Race, Brain Size, and Intelligence: A Reply to Cernovsky

1990 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 659-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Philippe Rushton
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Evolutionary Theory ◽  
Reproductive Strategies ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Autopsy Study

Cernovsky's 1990 critique of my work on the relation between brain size and IQ inadequately presents my position. I did not address the issue of sex differences in brain size nor did I conclude that “women are less intelligent than men” (p. 337). In the autopsy study cited by Cernovsky, it was concluded that, when body size is controlled, the male-female difference in brain size is removed but the black-white difference in brain size remains. Cernovsky also ignores much additional data, including that Mongoloid populations have larger and heavier brains than Caucasoids. Here, I review evidence on the relation between (a) brain size and race and (b) brain size and intelligence. Data are also tabulated for personality, speed of maturation, and sexuality, on all of which the Caucasoid average consistently falls between those of Mongoloids and Negroids. This ordering may be explained by a gene-based evolutionary theory of r/K reproductive strategies in which Mongoloids are more K-selected than Caucasoids and Caucasoids more than Negroids.

Interspecific variation in sexual dimorphism in brain size in Nearctic ground squirrels (Spermophilus spp.)

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew N Iwaniuk
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Ground Squirrel ◽  
Mating Systems ◽  
Resource Competition ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Ground Squirrels ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Size Dimorphism

A possible relationship between sexual dimorphism in brain size and mating system was investigated in five ground squirrel species: Spermophilus lateralis, S. tridecemlineatus, S. richardsonii, S. columbianus, and S. parryii. Relative brain size was measured by determining the endocranial volume of 247 ground squirrel skulls and regressing these values against two measurements of body size: mass and length. Analyses of covariation in the brain size / body size relationship within the five species revealed that sexual brain-size dimorphism occurs in three of the five species: S. lateralis, S. richardsonii, and S. tridecemlineatus. Application of a reduced major axis regression model indicated, however, that only S. lateralis and S. richardsonii exhibit significant sexual brain-size dimorphism. These findings suggest that the degree of sexual brain-size dimorphism is not directly correlated with variation in mating systems. Spatial abilities may play a role in the evolution of sexual brain-size dimorphism in ground squirrels, but the spatial requirements of mating systems appear to be insufficient. The possibility of sex differences in cognition, resource competition, and other variables as contributory factors to the evolution of sexual brain-size dimorphism is offered, but detailed knowledge of sex differences in the behaviour of ground squirrels is required to provide a definitive answer.

scholarly journals A Farewell to the Encephalization Quotient: A New Brain Size Measure for Comparative Primate Cognition

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Carel P. van Schaik ◽  
Zegni Triki ◽  
Redouan Bshary ◽  
Sandra A. Heldstab
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Cognitive Abilities ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Primate Species ◽  
Mammal Species ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Encephalization Quotient ◽  
Body Sizes ◽  
Size Measure

Both absolute and relative brain sizes vary greatly among and within the major vertebrate lineages. Scientists have long debated how larger brains in primates and hominins translate into greater cognitive performance, and in particular how to control for the relationship between the noncognitive functions of the brain and body size. One solution to this problem is to establish the slope of cognitive equivalence, i.e., the line connecting organisms with an identical bauplan but different body sizes. The original approach to estimate this slope through intraspecific regressions was abandoned after it became clear that it generated slopes that were too low by an unknown margin due to estimation error. Here, we revisit this method. We control for the error problem by focusing on highly dimorphic primate species with large sample sizes and fitting a line through the mean values for adult females and males. We obtain the best estimate for the slope of circa 0.27, a value much lower than those constructed using all mammal species and close to the value expected based on the genetic correlation between brain size and body size. We also find that the estimate of cognitive brain size based on cognitive equivalence fits empirical cognitive studies better than the encephalization quotient, which should therefore be avoided in future studies on primates and presumably mammals and birds in general. The use of residuals from the line of cognitive equivalence may change conclusions concerning the cognitive abilities of extant and extinct primate species, including hominins.

Sex differences in aggression: What does evolutionary theory predict?

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 273-274
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Cashdan
Keyword(s):  
Early Childhood ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Sex Difference ◽  
Evolutionary Theory ◽  
Spousal Abuse ◽  
Evolutionary Perspective ◽  
Target Article

AbstractThe target article claims that evolutionary theory predicts the emergence of sex differences in aggression in early childhood, and that there will be no sex difference in anger. It also finds an absence of sex differences in spousal abuse in Western societies. All three are puzzling from an evolutionary perspective and warrant further discussion.

Body size, brain size, and sexual dimorphism in Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber

2017 ◽  
Vol 111 ◽  
pp. 119-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather M. Garvin ◽  
Marina C. Elliott ◽  
Lucas K. Delezene ◽  
John Hawks ◽  
Steven E. Churchill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Brain Size

scholarly journals Are sex differences in human brain structure associated with sex differences in behaviour?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liza van Eijk ◽  
Dajiang Zhu ◽  
Baptiste Couvy-Duchesne ◽  
Lachlan T Strike ◽  
Anthony J Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Brain Structure ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Imaging Study ◽  
Data Driven ◽  
Cultural Norms ◽  
Weak Association ◽  
Human Connectome Project ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Behavioural Sex Differences

On average, men and women differ in brain structure and behaviour, raising the possibility of a link between sex differences in brain and behaviour. But women and men are also subject to different societal and cultural norms. We navigated this challenge by investigating variability of sex-differentiated brain structure within each sex. Using data from the Queensland Twin IMaging study (N=1,040) and Human Connectome Project (N=1,113), we obtained data-driven measures of individual differences along a male-female dimension for brain and behaviour based on average sex differences in brain structure and behaviour, respectively. We found a weak association between these brain and behavioural differences, driven by brain size. These brain and behavioural differences were moderately heritable. Our findings suggest that behavioural sex differences are to some extent related to sex differences in brain structure, but that this is mainly driven by differences in brain size, and causality should be interpreted cautiously.

scholarly journals Allometry unleashed: an adaptationist approach of brain scaling in mammalian evolution

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Willemet
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Allometric Scaling ◽  
Species Differences ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Neural Systems ◽  
Selection Pressures ◽  
Number Of Factors ◽  
Functional Consequences ◽  
Main Factor

The idea that allometry in the context of brain evolution mainly result from constraints channelling the scaling of brain components is deeply embedded in the field of comparative neurobiology. Constraints, however, only prevent or limit changes, and cannot explain why these changes happen in the first place. In fact, considering allometry as a lack of change may be one of the reasons why, after more than a century of research, there is still no satisfactory explanatory framework for the understanding of species differences in brain size and composition in mammals. The present paper attempts to tackle this issue by adopting an adaptationist approach to examine the factors behind the evolution of brain components. In particular, the model presented here aims to explain the presence of patterns of covariation among brain components found within major taxa, and the differences between taxa. The key determinant of these patterns of covariation within a taxon-cerebrotype (groups of species whose brains present a number of similarities at the physiological and anatomical levels) seems to be the presence of taxon-specific patterns of selection pressures targeting the functional and structural properties of neural components or systems. Species within a taxon share most of the selection pressures, but their levels scale with a number of factors that are often related to body size. The size and composition of neural systems respond to these selection pressures via a number of evolutionary scenarios, which are discussed here. Adaptation, rather than, as generally assumed, developmental or functional constraints, thus appears to be the main factor behind the allometric scaling of brain components. The fact that the selection pressures acting on the size of brain components form a pattern that is specific to each taxon accounts for the peculiar relationship between body size, brain size and composition, and behavioural capabilities characterizing each taxon. While it is important to avoid repeating the errors of the “Panglossian paradigm”, the elements presented here suggests that an adaptationist approach may shed a new light on the factors underlying, and the functional consequences of, species differences in brain size and composition.

scholarly journals Quantitative genetic analysis of brain size variation in sticklebacks: support for the mosaic model of brain evolution

2015 ◽  
Vol 282 (1810) ◽  
pp. 20151008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Noreikiene ◽  
Gábor Herczeg ◽  
Abigél Gonda ◽  
Gergely Balázs ◽  
Arild Husby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Additive Genetic Variance ◽  
Genetic Correlations ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Brain Evolution ◽  
Brain Regions ◽  
Independent Evolution ◽  
Mosaic Model

The mosaic model of brain evolution postulates that different brain regions are relatively free to evolve independently from each other. Such independent evolution is possible only if genetic correlations among the different brain regions are less than unity. We estimated heritabilities, evolvabilities and genetic correlations of relative size of the brain, and its different regions in the three-spined stickleback ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ). We found that heritabilities were low (average h 2 = 0.24), suggesting a large plastic component to brain architecture. However, evolvabilities of different brain parts were moderate, suggesting the presence of additive genetic variance to sustain a response to selection in the long term. Genetic correlations among different brain regions were low (average r G = 0.40) and significantly less than unity. These results, along with those from analyses of phenotypic and genetic integration, indicate a high degree of independence between different brain regions, suggesting that responses to selection are unlikely to be severely constrained by genetic and phenotypic correlations. Hence, the results give strong support for the mosaic model of brain evolution. However, the genetic correlation between brain and body size was high ( r G = 0.89), suggesting a constraint for independent evolution of brain and body size in sticklebacks.

Brain size/body weight in the dingo (Canis dingo): comparisons with domestic and wild canids

2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley P. Smith ◽  
Teghan A. Lucas ◽  
Rachel M. Norris ◽  
Maciej Henneberg
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Cuon Alpinus ◽  
Size Relationship ◽  
Wild Canids ◽  
Free Ranging ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Endocranial Volume ◽  
The Brain

Endocranial volume was measured in a large sample (n = 128) of free-ranging dingoes (Canis dingo) where body size was known. The brain/body size relationship in the dingoes was compared with populations of wild (Family Canidae) and domestic canids (Canis familiaris). Despite a great deal of variation among wild and domestic canids, the brain/body size of dingoes forms a tight cluster within the variation of domestic dogs. Like dogs, free-ranging dingoes have paedomorphic crania; however, dingoes have a larger brain and are more encephalised than most domestic breeds of dog. The dingo’s brain/body size relationship was similar to those of other mesopredators (medium-sized predators that typically prey on smaller animals), including the dhole (Cuon alpinus) and the coyote (Canis latrans). These findings have implications for the antiquity and classification of the dingo, as well as the impact of feralisation on brain size. At the same time, it highlights the difficulty in using brain/body size to distinguish wild and domestic canids.

The Conquest of Land

2019 ◽  
pp. 261-336
Author(s):  
Georg F. Striedter ◽  
R. Glenn Northcutt
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Brain Size ◽  
Somatosensory Input ◽  
Auditory Systems

Early amniotes evolved water-resistant skin and eggs, which allowed them to live and reproduce entirely on land. Roughly 300 million years ago, amniotes split into synapsids (including mammals) and sauropsids (“reptiles” and birds). The sauropsid lineage includes squamates (lizards and snakes), turtles, and archosaurs (crocodilians and dinosaurs, including birds). Tympanic ears and more complex auditory systems evolved at least twice within the various amniote lineages. Amniotes also evolved a separate vomeronasal epithelium and more diverse modes of locomotion and feeding. Brain size relative to body size increased in early amniotes and then increased further in several amniote lineages, notably mammals and birds. The most enlarged regions were the cerebellum and the telencephalon. Within the telencephalon, sauropsids enlarged mainly the ventral pallium, whereas mammals enlarged the dorsal pallium (aka neocortex). Although these regions are not homologous to one another, they both receive unimodal auditory, visual, and somatosensory input from the thalamus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document