scholarly journals GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD-DEPENDENT DAN FIELD-INDEPENDENT SEBAGAI JENDELA PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLYA DARI SISWA SMP

Factor M ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Resti Wulan
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Pythagoras Theorem ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research is to describe junior high school students’ problem solving profile in the Pythagoras Theorem problem based on the cognitive styles of FI and FD. The subjects of this research consisting of two subjects FI and two subjects FD in VIII H SMP Negeri 2 Lumajang. Instruments used: cognitive style tests (GEFT), Pythagoras Theorem problem solving tests, and interview guideline. Problem-solving indicators that be used is Polya's problem solving steps: understanding the problem, devise a plan, carry out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study is the FI subject is better than the FD subject. The FI subject understand the problem very well, arranging a solution plan well, implementing a plan properly, and looking back well. Different from previous research, subject FI make error even though not any Polya’s step. Nevertheless, The FD subjects are categorized as lacking in the step of understanding the problem, devising a plan with deficient category, implementing the plan without looking back on the solution, so it is categorized as lacking and errors emerged at almost every step. Some errors in problem solving showed by FI and FD subjects, so for further research need to analyses errors and the other cognitive style.

scholarly journals GAYA KOGNITIF FIELD-DEPENDENT DAN FIELD-INDEPENDENT SEBAGAI JENDELA PROFIL PEMECAHAN MASALAH POLYA DARI SISWA SMP

Factor M ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eka Resti Wulan
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
School Students ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Pythagoras Theorem ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Better Than

The aim of this research is to describe junior high school students’ problem solving profile in the Pythagoras Theorem problem based on the cognitive styles of FI and FD. The subjects of this research consisting of two subjects FI and two subjects FD in VIII H SMP Negeri 2 Lumajang. Instruments used: cognitive style tests (GEFT), Pythagoras Theorem problem solving tests, and interview guideline. Problem-solving indicators that be used is Polya's problem solving steps: understanding the problem, devise a plan, carry out the plan, and looking back. The results of this study is the FI subject is better than the FD subject. The FI subject understand the problem very well, arranging a solution plan well, implementing a plan properly, and looking back well. Different from previous research, subject FI make error even though not any Polya’s step. Nevertheless, The FD subjects are categorized as lacking in the step of understanding the problem, devising a plan with deficient category, implementing the plan without looking back on the solution, so it is categorized as lacking and errors emerged at almost every step. Some errors in problem solving showed by FI and FD subjects, so for further research need to analyses errors and the other cognitive style.

scholarly journals Metaphorical Thinking of Students in Solving Algebraic Problems based on Their Cognitive Styles

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 75-89
Author(s):  
Muthmainnah Muthmainnah ◽  
Marwan Ramli ◽  
M Ikhsan
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Metaphorical Thinking ◽  
Algebraic Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Looking Back ◽  
Banda Aceh

One of thinking concepts which connects real life to mathematics is called metaphorical thinking. Metaphor and modelling are two closely related concepts. Besides, each individual performs different cognitive styles, such as field independent (FI) and field dependent (FD) cognitive styles. This factor possibly leads to different metaphorical thinking in solving algebraic problems. The participants of this qualitative research consist of two students at grade 7 of one of junior high school in Banda Aceh, Indonesia, with FI and FD as their cognitive styles. Based on the findings, it is found that: 1) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FI cognitive style in solving the algebraic problem in the stage of understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back is considered to achieve the target for each criteria of CREATE; 2) Metaphorical thinking of the student with FD cognitive style in solving the problem in the all four stages but could not reveal all criteria mentioned in CREATE. This happens as the student is unable to find the appropriate metaphor to the algebraic problem. Therefore, the student does not need to explain the suitability of the metaphor to the algebraic problem.

scholarly journals PENGARUH PAKET PEMBELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DAN GAYA KOGNITIF TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN MEMECAHKAN MASALAH LINGKUNGAN (Studi Eksperimen pada Jurusan Kimia, FMIPA Universitas Negeri Jakarta)

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-68
Author(s):  
Agung Purwanto
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Environmental Education ◽  
Learning Environment ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Environmental Problems ◽  
Integrated Learning ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The objective of the research was aimed at finding out whether there is effect of the environmental education learning package and cognitive style on environmental problem solving skills. This research conducted was exsperiment methode. The target of population is the students at the Mathematics and Natural Sciences at the State University of Jakarta. Then accessible of population is Department of Chemistry and take it by randomly (n=40).The research came five conclusions are follow: the first, as a whole the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in an integrated package of environmental education is high than the monolithic environmental education learning package; the second, the ability of students problem-solving learning environment in field independent style cognitive is not high than the field dependent style cognitive; the third, interaction effect between learning and cognitive styles environmental education package; the fourth, the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on cognitive style of field dependent on an integrated learning package environmental education lower than on learning environmental education monolithic package, and the five, there is the ability of students to solve environmental problems based on field independent cognitive styles in an integrated learning package environmental education is high than on learning environmental education monolithic package.

Effect of Cognitive Style on Strategies for Comprehension of Prose

1983 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 859-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayo Adejumo
Keyword(s):  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Introductory Course ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Embedded Figures ◽  
Group Embedded Figures Test ◽  
Better Than

The effect of cognitive style on the performance of four groups who used different strategies of study to comprehend prose was investigated. Performance on Group Embedded Figures Test was used to classify subjects into groups by cognitive style. 201 field-dependent and 125 field-independent subjects enrolled in an introductory course in psychology were subjects. Field-independent subjects performed significantly better overall. In particular, field-independent subjects in the control group and the groups given factual and inferential questions as study aids performed better than the field-dependent subjects on the inferential items at posttest. On the factual items at posttest, field-independent subjects performed significantly better only in the group who were given inferential questions as an adjunct. The cognitive styles of the subjects interacted with the strategies of study and seem to affect performance on comprehension of prose at posttest.

scholarly journals Students’ Metacognitive Process in Mathematical Problem Solving Based on Cognitive Style

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-55
Author(s):  
Rina Apriyani ◽  
Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Problem ◽  
Mathematical Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematical Symbol ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Data Library

This study is a qualitative literature review aimed to describe junior high school students’ metacognitive process in mathematical problem solving based on field independent and field dependent cognitive style. The research was done based on these following steps: 1) Data library relevant to variable and in accordance to the data source criteria was collected; 2) the data library was classified according to the grade and the subjects; 3) the data was analyzed. The instruments used in this study were the researchers and interview. The interview was conducted to confirm the classified data. Based e this study, it can be concluded that students using field independent style, competently can employ metacognitive process in planning, monitoring, and evaluating because they can write down the known fact and the question using mathematical symbol, choose the appropriate strategy, and answer the question thoroughly. Students using field dependent style were having difficulties in writing down the known fact and the question using mathematical symbol, choosing an appropriate strategy, and answering the question thoroughly.

CHARACTERISTICS OF SOLUTION OF OPEN ENDED PROBLEMS REVIEWED FROM STUDENT COGNITIVE STYLES

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 48-54
Author(s):  
Rizky Alimuddin
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Research Subject ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Data Validity ◽  
Figure Test ◽  
Draw Conclusion ◽  
Problem Solving Strategy ◽  
Solving Strategy

The study aims at examining the characteristics of open ended problem solving based on student cognitive styles, namely field independent and field dependent. The study was descriptive qualitative started by determining research subject using group embedded figure test (GEFT) to group students based on their cognitive and the result of GEFT, the reasearcher choose 6 subjects from 19 students of drade IX at SMPN 1 Ma�rang consisted of three subjects of field independent and three of field dependent. Afterwards, the researcher gave open ended problem solving test on algebra and geometry mate rials, and conducted interview. Data validity of the study employed triangulation technique. The results of the study reveal tha the steps and strategy of open ended problem solving of field independent subject and field dependent subject: (1) in the steps of open ended problem solving, field independent subjects overall were able to understand the problem, plan the solution, and conduct the plan up to recheck it. One of field independent subject even was able to draw conclusion form one of the problems given which was the algebra 2 problem. In contrast, the field dependent subjects overall had steps of open ended problem solving that only able to understand and recheck it, (2) in problem solving strategy, there was no difference between field independent subjects and field dependent subjects. The field independent subjects used open ended problem solving strategy by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward. Similarly, the field dependent subjects also used open ended problem solving by thinking backward, thinking inductively, and thinking forward

scholarly journals Collaborative Problem-Solving Strategies and Cognitive Style: The Impact and Interaction on Students' Mathematical Reasoning Abilities

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 841-848
Author(s):  
Agus Setiawan Et al.
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Collaborative Problem Solving ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Collaborative Problem ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

This study aims at identifying the effect of collaborative problem solving (CPS) learning strategies on students' mathematical reasoning abilities with different cognitive styles, namely field-dependent (FD) and field-independent (FD). This study is a quasi-experimental study with a 2x2 factorial design. A total of 103 students of SMPN 3 Mesuji, Indonesia as research subjects. Mathematical reasoning ability data were obtained from essay tests and cognitive style data were obtained from the GEFT test. Data analysis used two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The results of this study are: 1) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who received collaborative problem solving and direct instruction learning strategies, 2) there were significant differences in mathematical reasoning abilities between students who had field dependent and field independent cognitive styles, 3) there was no significant interaction between different learning strategies (collaborative problem solving and direct instruction) and cognitive styles (field dependent and field independent) on mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINKING ALOUD PAIRS PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) DAN TWO STAY TWO STRAY (TSTS) DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA

JURNAL IQRA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Tyas Kusumaningtyas
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to determine: (1) Which has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct instruction, (2) Which has the achievement better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style field dependent (FD), (3) in each cognitive style, which one has the mathematics learning achievement better, a model of cooperative Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps), cooperative Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) or direct learning, (4) on each of the learning model, which one has the achievement of better mathematics learning, students who have the cognitive style field independent (FI) or students who have the cognitive style of field dependent (FD. This study is a quasi-experimental research. The populations in this study were all students of class VII SMP N 5 Metro 2015/2016 school year. The sampling technique was conducted by stratified cluster random sampling. The balance test performed using one way analysis of variance with different cells before carrying out a study of three groups of population. The data analysis technique used to test the hypothesis is two-way ANOVA with different cell with a 3x2 factorial design. Lilliefors prerequisite test method to test for normality and Bartlett methods for homogeneity. From the analysis concluded: (1) cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps ) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct, (2) students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) had mathematics learning achievement better than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD), (3) the individual cognitive style, cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS ), cooperative learning model Thinking Aloud Pairs Problem Solving (Tapps) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning direct, cooperative learning model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) generates mathematics learning achievement better than learning Direct (4) on each model of learning, mathematics achievement of students with cognitive style Field Independent (FI) have better mathematics learning achievement than students with cognitive style Field Dependent (FD). Keywords: Tapps, TSTS, Direct learning, Learning Achievement, Cognitive Style.

scholarly journals The effect of problem based learning by cognitive style on critical thinking skills and student retention

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 271
Author(s):  
Syamsul Arifin ◽  
Punadji Setyosari ◽  
Cholis Sa’dijah ◽  
Dedi Kuswandi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Thinking ◽  
Student Retention ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Thinking Skills ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Critical Thinking Skills ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent

The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of learning models to develop student critical thinking skills and retention in mathematics through the application of Problem Based Learning (PBL) models and multimedia assisted Direct Instruction (DI) models for students who have different cognitive styles. This research is quasi-experimental type, using non-equivalent control group design. Subject of this research are students in three different senior high school with two class samples in each school. There are 102 students of control class with Direct Instruction learning model by multimedia and 97 students of experiment class with Problem Based Learning model. The instrument of this research are test and questionnaires. The findings of this research are that there are significant differences in student critical thinking skills and retention between groups of student with Field Dependent (FD) and Field Independent (FI) cognitive styles and also between group of student with Direct Instruction model and Problem Based Learning model. Each learning model has interaction with critical thinking skills but not student retention. This research is useful for educators to develop students critical thinking skills processes with an effective learning model approach especially for senior high school students. The educators can know the interaction of cognitive styles with student retention, the extent to which cognitive styles are able to have an impact on student retention. This research provides knowledge an effective learning model to develop critical thinking skills and retention of student both Field Dependent and Field Independent cognitive style. Based on cognitive style, Field Independent students have higher retention and critical thinking skills compared to Field Dependent students.

scholarly journals Analysis of Mathematics Literation Capability in Cube and Beam Materials on Mts Students Reviewed from Dependent and Independent Field Kognitiffield Style

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
YL Sukestiyarno and Mellawaty .
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Cognitive Style ◽  
Cognitive Styles ◽  
Literacy Skills ◽  
Mathematical Literacy ◽  
Independent Field ◽  
Field Independent ◽  
Field Dependent ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
The Right

This research is a descriptive qualitative research which aims to describe the mathematical literacy skills of the material of cubes and beams of class VIII A students at MTsN 2 Indramayu that it be seen in terms of cognitive styles of dependent fields and independent fields. Data will be whereas to describe the ability of mathematical literacy using observation; interview test; documentation. Data from this study were analyzed using Miles and Huberman (2007) data analysis which consisted of data reduction,datapresentation,andconclusiondrawing.Theresultsofthisstudyindicate that students in the Field Dependent cognitive style use the concept and the steps of the test work are still not appropriate. While students in Field Independent cognitive style use the right concepts and work steps. The advice given is that the teacher should provide balanced proportions in giving individual and group assignments to students (more conical).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document