scholarly journals Implementasi Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Polres Gowa

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Burhan Burhan
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Police Station ◽  
Inhibiting Factor ◽  
Legal Factor ◽  
The Law ◽  
Resource Factor

Penelitian ini dilakukan dan bertujuan untuk: 1) Untuk mengetahui implementasi diversi dalam sistem peradilan anak di Kantor Polres Gowa; 2) Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor-faktor apa saja yang menjadi kendala dalam penerapan diversi kepada anak-anak yang menghadapi hukum di Kantor Polres Gowa. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: 1) Penerapan diversi kepada anak-anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum di kantor Polres Gowa telah dilakukan secara finansial, hal ini terlihat dari kasus anak-anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum yang ditangani sejak 2017 hingga 2019 terdapat 94 kasus dan dapat diselesaikan 93 kasus; 2) Faktor penghambat dalam penerapan diversi di Kantor Polres Gowa adalah bahwa hukum hanya memberikan batas waktu 30 hari untuk upaya diversi, faktor sumber daya penyelidik masih kurang jika dibandingkan dengan jumlah kasus yang ditangani. Faktor masyarakat yang terkadang tidak menginginkan perdamaian atau permintaan dari korban atau keluarga korban yang meminta kompensasi yang terlalu besar. The research was conducted and aimed at: 1) To find out the implementation of the application of diversion in the juvenile justice system at the Gowa Regional Police Station; 2) To find out and analyze what factors are the obstacles in the application of diversion to children who face huku at the Gowa Police Station.This type of research is empirical legal research. The results showed that: 1) The application of diversion to children facing the law at the Gowa police station had been carried out financially, it was seen from the cases of children facing the law handled since 2017 until 2019 there were 94 cases and could be resolved diversely 93 cases; 2) The inhibiting factor in the application of diversion in the Gowa Regional Police Station is that the legal factor only gives a 30-day time limit for diversion efforts, the investigator's resource factor is still lacking when compared to the number of cases handled. Community factors that sometimes do not want peace or requests from the victims or the families of victims who ask for compensation that is too large so the perpetrators cannot.

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS KONSEP DIVERSI DALAM PROSES PERADILAN ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA MENURUT UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA ANAK (Dalam Proses Peradilan Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Di Kabupaten Malang)

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Komariah Komariah ◽  
Tinuk Dwi Cahyani
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
The State ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

Enforcement of the Act No. 11 of 2012 on Juvenile Justice System provides protection of the rights of juvenile who commit criminal acts use the diversion approach to realize the concept of Restorative Justice. To figure out the implementation of the Act, it is necessary to study with the socio-legal research method in the Police District, the State Attorney and the District Court at Malang. The results of these studies found that the application of diversion has been effective although there are still some obstacles. One of the toughest obstacles to implementing a diversion to fit is the unavailability of places to educate, nurture and put the brat as stated in the law. The study also found that in Malang at least there are some organizations / institutions in applying the diversion of government supporters, among others: BAPAS and P2TP2A.

scholarly journals Diversion's Application in The Juvenile Justice System to Realize Restorative Justice Related to Deprivation of Liberty Principle

NORMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
Aunur Rofiq
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Restorative Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Comparative Method ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law ◽  
Liberty Principle

Diversion Efforts can only be carried out in cases of Children in conflict with laws that threaten their crimes under 7 (seven) years and do not constitute a repeat of a criminal act. In contrast, the juvenile justice system requires deprivation of liberty principle and punishment related to the latest findings. This research uses the normative legal research method, using the law method, research method, and comparative method. From this research, we know that diversion in the juvenile justice system cannot be done in every child's case; it can only be done in the case of children who meet the requirements of a case protected under 7 (seven) and not a repeat of follow up. Not all cases of children go through a process of diversion. Children who have a conflict with the law are directly threatened with criminal punishment. However, there has been a reconciliation between the perpetrators and the victims, so that the deprivation of liberty principle, and criminalization, is the latest result, which is not successful. Therefore, diversion shall not be used again to protect children.Keywords: Diversion, Children, Liberty

The Rights of Children in Conflict with the Law in Ghana

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kwame Ame
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Offenders ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Female Circumcision ◽  
Policy And Practice ◽  
Daunting Task ◽  
Female Children ◽  
The Law ◽  
Key Questions

AbstractIn a country where implementing children's rights in general remains a major challenge, the idea of according rights to children in conflict with the law can be a daunting task. With too many other children's problems to deal with such as the millions of street children and child laborers, female circumcision, and sexual violence against female children, the needs and rights of juvenile offenders could easily be relegated to the bottom of the government's priorities for children. Nonetheless, by virtue of ratifying the UNCRC in 1990, Ghana has made a commitment to address the needs and respect the rights of children in Ghana including its juvenile offenders. Thirteen years after ratifying the CRC, the Ghanaian Parliament passed the Juvenile Justice Act 2003 (Act 653). What rights does the Act accord children in conflict with the law? Do the policies and practices of the new juvenile justice system measure up to the standards of the Convention? These are the key questions addressed in this paper. The paper concludes that vis a vis the CRC, the new Juvenile Justice Act looks good on paper but argues that there is a colossal gap between policy and practice. The paper ends with suggestions on how to effectively protect the rights of children in conflict with the law.

A comparative study of measures for children in conflict with the law in Goa and Singapore

2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murli Desai
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Similarities And Differences ◽  
The Law

English This article aims to compare the measures undertaken for children in conflict with the law in terms of strengths and gaps and similarities and differences, together with profiles of children who enter the juvenile justice system in a progressive state of India, namely Goa, and Singapore. French Cette article vise à comparer les mesures prises pour les enfants en conflit avec la loi en termes de forces et manques, ressemblances et différences, ainsi que le profil des enfants entrants dans le système de justice des mineurs dans un état progressiste de l’Inde, en l’occurrence Goa, et Singapour. Spanish Este artículo compara las medidas tomadas para tratar a los niños en conflicto con la ley en términos de fortalezas y vacíos y similitudes y diferencias, y también el perfil de los niños que ingresan al sistema de justicia juvenil en el estado progresivo de India (Goa) y Singapur.

scholarly journals Pendidikan Kewirausahaan Bagi Anak Didik Pemasyarakatan Di Lembaga PEMLPKA Khusus Anak Kelas II Jakarta

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Irsyad Firdaus ◽  
Mahdi Adriansyah ◽  
Moh Jamaluddin ◽  
Irfan Sudarso Gultom ◽  
Nadya Fairuza
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Entrepreneurial Education ◽  
The Law

Pelaku tindak pidana tidak hanya dilakukan oleh orang dewasa, melainkan anak-anak juga dapat melakukan tindak pidana. Mengenai pengertian anak-anak yang melakukan tindak pidana atau yang berkonflik dengan hukum diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Dalam UU No 11 Tahun 2012, anak yang divonis bersalah dalam sistem peradilan anak mendapatkan pembinaan di LPKA. Salah satu pembinaan yang penting bagi anak sebagai bekal hidup ketika kelak kembalike masyarakat maka anak didik    penting mendapatkan pendidikan kewirausahaan melalui program pembinaan di LPKA.Kata Kunci: Pendidikan Kewirausahaan, Anak Didik, LPKACriminals are not only committed by adults, but children can also commit criminal acts. Regarding the understanding of children who commit criminal acts or who are in conflict with the law regulated in Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Children's Criminal Justice System. In Law No. 11 of 2012, children convicted in the juvenile justice system get coaching at LPKA. One of the important coaching for children as a provision of life when later returned to the community then important students get entrepreneurial education through a coaching program at LPKA.  Keywords: Entrepreneurial Education, Protege, LPKA

scholarly journals Model Of Punishment: Juvenile Justice Systems

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 35-56
Author(s):  
Rafika Nur ◽  
Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar ◽  
Nurul Miqat ◽  
Darmawati Darmawati ◽  
Mustawa Mustawa
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Two Systems ◽  
The Law ◽  
Justice Systems ◽  
Special Rights

The position of children who have special rights in the law makes children get special treatment. In the juvenile justice system in Indonesia, there are two systems of sanctions, namely criminal sanctions and actions, and this is done to realize the protection of children who are dealing with the law.  This research is a normative juridical review, using a statute, comparative and conceptual approaches. The results show that the imposition of sanctions on children is based on the child's age, where children aged 12 to before 14 years can only be sanctioned with actions, and children aged 14 to before 18 years may be subject to criminal sanctions or actions.

scholarly journals Perluasan Pertanggungjawaban Terhadap Tindak Pidana Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 84-106
Author(s):  
Chairul Bariah ◽  
Mohd Din ◽  
Mujibussalim Mujibussalim
Keyword(s):  
Juvenile Justice ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Juvenile Justice System ◽  
Criminal Liability ◽  
District Court ◽  
System State ◽  
Youth Offenders ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Family

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak menyatakan anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum selanjutnya disebut anak yang telah berumur 12 (dua belas) tahun, tetapi belum berumur 18 (delapan belas) tahun yang diduga melakukan tindak pidana. Maka dilihat dari usia anak tersebut haruslah mendapatkan perlakuan yang khusus terhadap anak yang melakukan tidak pidana. Sebagaimana dalamUndang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak disebutkan bahwa hakim wajib mengupayakan diversi paling lama 7 (tujuh) hari setelah ditetapkan oleh ketua pengadilan negeri sebagai hakim.Padadasarnya konsep pertanggungjawaban dari sebuah perbuatan pidana adalah ditanggung oleh pelakunya tanpa membebani pihak lain yang turut bertanggungjawab, namun dalam hal penyelesaian tindak pidana harus melibatkan pelaku, korban, keluarga pelaku/korban, dan pihak lain yang terkait, sehingga terdapat perluasan konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji sejauh mana orang tua dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban terhadap tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak dan konsep pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap orang tua dalam tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh anak dan apakah ada hubungan antara diversi dengan pertanggungjawaban terhadap orang tua. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif dengan penelitian hukum kepustakaan.The Act Number 11, 2012 on the Juvenile Justice System state that a child who is in conflictwith the law hereinafter called as a child who ages 12 (twelve) years old, but not yet 18 (eightteen) year of age alleged to have committed a crime. Therefore, it is seen from the age of the child it should be treated specifically for youth offenders, it can be seen from the obligation for the judge to conduct a diversion for the child’s case. As mention in the The Act on Juvenile Justice System that the judge is obliged to conduct a diversion for a maximum of 7 (seven) days after being stipulated by the head of the district court sitting as a judge. Basically, the concept of criminal liability from the criminal act is borne by its perpetrator without burdening the other party responsible, but in the case of the settlement of the crime must involve the perpetrator, the victim, the family of the perpetrator or victim, and other related parties, and hence there is an extension of the concept of criminal liability. This research aims to explain and explore to which extent parents could be held liable for crimes committed by juvenile and the concept of criminal liability of parents towards crimes committed by their childrenand whether there is a relationship between diversion with responsibility to parents.This is doctrinal legal research or library research.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document