scholarly journals Classification of Business Ecosystems of the Russian Territory Bordering China

Author(s):  
S. L. Sazanova

The theory of business ecosystems is becoming more and more popular in modern economic science, there is more and more applied research of business ecosystems in individual industries and territories. At the same time, there is no unified classification of business ecosystems in modern economic science. The works of Russian and foreign scientists mention digital ecosystems, technological ecosystems, communication ecosystems, but they are all considered in the sectoral and / or cross-sectoral context, without any connection with a specific territory. Thus, despite the initially ecological primary source of the concept of "ecosystem", the territorial aspect of business ecosystems is insufficiently studied, in our opinion. The article provides a classification of business ecosystems of the Russian border with China on the basis of a systemic economic approach for further study, forecasting and management of socio-economic ecosystems of business in border areas.

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (82) ◽  
pp. 111-126
Author(s):  
Martin Karlsson Pedersen

The article gives a short introduction to the new field of “economic science fictions” and discusses an economic approach to science fiction focusing on the class aspect of utopian and anti-utopian science fiction. By tracing a common interest in the new regimes of accumulation and exploitation of cognitive labor between Cognitive Capitalism and Dave Eggers’ anti-utopian novel The Circle, the article highlights the dangerous dynamic between class-specific utopian desire and new forms of technologically driven economic exploitation.


Author(s):  
Davit S. Bidzhoyan

Stress testing is a broad research area, at the interference of many disciplines (finance, banking, econometrics, macroeconomics, microeconomics, mathematical analysis etc.), and is of interest to both theoretical scientists and practitioners. The usefulness of this approach became evident after the financial crisis of 2007–2009, which prompted many researchers to develop and constantly improve stress-testing methodologies, using which it is possible to accurately forecast the behavior of banks and the financial sector in crisis periods. It allows banks to assess the scale of losses and timely take the necessary measures to strengthen the financial condition. Today, economic science has the biggest arsenal of stress testing methods that allow us to assess potential losses in crisis periods that correspond to extreme but plausible events. The stress testing methodologies cover all-important types of risks (credit, interest rate risk, liquidity risk etc.), as well as specific risks. The presence of a huge number of stress testing methods guarantees its versatility and depth, which could be explained by the attempt using this methods to create a behavior model of banks, which are quite complex in structure and functionality. The purpose of this study is to provide a concise, but at the same time comprehensive classification of stress testing methods, as well as a review of the current approaches to stress testing or to solving its various aspects (for example, developing stress scenarios) presented by scientists, international organizations, central banks and other interested parties. This paper is an introduction to the vast field of analytics – stress testing, and is oriented to banking and financial analysts, macroeconomists who want either to familiarize themselves with stress testing as a tool for assessing banking risks, or to systematize all the accumulated knowledge in this area in order to better understand economic processes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Charalambos Vlados ◽  
Fotios Katimertzopoulos

This study examines the concept of Innovation from two different conceptual and theoretical prisms: the science of economics and the theoretical tradition of entrepreneurship and organizational theory which both offer a remarkable distance in the way in which innovation is perceived. This study supports the notion that, by pointing a theoretical focus based on a co-evolutionary approach, centered on the "evolutionary heart" of the capitalist business, modern economic science and business thinking will gain from bridging the study of the innovative phenomenon with analytical fertility. To achieve this, the physiological structure and organic evolution of Strategy-Technology-Management (Stra.Tech.Man) synthesis of business becomes the center of attention, perceiving ultimately the firm as an active actor and even as a major structural co-creator of the sectors of industries and the socio-economic systems which is hosted in.


2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 501-510
Author(s):  
Philip Hider

It is suggested that the knowledge organization (KO) field places greater emphasis on basic research that examines the sociology of KO systems (KOS) and the broader, environmental reasons for the development of both formal and informal KOS. This approach is contrasted with applied KO, which focuses on the practical construction or improvement of specific KOS. The preponderance of applied research in the field of KO is confirmed, at least within the document-centric strand more closely aligned with library and information science, through a survey of articles in the Knowledge Organization journal published between 2009 and 2018. The survey utilized the Frascati Manual definitions for basic and applied research, and referenced Tennis’s classification of KO research (2008). There is considerable potential for building on the critical tradition of KO, with various areas ripe for further sociological investigation. A sociology of KOS could also be accommodated in the popular KO approach of domain analysis.


Upravlenie ◽  
10.12737/5630 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Толкачев ◽  
S. Tolkachev ◽  
Тепляков ◽  
A. Teplyakov

Methodological aspects of interrelation between economic science mainstream fundamentals and modern complex systems management issues are considered in this paper. It has been shown that mainstream’s ontology had been adopted in the early of the twentieth century from those natural sciences branches which studied noncomplex systems. Non-ergodic nature of modern economic world is proved. The features of the modern complex systems management are disclosed. Need of transition to institutional management of complex systems is justified.


2013 ◽  
Vol 353-356 ◽  
pp. 2277-2280
Author(s):  
Lin Zhi Fu ◽  
Yu Feng Li ◽  
Gang Li

According to the international standard, main problems lying in the process of hazardous zone classification were emphatically analyzed. The source of release was determined in light of its release frequency and duration, namely the continuous source, primary source and secondary source. Considering the effect of release rate, LEL, density, ventilation, obstacles, and meteorological conditions on the classification of the hazardous area, it could be found that the hazardous zone would expand as the release rate increased with lower explosion limit. The gas that was heavier than air covered larger hazardous areas than the lighter gas. Besides, ventilation might speed up the diffusion so as to reduce the scope the hazardous zone; obstacles prevented the diffusion so that concentration of partial gas increased and then the danger level increased; wind at high speed quickened the diffusion to decrease the range of dangerous area. Finally, explosion-proof electrical equipment was selected rationally according to the type of explosive gas and temperature group.


Author(s):  
Василий Владимирович Чекмарев ◽  
Владимир Васильевич Чекмарев ◽  
Александр Федорович Швец

Целью настоящей статьи является исследование внутренней логики развития экономической науки как причины формирования парадигмального взгляда на развитие современной экономики. Факторов-причин, влияющих на формирование нового парадигмального взгляда на фундаментальное основание экономической науки, достаточно много [2, с. 58-64]. Среди них можно назвать, например, такие, как критерии научной достоверности в их историко-диалектическом жизненном цикле, новые стандарты научной аргументации с учетом резкого падения качества статистических данных и возможности использования фактов, шумонаполняемость понятийного аппарата науки (например - бургерэкономика, билингвальность, иммерсивный сторителлинг). Авторами обосновано, что одним из направлений перестройки научного мышления является становление полицентрического образа фундаментальной экономической науки. Научная новизна полученных результатов заключается в формулировании принципов и критериев классификации экономических знаний, а также в доказательстве продуктивности определения названия фундаментальной основы экономической науки, как общей экономической теории. The purpose of this article is to study the internal logic of the development of economic science, as the reason for the formation of a paradigmatic view of the development of modern economics. There are a lot of factors-reasons influencing the formation of a new paradigmatic view of the fundamental basis of economic science [2, p. 58-64]. Among them, one can name, for example, criteria of scientific reliability in their historical-dialectical life cycle, new standards of scientific argumentation, taking into account a sharp drop in the quality of statistical data and the possibility of using facts, noise filling of the conceptual apparatus of science (for example, burger economics, bilingualism, immersive storytelling). The authors substantiated that one of the directions of the restructuring of scientific thinking is the formation of a polycentric image of fundamental economic science. The scientific novelty of the results obtained lies in the formulation of principles and criteria for the classification of economic knowledge, as well as in the proof of the productivity of determining the name of the fundamental basis of economic science as a general economic theory.


2021 ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
R.M. Kachalov ◽  
◽  
F.L. Kurshina ◽  
O.A. Pletenenko ◽  
◽  
...  

Periods of aggravation of the situation in the economy and politics, especially in connection with the crisis and transformation processes in society, are usually accompanied by increased interest in the problem of the phenomenon of risk and uncertainty in the economy. In this regard, the main results of creating methodological support and its practical application for solving management problems of modern production enterprises are analyzed. It is taken into account that management decisions are developed and implemented in an uncertain future state of the management object, as well as incomplete information about the past and current state of the surrounding socio-economic environment. Since in this case it is impossible to estimate in advance possible hindrances and obstacles to the «movement» of the controlled object to the goal and ways to overcome them, modern economic science has introduced the concept of «the phenomenon of economic risk» to solve this problem. It is proved that with the help of this concept and its applied characteristics, it is possible to analyze the purposeful activity of the control object and develop ways to control it when moving towards the goal in conditions of uncertainty. The main operational characteristics and variables of the risk management subsystem are analyzed, as well as applied methods for implementing risk management procedures in modern enterprises. It is shown that to reduce the economic risk level in the activities of enterprises, first of all, it is necessary to draw attention to the problem of forming a specific culture of risk management within economic organizations, which will allow using the advantages and positive features of such a culture to improve the efficiency of enterprises, including in the conditions of digitalization of the general economic space. The hypothesis is introduced that the inevitable spread of risk management in the practice of modern and especially promising enterprises as economic managed objects should be based, including on the application of the achievements of behavioral economic theory.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document