scholarly journals Penerapan Metode SAW dan Fuzzy Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Beasiswa

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Risa Helilintar ◽  
Wing Wahyu Winarno ◽  
Hanif Al Fatta
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
The Other ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Study Program ◽  
Fuzzy Database ◽  
The University ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Selection Of

Database Model Fuzzy Tahani dan SAW merupakan saatu metode yang dapat digunakan pada proses pengambilan keputusan. Sesuai dengan peraturan pihak Intansi yang memberikan beasiswa unuk memperoleh beasiswa, maka diperlukan kriteria-kriteria untuk menentukan siapa yang akan terpilih untuk menerima beasiswa. Pembagian beasiswa dilakukan untuk membantu penentuan dalam merekomendasikan seseorang yang layak menerima beasiswa maka dibutuhkan sistem pendukung keputusan. Penelitian ini membahas tentang seleksi penerimaan beasiswa dengan metode Fuzzy Database Tahani dan SAW. Penelitian ini dapat membantu KaProdi Teknik Informatika maupun Prodi-Prodi lain di UNP kediri untuk menentukkan penerima beasiswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memadukan metode Fuzzy dan SAW dengan ketentuan dan kriteria yang sudah ditentukan oleh pihak Universitas. Sistem yang akan dibuat harus mampu menentukan perangkingan untuk rekomendasi penerima beasiswa. Penelitian menggunakan metode fuzzy yaitu untuk menentukan nilai input ke SAW sebagai dasar nilai input. Hasil yang didapat pada penelitian ini yaitu berupa rangking dan selanjutnya akan dibuat rekomendasi untuk penerima beasiswa.Database fuzzy Tahani and SAW is the other, a method that can be used in the decision making process. In accordance with the regulation which provides scholarships instance transform and obtaining scholarships, the necessary criteria to determine who will be selected to receive a scholarship. The scholarship division. To assist in the determination of a person recommend the eligible then takes a decision support system. This study discusses the selection of scholarship acceptance by Fuzzy Database Tahani and SAW. This research can help leadership courses Informatics and other study program-UNP Kediri to determine recipients. This research aims to integrate Fuzzy and SAW with the rules and criteria set by the university. The system being designed to be able to determine rankings to recommendation recipients. Research using fuzzy method is to determine the value of the input to the SAW as the basis of input values. The results obtained in this study in the form of ranking and then make a recommendation to the receiving scholarships

scholarly journals DESAIN DSS (DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM) MENGGUNAKAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING UNTUK PENENTUAN PENERIMA BEASISWA DI POLITEKNIK NEGERI SAMARINDA

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Muchamad Zainul Rohman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Multi Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Profile Matching ◽  
To Receive

The scholarship selection process of Politeknik Negeri Samarinda are constraints on the decision-making process. This is because there is no objective method to determine quickly and precisely. To assist in the determination of the set someone worthy scholarship in this study will be design DSS (Decision Support System) with model of Multi-Criteria Decision Making. The method used is the method Profile Matching. Profile Matching methods have been able to select the best alternative from a number of alternatives, in this case meant that alternatives are eligible to receive scholarships based on the criteria specified. Research carried out by finding the weights for each sub-aspect, then carried ranking process that will determine the optimal alternative, the best students will be considered by decisionmakersto get a scholarship. Proses seleksi beasiswa di Politeknik Negeri Samarinda banyak terdapat kendala pada proses pengambilan keputusan. Hal ini dikarenakan belum ada metode objektif yang dapat memutuskan dengan cepat dan tepat. Untuk membantu penentuan dalam menetapkan seseorang yang layak menerima beasiswa maka dalam penelitian ini akan didesainkan DSS (Decision Support System) dengan model Multi Criteria Decision Making. Metode yang digunakan adalah metode Profile Matching. Metode Profile Matching dipilih karena mampu menyeleksi alternatif terbaik dari sejumlah alternatif, dalam hal ini alternatif yang dimaksudkan yaitu yang berhak menerima beasiswa berdasarkan kriteria-kriteria yang ditentukan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan mencari nilai bobot untuk setiap sub aspek, kemudian dilakukan proses perankingan yang akan menentukan alternatif yang optimal, yaitu mahasiswa terbaik yang akan dipertimbangkan oleh pengambil keputusan untuk mendapatkan beasiswa.

SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN PENENTUAN MITRA KERJASAMA PADA HOTEL GRAND SIRAO DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PSI (Preference Selection Index)

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hendri Cahaya Putra
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Index Selection ◽  
Short Supply ◽  
Cooperation Partners ◽  
The Right ◽  
Selection Of

Grand Sirao Hotel is a hotel that stands in the middle of Medan City, located on Jl. Semarang. Grand Sirao Hotel is an attractive hotel in the sector of cooperation in certain fields, but in this hotel it often happens in cooperation with outside companies. One of the problems that often occurs at the Grand Sirao Hotel is the constrained stock of goods needed for guests staying at the hotel, items that are often constrained which are usually in the form of sandals and toiletries that are in short supply. This problem often arises because of the many other factors between companies related to hotel owners themselves, debates that often arise from hotel owner claims include quality of goods that are sometimes incompatible with reservations and need to be taken into account, inventory can be exhausted, prices always go up because of skyrocketing market prices and other problems. This collaboration problem arises due to lack of success in determining partnerships with related companies that are not appropriate and in company selection is also still manual and there are appropriate systems and criteria. Therefore a decision support system is needed in the selection of partners upon the proposed approval. One solution to this problem that is right is to make a decision system in the decision of the company's business partners so that the determination of cooperation in accordance with the right requirements. By using a Decision Support System (SPK) is expected to help the company in making decisions made by the right company partners in increasing the efficiency of the decision. PSI (Index Selection Preference Method) is a method for solving multi-decision making (MCDM) decisions. In the proposed method it is not necessary to submit among the attributes. There are no attributes required in computing that are involved in decision making. It is hoped that by using the PSI (Index Selection Preference) Method, it is necessary to establish a decision support system which can assist in the selection of corporate cooperation partners at the Grand Sirao Hotel.Keywords: Determination of Cooperation Partners, Decision Support System, PSI (Index Selection Preference)

scholarly journals Determination Of Lecturer Reception Using Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Hafizah Hanim ◽  
Jefril Rahmadoni
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Hierarchical Structure ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Structure Calculation ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Extra Time ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of ◽  
Process Method

During this time, the selection of non permanent lecturers, parts staffing difficulties in selecting lecturers. The obstacle faced is the large number of applicants who register to become prospective lecturers. So that the staffing or the campus must give extra time to choose prospective lecturers so that lecturers can be obtained that fit the desired criteria. The AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) method is a method in the decision-making process, this method performs a hierarchical structure calculation where the top level in the hierarchy is the goal to be achieved then the hierarchy below in the form of criteria in achieving goals and the lowest level is the alternatives in achieving goals.

scholarly journals Penerapan Metode Composite Performance Index (CPI) Dalam Penerima Bantuan Kelompok Usaha Bersama (KUBE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 255
Author(s):  
Zainab Sipahutar ◽  
Berto Nadeak ◽  
Putri Ramadhani
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Support System ◽  
Social Service ◽  
Performance Index ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Careful Selection ◽  
Social Communities ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Poor Communities

A joint business group is a group of citizens or a group of social communities formed from families classified as poor communities through a social welfare program, abbreviated as prokesos, which is useful for carrying out business to increase the income of a group of underprivileged residents. In the decision-making process, errors and inaccuracies in the distribution of aid to the community, for example, people who do not deserve assistance but who receive assistance are inversely proportional to poor communities who do not receive assistance. This problem arises because of the lack of careful selection and miscalculation in determining which people are entitled to receive assistance. For this reason, it is necessary to have a decision support system in producing decisions so that it can support the decisions made by the Province of Social Affairs more real. In this study, one of the Composite Performance Index (CPI) methods is used which is expected to be able to assist the Provincial Social Service in determining the appropriate kube in receiving assistance.

scholarly journals Selection of an Optimal Supplier

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 531-539
Author(s):  
Predrag Ćosić ◽  
Zdenka Keran ◽  
Vedran Kokot
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Multiple Criteria Decision Making ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Primary Process ◽  
Consistency Checking ◽  
Ahp Method ◽  
Expert Choice ◽  
Selection Of

The paper describes the selection of an optimal supplier from China based on three obtained bids to produce 120,000 forged pieces, which is the primary process for shaft production. The choice was made using the AHP method based on the Expert Choice software program and Multiple-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM). The key information when choosing the optimal supplier of large number of forgings is to define the objective of the task, decision tree with weighted criteria and sub-criteria, consistency checking and possible reconsideration using brain storming when defining the strength of criteria/sub-criteria. To some extent, this may reduce initial subjectivity in the decision-making process in the Decision Support System.

scholarly journals Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) Methods in Selection of Young Lecturers with Achievements

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
M Mesran ◽  
Nelly Khairani Daulay
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support System ◽  
Support System ◽  
Assessment Criteria ◽  
Product Assessment ◽  
Simple Additive Weighting ◽  
The University ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Selection Of

Lecturers are resources owned by the University. One of the efforts to improve the quality of lecturers is by giving appreciation in the form of rewards or awards to the best lecturers or lecturers who excel. However, to be able to provide these rewards, of course there are several assessments that will be given to lecturers. The problem is how to give the assessment so that the lecturer is declared worthy to receive a reward or award. There is a decision support system or abbreviated as DSS where in the system there are several methods that can be used to provide an assessment of course with the determined assessment criteria. In this research, the method used is the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) and Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) with several criteria into consideration. The results showed that alternative A3 and A2 were selected as outstanding young lecturers.

scholarly journals Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Penerima Beasiswa pada SMK Madyatama dengan Metode TOPSIS

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ani Sunalia ◽  
Leon Andretti Abdillah
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Topsis Method ◽  
Scholarship Recipients ◽  
Decision Making System ◽  
The Right ◽  
Computerized System ◽  
Selection Of

Data processing in the determination of scholarships in SMK Madyatama to date still use a system that is still manual. Where the absence of a well-computerized system in determining the acceptance of scholarship which then led to the emergence of some problems in this manual system. The problem that often arises is not exactly the distribution of scholarships to students. Problems like this are triggered by the lack of scrutiny of the scholarship selectors in conducting the selection process of the scholarship recipients, which is basically the selection process conducted by teachers from the school itself. The decision-making system at SMK Madyatama will be made using TOPSIS method to determine the right scholarship recipient in accordance with the scholarship recipient criteria. With the decision support system of awarding scholarship recipients at SMK Madyatama Palembang based on this website can help and facilitate the school in evaluating the selection of scholarship receipt.

scholarly journals Implementation of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process on notebook selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2.27) ◽  
pp. 238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Satria Abadi ◽  
Miftachul Huda ◽  
Bushrah Basiron ◽  
Siti Suhaila Ihwani ◽  
Kamarul Azmi Jasmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Business Communication ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ◽  
Distinctive Features ◽  
Alternative Choice ◽  
Hierarchy Process ◽  
Selection Of

Notebooks are technological devices widely adopted to assist in human daily life including learning, business, communication and other tasks. Equipped with the distinctive features, notebook was facilitated more simply for one touch screen basis to enable freely in exploring the users’ creativity. This study attempts to examine the process of selecting notebook brand among the consumers. Using AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) to help decision support system in the selection of Notebook from decision support systems designed to enhance all decision-process through identifying problems, selecting relevant data and defining the approaches was used to evaluate the selection of alternatives in the decision-making process. The finding reveals that the visibility of decision making into the ranking of priority with alternative choice of notebook can be viewed as follows Zyrex 16%, HP 15%, Asus 14%, Apple 13%, Samsung and Axioo 11%, Acer and Toshiba with priority 10 %. 

scholarly journals SISTEM INFORMASI PENILAIAN KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA KANTOR KECAMATAN SUKODADI DI KABUPATEN LAMONGAN DENGAN METODE AHP DAN BOOTSTRAP

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 12
Author(s):  
Sundiya Eryfa Diana ◽  
M Hasan Wahyudi ◽  
M Ghofar Rohman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Decision Support Systems ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Employee Performance ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Systematic Data ◽  
Manual Calculation

So far, the employee performance assessment at the office of sukodadi sud district in lamongan regency is conducted by the appraisal officer in coordination with the Head Office. Previously was done manual calculation without using a system. The calculation carried out in the form of determination of eligibility fulfillment of promotion of employee. Decision support systems can assist in determining assessments of employee work for the purpose of regular promotion by using a method. The existence method can be used in decision support systems such as Analytical Hierarchi Process (AHP). Systematic and appropriate in the decision-making process that is able to show the value of the competence of employees in accordance with the criteria established by the Office or decision makers based on systematic data analysis for the purpose of promotion of regular.

scholarly journals PENGGUNAAN METODE PROFILE MATCHING UNTUK PEMILIHAN EOSH CAPTAIN TERBAIK PADA PT.COCA-COLA INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-240
Author(s):  
Riduan Syaiful Mashyur ◽  
Frieyadie Frieyadie
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Occupational Safety ◽  
Assessment Process ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Matching Method ◽  
Profile Matching ◽  
Subjective Factor ◽  
Safety Officer ◽  
Selection Of

Environment, Occupational, Safety and Health (EOSH) Captain is an activity created by the Safety Officer at PT. Coca-Cola Indonesia. To determine the best EOSH Captain for the first time and is still influenced by the Subjective factor in assessing the prospective EOSH Captain, the safety officer is sometimes difficult to determine the best EOSH Captain, due to the lack of criteria so that the inaccuracy of assessment results in errors in determining the selection of EOSH Captain, constraints Another factor is the search for supporting data for the EOSH captain selection criteria is hampered, because the safety officer must focus on the job desk of his work, resulting in the length of the decision-making process. In this study, to overcome the above constraints, a method called the Profile Matching method is used. This Profile Matching method can process and compare the actual data value of a profile to be assessed with the expected profile value so that competency differences can be known. The purpose of this research is to accelerate the decision-making process. The assessment process will be more accurate, resulting in the determination of the selection of EOSH to be more precise and correct. The assessment process will be more accurate, resulting in the determination of the selection of EOSH to be more precise and correct. The results of calculations using the Profile Matching method above have obtained the greatest value and become the best EOSH captain is employee 17.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document