FEATURES OF MODERN CODIFICATION OF CIVIL PROCEDURAL LEGISLATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 237-242
Author(s):  
I.I. GILAZOV
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Objective Necessity

This article is devoted to the modern codification of civil procedural legislation of the Russian Federation. The author substantiated the necessity to intensify work on the determination of unified procedural mechanisms in various types of legal proceedings and the necessity to conceptual unification of legislation. The ultimate goal of unification is the adoption of a single codified normative legal act regulating civil procedural relations. In particular, the study points out the objective necessity, at this stage, of scientifically and practically grounded, deliberate, gradual and progressive actions for the conceptual unification of legislation, the ultimate goal of which is the adoption of a single codified normative legal act regulating civil procedural relations. At the same time, the unity of the legal regulation system will depend primarily on the extent to which all the features of various types of legal proceedings are identified and taken into account. Particular attention should be paid to judicial practice: both courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts.

DIRECTION OF THE CASE ON JURISDICTION: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION AND FEATURES OF PROCEDURAL REGISTRATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-315
Author(s):  
D.Yu. VORONIN
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Appellate Courts ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Universal Approach ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Difference

The paper presents a research of the new legal regulation for such an institute in relation to a regional and equal court, as the referral of a case received in accordance with part 4 of Article 39 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to a court of general jurisdiction, which is in jurisdiction to hear a case as it is assigned by law. The absence of procedural legal regulation of this action, which is, in author’s opinion, has an obvious procedural nature, and researched practice general jurisdiction courts demonstrate the uncertainty in implementation of the considered reform. The author analyzes the new procedural institution on the basis of his own vision of a number of procedural norms, as well as scholar works and historical experience. In particular, the author reasoning that the courts are to issue special rulings on the referral of cases received from arbitration to the courts of general jurisdiction. Moreover, the author considers the mechanism for adopting such a judicial act. The article presents a wide range of practical examples of the implementation of considered provision, as well as the difference in the approaches of the appellate courts to assess these implementation practice. In conclusion, the article presents the proposals for further improvement of the regulation of considered issue. Most likely such an improvement will be impossible without the universal approach established by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Such improvements should result in uniform judicial practice, as well as further developments of procedural legislation.

scholarly journals RATIO OF THE LEGAL AND PROCEDURAL STATUS OF THE HEAD OF INVESTIGATIVE BODY

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-165
Author(s):  
T. Yu. Popova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Legal Proceedings ◽  
The Status ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Sense

Article is devoted to search of author's determination of the criminal procedure status of the head of investigative body. Determination of the status is given in it is general legal sense, types of legal statuses, such as the general (constitutional), special (patrimonial), individual, the status of the foreigner and branch legal statuses are allocated. The discussion about a ratio of legal status and a legal status on the basis of which conclusions the author has divided concepts of legal and procedural status per se is given. Are carried to number of elements of legal status of the head of investigative body: the rights and duties provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and specified departmental standard legal by acts of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation, SK of Russia and FSB of Russia; the criminal liability regulated by the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation and the disciplinary responsibility provided by subordinate regulations for non-execution or inadequate execution of the procedural powers; procedural and administrative accountability of activity of the head of investigative body to the head of higher investigative body. Elements of the criminal procedure status of the designated participant of criminal trial, according to the author, are the rights and duties provided by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation; the accountability of activity of the head of investigative body to the head of higher investigative body regulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation. The author has also mentioned a discussion about existence of criminal procedure responsibility of participants of criminal legal proceedings. In article the maintenance of each of elements of the status and justification of reference of each of them to this or that type of the status is opened. Proceeding from the considered structure, the concept of the criminal procedure status of the head of investigative body as the position of the head of the investigative body including his procedural laws, duties and accountability to the head of higher investigative body regulated only by the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation is formulated.

scholarly journals ON THE RELEVANCE OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROCEDURES IN PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS APPLICABLE UNDER ARTICLES 25, 25.1, 28 PART 1, 28.1 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, AND THEIR CLASSIFICATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1078-1084
Author(s):  
M.N. Tarsheva
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Structural Element ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Procedures

Legal procedures in a state governed by the rule of law are a kind of guarantor of legality and protection of citizens' rights, and therefore issues related to the development and improvement of the procedural mechanism are among the top priorities. The procedural mechanism is the most important structural element of the legal regulation system, which includes entire procedural branches. The article substantiates the need to develop and legislate procedures within which actions can be carried out to reconcile and make amends for harm, compensation for damage or otherwise make amends for harm (since gaps and shortcomings in the legislation associated with the lack of procedural mechanisms do not allow to fully realize the human rights potential of Articles 25, 25.1, 28 Part 1, 28.1 of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation), as well as the need to classify these procedures (which has not been previously carried out). The author proposes to divide such procedures into conciliatory and restorative ones. The author's definitions of conciliation and restorative procedures in pre-trial proceedings are given.

scholarly journals Personal Reception of Citizens: Problems of Legal Regulation and Implementation

Lex Russica ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 71-83
Author(s):  
A. V. Savoskin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Government Agency ◽  
Legislative Regulation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Right ◽  
The Government

Personal reception represents a way of submitting citizens’ complaints and one of the forms of implementation of the constitutional right of citizens to appeal (complain). However, the legislative regulation of the issue under consideration seems insufficient, which has given rise to adverse law enforcement practice.The article determines signs of personal reception that allow us to distinguish it from other types of citizen’s communication with officials. The paper makes a thorough analysis of the duty of officials to conduct personal reception. Two models of performing the reception are highlighted: 1) personal reception is carried out only by chairpersons (of the government agency as a whole, its deputies or heads of structural divisions); 2) personal reception is carried out not only by chairpersons, but also by other authorized officials or specialized units. Moreover, the paper focuses on the problem of delegation of the obligation to perform personal reception to other officials.The paper investigates the procedure of personal reception that includes four stages: registration for personal reception (optional stage); arrival of a citizen at the place and time provided for personal reception, identification and determination of the order of personal reception; personal intercourse with the official, including a statement of the essence of the oral request or submission of a written application; registration of a personal reception card. Special attention is paid to the issue of registration of a personal reception, which allowed to formulate conclusions about the most relevant content of a personal reception card. The procedure of holding the all- Russian day of personal reception and experience of introduction of regional uniform days of personal reception in constituent entitities of the Russian Federation is analyzed.Also, the author scrutinizes the experience of organizing personal receptions in various governmental bodies and authorities in order to generalize additional guarantees of the rights of citizens during personal reception, as well as to develop an approximate list of feasible constrains.

MULTIVARIANT LEGAL STATUS OF A CITIZEN AND ITS ROLE IN DEFINING THE COMPETENCE OF ARBITRATION COURTS

2018 ◽  
pp. 48-60
Author(s):  
Aleksandr Nikolayevich Ermakov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Economic Activity ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Natural Person ◽  
Legal Nature ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Debt Collection

This study is devoted to the question of qualification of the legal status of a citizen in a dispute arising in the field of economic activity, and its impact on the determination of the jurisdiction of the arbitration court. On the example of cases on debt collection from the guarantor-citizen it is noted that the latter can participate in the disputed legal relations as an natural person, as an self-employed entrepreneur or as the founder of a legal body. It is the legal status of a person, as established judicial practice shows, that is the key argument in determining the legal within jurisdiction of the case. It seems that this circumstance in itself cannot determine the nature of the dispute, which previously drew the attention of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation It is important to take into account the specific legal nature of material legal relations, as well as the nature of the interest of its participants. It is concluded that it is necessary to take into account the abovementioned aspects in the aggregate when determining the jurisdiction of arbitration courts of the cases of the analyzed category. In order to ensure the legal certainty and effectiveness of the protection of the rights of persons in the field of business and economic activity, proposed a technical and legal solution to this problem.

scholarly journals Areas of concern in mediation as a way of corporate disputes settlement

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 ◽  
pp. 04016
Author(s):  
Tatiana Stanislavovna Korobeinikova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Scientific Publications ◽  
Research Results ◽  
Methodological Basis ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Areas Of Concern

The purpose of the study involves systemic identification, generalization of the issues of legal regulation of the mediation procedure in corporate disputes settlement based on summarizing judicial practice, scientific research and the regulatory framework. The analysis of judicial practice, statistical data, scientific publications, as well as deduction and synthesis are the methodological basis of the research. The use of these methods made it possible to characterize the mechanism and advantages of using mediation in the settlement of corporate disputes; to identify problems in the application of the mediation procedure; to propose measures for improvement of the legal regulation of mediation, its application in corporate disputes in the Russian Federation. The research results obtained during the analysis of judicial practice and statutory instruments regulating the use of mediation in corporate disputes made it possible for the author to identify a number of problems and possible solutions to them, which are included in the author’s proposals and can be used to improve Russian legislation in terms of corporate disputes settlement using mediation procedures. Moreover, it was substantiated by the author that mediation as a tool for a quick disputes settlement, the preservation of partnership relations after using the mediation procedure will be used more often in the event of a change in Russian legislation. The scientific novelty of the study lies in determining the possibilities of mediation in corporate disputes settlement within the framework of Russian legislation and identification of existing gaps in such regulation.

scholarly journals Sources of Formation of Legal Positions of Russian Highest Judicial Bodies

2021 ◽  
pp. 130-142
Author(s):  
Mariia Viktorovna Globa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Doctrine ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Method ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation

The present study is devoted to determining the place and role of legal positions of higher judicial bodies of Russia (judicial legal positions) in the mechanism of legal regulation. Let us specify in advance that the author means the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation (taking into account the 2014 amendments made to the legislation concerning the liquidation of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation) as the higher judicial bodies of Russia. Establishing the meaning and role of judicial legal positions in the mechanism of legal regulation is carried out by the author of this study through the analysis and demonstration of the main sources of formation of legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the author of this work identifies as sources of formation of judicial legal positions: legal and non-legal. Non-legal sources of formation of legal positions of the highest courts of Russia differ from the legal ones in the fact that initially they do not have material expression, exist in the abstract, however, have no less importance for the process of formation of judicial legal positions. To the legal sources of creating legal positions of the highest judicial bodies of Russia the author includes: formal sources of law, current legal practice, legal doctrine. As non-legal sources of formation of legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation are: the inner conviction of a judge and professional legal consciousness of a judge. The author of this scientific research consistently reveals the importance and role of each source of formation of judicial legal positions. The conducted study of the most significant sources of formation of judicial legal positions allowed to better understand the place of legal positions of higher courts of Russia in the legal system and their role in legal regulation, which is reduced not just to the interpretation of judicial acts, but also to the formation of new legal provisions, which ultimately form a uniform judicial practice. Methodological basis of the study consisted of: analysis, synthesis, comparative-legal method, deduction, induction and other ways of knowledge used in science. Scientific conclusions and proposals contained in this work may serve as a basis for further theoretical study of the problems of judicial legal positions and used in the activities of legislative and law enforcement bodies.

scholarly journals Administrative-Legal Issues of the Movement of Detained Vehicles To a Specialized Parking Lot and Their Storage

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-174
Author(s):  
V. B. Bashurov
Keyword(s):  
Public Relations ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Parking Lots ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Parking Lot ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Selection Of

The subject of the study is the norms of the legislation of the Russian Federation on administrative offenses, which establish the powers of the subjects of the Russian Federation to determine the procedure for moving detained vehicles to a specialized parking lot and storing them. The object of the study is public relations related to the organization of the activities of service providers for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, as well as the selection of these service providers. Within the framework of the article, the Author presents an analysis of federal and regional legislation in terms of the implementation of powers by public legal entities in this area of relations. The problems of the implementation of federal legislation, as well as the main approaches, similarities and differences of the "advanced" legal regulation of the relations under consideration at the level of the subjects of the Russian Federation are noted. The existing legislative models for involving local self-government bodies in the exercise of the authority to organize specialized parking lots for the storage of detained vehicles are analyzed. In the research paper, the Author presents options for determining the performers of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, analyzes the legal grounds for the implementation of each of them, taking into account the existing law enforcement, including judicial practice. For the purpose of unified legal regulation of relations on the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, aimed at implementing measures to ensure the proceedings in the case of an administrative offense in the form of detention of a vehicle, the Author formulated proposals for the legislative consolidation of the federal authorities of the authority to determine the procedure for selecting performers of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles. To ensure equal opportunities for economic entities to carry out activities in the market of services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, the Author proposed, within the framework of the above procedure, to determine the requirements for the performers of these services, as well as the criteria for their competitive selection. At the same time, the paper substantiates the need for mandatory application of the territorial criterion for the selection of performers of these services for the movement and (or) storage of detained vehicles, taking into account not only the boundaries of the relevant municipality, but also the distance of specialized parking lots from socially significant objects.

scholarly journals Administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to the government bodies in the Ural Federal District: the peculiarities of legal regulation

2021 ◽  
pp. 32-46
Author(s):  
Stanislav Vladimirovich Kalashnikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Federal District ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Mechanism

The subject of this this research is the normative legal and legal acts of the government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District (Kurgan, Sverdlovsk, Tyumen, Chelyabinsk regions, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug, Ugra and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug) that regulate the administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to the government bodies in the indicated regions. Special  attention is given to the importance and need for legal regulation of the issues associated with arranging additional guarantees and exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies, particularly on the level of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the aforementioned normative legal act and legal acts, the author reveals the peculiarities of legal regulation of the administrative legal mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District, the limits of norm-setting authorities of the listed regions of the Russian Federation, specificities of securing additional guarantees of the rights of citizens to appeal to government bodies in the corresponding regional laws, approaches towards consolidation of the categorical and conceptual apparatus, determination of parties to legal relations in the area of exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies, the role of normative legal and legal acts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation included into the Ural Federal District within the mechanism of exercising the right of citizens to appeal to government bodies. The conclusion is formulated on the prospect of the approaches of certain constituent entities of the Russian Federation towards legal regulation of the mechanism for exercising the right of citizens to appeal government. The author also makes recommendation for its improvement.

scholarly journals GENOMIC RESEARCH LEGAL REGULATION SYSTEM: EXPERIENCE OF RUSSIA AND THE USA

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-564
Author(s):  
Emil V. Alimov
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Self Regulation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Genomic Research ◽  
Regulation System ◽  
Scientific Institutions ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Russian Federation

This article is devoted to the analysis of the genomic research legal regulation in the Russian Federation and the USA. In the United States, in addition to the legislation great importance is attached to medical and scientific institutions self-regulation, and such information is usually open. It is concluded that in Russia, despite the presence of both state and non-state scientific institutions engaged in genomic research, the mechanism of self-regulation as a whole is fragmented. It is also noted that Russia and the United States have specific legal regulation of these relations, which is reflected in the text of the article. For example, in the United States, unlike Russia, most organizations conducting genomic research, including genomic testing, are non-governmental. Currently, the general trend in the legal regulation of genomic research in Russia and the USA is the active development of normative legal regulation. Moreover, a significant difference in the approaches of these countries is the active role of the US states in the development of regional legal regulation on these issues. Despite the fact that Russia is a federal state, the subjects of the Russian Federation are significantly limited in the genomic research legal regulation possibilities. This is largely due to both legal and political reasons that were given in this article. In the United States, a number of statutes have been adopted at the state level that regulate genomic research in such aspects as health insurance, confidential of personal information, the prohibition of discrimination, screening of newborns, and certain types of clinical and scientific research. It should be noted that the genomic research regulation in the United States is not integrated into a single national consolidated act, which is a feature of this legal system. A comparative legal study of the fundamentals of legal regulation and self-regulation of genomic research in Russia and the USA made it possible to understand the specifics of regulation of these issues in different legal systems. The positive regulatory experience in conducting genomic research in the United States can be used to improve the regulatory framework of the Russian Federation in this area.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document