scholarly journals PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERZINAAN PADA MASYARAKAT KUTAI ADAT LAWAS

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-73
Author(s):  
Rosdiana Rosdiana ◽  
Ulum Janah

ABSTRAKKesadaran akan penyelesaian melalui peradilan formal umumnya masih dirasakan kurang memberikan keadilan bagi korban, seringkali masih menyimpan ketidakpuasan korban atas sanksi pidana yang dijatuhkan kepada pelaku oleh pengadilan. Oleh karenanya, penerapan keadilan restoratif dalam penyelesaian delik adat secara musyawarah mufakat dalam bentuk perdamaian adat masih menjadi primadona dalam menyelesaikan delik adat. Penyelesaian antara pelaku dan korban secara kekeluargaan ataupun melalui peradilan adat merupakan penyelesaian dengan mencari keadilan hakiki. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan metode sosiologis. yaitu penelitian studi empiris, penelitian yang berorientasi pada aspek hukum dan aspek non hukum yakni mengkaji dan menganalisis bekerjanya hukum dalam masyarakat dengan penerapan restorative justice dalam tindak pidana perzinaan pada Masyarakat Kutai Adat Lawas. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa penyelesaian tindak pidana perzinahan pada Masyarakat Kutai Adat Lawas menerapkan konsep restorative justice, yang model penyelesaiannya ditentukan oleh ketua adat, atau melalui peradilan adat. Keadilan restoratif ini diterapkan dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana perzinahan sebagai upaya untuk memulihkan penderitaan yang dialami korban dan untuk memperbaiki keseimbangan masyarakat. Sanksi bagi pelaku zina bukan sanksi fisik tetapi sanksi berupa pengganti kerugian atau denda yang dikenakan atas perbuatan yang dilakukan. Jika kejadian perselingkuhan terjadi selama 3 (tiga) kali dan yang melakukan orang yang sama maka menggunakan hukum positif yaitu hukum pidana.Kata kunci: adat; perzinahan; restorative justice. ABSTRACTThe awareness of settlement with formal justice mostly does not offer satisfactory towards the victim, often times the victim still holds grudge and does not satisfied with the punishment given to the perperator. Therefore, the settlement of offense consetuede with restorative justice is the pre-eminent choice to solve the problem. The settlement between the perperator and the victim with kinship or customary court is really essential. This research is using sociology methods, that is an empirical study oriented towards legal & non legal aspects which is examine & analyze the work of law within the society with the application of restorative justice in criminal act of adultery in the Society of Kutai Adat Lawas. The result of the the research is to show that settlement of criminact act of adultery in Society of Kutai Adat Lawas apply the restorative justice, that the solving model is determined by the chief of the society, or customary justice. This restorative justice applied to solve the criminal act of adultery in attempt to console the victim and the harmony of the society. The penalty for the adultery perparator is not a physical punishment but with a fine worth of the criminal that has been done. If the same person did an affair 3 times, then the y use the positive punishment which is the criminal law.Keywords: adultery; customary; restorative justice.

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 103-110
Author(s):  
Ahmad Syauf ◽  
◽  
Diana Haiti ◽  
Mursidah Mursidah

Lawsuits submitted by patients or their families to the hospital and / or their doctors can take the form of criminal or civil lawsuits by almost always basing on the theory of negligence. This paper seeks to explore the application of the values of restorative justice in resolving cases of medical malpractice in Indonesia. This research is a qualitative research using normative legal research and uses a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that settlement of medical malpractice cases through a restorative justice approach or which is known in the culture of the Indonesian people as a consensus agreement as contained in the 4th Precepts of Pancasila is one alternative settlement that is to restore conflict to the parties most affected (victims, perpetrators and interests community) and give priority to the interests of all parties. The conclusion showed that the restorative justice emphasizes human rights and the need to recognize the impact of social injustice and in simple ways to restore the parties to their original condition rather than simply giving formal justice actors or legal actors and victims not getting any justice. Hence, restorative justice also strives to restore the security of victims, personal respect, dignity and more importantly is a sense of control so as to avoid feelings of revenge both individual or family or group.


2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 550-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leandi Steenkamp ◽  
Dave Lubbe

Sectional title property plays an important role in addressing the high priority housing problem in South Africa. Very little research has so far been done on the South African sectional title industry from an accounting and auditing perspective. Furthermore, sectional title legislation is often contradictory and confusing. Sectional title owners are also putting pressure on costs, bringing about unique industry challenges. These aspects do, however, provide ample opportunity for research. The aim of this article was to provide an overview of practical problems experienced by accounting and auditing practitioners regarding risks, auditing- and accounting-specific problems relating to sectional title. The literature review covered the main legal aspects relating to accounting and auditing matters of sectional title schemes, paving the way for an empirical study performed on the sectional title industry in South Africa by way of interviewing a sample of key role players in the industry. The empirical results revealed significant contradictory and confusing aspects and uncertainties in the industry. Various problems and concerns were addressed and practical recommendations were made that can be of assistance to owners, trustees, managing agents, accountants and auditing professionals. The findings can also be used as a valuable basis for further research


Author(s):  
Giuseppe Maglione ◽  
Jamie Buchan ◽  
Laura Robertson

AbstractThis article presents the results of the first empirical qualitative research on the provision of restorative justice (RJ) in Scotland, based on interviews with 14 practitioners. In Scotland, RJ has attracted the attention of penal reformers and practitioners since the late 1980s, offering an alternative to criminal justice practices based on retribution and/or rehabilitation whilst promising to reduce reoffending and heal people harmed by crime. In 2017, the Scottish Government has fully recognized the existence of RJ by issuing the first national ‘Guidance’ for the delivery of this process, followed by an ambitious ‘Action Plan’. In spite of such a long-lasting interest and recent policy recognition, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the organization and actual delivery of RJ in Scotland. In fact, research on this subject is scant, anecdotal and dated. This article addresses this knowledge gap by presenting original data on the provision of RJ within Scottish local authorities. The findings show similar understandings of RJ, context-specific organizational models and common systemic challenges characterizing RJ providers, generating evidence to critically assess recent Scottish policy on RJ, whilst drawing implications with relevance for the development of RJ across Europe.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1952
Author(s):  
Desak Putu Rini Larashati Subagia ◽  
I Nyoman Budiana ◽  
Anak Agung Ayu Ngurah Tini Rusmini Gorda

Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta mengkaji penerapan serta pelaksanaan dari konsep keadilan restoratif yang tercantum dalam Perarem Desa Adat Renon Tentang Perlindungan Anak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini yaitu menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa dalam hal penerapan konsep keadilan restoratif melalui Perarem Desa Adat Renon Nomor 001/Par-DPR/VI/2017 tentang Perlindungan Anak khususnya dalam hal penyelesaian perkara anak yang cenderung ringan, di desa adat renon mengutamakan penyelesaian secara damai dan berdasarkan pemulihan keadilan guna memberikan perlindungan terhadap anak agar perkara tersebut tidak masuk ke ranah peradilan formal, serta menghindari anak dari labelisasi dalam masyarakat. Adanya keberlakuan perarem desa adat renon tentang perlindungan anak tersebut menjadi acuan serta memberikan penguatan dalam penyelenggaraan penyelesaian perkara anak berdasarkan konsep keadilan restoratif. Sehingga dalam hal implementasi atau pelaksanaan dari adanya perarem tersebut dapat dikatakan telah efektif diterapkan serta dilaksanakan di Desa Adat Renon. This paper aims to identify and examine the application and implementation of the concept of restorative justice as stated in the Perarem of the Traditional Village of Renon concerning Child Protection. The research method used in this paper is to use empirical legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that in terms of the application of the concept of restorative justice through Perarem Traditional Village Renon Number 001/Par-DPR/VI/2017 concerning Child Protection, especially in terms of resolving cases of children who tend to be mild, in traditional villages Renon prioritizes peaceful and recovery-based solutions in order to provide protection for children so that the case does not enter the realm of formal justice, and prevents children from being labeled in society. The implementation of the Renon traditional village regulations regarding child protection is a reference and provides reinforcement in the implementation of settlement of child cases based on the concept of restorative justice. So that in terms of implementation of the perarem, it can be said that it has been effectively implemented in the traditional village of Renon.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
BAMBANG JOYO SUPENO

<p>Restorative justice is the ultimate goal of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, so that children in conflict with the law must obtain Diversion. Article 7 paragraph (2) and Article 9 paragraph (2) the SPPA Law is<br />discriminatory and unjust, both for perpetrators and victims of criminal acts, because there are restrictions, exceptions and disregard for Diversion provisions. In concretto, in 2014-2018 the use of Diversion (49.61%) was lower than formal justice (50.39%), the data showed that some children who were in conflict with the law did not get Diversion. Based on the analysis of concept the principle of equality before the law in ideal-norm thinking, it is necessary to reconstruct the provisions of Diversion in the SPPA Law, namely (a) The principle of equality before the law must be used as a determining indicator in the formulation and process of Diversion law enforcement. (b) Provisions on child-oriented Diversion as the subject of criminal acts will determine justice in the application of Diversion for every child in conflict with the law. (c) Diversion provisions which are oriented towards acts, sanctions and value of losses as a requirement for the application of Diversion, will cause discrimination in the application of Diversion.</p>


1969 ◽  
pp. 991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Bala

In responding to youth crime, Canada makes disproportionate use of courts and custodial sentences, while other countries divert more youth from the formal justice system and make greater use of community-based responses. This article surveys diversion from the youth courts under the different youth justice regimes that have existed in Canada, including informal and formal screening, police and Crown cautions, and use of youth justice committees and conferencing. The newly enacted Youth Criminal Justice Act is intended to encourage greater use of these diversionary "extrajudicial measures," and more use of a "restorative justice " approach to cases. A major limitation is that these provisions are permissive, and create no new legal rights for youths and impose no new obligations on governments. It will be up to provincial governments to decide whether to allow police, prosecutors and local program operators to actually implement these provisions. Further, depending on how these provisions are implemented, there are legitimate concerns about the potential for these informal responses to abuse the rights of youths or ignore the needs of victims. There should be both monitoring of the implementation of these provisions and research to determine how effective they are at reducing offending, and meeting the needs of victims, offenders and communities.


Author(s):  
Fanie du Toit

This chapter focuses on whether the TRC maintained momentum toward inclusivity and fairness built up during the early 1990s, or if it embodied the first signs of South Africa’s stepping away from these guiding values. I argue that instead of the result of security-sector blackmail, amnesty as a tool of reconciliation went through two distinct phases that showed political dexterity and a measure of increasingly civic inclusivity. I also argue that liberals get it wrong when they accuse Archbishop Tutu of moral overreach that excluded non-Christians. Instead, the archbishop spoke in language familiar and reassuring to the vast majority of victim communities in South Africa. Finally, I argue that the liberal critique is mistaken in criticizing the TRC for its lack of formal justice—that in fact, the TRC embodied a prescient mix of formal and restorative justice—one working in favor of the other.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document