scholarly journals The changes of horizontal distance condyle to nasal septum after the Twin-block treatment on class II division 1 with retrognathic mandible

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Jie Xin ◽  
Endah Mardiati ◽  
Andriani Harsanti
Keyword(s):  
Nasal Septum ◽  
Panoramic Radiograph ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Horizontal Distance ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Superior Surface ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Introduction: Twin-block appliance is simple removable bite block mostly used in the management of Class II malocclusion. It can modify the occlusal inclined plane to guide the mandible protrusion. Hence, when the patients are wearing the Twin-block appliances, this altered biomechanical environment and will stimulate the growth of the secondary cartilage of condyle and will caused the condyle to change in size, volume or position the in long term. The aim of this study was to investigate the changes of horizontal distance from condyle to nasal septum after the Twin-block treatment on Class II division 1 with retrognathic mandible. Methods: There were total 5 samples of panoramic radiograph before Twin-block treatment and 5 samples of panoramic radiograph after Twin-block treatment. The panoramic radiographs were traced to identify the changes of horizontal distance from condyle to nasal septum after the Twin-block treatment. The distance from the middle of nasal septum to the most superior surface of condyle head for right region and left region were measured, then the differences were statistically analyzed. Results: The horizontal distance from the middle of nasal septum to the most superior surface of condyle head after the Twin-block treatment increased. The difference of condyle position before and after the treatment of Twin-block.was slight (p-value > 0.05). Conclusion: There is no significant difference in horizontal distance from the most superior surface of condyle head to the middle of nasal septum before and after treatment of Twin-block.

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

Comparative Dentoskeletal Study of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Subjects

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Jyoti Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Basic Difference ◽  
Cephalometric Radiograph ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Dentoskeletal Morphology ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Dental Cast ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II malocclusion subjects were evaluated using cephalometric radiograph and dental cast of 60 untreated patients. The sample included 30 Class II Division 1 and 30 Class II Division 2 malocclusion patients. The inter-canine, inter-premolar, inter-molar, inter-canine alveolar, inter-premolar alveolar, inter-molar alveolar widths are measured on study models. The result showed statistically significant difference between the groups for mandibular inter-canine width only. The cephalometric analysis revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups except for the position of maxillary incisors. No basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology existed between Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 malocclusions.

scholarly journals Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion

2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Jamilian ◽  
R. Showkatbakhsh ◽  
S. S. Amiri
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Comparison of arch width, alveolar width and buccolingual inclination of teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion

2012 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Shu ◽  
Xianglong Han ◽  
Yating Wang ◽  
Hui Xu ◽  
Dongqing Ai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Posterior Teeth ◽  
Mandibular Arch ◽  
Arch Width ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Maxillary Premolars ◽  
Mandibular Posterior Teeth ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the arch width, alveolar width, and buccolingual inclination of maxillary and mandibular posterior teeth between Class II division 1 malocclusion and Class I occlusion. Materials and Methods: Forty-five subjects with Class I occlusion and 45 subjects with Class II division 1 malocclusion were selected to measure the maxillary and mandibular arch width and alveolar width of premolars and first molars with digital caliper. Buccolingual inclination of maxillary and mandibular premolars and first molars were measured with a modified universal bevel protractor. Results: All of the posterior teeth in both groups were lingually tilted. The maxillary premolars and first molars were significantly more lingually tilted (P < .05) in Class II division 1 malocclusion than in Class I occlusion. Mandibular first premolars were significantly less lingually tilted in Class II division 1 malocclusion than in Class I occlusion. No significant difference of buccolingual inclination was found in mandibular second premolars and first molars between the two groups. No significant difference in maxillary and mandibular arch width and alveolar width was found between the two groups. Conclusions: Buccolingual inclination rather than arch width and alveolar width plays an important role in transverse discrepancy of Class II division 1 malocclusion.

scholarly journals Facial esthetic outcome of functional followed by fixed orthodontic treatment of class II division 1 patients

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary-Eleni Zouloumi ◽  
Kleopatra Tsiouli ◽  
Simeon Psomiadis ◽  
Olga-Elpis Kolokitha ◽  
Nikolaos Topouzelis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Facial Appearance ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Fixed Orthodontic Appliances ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Wilks Lambda ◽  
Facial Changes ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Abstract Objectives To assess the perceived facial changes in class II division 1, convex profile patients treated with functional followed by fixed orthodontic appliances. Subjects and methods The study sample consisted of 36 pairs of pre- and post-treatment photographs (frontal and profile, at rest) of 12 patients treated with activator, 12 with twin-block, and 12 controls with normal profiles, treated without functional appliances. All photographs were presented in pairs to 10 orthodontists, 10 patients, 10 parents, and 10 laypersons. Visual analog scale (VAS) ratings of changes in facial appearance were assessed. Results The patient groups were similar in sex distributions, age, and treatment duration. The different rater groups showed strong to excellent agreement. There were no significant differences among treatment groups (F = 0.91; P = 0.526; Wilks lambda = 0.93), raters (F = 1.68; P = 0.054; Wilks lambda = 0.83), and when testing the combined effect of treatment and rater on the results (F = 0.72; P = 0.866; Wilks lambda = 0.85). The raters detected slightly more positive changes in the activator and twin-block groups, compared to the control group, regarding the lower face and the lips, but these findings did not reach significance. Furthermore, their magnitude hardly exceeded 1/20th of the total VAS length. Limitations Retrospective study design. Conclusions The perceived facial changes of convex profile patients treated with functional, followed by fixed orthodontic appliances, did not differ from those observed in normal profile patients, when full-face frontal and profile photos were simultaneously assessed. Consequently, professionals should be skeptical regarding the improvement of a patient’s facial appearance when this treatment option is used.

scholarly journals Frankel 2 appliance versus the Modified Twin Block appliance for Phase 1 treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ciara Campbell ◽  
Declan Millett ◽  
Niamh Kelly ◽  
Marie Cooke ◽  
Michael Cronin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Treatment Duration ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Parent Perspectives ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare Phase 1 treatment, using the Frankel 2 (FR2) or the modified Twin Block (MTB), for Class II division 1 malocclusion in children and adolescents with respect to: treatment duration, number of appliance breakages, occlusal outcome, and patient and parent perspectives. Materials and Methods: Sixty participants with a Class II division 1 malocclusion were randomly assigned to either the FR2 or MTB appliance in a two-armed parallel randomized clinical trial with an allocation ratio of 1 to 1. Time to achieve a Class I incisor relationship was the primary outcome. The number of appliance breakages was recorded. The Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index was used to evaluate pre- and post-treatment occlusal outcome on study models. Participants completed the child OHRQoL (oral health-related quality of life), Piers-Harris, Standard Continuum of Aesthetic Need (SCAN), and Oral Aesthetic Subjective Impact Score (OASIS) questionnaires pre- and post-treatment; parents completed a SCAN questionnaire. Results: Forty-two participants completed treatment (FR2: 20; MTB: 22). Multiple imputation was used to impute missing data for noncompleters. Mean treatment duration was similar for the two appliances (FR2: 376 days [SD 101]; MTB: 340 days [SD 102]; P = .41). There were no significant differences in mean number of appliance breakages (FR2: 0.3 SD 0.7; MTB: 0.4 SD 0.8; P = .67 or mean PAR score P = .48). Patient and parent perspectives did not differ between appliances (P > .05). Conclusions: Phase 1 treatment duration, number of appliance breakages, occlusal outcome, and patient and parent perspectives were similar in 11–14 year olds with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated using the FR2 or MTB appliance.

Electromyographic Muscular Activity Improvement in Class II Patients Treated with the Pre-Orthodontic Trainer

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 380-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Satygo ◽  
A V Silin ◽  
G O Ramirez-Yañez
Keyword(s):  
Muscular Activity ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Functional Appliance ◽  
Treatment Results ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Masseter Muscles ◽  
Normal Controls ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Objective: A study was designed to determine changes in the amplitude of the EMG muscular activity of the Masseter and Temporalis muscles at clench in children with a Class II, division 1 malocclusion treated with the pre-orthodontic Trainer functional appliance, for 12 months. Study Design: 36 Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients (mean age 7.6 ± 1.3 years) composed the treated group and wore the functional appliance; 22 children with a similar age and malocclusion composed the untreated controls; and, 20 children with no dental malocclusion participated as normal controls. Electromyographic (EMG) muscular activity of the Temporalis and Masseter muscles were recorded before and after treatment. Results: Subjects in the treated group reported a bilateral significant increase in the muscular electrical activity in the both tested muscles (p < 0.001). After treatment, they recorded values similar to those measured in normal controls, whereas the untreated controls remained on lower values. Conclusion: These results confirm that treatment with the pre-orthodontic Trainer functional appliance significantly increases the EMG muscular activity in the Temporalis and Masseter muscles at clench in patients with Class II, division 1 malocclusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document