scholarly journals The Impact of Cognitive Style-based Learning Models on Students' Problem-Solving Abilities

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-306
Author(s):  
Sutrisno Sutrisno ◽  
Dwi Rahayuningsih ◽  
Heni Purwati
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Nonparametric Tests ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Tenth Grade ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Impact

Every student must possess problem-solving abilities. Solving students' problems is varied; several factors influence the difference between cognitive styles and learning models. This study aimed to determine differences in problem-solving abilities based on students' cognitive styles in the Concept Attention (CA) and Group Investigation (GI) learning model. This study was a quantitative study with the tenth-grade students of SMA Negeri 16 Semarang as the 2018/2019 academic year population. The sample was selected using cluster random sampling. The research data had been collected through documentation and tests and then were analyzed using nonparametric tests, specifically the Hildebrand test, since the data were not normally distributed. The results showed that students with Field Independent (FI) cognitive style's problem-solving ability were better than students with Field Dependent (FD) cognitive style, either in general, CA, or GI learning models. The CA learning model produced better problem-solving abilities than the GI learning model, both in general and in terms of the type of students’ cognitive style.

scholarly journals The effect of problem based learning by cognitive style on critical thinking skills and student retention

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Punadji Setyosari ◽  
Cholis Sa’dijah ◽  
Dedi Kuswandi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of learning models to develop student critical thinking skills and retention in mathematics through the application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) models and multimedia assisted Direct Instruction (DI) models for students who have different cognitive styles. This research is quasi-experimental type, using non-equivalent control group design. Subject of this research are students in three different senior high school with two class samples in each school. There are 102 students of control class with Direct Instruction learning model by multimedia and 97 students of experiment class with Problem Based Learning model. The instrument of this research are test and questionnaires. The findings of this research are that there are significant differences in student critical thinking skills and retention between groups of student with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles and also between group of student with Direct Instruction model and Problem Based Learning model. Each learning model has interaction with critical thinking skills but not student retention. This research is useful for educators to develop students critical thinking skills processes with an effective learning model approach especially for senior high school students. The educators can know the interaction of cognitive styles with student retention, the extent to which cognitive styles are able to have an impact on student retention. This research provides knowledge an effective learning model to develop critical thinking skills and retention of student both Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style. Based on cognitive style, Field Independent students have higher retention and critical thinking skills compared to Field Dependent students.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PAKET PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN GAYA KOGNITIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH LINGKUNGAN (Studi Eksperimen pada Jurusan Kimia, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Jakarta)

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68
Author(s):  
Agung Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Environmental Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Environmental Problems ◽  
Integrated Learning ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The objective of the research was aimed at finding out whether there is effect of the environmental education learning package and cognitive style on environmental problem solving skills. This research conducted was exsperiment methode. The target of population is the students at the Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the State University of Jakarta. Then accessible of population is Department of Chemistry and take it by randomly (n=40).The research came five conclusions are follow: the first, as a whole the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in an integrated package of environmental education is high than the monolithic environmental education learning package; the second, the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in field independent style cognitive is not high than the field dependent style cognitive; the third, interaction effect between learning and cognitive styles environmental education package; the fourth, the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on cognitive style of field dependent on an integrated learning package environmental education lower than on learning environmental education monolithic package, and the five, there is the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on field independent cognitive styles in an integrated learning package environmental education is high than on learning environmental education monolithic package.

scholarly journals Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities: The Impact of Search Solve Create Share and Think Pair Share learning models on Logarithmic Lesson

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 159-166
Author(s):  
Syahfitri Purnama ◽  
Muawanah Muawanah ◽  
Tista Maya Surati ◽  
Rika Septianingsih
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Quantitative Study ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
P Value ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Better Than

A learning can run well supported by an appropriate learning model. In this study the Search Solve Create Share (SSCS) and Think Pair Share (TPS) learning models are used. This research is a quantitative study using t test. The purpose of this study is to study whether there are differences between the SSCS learning model and the TPS learning model on students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This research is a quantitative study with a research design. Random Design Group Pretest-Posttest Group. The results of this study obtained a P-value smaller than the significance level. Hypothesis testing from this study provides conclusions about the TPS learning model better than the SSCS learning model in improving students' mathematical problem solving abilities.

scholarly journals Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Capabilities : Impact of Improve and OSBORN Learning Models on Management Education

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Munifah Munifah ◽  
Windi Septiyani ◽  
Indah Tri Rahayu ◽  
Rahmi Ramadhani ◽  
Hasan Said Tortop
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Design Method ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Sample Test ◽  
Problem Solving Process ◽  
The Impact

Objectives The ability to solve problems is to gain knowledge and motivation in the problem solving process of students. The researcher used the IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models to improve problem solving skills. The IMPROVE and OSBORN learning models emphasize the development of optimal mathematical skills and generate new ideas in the process of problem solving. This research is used to see the impact of the IMPROVE learning model and OSBORN learning model which is better in mathematical problem solving abilities. This research uses the Quasy Experimental Design method. Hypothesis testing uses an independent sample test. The conclusion of the study is the mathematical problem solving ability of students who use the IMPROVE learning model is better than the mathematical problem solving abilities of students who use the OSBORN learning model.

scholarly journals PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA MENGGUNAKAN LANGKAH POLYA BERDASARKAN GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD INDEPENDENT DAN FIELD DEPENDENT

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Dewi Kristika Findia Ning Tyas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Planning Step ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Program Technique ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Difference

Based on the experience of the researchers taught the subject of Economic Mathematics many students who have not been able to solve the problem solving. One alternative that can be used to solve the problem is by using Polya steps. When solving a mathematical problem, each student has a different way of thinking. The difference is possible because of differences in student cognitive style. The cognitive styles used in this research are Field Independent cognitive style and Field Dependent cognitive style. The material chosen in this research is the demand function, the Bid Function, the Savings Function and the Taxation Function. This research is a descriptive research with qualitative approach which aims to describe the problem solving ability of student mathematics using Polya steps in terms of cognitive style of FI and FD. Subjects in this research are students of VI semester of Mathematics Education Program. Technique of taking research subject is by purposive sample. The results showed that FI subject understood the problem well. In the planning step, the FI subject can analyze the information received. Subjects use previously learned information and solve problem-solving given to the problem as planned and check back on each question. The subject of FD can not receive information and understand the problems that exist in the problem and can not process information/do not understand the purpose of the problem. In the planning step, the subject of FD is unable to think how to solve the problem and is not accustomed to rechecking

scholarly journals Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies and Cognitive Style: The Impact and Interaction on Students' Mathematical Reasoning Abilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 841-848
Author(s):  
Agus Setiawan Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Collaborative Problem Solving ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Collaborative Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

This study aims at identifying the effect of collaborative problem solving (CPS) learning strategies on students' mathematical reasoning abilities with different cognitive styles, namely field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FD). This study is a quasi-experimental study with a 2x2 factorial design. A total of 103 students of SMPN 3 Mesuji, Indonesia as research subjects. Mathematical reasoning ability data were obtained from essay tests and cognitive style data were obtained from the GEFT test. Data analysis used two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The results of this study are: 1) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who received collaborative problem solving and direct instruction learning strategies, 2) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who had field dependent and field independent cognitive styles, 3) there was no significant interaction between different learning strategies (collaborative problem solving and direct instruction) and cognitive styles (field dependent and field independent) on mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD-DEPENDENT DAN FIELD-INDEPENDENT SEBAGAI JENDELA PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLYA DARI SISWA SMP

Factor M ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Resti Wulan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Pythagoras Theorem ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research is to describe junior high school students’ problem solving profile in the Pythagoras Theorem problem based on the cognitive styles of FI and FD. The subjects of this research consisting of two subjects FI and two subjects FD in VIII H SMP Negeri 2 Lumajang. Instruments used: cognitive style tests (GEFT), Pythagoras Theorem problem solving tests, and interview guideline. Problem-solving indicators that be used is Polya's problem solving steps: understanding the problem, devise a plan, carry out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study is the FI subject is better than the FD subject. The FI subject understand the problem very well, arranging a solution plan well, implementing a plan properly, and looking back well. Different from previous research, subject FI make error even though not any Polya’s step. Nevertheless, The FD subjects are categorized as lacking in the step of understanding the problem, devising a plan with deficient category, implementing the plan without looking back on the solution, so it is categorized as lacking and errors emerged at almost every step. Some errors in problem solving showed by FI and FD subjects, so for further research need to analyses errors and the other cognitive style.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA

JURNAL IQRA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Tyas Kusumaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine: (1) Which has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct instruction, (2) Which has the achievement better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style field dependent (FD), (3) in each cognitive style, which one has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct learning, (4) on each of the learning model, which one has the achievement of better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style of field dependent (FD. This study is a quasi-experimental research. The populations in this study were all students of class VII SMP N 5 Metro 2015/2016 school year. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The balance test performed using one way analysis of variance with different cells before carrying out a study of three groups of population. The data analysis technique used to test the hypothesis is two-way ANOVA with different cell with a 3x2 factorial design. Lilliefors prerequisite test method to test for normality and Bartlett methods for homogeneity. From the analysis concluded: (1) cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps ) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct, (2) students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) had mathematics learning achievement better than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD), (3) the individual cognitive style, cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS ), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct (4) on each model of learning, mathematics achievement of students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) have better mathematics learning achievement than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Keywords: Tapps, TSTS, Direct learning, Learning Achievement, Cognitive Style.

scholarly journals Self-regulated Learning Model Affects Students’ Mathematical Conceptual Understanding and Self-confidence in terms of Cognitive Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
N. P. L. Mahayani ◽  
I. W. Astawa ◽  
I. G. P. Suharta
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Conceptual Understanding ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Self Regulated Learning ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Regulated Learning ◽  
The Impact

The main problem in mathematics learning is to form students’ understanding and self confidence. The aim of this study is to analyze the impact of self-regulated learning model on conceptual understanding and self-confidence in terms of cognitive styles. This study was a quasi-experimental study which applies treatment by level design, where the treatment is learning model for students with different cognitive style level. The samples of the study are 80 students in four classes, who are selected using cluster random sampling technique. Data on conceptual understanding are collected by using conceptual understanding test in the form of essay test. While the data on the students’ self-confidence are collected using questionnaires. The data collected are anayzed using manova. The results of the study indicate that self-regulated learning has positive impact on the students’ conceptual understanding and self-confidence (F = 8,796; p < 0,05). Thus, it could be concluded that learning model and cognitive style give significant impact on the students’ conceptual understanding and self-confidence in terms of cognitive styles.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dan Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Setelah Mengontrol Kemampuan Awal Siswa

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 200
Author(s):  
Bambang Gulyanto ◽  
Harun Sitompul ◽  
Abdul Hasan Saragih
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Learning History ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Quasi Experimental

This study aims to determine the effect of cooperative learning models and cognitive styles on historical learning outcomes after controlling for students' initial abilities. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 1 Kisaran and SMA Negeri 2 Kisaran in Asahan Regency in the even semester of the 2020/2021 academic year. This study used a quasi-experimental method with a 2x2 treatment by level design. The sample of this research was 72 people who were taken by using cluster random sampling technique. The data analysis technique used was covariance analysis (ANAKOVA). The results showed that (1) The results of the history learning of the group of students who were taught with the GI model were higher than the group of students taught with the STAD model after controlling for students' initial abilities; (2) The learning outcomes of students who have a FI cognitive style are higher than students who have FD cognitive styles after controlling for students 'initial abilities, (3) There is an interaction effect between cooperative learning models and cognitive styles on historical learning outcomes after controlling for students' initial abilities, (4) The results of learning history between groups of students taught with the GI learning model were higher than the groups of students taught with the STAD model in students who had FI cognitive styles, (5) The results of learning history between groups of students taught with the STAD learning model were more higher compared to the group of students who were taught with the GI learning model, in students who had FD cognitive style after controlling for students' initial abilities.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document