scholarly journals A CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR PRACTICE ORIENTED RESEARCH AND PRACTICE RESEARCH NETWORKS

Author(s):  
Louis G. Castonguay ◽  
Michael J. Constantino ◽  
Henry Xiao

This chapter reviews efforts to integrate psychotherapy research and practice through collaboration and information-sharing within naturalistic clinical settings. Specifically, the chapter focuses on three types of practice-oriented research that capitalize on the bidirectional partnership between researchers and practitioners: (1) patient-focused, (2) practice-based, and (3) practice-research networks. The authors provide examples of each type of integration, highlighting the ways in which the research is different, yet complementary to more traditional studies conducted in controlled settings. They submit that the researcher–practitioner partnership in an ecologically valid treatment context represents an optimal means to reduce the pervasive research–practice chasm and to promote genuine integration for enhancing the effectiveness and personalization of psychotherapy. The chapter also discusses future directions in this vein.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 449-456
Author(s):  
Olajide Aguloye

Traditionally, doctorate in education is pitched on two platforms. The Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) is pitched as belonging exclusively to the domain of research and scholarship, while the Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) is pitched as belonging to the domain of active professional practice. This distinction is dysfunctional to bridging the gap between research in the academe and research in professional practice. Research in the academe is often insular with theoretical intents and with outcomes that have limited utility for solving active problems of or in practice in education. This misguided distinction can be corrected through a new thinking of the educational purpose and outcome-expectations for Ph.D. and Ed.D. programs in education. Doctoral education, irrespective of nomenclature (Ph.D. or Ed.D.) should be envisioned as leadership platforms through which knowledge and practice is used seamlessly to continuously ignite innovation and transformation in education. This paper proposes a framework for reexamining doctoral education and their comparative relevance in solving problems of and in practice. The paper aims to position the two doctoral education pathways as platforms for developing leaders who promote the generation and application of knowledge on solutions to problems of and in practice. Author presents a conceptual model that explores the two doctoral pathways through the lens of application of knowledge, research, and practice. Further research is proposed on how doctoral education can enhance practice in educational leadership and foster continuous improvements in education. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Wen-Yu Tsao

The YouTubers are the new vocations to make money. People like to access the videos to relax or learn from the special YouTuber. Despite the growth and commercial potential of virtual worlds, relatively little is known about what users’ motivations to favor specific YouTubers. This paper offered and empirically tested a conceptual model to fill this gap. Given the system characteristics (mobility, reachability, compatibility, convenience) and YouTuber specific characteristics (escapism and post popularity) integrated extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as their preference determinants. Using PROCESS on a survey of 349 users of YouTube. The results confirmed the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation as preference determinants and showed the two system and two YouTuber specific characteristics as motivational basis. Implications for research and practice are discussed.


Author(s):  
Annekatrin Bock ◽  
Felicitas Macgilchrist

How do schools today engage with mobile media? Drawing on ethnographically oriented research at German Schools Abroad, this paper teases out three sets of practices regarding young people’s mobile media use: «safe», «enthusiastic», and «postdigital». Presenting vignettes from three schools to illustrate each set of practices, the paper demonstrates how students are differently controlled, guided, and given space to shape their worlds through the practices. The paper highlights that these practices exist simultaneously. They enact different (not better or worse) institutional priorities and different (not better or worse) understandings of young people’s mobile use. The paper also highlights the tensions when schools aim to control young people’s mobile use, arguing that each set of practices undermines itself. It ends by reflecting on the implications for future research and practice if we see increased mobile media use in schools not, as often assumed, as a mark of «progress», «improvement» or «modernity», but instead as emerging from different understandings of school and young people.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-36
Author(s):  
Mike Fisher

This paper concerns the impact of social work research, particularly on practice and practitioners. It explores the politics of research and how this affects practice, the way that university-based research understands practice, and some recent developments in establishing practice research as an integral and permanent part of the research landscape. While focusing on implications for the UK, it draws on developments in research across Europe, North America and Australasia to explore how we can improve the relationship between research and practice.


Author(s):  
Soo Jeong Youn ◽  
Andrew A. McAleavey ◽  
Louis G. Castonguay

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Kaehne

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to critically reflect on the practice, rhetoric and reality of integrating care. Echoing Le Grand's framework of motivation, agency and policy, it is argued that the stories the authors tell themselves why the authors embark on integration programmes differ from the reasons why managers commit to these programmes. This split between policy rhetoric and reality has implications for the way the authors investigate integration.Design/methodology/approachExamining current integration policy, practice and research, the paper adopts the critical framework articulated by Le Grand about the underlying assumptions of health care policy and practice.FindingsIt is argued that patient perspectives are speciously placed at the centre of integration policy but mask the existing organizational and managerial rationalities of integration. Making the patient the measure of all things integration would turn this agenda back on its feet.Originality/valueThe paper discusses the underlying assumptions of integration policy, practice and research. Increasing the awareness about the gap between what the authors do, why the authors do it and the stories the authors tell themselves about it injects a much needed amount of criticality into research and practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document