scholarly journals The effect of CTL learning model and learning style on the historical learning outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inda Syahra ◽  
Sarkadi Sarkadi ◽  
Nurzengky Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
School Year

This study aims to obtain the influence of learning models and learning styles on historical learning outcomes. Students are given a CTL and conventional learning model by measuring visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. This type of research is a quantitative study using an experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial design. The population is all students of class X 2019/2020 school year. The sampling technique used is multistage random sampling. Class X-A as an experimental class and grade X-B  as a control class with a total of 70 students construct validity is analyzed by the correlation between items using Product Moment Correlation, and Cronbach's alpha formula tested reliability. The results showed that learning outcomes with the CTL learning model were higher than conventional learning models. While student learning outcomes using visual learning styles are more effective than auditory learning styles. There is a relationship between learning models with learning styles.

scholarly journals The Effect of Value Clarification Technique Learning Models and Learning Styles on the Achievement Learning Outcomes of Class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong, Labura District

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1371-1377
Author(s):  
Siti Halimah ◽  
Zulfahmi Lubis ◽  
Saidatun Nisa Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Average Value ◽  
Class Viii

The purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the influence of the value clarification technique (VCT) learning model on student learning result. (2) Knowing the influence of learning styles on student learning result. (3) Knowing the interaction between learning models and learning styles on student learning result.   The population of this study were students of class VIII MTs Al-Hasanah Tanjung Leidong Labuhan Batu Utara consisting of three classes. The sample chosen for the class with the VCT learning model was class VIII-3 with 30 students, while students who were taught using the expository model were 32 students. The cluster random sampling technique is influenced by analysis of variance at a significant level (α = 0.05) followed by Scheffe. The results of this study are: (1) the average value of students taught with the VCT learning model (= 33.6) is higher than students taught with the expository learning model (= 24.68) with Fcount 0.0023 < Ftable 3,988. (2) The average value of learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with visual learning styles (= 27.5), auditory (= 29.56) and kinesthetic (= 28.26) with Fcount = 0.068 < Ftable = 3,988. (3) There is an interaction between learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes Akidah Akhlak with Fcount 28.96 < Ftable 3,988. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that students with visual and auditory characteristics, the appropriate learning model is the VCT, while students with the kinesthetic learning style are expository. The implication is that teachers must be trained in how to understand student learning styles. Thus it is suggested that in planning the learning process the characteristics of students must be considered.

scholarly journals Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran STAD Berbantuan Geogebra pada Materi Similaritas Ditinjau dari Gaya Belajar

2017 ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Wawan Wawan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Learning Achievement ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Achievement In Mathematics

The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of Learning model of STAD geogebra viewed from learning style. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 × 3. The population was entirely the students 4thof Mathematics Education Program Ma’arif Institute of Metro Lampung in Academic Year 2015/2016. The samples of the research were taken by using the cluster random sampling technique. The size of the sample was 50 students consisted of 26 students in the first experimental class and 24 students in the control class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in mathematics and student learning styles questionnaire. The data was analyzed by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusionsof thisresearchwere as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of STAD Geogebra type resulted in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the Powerpoint-assisted direct learning model. (2) Students with visual learning style have the same achievement with students with auditory learning styles. Students with auditory learning style have the same achievement with students with kinesthetic learning styles. Students with visual learning styles have a better academic achievement than students with kinesthetic learning styles. (3) Difference in achievement of each learning method was not consistent with their respective learning styles and differences between individual learning style also was not consistent in each learning method Keywords: geogebra, power point, STAD

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF DAN GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 146
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi daripada kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan pragmatis. (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi 180 orang, dengan cluster random sampling berjumlah 80 orang yang terdiri dari 40 orang kelas A dan B. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen, desain faktorial 2 x 2. Uji statistik dengan statistik deskriptif, dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Sebelumnya dilakukan uji persyaratan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa. Hipotesis ini menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tepat dari pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa, dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis akan memperoleh hasil yang lebih baik dari pada mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis pembelajaran yang tepat digunakan adalah strategi pembelajaran Direct Instructional.            Kata Kunci: pengantar bisnis, kooperatif tipe TST, NHT, gaya belajar Abstract: The purpose of this study is to find out: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than that of the NHT cooperative type. (2) introductory student learning outcomes that have theoretical and pragmatic learning styles. (3) the interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. The research was conducted at Methodist University in Indonesia. A population of 180 people, with a cluster random sampling of 80 people consisting of 40 people class A and B. Quasi-experimental research methods, factorial design 2 x 2. Statistical tests with descriptive statistics, followed by inferential statistics two-way ANOVA with a significant level α = 0.05 continued with the Scheffe test. Previously performed requirements testing. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning of students taught with the cooperative learning model of the TSTS type were higher than that of the NHT type of cooperative; (2) the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have higher theoretical learning styles than pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. This hypothesis shows that the TSTS type of cooperative learning model is more appropriate than the NHT type of cooperative learning model in improving student business introductory learning outcomes, and students who have a theoretical learning style will get better results than students who have appropriate pragmatic learning styles of learning used is the Direct Instructional learning strategy. Keywords: business introduction, cooperative TST type, NHT, learning style

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN INQUIRI DENGAN MASYARAKAT BELAJAR DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR MATEMATIKA

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Marianto Pardosi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Communities ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Inquiry Learning ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika antara siswa yang diajar dengan model  pembelajaran inkuiri dan yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) Perbedaan hasil belajar matematika  antara siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial, (3) interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas VI Sekolah Dasar Negeri 118299 Aek Raso, Teknik penarikan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2 x 2. Teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikan α = 0,05. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajarn inkuiri lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran masyarakat belajar, (2) hasil belajar matematika siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar visual lebih tinggi daripada hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki gaya belajar auditorial, (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dan gaya belajar terhadap hasil belajar matematika. Perhitungan uji lanjut dengan uji Scheffe menunjukkan perbedaan yang signifikan pada hasil belajar matematika antara model pembelajaran inkuiri dan masyarakat belajar, begitu pula anatara gaya belajar visual dan gaya belajar auditorial. Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran, inquiri, masyarakat belajar, gaya belajar visual, gaya belajar auditorial, matematika Abstract: This study aims to find out: (1) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students taught with inquiry learning models and those taught with learning communities learning models, (2) Differences in mathematics learning outcomes between students who have visual learning styles and auditory learning styles , (3) the interaction between learning models and learning styles on learning outcomes in mathematics. The population of this research is all students of grade VI of State Elementary School 118299 Aek Raso, withdrawal technique with cluster random sampling. The research method uses a quasi-experimental method with a 2 x 2 factorial research design. Data analysis technique uses two-way ANOVA at a significant level α = 0.05. The research findings show that: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught with inquiry learning models are higher than the learning outcomes of students taught with learning models of learning communities, (2) the results of learning mathematics students who have higher visual learning styles than student learning outcomes which has an auditory learning style, (3) there is an interaction between the learning model and learning style on learning outcomes in mathematics. Further test calculations with the Scheffe test show significant differences in mathematics learning outcomes between inquiry learning models and learning communities, as well as between visual learning styles and auditory learning styles. Keywords: learning model, inquiry, learning society, visual learning style, auditory learning style, mathematics

scholarly journals The Effect of Learning Models and Learning Styles on Social Science Learning Outcomes of Arrahman Percut Students

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 2076-2083
Author(s):  
Lili Nur Indah Sari ◽  
Abdul Muin Sibuea ◽  
Samsidar Tanjung
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Problem Based Learning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
The Social

This study aims (1) to determine the differences in social studies learning outcomes taught by the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model which is higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model. (2) To find out the differences in social studies learning outcomes of students who have a higher visual learning style than the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style. (3) To determine the interaction between learning models and student learning styles in influencing the social studies learning outcomes of private students, Ar Rahman Percut. The population of this study was 122 students of class VII-A and VII-B of Ar Rahman Percut Private Middle School. Samples were taken by cluster rondom sampling. The sample used in this study was 63 students. The selected sample is classVII-A and class VII-B. The instrument used was a multiple choice test, amounting to 30 items and a learning style questionnaire. The data were analyzed at the significant level = 0.05, followed by the Scheffe further test after the normality and homogeneity tests. The results showed that, (1) There are differences in social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes with the Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS) learning model are higher than the social studies learning outcomes with the Problem Based Learning model with Fcount 8,70> Ftable 4.00, (2) There are differences in student social studies learning outcomes, where the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a visual learning style from the social studies learning outcomes of students who have a kinesthetic learning style with Fcount 5.01> Ftable 4.00, (3) There is an interaction between the learning model and the learning style of the students' social studies learning outcomes Fcount 5.20> Ftable 4.00

scholarly journals Penerapan pembelajaran matematika realistik pada mata kuliah matematika II ditinjau dari gaya belajar mahasiswa Teknik Sipil

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 84
Author(s):  
Bq. Malikah Hr ◽  
Sukandi Sukandi ◽  
Ni Putu Ety Lismaya Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Student Learning ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Student Learning Outcomes ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Kinesthetic Learning ◽  
Realistic Mathematics

The research aims to know the effect of realistic mathematics learning in mathematics-II courses seen from the learning styles of Civil Engineering students. This type of research uses a quasi-experimental with a 2 x 3 factorial design. The sample consists of 30 second-semester students of Civil Engineering of Mandalika university of Education. The instruments in the research were a learning style questionnaire and an essay test that contained questions for mathematics II courses. The test of data analysis using two-way analysis of variance. The results showed that the learning method and learning style had a significant effect on student learning outcomes in mathematics II courses. The influence of learning methods was 26.8% and the influence of student learning styles was 37.8%. Based on the marginal average, the average of students with realistic mathematics learning methods was 70.73 and the average of students with conventional methods was 65.93. In a class that was treated with realistic mathematics learning, the average of students with visual learning styles was 75.80, the average of students with auditory learning styles was 70.80 and the average of students with kinesthetic learning styles was 65.60. It was concluded that in mathematics II courses, the application of realistic mathematics learning was effective in improving student learning outcomes and students with visual learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with auditory and kinesthetic learning styles and students auditory learning styles had better learning outcomes than students with kinesthetic learning styles.

The Effect of Instructional Approaches and Learning Styles on Students’ Achievement of Grammar

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rista Damesari Saragih ◽  
Lince Sihombing ◽  
Eddi Setia
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cluster Sampling ◽  
Instructional Approaches ◽  
Vocational High School ◽  
Instructional Approach ◽  
Auditory Learning

The objectives of this research are to investigate whether: (1) students’ achievement of grammar taught by applying inductive approach higher than taught by applying deductive approach, (2) achievement of grammar of visual learning style students higher than achievement of grammar of auditory learning style students, and (3) there is an interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on the students’ achievement of grammar. The population was students of Grade X of Vocational High School 1 Beringin Deli Serdang. Based on Cluster Sampling technique, two classes were chosen, namely Grades X1 and X3. The data were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA with 2 × 2 factorial design. The result reveals that (1) Students` grammar achievement taught by using inductive instructional approach is higher than that taught by using deductive instructional Approach (81,20 > 72,10), (2) Students with visual learning style have higher achievement in grammar than students with auditory learning style (81,90 > 72) and (3) there is significant interaction between instructional approaches and learning styles on students` achievement of grammar (4.906 > 3.96). Thus, it can be concluded that the application of instructional approaches and learning styles can affect students` achievement in grammar.   Keywords: Grammar; Instructional Approach; Learning Styles

scholarly journals IDENTIFIKASI GAYA BELAJAR MAHASISWA

2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 56
Author(s):  
Jeanete Ophilia Papilaya ◽  
Neleke Huliselan
Keyword(s):  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Guidance And Counseling ◽  
Auditory Learning ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Survey Results

The objective of this study was to identify learning styles of students. The approach used in this study is a quantitative approach with survey method. The variable in this study is a single variable , namely the identification of student learning styles. The study population is students of Guidance and Counseling FKIP Pattimura University totaling 388 people. Samples were used as samples in the amount of 10% of the population of 39 people. The sampling technique using Simple Random Sampling. Learning styles questionnaire prepared based on the opinion of De Poter & Hernacki is used as a data collection tool. Learning styles identified as visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style. Data analysis techniques in this study is the descriptive statistical analysis methods. Based on the survey results revealed that students of guidance and counseling FKIP Pattimura University has a tendency to one learning style. Of the 39 students found that 6 students had a tendency visual learning style, 20 students have a tendency to auditory learning style, 1 student has a tendency kinestheticlearning style, and 12 students have a tendency to mix between learning styles and learning styles visual auditorylearning styles.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals Komparasi Tingkat Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar Visual, Auditorial, dan Kinestetik

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
Nastiti ◽  
Wahyu Rika Agustin
Keyword(s):  
Social Studies ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Visual Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Ex Post ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good Learning

The purpose of the study was to determine whether there was a difference between learning outcomes based on VAK learning styles (visual, auditory, kinesthetic) in Integrated Social Studies subjects for seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. Researchers used a comparative quantitative approach with a comparative causal design or ex post facto. The population in the study were all students of class VII, amounting to 295 students and the sample was 59 students taken from class VII H and I. The sample was taken using simple random sampling technique. The study used a questionnaire and documentation as data collection instruments. While the data analysis technique used kruskal wallis. The results showed that good learning outcomes based on visual learning styles were 20%, low learning outcomes were 60%, and moderate learning outcomes were 20%. Furthermore, good learning outcomes based on auditory learning styles are 68%, low learning outcomes are 3%, and moderate learning outcomes are 29%. Finally, good kinesthetic learning outcomes are 22%, low learning outcomes are 73%, and low learning outcomes are 5%. Based on these results, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in learning outcomes based on learning styles using the VAK learning style in Integrated Social Studies subjects class VII SMP Negeri 1 Patianrowo. This can be seen from the sig value. namely 0.000 <from the significance level of 5% (0.05).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document