scholarly journals Detection of early cytokine storm in patients with septic shock after abdominal surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-98
Author(s):  
Jiaojiao Chao ◽  
Song Cui ◽  
Chang Liu ◽  
Shan Liu ◽  
Sibo Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Abdominal Surgery ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Shock Group ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cytokine Storm ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Storm Intensity ◽  
Dependency Index

AbstractObjectives: To explore the characteristics of cytokine storm in patients with septic shock after abdominal surgery, examine its relationship with clinical data, and determine intervention timings.Materials and Methods: We prospectively observed a cohort of patients with abdominal infection admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery (shock group). A control group of healthy individuals was used for comparison. Plasma samples and clinical data recorded at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery were collected. Cytokines (tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin [IL]-6, IL-8, IL-10, monocyte chemotactic protein [MCP]-1, IL-1 β, interferon-γ, IL-12p70, MCP-1α, IL-4, IL-2, and IL-13) were detected using the Luminex® technique.Results: Concentrations of most cytokines were significantly higher in the shock group. When a cytokine storm intensity curve was considered with the vasopressor dependency index and a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, time point of maximum cytokine storm intensity was earlier than that of the maximum vasopressor dependency index and SOFA score in the shock group.Conclusions: Cytokine storm occurred in patients with septic shock shortly after the abdominal surgery and may be a main mechanism leading to septic shock. Cytokine storm interventions should ideally be initiated within 24 h after surgery and be guided by cytokine storm biomarkers.

scholarly journals C-reactive protein is not a useful indicator for infection in surgical intensive care units

2009 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 350-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domingos Dias Cicarelli ◽  
Joaquim Edson Vieira ◽  
Fábio Ely Martins Benseñor
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Lactate Levels

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: C-reactive protein (CRP) is commonly used as a marker for inflammatory states and for early identification of infection. This study aimed to investigate CRP as a marker for infection in patients with postoperative septic shock. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, single-center study, developed in a surgical intensive care unit at Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo. METHODS: This study evaluated 54 patients in the postoperative period, of whom 29 had septic shock (SS group) and 25 had systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS group). All of the patients were monitored over a seven-day period using the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and daily CRP and lactate measurements. RESULTS: The daily CRP measurements did not differ between the groups. There was no correlation between CRP and lactate levels and the SOFA score in the groups. We observed that the plasma CRP concentrations were high in almost all of the patients. The patients presented an inflammatory state postoperatively in response to surgical aggression. This could explain the elevated CRP measurements, regardless of whether the patient was infected or not. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not show any correlation between CRP and infection among patients with SIRS and septic shock during the early postoperative period.

scholarly journals Comparison of Automated Strategies for Surveillance of Nosocomial Bacteremia

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (9) ◽  
pp. 1030-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Bellini ◽  
Christiane Petignat ◽  
Patrick Francioli ◽  
Aline Wenger ◽  
Jacques Bille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Automated Surveillance ◽  
Contaminated Blood ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Objective.Surveillance of nosocomial bloodstream infection (BSI) is recommended, but time-consuming. We explored strategies for automated surveillance.Methods.Cohort study. We prospectively processed microbiological and administrative patient data with computerized algorithms to identify contaminated blood cultures, community-acquired BSI, and hospital-acquired BSI and used algorithms to classify the latter on the basis of whether it was a catheter-associated infection. We compared the automatic classification with an assessment (71% prospective) of clinical data.Setting.An 850-bed university hospital.Participants.All adult patients admitted to general surgery, internal medicine, a medical intensive care unit, or a surgical intensive care unit over 3 years.Results.The results of the automated surveillance were 95% concordant with those of classical surveillance based on the assessment of clinical data in distinguishing contamination, community-acquired BSI, and hospital-acquired BSI in a random sample of 100 cases of bacteremia. The two methods were 74% concordant in classifying 351 consecutive episodes of nosocomial BSI with respect to whether the BSI was catheter-associated. Prolonged episodes of BSI, mostly fungemia, that were counted multiple times and incorrect classification of BSI clinically imputable to catheter infection accounted for 81% of the misclassifications in automated surveillance. By counting episodes of fungemia only once per hospital stay and by considering all cases of coagulase-negative staphylococcal BSI to be catheter-related, we improved concordance with clinical assessment to 82%. With these adjustments, automated surveillance for detection of catheter-related BSI had a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 93%; for detection of other types of nosocomial BSI, the sensitivity was 98% and the specificity was 69%.Conclusion.Automated strategies are convenient alternatives to manual surveillance of nosocomial BSI.

scholarly journals Transthoracic Echocardiography: Impact on Diagnosis and Management in Tertiary Care Intensive Care Units

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. K. Stanko ◽  
E. Jacobsohn ◽  
J. W. Tam ◽  
C. J. De Wet ◽  
M. Avidan
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Management Plan ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Diagnosis And Management ◽  
Referring Physicians

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in an intensive care unit by determining its impact on diagnosis and management. Over a six-month time period, we performed a prospective observational study on all patients admitted to either the medical or the surgical intensive care unit. Structured interviews were conducted with referring physicians before and after the TTE to determine the referring physicians’ pre-TTE diagnosis, reasons for requesting the TTE, and whether the TTE resulted in a change in diagnosis and/or management. A total of 135 TTE examinations were done in 126 patients. The referring physicians deemed that clinical information was inadequate to make a definitive diagnosis and management plan in 36/135 (27%) of the requests. In 99/135 (73%) studies, physicians indicated that there was probably sufficient clinical information to formulate a diagnosis and management plan, but ordered a TTE to corroborate their clinical findings. Overall, a change in diagnosis occurred in 39/135 (29%) of studies, and a change in management in 55/135 (41%) of studies. Diagnosis was changed in 19/99 (19%) studies with adequate clinical data, and in 20/36 (56%) studies with inadequate clinical data (P<0.001). Management was changed in 34/99 (34%) of studies with adequate clinical data and in 21/36 (58%) of studies with inadequate clinical data (P=0.017). Of the 62 management changes, 57/62 (92%) changes were minor, and 5/62 (8%) were major. In conclusion we have found that TTE frequently resulted in a change in the diagnosis and management.

CHANGES IN VASOPRESSIN USE AND OUTCOMES IN SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK

CHEST Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 556B
Author(s):  
Monica I. Lupei ◽  
Gregory J. Beilman ◽  
Jeffrey G. Chipman ◽  
Henry J. Mann
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care

scholarly journals Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Protein in Septic Shock Patients

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domingos Dias Cicarelli ◽  
Joaquim Edson Vieira ◽  
Fábio Ely Martins Benseñor
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Serum Amyloid A ◽  
Infectious Agent ◽  
Serum Amyloid ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Amyloid A ◽  
Serum Amyloid A Protein

Septic shock is a severe inflammatory state caused by an infectious agent. Our purpose was to investigate serum amyloid A (SAA) protein and C-reactive protein (CRP) as inflammatory markers of septic shock patients. Here we evaluate 29 patients in postoperative period, with septic shock, in a prospective study developed in a surgical intensive care unit. All eligible patients were monitored over a 7-day period by sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, daily CRP, SAA, and lactate measurements. CRP and SAA strongly correlated up to the fifth day of observation but were not good predictors of mortality in septic shock.

Association of Microcirculation, Macrocirculation, and Severity of Illness in Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study to Identify Microcirculatory Targets Potentially Suitable for Guidance of Hemodynamic Therapy

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Sturm ◽  
Julia Leiblein ◽  
Verena Schneider-Lindner ◽  
Thomas Kirschning ◽  
Manfred Thiel
Keyword(s):  
Septic Shock ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Fluid Balance ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Lactate Concentration ◽  
Severity Of Illness ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Hemodynamic Therapy

Purpose: Clinically unapparent microcirculatory impairment is common and has a negative impact on septic shock, but specific therapy is not established so far. This prospective observational study aimed at identifying candidate parameters for microcirculatory-guided hemodynamic therapy. : NCT01530932. Materials and Methods: Microcirculatory flow and postcapillary venous oxygen saturation were detected during vaso-occlusive testing (VOT) on days 1 (T0), 2 (T24), and 4 (T72) in 20 patients with septic shock at a surgical intensive care unit using a laser Doppler spectrophotometry system (O2C). Results: Reperfusional maximal venous capillary oxygen saturation (SvcO2max) showed negative correlations with Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPSII)/Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, norepinephrine dosage, and lactate concentration and showed positive correlations with cardiac index (CI). At T24 and T72, SvcO2max was also inversely linked to fluid balance. With respect to any predictive value, SvcO2max and CI determined on day 1 (T0) were negatively correlated with SAPS II/SOFA on day 4 (T72). Moreover, SvcO2max measured on day 1 or day 2 was negatively correlated with cumulated fluid balance on day 4 ( r= −.472, P < .05 and r = −.829, P < .001). By contrast, CI neither on day 1 nor on day 2 was correlated with cumulated fluid balance on day 4 ( r = −.343, P = .17 and r = −.365, P = .15). Conclusion: In patients with septic shock, microcirculatory reserve as assessed by SvcO2max following VOT was impaired and negatively correlated with severity of illness and fluid balance. In contrast to CI, SvcO2max determined on day 1 or day 2 was significantly negatively correlated with cumulative fluid balance on day 4. Therefore, early microcirculatory measurement of SvcO2max might be superior to CI in guidance of sepsis therapy to avoid fluid overload. This has to be addressed in future clinical studies.

scholarly journals Vasopressin for Septic Shock in a Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Unit

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arpita Patel ◽  
Arielle Beauchesne ◽  
Nina Bredenkamp ◽  
Rumi McGloin ◽  
Sarah N Stabler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Septic Shock ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Surgical Intensive Care ◽  
Choc Septique ◽  
The Mean

ABSTRACTBackground: Critically ill patients often need vasopressors to treat hypotension related to septic shock and to maintain adequate systemic perfusion. Although the 2017 guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommend norepinephrine as first-line therapy, they also state that vasopressin may be considered as an adjunctive agent for patients with refractory shock. Limited evidence is available for directing optimal administration of vasopressin. As such, prescribing practices are not standardized and may vary according to the particular clinician, the clinical scenario, and various patient-specific factors.Objectives:To review the current practice of administering concomitant norepinephrine and vasopressin therapy to patients with septic shock, to describe variability in vasopressin administration, and to evaluate effects on patient safety in a medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU).Methods: This single-centre retrospective chart review involved 100 adult patients admitted to the ICU who received vasopressin and norepinephrine for septic shock between April and December 2017. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics.Results: The mean time to initiation of vasopressin was 12.0 (standard deviation [SD] 21.6) h after initiation of norepinephrine. The mean dose of norepinephrine at the time of vasopressin initiation was 29.5 (SD 19.7) μg/min. The mean vasopressin dose prescribed was 0.04 (SD 0.03) units/min, with a range of tapering and discontinuation regimens. The mean duration of vasopressin therapy was 49.1 (SD 65.2) h, and vasopressin was discontinued before norepinephrine in 49 of the patients. A total of 60 hypotensive events occurred after vasopressor discontinuation and were more common when vasopressin was discontinued before norepinephrine.Conclusions: Vasopressin dosing was comparable to that reported elsewhere; however, discontinuation practices were inconsistent. These results show that variability in the literature supporting vasopressin use has led to variability in vasopressin administration and discontinuation practices; however, correlation with improvement in clinical outcomes, such as mortality or ICU length of stay, is unclear, and further research is required to determine the ideal approach to vasopressin use.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les patients gravement malades nécessitent souvent un vasopresseur pour traiter l’hypotension liée au choc septique et pour préserver une perfusion systémique adéquate. Bien que les directives de 2017 de la campagne Surviving Sepsis recommandent la norepinephrine en guise de thérapie de première ligne, elles précisent également que la vasopressine pourrait être envisagée comme agent d’appoint pour les patients présentant des chocs réfractaires. Seules des données probantes limitées soutiennent l’administration optimale de la vasopressine. Les pratiques de prescription proprement dites ne sont pas standardisées et peuvent varier selon le clinicien, le scénario clinique et les divers facteurs particuliers au patient.Objectifs : Examiner la pratique actuelle d’administration de la norépinephrine concomitante à la thérapie de vasopressine aux patients ayant subi un choc septique, décrire la variabilité d’administration de la vasopressine et évaluer les effets sur la sécurité du patient dans une unite de soins intensifs (USI) médicale-chirurgicale.Méthodes : Cet examen rétrospectif unicentrique des dossiers portait sur 100 patients adultes admis dans une USI, ayant reçu de la vasopressine et de la norépinephrine en réponse à des chocs septiques entre avril et décembre 2017. Les données ont été analysées à l’aide de statistiques descriptives.Résultats : Le temps moyen du début de l’administration de la vasopressine était de 12 h (écart type [É.T.] 21,6) après le début de l’administration de la norépinephrine. La dose moyenne de norepinephrine au moment du début de l’administration de la vasopressine était de 29,5 (É.T. 19,7) μg/min. La dose moyenne de vasopressine prescrite était de 0,04 (É.T. 0,03) unités/min, avec une gamme de posologies dégressives et d’abandons. La durée moyenne de la thérapie à la vasopressine était de 49,1 h (É.T. 65,2), et 49 patients ont abandonné la vasopressine avant l’abandon de la norépinephrine. Un total de 60 événements hypotenseurs se sont produits après l’abandon du vasopresseur et ils étaient plus fréquents lors de l’abandon de la vasopressine précédant celui de la norépinephrine.Conclusions : Le dosage de vasopressine était comparable à celui indiqué dans d’autres études; cependant, les pratiques d’abandon étaient incohérentes. Ces résultats démontrent que l’indétermination de l’information publiée dans la littérature soutenant l’utilisation de la vasopressine a entraîné une fluctuation dans l’administration de la vasopressine et des pratiques d’abandon; cependant, la corrélation entre l’usage de la vasopressine et l’amélioration des résultats cliniques, comme la mortalité ou la durée du séjour en USI, n’est pas claire, et davantage de recherches sont nécessaires pour déterminer l’approche idéale à adopter à l’égard de l’utilisation de la vasopressine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document