scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN ROLE PLAY DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPS KELAS IV SD MUHAMMADIYAH 31 HELVETIA KOTA MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Junaidi Amin Sitepu ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Role Play ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untu mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode pemelajaran role play dan hasil belajar siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan menggunakan metode ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dengan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar IPS. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan rancangan faktorial 2 X 3. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis varians (ANAVA) dua jalur dengan taraf signifikansi 5 % (α = 0.05).. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran role play lebih tinggi dari hasil belajar IPS siswa yang dibelajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditori, dan gaya belajar kinesteti; (3) terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar  dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar IPS. Kata Kunci: role play dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar ips Abstract: This study aims untu determine: (1) the results of social studies students that learned by using learning role play and learning outcomes of students that learned by using the expository method, (2) the learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, learning style auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles, (3) the interaction between the learning method with learning styles in influencing learning outcomes IPS. The research method using quasi-experimental method with factorial design 2 X 3. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) two lanes with a significance level of 5% (α = 0,05) .. The results showed: (1) the results of social studies students that learned with learning methods play a higher role than the results of social studies students that learned with expository teaching methods; (2) there are differences in learning outcomes between students who have a visual learning style, auditory learning styles and learning styles kinesteti; (3) There is no interaction between teaching methods and learning styles to improve learning outcomes IPS. Keywords: role play and learning style on learning outcomes ips

scholarly journals Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR HADITS SISWA KELAS VII MTS. PESANTREN AR-RAUDHATUL HASANAH MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kairul Anwar ◽  
Harun Sitompul
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Education Outcomes ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah hasil belajar siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dari siswa yang diajarkan dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dari siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam memberikan pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar Hadits. Metode penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan : (1) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching lebih tinggi dibandingkan siswa yang diajar dengan metode pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar Hadits siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik, dan (3) Terdapat interaksi antara metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar Hadits siswa. Siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual memiliki hasil belajar lebih tinggi jika dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik yang di ajar dengan metode pembelajaran hypnoteaching. Kata Kunci: metode pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar hadits Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the learning outcomes of students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style higher than students who have a kinesthetic learning style, and interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in giving effect to the learning outcomes Hadith. The research method using a quasi-experimental design with a 2x2 factorial study. Data were analyzed using ANOVA two lanes on the significant level α = 0.05. The findings show: (1) the learning outcomes Hadith students who are taught by the teaching methods hypnoteaching higher than students taught with methods expository, (2) learning outcomes Hadith students who have a visual learning style more than in the learning outcomes Hadith students who have kinesthetic learning style, and (3) There is an interaction between teaching methods and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes Hadith. Students who have a visual learning style education outcomes are higher when compared with students who have a learning style that kinesthetic learning methods in teaching with hypnoteaching. Keywords: teaching methods and learning styles on learning outcomes hadith

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MENGGAMBAR TEKNIK

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Novidawaty Tambunan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Map Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Drawing Technique

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada strategi pembelajaran ekspositori; (2) hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1 siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual; (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Menggambar teknik 1. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran, gaya belajar, menggambar teknik Abstract: This study aims to determine: (1) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students taught with Mind Map learning strategies and expository learning strategies, (2) Differences in learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 between students who have visual learning styles with kinestetik, (3) interaction between learning strategy and learning style to learning result Drawing technique 1. Method research using quasi experimental method with 2 x factorial research designs 2. Data analysis technique using two-way ANOVA at significance level α = 0,05. The results showed that: (1) learning result Drawing technique 1 students taught by Mind Map learning strategy, higher than expository learning strategy; (2) learning outcomes Drawing techniques 1 students who have a higher learning style Kinesthetic than Visual learning style; (3) there is an interaction between learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Drawing technique 1. Keywords: learning strategy, learning style, drawing technique

scholarly journals The Effects of Visual and Auditory Learning Styles on Students’ Learning Outcomes in Historical Social Studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 72-76
Author(s):  
Zulhamdi Hasian Harahap ◽  
Sugiharto . ◽  
Syarifah .
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Multiple Choice Tests ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Choice Tests ◽  
Data Collection Technique

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of visual and auditory learning styles on students’ learning outcomes in historical social studies. The samples were the students of classes VII-2 and VII-3 respectively in MTs. Negeri Binanga. The data collection technique was the learning outcome tests. The instrument for collecting data on students’ learning outcomes was in the form of 30 multiple choice tests, and the learning styles consisted of 30 statements. The data analysis technique applied a Two-Way ANOVA with 2 x 2 factorial. The results showed that the students’ visual and auditory learning styles had the significant effects on students’ learning outcomes, where the groups of students who performed a visual learning style (=75.93) was significantly higher than those who performed an auditory learning style (= 52.90) on students’ learning outcomes in historical social studies. Keywords: Auditory, Visual, Learning Styles, Learning Outcomes

scholarly journals PENGARUH STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR GAMBAR TEKNIK MESIN SISWA SMK DI MEDAN

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Mursid
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mechanical Engineering ◽  
Engineering Students ◽  
Learning Strategy ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstrak: Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map dan ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dengan kinestetik, (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas X Program keahlian teknik mesin SMK Negeri 2 dan SMK Negeri 5 Medan. Metode penelitian yang menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, lebih tinggi dari pada ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar Kinestetik lebih tinggi daripada gaya belajar Visual, (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar kinestetik lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran Mind Map, sedangkan hasil belajar Gambar teknik mesin siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi bila diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori. Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran mind map dan ekspositori, gaya belajar, gambar teknik mesin Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who are taught by learning strategies Mind Map and expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering among students who have a visual learning style with kinesthetic, (3 ) interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. The population of this research is all class X students of mechanical engineering expertise program SMK Negeri 2 and SMK Negeri 5 Medan. The research method using quasi-experimental research design 2 x 2 factorial ANOVA Analysis using two lanes at significance level α = 0.05. The findings show that: (1) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who are taught by learning strategy Mind Map, higher than in the expository, (2) the results of studying images of mechanical engineering students who have learning style Kinesthetic higher than learning styles Visual, (3) there is no interaction between the learning strategies and learning styles on learning outcomes Figure engineering. Further test calculations with Scheffe test showed learning outcomes Figure engineering students who have a kinesthetic learning style higher when taught by Mind Map instructional strategies, while learning outcomes Picture mechanical engineering students who have a visual learning style higher when taught by expository strategy. Keywords: learning strategies mind map and expository, learning styles, mechanical engineering drawings

scholarly journals Pengaruh Gaya Belajar dan Sikap Siswa pada Pelajaran Matematika terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leny Hartati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Cognitive Learning ◽  
Negative Attitude ◽  
Math Learning ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Learning Mathematics

<p>This study aims to determine the effect of learning styles and attitudes of <br />students in math on math learning outcomes. The method used is the method Expose Facto. The study sample drawn from a population with affordable proportional random technique, as many as 60 students. The instrument used in this study is a questionnaire instrument to measure learning style variables and variable attitudes of students in math, and test instruments, to measure the outcomes of learning mathematics. The research design used in this study is a 3 x 2 factorial design with three variables consisting of two independent variables, namely cognitive learning styles and attitudes of students in math, as well as the dependent variable, which is the result of learning mathematics. From the <br />data processing obtained the following results: (1) There are differences in mathematics learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style, auditory and kinesthetic. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 2,494 with a probability of 0.047 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level ? = 5 %. (2) The results of the mathematical learning of students who have a positive attitude at a higher math than students who have a negative attitude on math. It is in the show by the price of the F - count of 3,124 with a probability <br />of 0.018 sig (sig &lt; 0.05) at significance level. (3) There is no interaction between the learning styles of students in math attitudes toward math learning outcomes. It is in the show by the price of the F - calculated interaction probability value was 1.621 while sig. for interaction (learning styles * attitude of students in math) of 0.140 (sig &gt; 0.05). </p>

scholarly journals The effect of CTL learning model and learning style on the historical learning outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
School Year

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.

scholarly journals ANALISIS MOTIVASI DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI KELAS IV SDS AMALIA MEDAN

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tri Astari
Keyword(s):  
Data Analysis ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
High Motivation ◽  
Motivation And Learning ◽  
Very High

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Guru dan Sosial (JIPGUSOS) STKIP Citra Bangsa Aceh Utara Volume 1, No. 1, Maret 2018. This study aims to analyze the motivation and learning styles to the results of learning the mathematics of IV students SDS Amalia Medan. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive. The population and sample of this research are 23 students of class IV. Data analysis comes from observation, observation, and questionnaire. The result of motivation analysis obtained very high motivation percentage 13,04% (3 person), high 56,52% (13 persons), low 21,74% (5 person), and very low 8,70% (2 person). Many students completed KKM with very high motivation as much as 2 people, high as many as 13 people, and low as much as 1 person. The result of learning style analysis was 15 students (65,22%) with visual learning style, 5 students (21,74%) had an auditory learning style, and 3 students (13,04%) with kinesthetic learning style. Many students who complete the learning outcomes (beyond the limit of KKM 70) by using semester exam questions as the test is 12 visual persons (52.17%), 3 auditory (13.04%) and 1 kinesthetic (4.35%). Based on the results of data analysis, the motivation and learning style influence the learning outcomes of mathematics.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Media Peta Sejarah Interaktif dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMP di Kota Bekasi

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Arinarita Peni Andaryati
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Interactive Media ◽  
Historical Maps ◽  
Validity And Reliability ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
History Learning ◽  
Media Learning

The aim of this research is to determining the influence of media learning interactive historical map and learning style to the result of history learning through IPS subject in class IX. The method used in this research is the experimental method, a 2X2 treatment design by level. The validity and reliability are tested by Pearson Product Moment and Alpha Cronbach. The results of this research are (1) the results of historical learning outcomes students using interactive historical maps and have higher visual learning style of students who use historical maps interactive media and have auditory learning style. (2) the results of historical learing outcomes students who have higher auditory learning styles of students who have a visual learning style on instruction using conventional media, (3) There is an interaction effect the use of interactive historical maps on historical learning outcomes.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jumardi Jumardi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Teaching Methods ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Learning Outcome ◽  
Teaching Approach ◽  
Learning Approach ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Conventional Teaching ◽  
History Learning

Abstract The aim of the study is to reveal the empirical data about the effect of learning approach and and learning styles on the outcome of history learning of SMA Negeri 35 Jakarta The methodology used is the experimental method with a 2x2 factorial design.. Data analysis performed by using two way variance analysis. The findings of the study demonstrated: 1) The history learning outcome of the students who take the teaching methods CTL was higher than students who take conventional teaching methods . 2) The history learning outcome between students who have a visual learning style was higher than students who have auditory learning style. 3) There is an interaction effect between learning approach and learning style of the history learning outcome. 4) The history learning outcome of the students who take the teaching approach of CTL and have a visual learning style higher than students who take conventional teaching approach and have a visual learning style . 5) The history learning outcome of the students who take the teaching approach of CTL and auditory learning style is lower than students who take conventional teaching approach and have auditory learning styles. 6) The history learning outcome of the students who take the teaching approach of CTL and have a visual learning style was higher than students who take the teaching approach of CTL and have auditory learning styles. 7) The history learning outcome of the students who take conventional teaching approach and have a visual learning style is lower than students who take conventional teaching approach and have auditory learning styles Keywords : Learning approach, learning style and history learning outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document