed by 23 weeks of maxillary protraction (group 1). The other 10 patients underwent 7 weeks of alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction, with one complete turn per day, followed by 17 weeks of maxillary protraction (group 2); both groups underwent a total of 6 months of treatment. Cephalometric measurements were taken at different times: pretreatment (T1), soon after RME (T2), and after 6 months of treatment (T3). Each measurement was analyzed with mixed models for repeated measures, and the covariance structure chosen was compound symmetry. Results: The maxilla displaced slightly forward and downward with a counterclockwise rotation; the mandible rotated downward and backward, resulting in an increase in anterior facial height; the sagittal maxillomandibular relationship was improved; the maxillary molars and incisors were protruded and extruded; and the mandibular incisors were retroclined. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between the groups in evaluation time.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document