The Birth of Modern Economic Science (Reading Gilles Campagnolo's Book)

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolay Nenovsky
Keyword(s):  
Economic Science ◽  
Science Reading ◽  
Modern Economic

scholarly journals The “Mystery” of Innovation: Bridging the Economic and Business Thinking and the Stra.Tech.Man Approach

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 236
Author(s):  
Charalambos Vlados ◽  
Fotios Katimertzopoulos
Keyword(s):  
Technology Management ◽  
Organizational Theory ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Organic Evolution ◽  
Physiological Structure ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
The Way

This study examines the concept of Innovation from two different conceptual and theoretical prisms: the science of economics and the theoretical tradition of entrepreneurship and organizational theory which both offer a remarkable distance in the way in which innovation is perceived. This study supports the notion that, by pointing a theoretical focus based on a co-evolutionary approach, centered on the "evolutionary heart" of the capitalist business, modern economic science and business thinking will gain from bridging the study of the innovative phenomenon with analytical fertility. To achieve this, the physiological structure and organic evolution of Strategy-Technology-Management (Stra.Tech.Man) synthesis of business becomes the center of attention, perceiving ultimately the firm as an active actor and even as a major structural co-creator of the sectors of industries and the socio-economic systems which is hosted in.

Institutional management of Сomplex economic systems

Upravlenie ◽  
10.12737/5630 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Толкачев ◽  
S. Tolkachev ◽  
Тепляков ◽  
A. Teplyakov
Keyword(s):  
Twentieth Century ◽  
Complex Systems ◽  
Natural Sciences ◽  
Economic Systems ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Systems Management ◽  
Institutional Management ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Methodological Aspects ◽  
Management Issues

Methodological aspects of interrelation between economic science mainstream fundamentals and modern complex systems management issues are considered in this paper. It has been shown that mainstream’s ontology had been adopted in the early of the twentieth century from those natural sciences branches which studied noncomplex systems. Non-ergodic nature of modern economic world is proved. The features of the modern complex systems management are disclosed. Need of transition to institutional management of complex systems is justified.

scholarly journals Uncertainty and Risk Phenomenon in the Enterprise Managing

2021 ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
R.M. Kachalov ◽  
◽  
F.L. Kurshina ◽  
O.A. Pletenenko ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Management ◽  
Control Object ◽  
Risk Level ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Economic Risk ◽  
Operational Characteristics ◽  
Management Procedures ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Specific Culture ◽  
Uncertain Future

Periods of aggravation of the situation in the economy and politics, especially in connection with the crisis and transformation processes in society, are usually accompanied by increased interest in the problem of the phenomenon of risk and uncertainty in the economy. In this regard, the main results of creating methodological support and its practical application for solving management problems of modern production enterprises are analyzed. It is taken into account that management decisions are developed and implemented in an uncertain future state of the management object, as well as incomplete information about the past and current state of the surrounding socio-economic environment. Since in this case it is impossible to estimate in advance possible hindrances and obstacles to the «movement» of the controlled object to the goal and ways to overcome them, modern economic science has introduced the concept of «the phenomenon of economic risk» to solve this problem. It is proved that with the help of this concept and its applied characteristics, it is possible to analyze the purposeful activity of the control object and develop ways to control it when moving towards the goal in conditions of uncertainty. The main operational characteristics and variables of the risk management subsystem are analyzed, as well as applied methods for implementing risk management procedures in modern enterprises. It is shown that to reduce the economic risk level in the activities of enterprises, first of all, it is necessary to draw attention to the problem of forming a specific culture of risk management within economic organizations, which will allow using the advantages and positive features of such a culture to improve the efficiency of enterprises, including in the conditions of digitalization of the general economic space. The hypothesis is introduced that the inevitable spread of risk management in the practice of modern and especially promising enterprises as economic managed objects should be based, including on the application of the achievements of behavioral economic theory.

scholarly journals N.A. Vitke & School of Human relations

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 78-85
Author(s):  
E. V. Lapteva ◽  
V. V. Ostroumov
Keyword(s):  
Management Theory ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Human Relations ◽  
Labor Management ◽  
American Psychologist ◽  
Scientific Labor ◽  
Material Goods ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Management School

Modern economic science pays considerable attention to the study of labor economics, an integral part of which is the problem of human resources in the production of material goods. The study of this problem has been initiated by the scientific labor management school and Nikolay Vitke. His work and ideas were undeservedly forgotten and they require more attention. The authors’ goal is to draw ones attention to the fact that the concept authorship of human relations, the beginning of the problem development of communication between psychology and management was initiated by domestic scientists. Later, this concept was developed in numerous of works of foreign scientists, who consider the authors of the American psychologist and sociologist E. Mayo. The concept of N.A. Vitke should be taken into account as one of the important, according to the authors, in the development of modern control theories. The study can be the subject of further discussion about the prospects for the development of management theory, the life and personality of N.A. Vitke as well as his colleagues.

scholarly journals INSTITUTIONALIZING OF PROPERTY RELATIONS IN THE SYSTEM OF NETWORK COORDINATION NEXUS

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey D. Mokichev ◽  
Lilia F. Zulfakarova ◽  
Tina M. Vakhitova
Keyword(s):  
Institutional Environment ◽  
Structural Features ◽  
Economic Life ◽  
Financial Capital ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Property Relations ◽  
Institutional Approach ◽  
Network Coordination ◽  
Modern Economic

There is an active development and use of the principles and research tools of the institutional approach in modern economic science. It allows establishing the relationships that exist between the economic, political and social elements of the system, expanding the boundaries of economic life. The institutional environment determines the goals, functions and dynamics of interaction in property relations. Thus, it appears the effectiveness of functioning of its various forms, which will depend on the institutional structure of management as a system of norms and rules that determine the configuration of property rights, together with coercive instruments. The article considers the approach from the theory of constructivism, which describes the structural features of property relations, taking as a basis the system of network coordination of relations. Formation of a network structure and a new, non-hierarchical way of coordinating ties reflects new economic realities associated with the strong interdependence of property subjects. Formation of a knowledge economy, development of globalization, integration of property subjects have led to the accelerated development of innovations, to a new quality of property relations. Innovations are supported by a huge agglomeration of social, innovative, intellectual and financial capital, which forms the emergence of “innovations in innovations” and determines the relevance of studying the system of network coordination of relations.

scholarly journals Classification of Business Ecosystems of the Russian Territory Bordering China

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 43-51
Author(s):  
S. L. Sazanova
Keyword(s):  
Applied Research ◽  
Primary Source ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Economic Approach ◽  
Russian Territory ◽  
Business Ecosystems ◽  
Technological Ecosystems ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Border Areas

The theory of business ecosystems is becoming more and more popular in modern economic science, there is more and more applied research of business ecosystems in individual industries and territories. At the same time, there is no unified classification of business ecosystems in modern economic science. The works of Russian and foreign scientists mention digital ecosystems, technological ecosystems, communication ecosystems, but they are all considered in the sectoral and / or cross-sectoral context, without any connection with a specific territory. Thus, despite the initially ecological primary source of the concept of "ecosystem", the territorial aspect of business ecosystems is insufficiently studied, in our opinion. The article provides a classification of business ecosystems of the Russian border with China on the basis of a systemic economic approach for further study, forecasting and management of socio-economic ecosystems of business in border areas.

scholarly journals DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL OF MOTIVATION AND INCREASING LABOR FOR BANKING STAFF

2021 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 205-213
Author(s):  
N.B. Kultanova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Human Capital ◽  
Personnel Management ◽  
Management System ◽  
Employee Motivation ◽  
High Impact ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Economic Aspects ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Bank Employees ◽  
Second Tier

This article presents an analysis of the system and methods of motivating and stimulating employees in second-tier banks in domestic and foreign practice. It is known that no organization can count on success if there is no employee motivation for high-impact work, their interest in the final results of work and their desire to contribute to the achievement of the set goals. That is why there is so much interest among managers and management researchers in exploring the reasons that make people work with full energy and in the interests of the organization. The peculiarities of banking work are also due to the specifics of banking, therefore, the study of the problems of personnel management in second-tier banks, and the search for ways to improve it are among the urgent tasks of modern economic science. The material analyzed, systematized and clarified the sections "stimulus" and "stimulation".In Kazakhstan, the economic aspects of this problem are devoted scientists and practitioners like A.K. Belgibaev, A.A. Abishev, T.S. Satkalieva, S.A. Svyatov, N.N. Khamitov, G.S. Seitkasimov and others. The author studied on the basis of the analysis of domestic and foreign literature, as well as the results of the study, the following recommendations were developed for improving the personnel management system in second-tier banks based on labor motivation. The models for motivating bank employees have been clarified. The factors that are directly related to the development of human capital and the motivation of bank employees are highlighted.

The mesoeconomic Odyssey: Between Scylla of macroeconomics and Charybdis of microeconomics (On the book “Mesoeconomics: Elements of a new paradigm” edited by V. I. Mayevsky and S. G. Kirdina-Chandler)

2020 ◽  
pp. 144-153
Author(s):  
G. B. Kleiner
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Economics ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Internal Logic ◽  
The Social ◽  
Tax Regimes ◽  
The Status ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Evolutionary Growth

The monograph “Mesoeconomics: Elements of a new paradigm”, prepared by the collective of Russian and foreign scientists, reveals the stages and genesis’s internal logic of one of the most promising areas of modern economic science — mesoeconomics. This article identifies the empirical, managerial, theoretical, and system-wide foundations for the need for mesoeconomics to arise as an independent discipline. The importance of the economy’s mesolevel for the transition to the trajectory of the sustainable evolutionary growth of Russia is emphasized. It is proposed to institutionalize the belonging of economic objects to the economy’s mesolevel, introducing the status of a “mesoeconomic organization” for them. It is a prerequisite for separating mesoeconomic formations from microeconomic objects and macroeconomic systems. This status allows introducing special tax regimes, facilitating access to state orders, while strengthening the social responsibility of the mesoeconomic organization to the state, business, economy, and society. The role of the Center for Evolutionary Economics of the Institute of Economics, RAS as the “assembly point” of modern research in the field of mesoeconomics is emphasized.

How Many Paradigms There are in Economic Theory – and Can it Become a One-paradigm Science

2021 ◽  
pp. 129
Author(s):  
Dmitrij Egorov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Theory ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Economic Science ◽  
Individual Choice ◽  
Equilibrium System ◽  
The Past ◽  
Scientific Disciplines ◽  
Modern Economic ◽  
Development Of Economic Theory ◽  
Science Subject

Over the past 100 years, economics has stood out from other scientific disciplines because of the presence of two fundamentally different approaches to understanding its subject: from a systemic point of view, and from the point of view of individual choice. All the main directions of modern economic theory turn out to be reducible to two paradigms, conceptually related to two main interpretations of the economic science subject. The understanding of the economy as an equilibrium or non-equilibrium system is associated with two said paradigms. The author believes that the development of economic theory after Keynes can be interpreted as a series of attempts to integrate the identified paradigms. In another form, this is the question of the synthesis of micro- and macro-approaches in economic theory. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document