A Measure of Career Self-Efficacy

The present study involved the development of a measure of career self-efficacy. The measure is short, easy to use, and has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability as well as good congruent and discriminant validity.

Download Full-text

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Patient' s Communication Perceived Self-efficacy Scale (PCSS) in Out Patients after Total Hip Replacement

10.21203/rs.3.rs-78784/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Jing Liu ◽

Wen H Zhao ◽

Vincenza Capone ◽

Yi Z Li ◽

Jing Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Construct Validity ◽

Total Hip Replacement ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Self Efficacy ◽

Hip Replacement ◽

Chinese Version ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Total Hip ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background: Among older patients worldwide, communication has become an important public health issue in the world. This communication could be improved by different interventions. However, a tool of measuring patients’ confidence in communication with doctors has not been established in China. This study is aimed at translating and introducing the Patient's Communication Self-Efficacy Scale for assessing communication between doctors and elderly patients.Method: (1) A post-consultation questionnaire was completed by 167 patients (mean age = 70.04 years; SD: 6.3 years; females/males: 94/73). The researchers translated the English version PCSS into Chinese under the guidance of the original author. (2) The final Chinese version of the PCSS was validated. Measurement indices included item generation, reliability testing, construct validity and test-retest reliability. To carry out the above tests, we used SPSS 19.0 software and LISREL 8.7. We built the Bayesian network model of the Chinese version of the PCSS and determined predictive variables.Result: Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of the PCSS fit a three-dimensional model. Additionally, the Chinese version of the PCSS has high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficient 0.929) and test-retest reliability (Kappa coefficient 0.761). The Bayesian networks shows that the important predictors are education (0.4207), PEPPI 3 (0.3951), and PCSS 1 (0.1139). The connections between PCSS 3 and other variables do not indicate causality but rather conditional dependencies or interrelatedness.Conclusion: This is the first study to validate the Chinese version of the PCSS in outpatients after total hip replacement. Our results confirmed that the Chinese version of the scale has high internal consistency, construct validity and test-retest reliability. Patient-doctor interaction and education are important predictors of patient communication self-efficacy.

Download Full-text

The Response to Conflict Scale

Assessment ◽

10.1177/107319119400100402 ◽

1994 ◽

Vol 1 (4) ◽

pp. 335-344 ◽

Cited By ~ 15

Author(s):

Gary R. Birchler ◽

William Fals-Stewart

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Marital Conflict ◽

Clinical Utility ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Psychometric Evaluation ◽

Consistency Test ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Conflict Scale

This study details the psychometric evaluation of the Response to Conflict Scale (RTC), a 24-item measure of maladaptive responses to marital conflict. The inventory showed high internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct and discriminant validity, and classification efficiency. Clinical utility of the RTC is also discussed.

Download Full-text

Measuring Attitudes toward Euthanasia

OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying ◽

10.2190/eqp2-kufm-w7th-butl ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 30 (1) ◽

pp. 53-65 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Harold D. Holloway ◽

Bert Hayslip ◽

Melissa E. Murdock ◽

Robyn Maloy ◽

Heather L. Servaty ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Young Adults ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Likert Scale ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability

The development of a measure assessing attitudes toward euthanasia is presented, where data gathered from over 400 young adults yielded a thirty item Likert scale with high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Additionally, the discriminant validity of the scale was found in comparisons of those with death-related versus non-death-related experiences.

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of the critical thinking disposition assessment test amongst medical students in China: a cross-sectional study

BMC Medical Education ◽

10.1186/s12909-020-02437-2 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Liyuan Cui ◽

Yaxin Zhu ◽

Jinglou Qu ◽

Liming Tie ◽

Ziqi Wang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Critical Thinking ◽

Medical Students ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Critical Thinking Disposition ◽

Thinking Disposition ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background Critical thinking disposition helps medical students and professionals overcome the effects of personal values and beliefs when exercising clinical judgment. The lack of effective instruments to measure critical thinking disposition in medical students has become an obstacle for training and evaluating students in undergraduate programs in China. The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the CTDA test. Methods A total of 278 students participated in this study and responded to the CTDA test. Cronbach’s α coefficient, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, floor effects and ceiling effects were measured to assess the reliability of the questionnaire. Construct validity of the pre-specified three-domain structure of the CTDA was evaluated by explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity and discriminant validity were also analyzed. Results Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the entire questionnaire was calculated to be 0.92, all of the domains showed acceptable internal consistency (0.81–0.86), and the test-retest reliability indicated acceptable intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) (0.93, p < 0.01). The EFA and the CFA demonstrated that the three-domain model fitted the data adequately. The test showed satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity. Conclusions The CTDA is a reliable and valid questionnaire to evaluate the disposition of medical students towards critical thinking in China and can reasonably be applied in critical thinking programs and medical education research.

Download Full-text

The Italian version of the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) for Dupuytren’s disease: The URAM-I(10)

Hand Therapy ◽

10.1177/17589983211034532 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 175899832110345

Author(s):

E Lanfranchi ◽

T Fairplay ◽

P Arcuri ◽

M Lando ◽

F Marinelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Cultural Adaptation ◽

Dupuytren’S Disease ◽

Divergent Validity ◽

Dupuytren's Disease ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Sf 36 ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Introduction Several general hand functional assessment tools for Dupuytren’s disease have been reported, but none of the patient-reported-outcome measures specific to Dupuytren’s disease-associated disabilities are available in the Italian language. The purpose of this study was to culturally adapt the Unité Rhumatologique des Affections de la Main (URAM) into Italian (URAM-I) and determine its measurement properties. Methods Cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the current guidelines. Construct validity (convergent and divergent validity) was measured by comparing the URAM-I with the Pain-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE-I), Short-Form 36 (SF-36-I) scale and finger range of motion, respectively. Factor analysis was used to investigate the URAM-I’s internal structure. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test-retest reliability by Intra-Class Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Results This study included 96 patients (males = 85%, age = 66.8 ± 9.3). Due to the cultural adaptation, we divided the original item #1 into two separate items, thus generating the URAM-I(10). Convergent validity analysis showed a strong positive (r = 0.67), significant (p < 0.01) Pearson’s correlation with the PRWHE-I. Divergent validity analysis showed a weak, negative (r < 0.3) and not significant correlation with the SF-36-I subscales, except for the physical pain subscale (r = −0.21, p < 0.05). Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor, 4-item solution that explained 76% of the total variance. The URAM-I(10) demonstrated high internal consistency (α = 0.94) and high test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.97). Conclusion The URAM-I(10) demonstrates moderate construct validity, high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, and showed a 2-factor internal structure. Its evaluative use can be suggested for the Italian Dupuytren’s population.

Download Full-text

Translation and Test–Retest of the Spanish Podiatry Health Questionnaire (PHQ-S)

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ◽

10.3390/ijerph15102205 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 15 (10) ◽

pp. 2205 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores ◽

Marta Losa-Iglesias ◽

Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo ◽

Daniel López-López ◽

David Rodríguez-Sanz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

English Language ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Health Questionnaire ◽

Foot Health ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Language Version ◽

Health Related ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Background: The Podiatric Health Questionnaire (PHQ) is a health-related questionnaire consisting of six questions designed for measuring foot health status. To date, the PHQ has only been validated in the English-language version. Thus, this study aimed to perform the Spanish translation and test–retest procedures of the PHQ (PHQ-S). Method: The forward/backward translation and test–retest reliability methods were applied from English to Spanish languages. Regarding the total score for each domain, internal consistency and reliability were determined by the Cronbach α and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Results: High internal consistency was shown for the six domains: (1) walking with a Cronbach α of 0.97; (2) hygiene and nail care with 0.93 and 093, respectively; (3) foot pain with 0.91; (4) worry and concern domain with 0.904; (5) quality of life with 0.87; and (6) the self-perception of how their feet are feeling measured by a visual analogic scale with 0.92. Excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.96–0.98)) was shown for the total score. Conclusions: The PHQ-S was shown to be a valid and reliable tool for an acceptable use in the Spanish population.

Download Full-text

Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of the Aphasia Check List (ACL) for Farsi-Speaking Persons with Aphasia

Basic and Clinical Neuroscience Journal ◽

10.32598/bcn.2021.1906.1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Ahmad Reza Khatoonabadi ◽

◽

Amin Modarres Zadeh ◽

Azar Mehri ◽

Elke Kalbe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Control Group ◽

Check List ◽

Time Saving ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Ceiling Effects ◽

Language And Cognition ◽

Test Retest Reliability

The Aphasia Check List (ACL) test is a comprehensive, time-saving tool for language evaluation in aphasia, including a cognitive assessment part. This cross-sectional study aimed to translate this test into Farsi and analyze the psychometric features of the translated version. The original version of the ACL was translated and adapted from German; its psychometric features were then determined. Twenty participants with aphasia (PWA) and 50 age- and education-matched, cognitively healthy controls participated. Possible floor and ceiling effects, discriminant validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were analyzed in addition to the evaluation of internal correlations between the test parts (Language and Cognition). Regarding the performance of PWAs in the language section and the cognitive subtests assessing attention, memory, and reasoning, there were no floor and ceiling effects. Adequate discriminant validities for the language section of the test (i.e., total score: [Mann-Whitney U= 6.000, p<0.001]; diagnostic subtests scores: [U=3.000, p<0.001]; and each subtest individually) and for the attention subtest of the cognition section [U=16.500, p<0.001] were observed. There was no difference between the control group and the patient group in the subtests of memory [U=497.500, p=0.973] and reasoning [U=3.000, p=308]. The test-retest reliability was acceptable in all subtests (ICCagreement =0.573-0.984). The ACL-P test showed appropriate internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.761 for test and retest scores). There were also significant correlations between language and cognition in the control and patient groups. The ACL-P test showed sufficient reliability and validity for the evaluation of Farsi-speaking PWAs and used in studies on this population

Download Full-text

Assessing psychological adjustment and cultural reintegration after military service: development and psychometric evaluation of the post-separation Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM)

BMC Psychiatry ◽

10.1186/s12888-020-02936-y ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Madeline Romaniuk ◽

Gina Fisher ◽

Chloe Kidd ◽

Philip J. Batterham

Keyword(s):

Factor Analysis ◽

Phase I ◽

Psychological Adjustment ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Military Service ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Civilian Life ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Confirmatory Factor ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Abstract Background The transition out of military service and subsequent reintegration to civilian life has been established as a period associated with an increased risk of psychological adjustment difficulties, psychiatric disorders and suicide risk, yet no tool exists to measure cultural and psychological adjustment following permanent separation from the military. This study describes the two-phase mixed-methods development and validation of the self-report Military-Civilian Adjustment and Reintegration Measure (M-CARM). Methods In Phase I, four focus groups (n = 20) and semi-structured one-on-one interviews (n = 80) enabled thematic analysis and generation of 53 initial items that were reviewed by an expert multidisciplinary panel (n = 12) and piloted for clarity and relevance in an Australian service-veteran sample (n = 11). In Phase II, psychometric properties of the 47 items resulting from Phase I were evaluated with online assessment of a convenience sample of transitioned Australian Defence Force veterans (n = 725). Analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, as well as evaluation of test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and convergent, divergent and discriminant validity. Results Exploratory factor analysis on a randomized split-half sample (n = 357), resulted in a 21-item, five-factor solution of Purpose and Connection, Help seeking, Beliefs about civilians, Resentment and regret, and Regimentation, explaining 53.22% of the variance. Confirmatory factor analysis (n = 368) verified this factor structure without modification (χ2 = 304.96, df = 160; CFI = .96, TLI = .94, NFI = .91, RMSEA = .05). Strong convergent, divergent and discriminant validity was demonstrated as M-CARM scores significantly correlated with related constructs assessed by standardised clinical measures as well as differentiated groups based on three binary reintegration items, with large effect sizes (d = > 1). Strong test-retest reliability for the total score (n = 186, r = .93) and excellent internal consistency (n = 725, a = .90) were also found. Conclusions Results provide promising evidence the M-CARM is a valid, reliable measure of psychological and cultural reintegration to civilian life, with potential for considerable clinical and research application.

Download Full-text

Reliability and Construct Validity of Self-Report Questionnaires for Patients With Pelvic Girdle Pain

Physical Therapy ◽

10.2522/ptj.20110076 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 92 (1) ◽

pp. 111-123 ◽

Cited By ~ 55

Author(s):

Margreth Grotle ◽

Andrew M. Garratt ◽

Hanne Krogstad Jenssen ◽

Britt Stuge

Keyword(s):

Construct Validity ◽

Internal Consistency ◽

Discriminant Validity ◽

Pelvic Girdle ◽

Self Report ◽

Pelvic Girdle Pain ◽

Consistency Test ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Background There is little evidence for the measurement properties of instruments commonly used for women with pelvic girdle pain. Objective The aim of this study was to examine the internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of instruments used for women with pelvic girdle pain. Design This was a cross-sectional methodology study, including test-retest reliability assessment. Methods Women with pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy and after delivery participated in a postal survey that included the Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Disability Rating Index (DRI), Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and 8-item version of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Test-retest reliability was assessed with a random subsample 1 week later. Internal consistency was assessed with the Cronbach alpha, and test-retest reliability was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC). Construct validity based on hypotheses was assessed by correlation analysis. Discriminant validity was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results All participants responded to the main (N=87) and test-retest (n=42) surveys. Cronbach alpha values ranged from .88 to .94, and ICCs ranged from .78 to .94. The MDC at the individual level constituted about 7% to 14% of total scores for the 8-item version of the SF-36, ODI, and PGQ activity subscale; about 18% to 22% for the DRI, PGQ symptom subscale, and PCS; and about 25% for the FABQ. Hypotheses were mostly confirmed by correlations between the instruments. The PGQ was the only instrument that significantly discriminated participants who were pregnant from participants who were not pregnant as well as pain locations. Limitations A comparison of responsiveness to change of the various instruments used in this study was not undertaken, but will be carried out in a future study. Conclusions Self-report instruments for assessing health showed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity for women with pelvic girdle pain. The PGQ was the only instrument with satisfactory discriminant validity, thus, it is recommended for evaluating symptoms and disability in patients with pelvic girdle pain.

Download Full-text

Rapid Assessment of Reward-Related Eating: The RED-X5

10.31232/osf.io/5uamk ◽

2018 ◽

Author(s):

Uku Vainik ◽

Jung Eun Han ◽

Elissa Epel ◽

Janet Tomiyama ◽

Alain Dagher ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Internal Consistency ◽

Rapid Assessment ◽

Eating Behaviour ◽

Consistency Test ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Large Sample ◽

Diabetes Status ◽

Research Designs ◽

High Internal Consistency ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Objective: Obesity’s prevalence has created a plethora of questionnaires characterizing psychological aspects of eating behaviour, such as reward-related eating (RRE). The Reward-based Eating Drive questionnaires (RED-9, RED-13) broadly and deeply assesses the RRE construct. However, large-sample research designs require shorter questionnaires that capture RRE quickly and precisely. We sought to develop a brief, reliable, and valid version of the RED questionnaire.Methods: We used all-subset correlation to find a subset that maximally associated with the full RED-13 in two separate samples. We validated results in a third independent sample. We also assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and ability to explain variance in external outcomes. Results: A 5-item questionnaire (RED-X5) correlated strongly with RED-13 in the independent sample (r = .95). RED-X5 demonstrated high internal consistency (omega total ≥ .80) and 6-month test-retest reliability (r = .72). RED-X5 accurately reproduced known associations between RED-13 and body mass index, diabetes status, and craving for sweet and savory foods. As a novel finding, RED questionnaires predicted laboratory intake of chips.Conclusions: The RED-X5 is a short, reliable, and valid measure of the RRE construct and can be readily implemented in large-sample research designs where questionnaire space is limited. Materials are available at https://osf.io/bd3mg/.

Download Full-text