scholarly journals Pemberian Wasiat Wajibah Atas Harta Warisan Kepada Ahli Waris Non-Muslim Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam

Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 397
Author(s):  
Syans Dias Aulia Abiandti ◽  
I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi
Keyword(s):  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Historical Interpretation ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Masses ◽  
Interpretation Method ◽  
Sociological Interpretation

Abstract The purpose of writing is to know and analyze the regulation of wills in the provisions of fiqh and positive legal provisions in Indonesia, and the basis for consideration of the Judge is to grant inheritance rights in the form of compulsory wills to non-Muslim heirs. Normative legal research methods. The results of this study indicate that the provision of wills is only intended for adoptive parents or adopted children and not to be given to a non-Muslim as this is regulated in Article 209 KHI. Second, the basis for judges to grant compulsory wills for heirs of different religions is the jurispudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 368/K/Ag/1995 on the basis of being the freedom that is owned by the Judge, and the Judge has the obligation to make legal discoveries using the historical interpretation method, sociological interpretation, and the analogue argumentum based on morals, justice and the masses of society. Abstrak Adapun tujuan penulisan adalah mengetahui dan menganalisis mengenai pengaturan wasiat wajibah dalam ketentuan fikih dan ketentuan hukum positif di Indonesia, dan dasar pertimbangan Hakim memberikan hak waris dalam bentuk wasiat wajibah kepada ahli waris non muslim. Metode penelitian hukum normatif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, pemberian wasiat wajibah hanya diperuntukkan kepada orang tua angkat atau anak angkat dan tidak untuk diberikan kepada seseorang non-muslim sebagiamana hal ini diatur pada Pasal 209 KHI. Kedua, dasar hakim pemberian wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris beda agama adalah yurispudensi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 368/K/Ag/1995, atas dasar asas kebebasan yang dimiliki oleh Hakim, dan Hakim memiliki kewajiban untuk melakukan penemuan hukum menggunakan metode penafsiran historis, penafsiran sosiologis, dan argumentum peranalogium dengan berlandasakan moral, keadilan dan kemashlatan masyarakat.    

scholarly journals PEMBERIAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP AHLI WARIS BEDA AGAMA (Kajian Perbandingan Hukum Antara Hukum Islam dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 368.K/AG/1995)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rinaldi Arif
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

According to Islamic law, one of the obstacles to get inheritance is the religious difference between joint heirs and testator. The condition for the joint heirs of different religions felt unfair, so the problem is then brought to the realm of law. The Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K/AG/1995 provides a way for the joint heirs of different religions to obtain the inheritance through a wasiat wajibah. This study is a descriptive analysis that leads to normative legal research, with a research of legal approach. Data collection is obtained from secondary data by library study. The data obtained is then analyzed using qualitative analysis. Based on the results of the research according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 368.K/AG/1995, the concept of wills is not only for adopted children or adoptive parents, but also for non-Muslim heirs by giving Part or portion of the heirs of different religions based on the heirs of different religions based when he/she is Muslim. Analysis of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 368.K/AG/1995, about the provision of wasiat wajibah to the heirs of different religions is that the provision of wasiat wajibah to the heirs of non-Muslims actually is not in accordance with the rules of Islamic law.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Pengangkatan Anak menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 14
Author(s):  
Adawiyah Nasution
Keyword(s):  
Child Protection ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Field Research ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Right

<h1>The purpose of this study is to assess the legal provisions of the children under Law No. 23 of 2002 and to explain the consequences of the child's adoption law. In addition, to know the legal protection of adopted children under the Child Protection Act is reviewed from Islamic Law Preformance law Practice in Indonesia. To examine the matter, a descriptive study was conducted with a normative juridical approach that was conducted only on the written rules. The collection of data is derived from the literature research and supported field research studies on the appointment of Court and Civil registry office. Primary data collection tools are informant with the interview guidelines whereas data analysis is done with a qualitative approach using the logical and inductive thinking logic in the field of law. In the content of this article shows that, firstly, the consequences of child adoption generally arise with the appointment of a court by not deciding the adoption of adopted children with their biological parents, which switching is the right of custody. In the case of inheritance, the appointment of children based on the determination of the Court of Justice is entitled to the inheritance of his adoptive parents based on wills. Thirdly, with the determination of the adoption of children from the courts, the consequence is the protection of adopted children can be assured of the custody of the law and the inheritance of its adoptive parents.</h1><h1> </h1>

scholarly journals WASIAT TERHADAP HARTA PENINGGALAN UNTUK ANAK ANGKAT DIPANDANG DARI HUKUM ISLAM

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Ade Kurniawan Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Distribution System ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
The Way

Abstract: Islamic jurists suggest that a will is ownership based on a person who declares a will died in the way of goodness without demanding compensation or tabarru '. In Islamic law, adopted children are not heirs, so if the adoptive parents die, the adopted child does not get a heritage. However, of course this is not fair for adopted children who are like their own children by their adoptive parents. For this reason, a will for the adopted child is needed to obtain the inheritance of the adoptive parents. The purpose of this study, namely: 1). To study and explain the provisions of Islamic law regarding testaments to inheritance. 2). To study and explain the provisions of Islamic law regarding testaments to inheritance for adopted children. This type of research belongs to the category of normative legal research. Conclusion, Many inheritance that can be inherited for adopted children is as much as 1/3 of all assets left behind, where the assets are in the distribution system that before the distribution of inheritance to the heirs is carried out, the obligatory will must be fulfilled first. In the division of obligatory wills, which have been determined according to Islamic law, what must be considered is that the part of the adopted child is a third part and must not exceed the minimum portion received by the heirs.Keywords: testament, adoption, inheritance

PENEGAKAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA DALAM MENANGANI KASASI PERKARA KARTEL PUTUSAN KPPU YANG MENGGUNAKAN ALAT BUKTI TIDAK LANGSUNG (INDIRECT EVIDENCE)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-101
Author(s):  
Fransiska Lestari Simanjuntak
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Indirect Evidence ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Problem ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Is Research ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Valid Evidence ◽  
The Republic

Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) is an institution authorized to handle unfair business competition violation. In fact, in several KPPU decisions it was revealed that KPPU prioritizes indirect evidence in handling cartel cases in Indonesia. KPPU's decision is not final and binding. Business actors who do not accept the decision of KPPU may file an objection at the District Court. The parties who do not accept the decision of the district court, may file an appeal in the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The type of research is used in this research is normative legal research, that is research done by reviewing the rules of law applicable or applied to a certain legal problem. The result of the research shows that in the Supreme Court appeal, KPPU's decision was upheld and canceled by Supreme Court to KPPU's decision uses indirect evidence in handling cartel case. The basis of consideration of the Supreme Court Justices ruling the KPPU's decision in the case of the tire cartel and the cement cartel is the Chief Justice accepting and acknowledging the indirect evidence as valid evidence, since the evidence is sufficient and logical evidence, and there is no evidence the more powerful that can weaken the indirect evidence. While the consideration of the Supreme Court Judge overturning the KPPU's decision in the case of cartel fuel surcharger is not accepting and acknowledging indirect evidence as valid evidence, because the evidence is insufficient and illogical, and there is stronger evidence that can weaken the tool indirect evidence

E-Court

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Yordan Gunawan ◽  
Rizaldy Anggriawan
Keyword(s):  
Industry 4.0 ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Legal Discovery

Facing the advanced Industry 4.0, where everything is closely tied to technology and is characterized by digitalization, the Supreme Court of Indonesia has introduced the implementation of e-justice by developing an electronic justice system (e-court) in 2018. The study aims to highlight the current practice of e-court in Indonesia. It also examines the existing implementation and legal provisions regulating the electronic-based court proceedings. The research method used is normative legal research. It analyzes the positive law, principles, doctrines of law, legal discovery in particular cases, legal systematics, legal comparison, and legal history. The study revealed that e-court has provided easier access to the public in order to make the court more accessible, effective, and efficient. Nevertheless, several improvements in particular sectors such as access to justice, case delays, human resource readiness, public internet facility, evidence management, and hearing session procedures need to be highlighted and updated by the court.

scholarly journals Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia dalam Menciptakan Hakim Agung Yang Berkualitas dan Berintegritas

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Muslim Mamulai
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Ad Hoc ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Court Judge ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic

Kajian ini untuk mengkaji eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesa dalam menciptakan hakim agung yang berkualitas dan berintegritas. Metode peneltia yang digunaka menggunakan metode peneltian hukum normatif. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 24B ayat (1) UUD 1945 mengalami dinamika dan perubahan dalam penafsiran baik pada tingkat legislasi di DPR, ajudikasi di Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Mahkamah Agung, maupun pada tingkat regulasi di Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial.Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial mengusulkan pengangkatan hakim agung telah mengalami perluasan makna mencakup hakim ad hoc di Mahkamah Agung serta penguatan dengan dihapuskan kewenangan DPR untuk memilih calon hakim agung dan hanya menyetujui atau tidak menyetujui calon hakim agung usulan Komisi Yudisial. This study is to study the existence of the Judicial Commission of the Republic of Indonesia in creating high-quality judges with integrity. The research method used uses normative legal research methods. The results showed that the authority of the Judicial Commission as referred to in Article 24B paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution experienced dynamics and changes in interpretation both at the legislative level in the DPR, adjudication in the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court, as well as in the Supreme Court and Judicial Commission. The existence of the Judicial Commission proposing the appointment of a Supreme Court judge has broadened the meaning including ad hoc judges in the Supreme Court and strengthened by abolishing the authority of the DPR to elect candidate judges and only approving or not approving candidates for the proposed Judicial Commission.

scholarly journals A HOLISTIC APPROACH OF AMNESTY APPLICATION FOR BAIQ NURIL MAKNUN IN THE FRAMEWORK OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF INDONESIA

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Reda Manthovani ◽  
Kukuh Tejomurti
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Education Agency ◽  
The Republic

<p>The Supreme Court has rejected a petition for case review from Baiq Nuril Maknun, a West Nusa Tenggara woman who was convicted of defamation against her alleged sexual harasser. Justices Margono, Desniyati and Suhadi rejected Nuril’s challenge against the Supreme Court's decision in September 2018, which found Nuril guilty of violating Article 27 of the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law and sentenced her to six months in prison and a fine of Rp 500 million (US$34,644). The defamation case has been criticized for using the controversial law to incriminate an alleged victim of sexual harassment, when the Mataram Education Agency reported Nuril for recording the phone call.This research is prescriptive normative research namely, legal research that takes legal issues as a norm system used to provide prescriptive justifications about a legal event. From Nuril’s case we can see the laws are sorely inadequate, case in point the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law), that got her into trouble. It’s so rubbery, it can be interpreted any way anyone wants. Amnesty should be given to Baiq Nuril Maknun because amnesty is the authority of the President for the interests of the state, in this case human rights and citizens' rights to get legal protection and free from discrimination and Law Number 11 <em>Drt</em> In 1954, yet it contradicted the constitution in cases and institutions, because Article 14 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia had no case restrictions in granting amnesty and was carried out with consideration of the People’s Representative Council of The Republic of Indonesia.</p>

scholarly journals PENGATURAN WASIAT WAJIBAH TERHADAP ANAK ANGKAT MENURUT HUKUM ISLAM

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Ade Kurniawan Akbar
Keyword(s):  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Adoptive Parents ◽  
Adopted Children ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Adopted Child ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Library Research ◽  
Mandatory Requirement

Abstract: The inheritance law is an approved law regarding the transfer of assets issued by a person who is delayed and the consequences for his heirs. In a will which is also called a mandatory will, a will is usually given to people who are not heirs. Mandatory obligation is a mandatory requirement for every Muslim to provide part of the inheritance to family members needed and for adopted children. The type of research used in this journal is a normative legal research method. Normative research or library research is legal research conducted by examining library material or mere secondary data. Normative legal research is to consider the relationship between the legal sciences and positive law. Mandatory wills are made as a basis by the Compilation of Islamic Law to provide part of the inheritance's inheritance for adopted children who may not be given a will by the testator, or adoptive parents who are not given a will by the heir (adopted child). The existence of mandatory provisions in the Compilation of Islamic Law is a bridge that determines the inequality that has occurred so far between adopted children and adoptive parents who have not inherited from each other, because there is indeed no provision to inherit each other between.Keywords: Mandatory Testament; Adopted Child; Islamic law;

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis Pengajuan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali pada Perkara Pidana dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-105
Author(s):  
I Made Widi Adi Peremana ◽  
A. A. Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Criminal Cases ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
Library Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Circular Letter ◽  
The Republic

The study of this research is the submission of requests for reconsideration in criminal cases in the Indonesian legal system which became a polemic after the issuance of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 34 / XI-PUU / 2013 and Circular Letter of the Supreme Court (SEMA) Number 7 of 2014 concerning Submission of Reappeals in Cases Criminal. The research objectives to be achieved, in this case, are the regulation of legal reconsideration efforts in Indonesia and the procedure for submitting a request for review in the Indonesian system. Researchers use a normative juridical approach or library research or doctrinal legal research which can be interpreted as legal research by examining library materials and secondary materials. This study illustrates that the regulations for reconsideration in the legal system in Indonesia are based on various regulations, namely Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, Law No. 3 of 2009 concerning the Supreme Court, Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power, Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Review of Criminal Cases and Submission of Reconsiderations at this time refers to the provisions of the Circular Letter of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 7 of 2014 concerning Reconsideration in Criminal Cases.  

scholarly journals Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menafsir Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

EKSPOSE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 349
Author(s):  
Syawaluddin Hanadi
Keyword(s):  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Historical Interpretation ◽  
Original Intent ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Sociological Interpretation

The Constitutional Court as a judicial institution plays an important role in the enforcement of Indonesian law. The institution authority is to interpret the constitution. In accordance with its function, the institution is able to provide an interpretation, not only the juridical interpretation but also the theological or sociological interpretation, letterlijk (original intent), and historical interpretation. These interpretations are used to assess the presence of the law which is considered contrary to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document