scholarly journals The principle of mutual interest as a tool for harmonizing the distribution system

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Extra-B) ◽  
pp. 207-214
Author(s):  
Marat Rashitovich Safiullin ◽  
Vasiliy Aleksandrovich Rylov

This article is devoted to distribution relations. It analyzes theoretical issues related to the distribution of goods produced in the transition of the Russian economy from planned economic management to work in market conditions, considers indicators of mutual interest of the parties to the production process, as well as possible transformations associated with the monopoly position of one of the parties in the production process. On the basis of the material presented in the work, a mechanism is proposed that contributes to the formation of optimal decisions in the distribution of the goods produced.    

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (Extra-B) ◽  
pp. 207-214
Author(s):  
Marat Rashitovich Safiullin ◽  
Vasiliy Aleksandrovich Rylov

This article is devoted to distribution relations. It analyzes theoretical issues related to the distribution of goods produced in the transition of the Russian economy from planned economic management to work in market conditions, considers indicators of mutual interest of the parties to the production process, as well as possible transformations associated with the monopoly position of one of the parties in the production process. On the basis of the material presented in the work, a mechanism is proposed that contributes to the formation of optimal decisions in the distribution of the goods produced.    


2013 ◽  
pp. 143-155
Author(s):  
A. Klepach ◽  
G. Kuranov

The role of the prominent Soviet economist, academician A. Anchishkin (1933—1987), whose 80th birth anniversary we celebrate this year, in the development of ideas and formation of economic forecasting in the country at the time when the directive planning acted as a leading tool of economic management is explored in the article. Besides, Anchishkin’s special role is noted in developing a comprehensive program of scientific and technical progress, an information basis for working out long-term forecasts of the country’s development, moreover, his contribution to the creation of long-term forecasting methodology and improvement of the statistical basis for economic analysis and economic planning. The authors show that social and economic forecasting in the period after 1991, which has undertaken a number of functions of economic planning, has largely relied on further development of Anchishkin’s ideas, at the same time responding to new challenges for the Russian economy development during its entry into the world economic system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 02108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Gagulina ◽  
Arthur Budagov ◽  
Andrey Novikov

Due to the large-scale reforming of the Russian economy, the scope of transformations of the regional level does not lose relevance for many years. As generalization of results of domestic and foreign methods of research of transformations in the economy showed, application of institutional approach in this direction is limited to difficulties of terminological character. For their overcoming, the concept of institutional conditions is specified in the paper. Value of these conditions for economic growth and development of the region is shown. In the paper, the special attention is paid to a problem of forming the system of indicators for operational use of institutional approach in the economy of a region. The system of indicators of institutional transformations described in the paper is intended for operational use of quantitative estimates in the regional economy. The system of indicators is made by two complementary blocks – socio-economic and institutional. Indicators of the socio-economic block adumbrate about the economy of a region, about its potentials, illustrate a region place in national economy. The information base for assessing the existing conditions in the regional economy for the implementation of available opportunities is the institutional block, which contains indicators of the quality and efficiency of institutions. The use of the offered system of indicators will allow not only receiving the results having the high practical importance in the field of regional economic management, but also using them at further creation of macroeconomic models.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (37(64)) ◽  
pp. 61-63
Author(s):  
G. Kaliakbarova ◽  
A. Mukhanov

In the article theoretical issues of the concept of financial stability, options for its increase in the period of uncertain market conditions through the implementation of innovative projects are considered. The authors paid special attention to the influence of innovation processes on the financial stability of the enterprise, and considered the problems associated with the implementation of innovations.


2019 ◽  
pp. 5-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. V. Mironov

The article assesses the situation in the Russian economy after a two-year recovery and the outlined signs of stagnation associated with both the slowdown of the global economy and the exhaustion of domestic sources of improved market conditions. The approaches to identifying the factors that initiate growth and are different from the factors that support it are considered. In this case, emphasis was placed on the factors of uncertainty of the economic situation and the lack of domestic demand. The approaches to accelerating growth based on macroeconomic and structural policy measures are formulated, forecasts of the Russian economy dynamics for the coming years are analyzed.


Author(s):  
Ludmila Larka ◽  
Viktoriia Pavlenko

The role of pricing in the system of economic management of business development is analyzed. The relationship between the pricing strategy of the company and the processes of cost management and the company's profitability is revealed. The purpose of the article is to compare cost, market and parametric methods of pricing and determine the feasibility of their use in economic management of business development. The relevance of a unified systematization of pricing methods in the system of economic management of business development is shown, which will allow enterprises to set prices for products to maximize their profits. A comparative analysis of cost, market and parametric pricing methods is given and the expediency of their application in the economic management of business development is determined. It has been determined that market-based pricing methods allow a company to set a more efficient level of prices for products due to a more complete consideration of the influence of demand and competition factors in the pricing process. Necessary data for determining the price of products according to the cost method of pricing are variable costs of production per unit of goods, average fixed costs, unit profit. To determine the price of products by the market method, data on the level of demand, competition, market conditions, consumer perception of the value of the product are needed. To apply the parametric method of pricing requires data on the design and technical parameters of products, the level of costs for the production of goods. The application of cost pricing methods does not take into account the state of competition, market conditions, consumer preferences. The disadvantage of using market-based pricing methods is the possible difficulties in gathering information. Parametric pricing methods have limited application because they require complex calculations. The application of modern methodological approaches to pricing in the system of economic management of business development allows to achieve the strategic goals of the company by mobilizing human, financial, marketing and production resources of the company.


2012 ◽  
pp. 347-365
Author(s):  
Petrovic Parsev

The article discusses the problem of investment attraction of Russian economy in the period of transition to the market conditions of economy. The author emphasizes that the attraction is hard to achieve because of natural conditions (primarily climatic) and that this should not be connected with political and other factors because this is an economic problem. After indicating that competition cannot be directly connected with the quality of goods, the author stresses the key hypothesis which states that in the conditions of the free world market the level of production cost of almost every Russian company is higher than average, which is why it is not attractive for investments. He terms this claim the ?bitter theorem? and proves is through the acts of natural, primarily climatic factors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 91-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivan Novikov

In this paper, we study the classical and modern approaches to the formation of regional agro‑industrial clusters. In the current market conditions, the creation of a cluster based on the existing regional infrastructure is impractical. In most cases, clusters are called holding structures that include the full cycle of production, processing and marketing of agricultural products, for example, “dairy clusters” –there are traditional groups of companies that formally follow the classical cluster principles, but do not give individual participants in the production process sufficient organizational and legal autonomy. The conditions for the development of innovation within the cluster, as well as the mechanism for creating the scientific and innovation component of the cluster as a fully‑ledged newly created cluster element are investigated. We show that the cluster should be created on the basis and strict adherence to fundamental organizational and economic principles. In particular, while in holdings the economic result of the activity is aimed at achieving the goals of the parent company, in a cluster the maximum interest in the result and the satisfaction of the economic interests of all participants in equal measure should be laid. Moreover, the classical cluster approach in the current market conditions may be unrealizable and the author’s concept of cluster development is preferable.


Federalism ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 135-146
Author(s):  
A. S. Neshitoy

The results of Russia’s economic activity over the years of its reform, the indicators of economic development of the regions allow us to conclude that the liberal market approach to economic management has completely discredited itself. The current state of the Russian economy requires a revision of the previously established model of its reforming. A new model should be primarily focused on the new industrialization, the priority revival of the high-technological sector of the economy as the main goal of industrial policy. The author proves that the revival of the industrial potential of the country should be provided on the basis of scientific-based Strategy of innovative development and system-dialectical approach to economic management, which is based on the strengthening of economic and social functions of the state, on the usage of planning and economic mechanisms of state regulation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document