scholarly journals Protection of Animated Cartoon Character: Copyright or Trademark?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Satriawan ◽  
Marwanto Marwanto
Keyword(s):  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Animated Cartoon ◽  
Cartoon Character ◽  
Animated Film ◽  
Cartoon Characters ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Animated cartoon character is a character created or depicted in an animated story with the aim of supporting the story in an animated film. Currently, many children's clothes, bags, shoes or accessories include animated pictures from cartoons with the aim of attracting buyers' attention to increase sales of these products. The purpose of this writing is to identify, analyse and elaborate legal protections for animated cartoon characters based on the provisions in the copyright law, as well as legal protection for animated cartoon characters used as brands. This was normative legal research using a statutory, conceptual and analytical approaches. Animated cartoon characters as one of the objects of copyright protection, namely images, receive automatic protection based on the Copyright Law and can also be registered as Trademarks, as long as the image has distinctive power and has no similarity in substantial or in its entirety. However, if any parties who intend to use the animated cartoon characters that already classified as a well-known trademark, that party can propose a License to the owner of the trademark as regulated under the provision of Article 42 paragraph (1) of Trademark Law

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA TERHADAP COVER VERSION LAGU DI YOUTUBE

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Anak Agung Mirah Satria Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Infringement ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Copyright Holder ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Cover Songs

Protection of copyright law against cover version of song on youtube. Copyright protection only extends to the “expression” of the creator, and not to the “idea” or information derived from a work. This is what happens in cover songs, others have the freedom to express the same idea or reuse the information gained from the creation or work that is protected into the work afterwards as long as the idea is expressed in a different way. The formulation of the problem in this research is 1. Does making cover versions of songs belonging to others and uploading to youtube social media is a form of copyright infringement? and 2. What is the legal protection of the copyright holder for copyright infringement in the field of music and song in the form of commercial cover version?. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research. The conclusion of the results of this research is in making cover versions of songs and uploading to youtube social media in general do not violate the Copyright when the making and announcement is done by not violating the exclusive rights of copyright holder and legal protection against the copyright holder over copyright infringement in the field of music and songs in the form of commercialized version cover can be done through two ways, namely preventive efforts and repressive efforts. Abstrak Perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap cover version lagu di youtube. Perlindungan hak cipta hanya mencakup kepada “ekspresi” pencipta, dan bukan kepada “ide” atau informasi yang didapat dari suatu ciptaan. Hal inilah yang terjadi dalam kegiatan cover lagu, pihak lain memiliki kebebasan untuk mengekspresikan ide yang sama atau menggunakan kembali informasi yang diperoleh dari ciptaan atau karya yang dilindungi kedalam karya sesudahnya selama ide tersebut diekspresikan dengan cara yang berbeda. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah 1. Apakah membuat cover version lagu dan mengunggah ke media sosial youtube merupakan suatu bentuk pelanggaran hak cipta ? dan 2. Bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak cipta atas pelanggaran hak cipta di bidang musik dan lagu dalam bentuk cover version yang di komersilkan ?. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini yaitu membuat cover version lagu dan mengunggah ke media sosial youtube secara umum tidak melanggar Hak Cipta apabila pembuatan dan pengumuman tersebut dilakukan dengan tidak melanggar hak-hak eksklusif pemegang hak cipta dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak cipta atas pelanggaran hak cipta dibidang musik dan lagu dalam bentuk cover version yang dikomersilkan dapat dilakukan melalui dua cara yaitu upaya preventif dan upaya represif.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Motif Tato Suku Dayak dalam Dimensi Hukum Hak Cipta di Indonesia

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 655
Author(s):  
Putu Prashanti Vahini Kumara ◽  
I Ketut Westra
Keyword(s):  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Modern Society ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Customary Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Cultural Expressions ◽  
Traditional Cultural Expressions

Dayak tattoos are works of art with tattoo motifs created by the Dayak people from generation to generation so that they can be referred to as Traditional Cultural Expressions, but now these tattoo motifs are widely used by modern society and are considered as art. The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and elaborate the legal protection arrangements for modern tattoos based on the provisions of the copyright law in Indonesia, as well as the protection of Dayak tattoos from a copyright perspective. This paper is a normative legal research with descriptive analysis technique. The results show that tattoos are one of the objects of copyright protection in the form of images that receive automatic protection as stipulated in Article 40 letter f UUHC. Regarding the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe, it should be protected as one of the Traditional Cultural Expressions as stipulated in Article 38 paragraph (1) UUHC. Protection is given considering that the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe is closely related to the values ??that live in the community that bears it, including customs, customary law norms, and other noble norms that are upheld by the Dayak community. Therefore, the State is obliged to carry out an inventory, maintain and preserve the existence of the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe. Tato Suku Dayak merupakan karya seni motif tato yang diciptakan oleh masyarakat suku Dayak secara turun-menurun sehingga dapat disebut sebagai Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional, namun kini motif tato tersebut banyak digunakan oleh masyarakat modern dan dianggap sebagai hal yang seni. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis dan mengelaborasi pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap tato modern berdasarkan ketentuan undang-undang hak cipta di Indonesia, serta perlindungan terhadap tato Suku Dayak dalam perspektif hak cipta. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan tehnik deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tato merupakan salah satu objek perlindungan hak cipta berupa gambar mendapat perlindungan secara otomatis atau automatically protection sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Pasal 40 huruf f UUHC. Berkaitan motif tato Suku Dayak sepatutnya dilindungi sebagai salah satu Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Pasal 38 ayat (1) UUHC. Perlindungan diberikan mengingat motif tato Suku Dayak memiliki keterkaitan erat dengan nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat pengembannya, antara lain adat-istiadat, norma hukum adat, dan norma-norma luhur lain yang dijunjung tinggi oleh masyarakat Suku Dayak. Maka dari itu, Negara wajib untuk melakukan inventarisasi, menjaga dan melestarikan keberadaan motif tato Suku Dayak.

The Copyrightability of Opera Direction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Iaia
Keyword(s):  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The Other ◽  
Eu Law ◽  
Eu Member States ◽  
Dramatic Text ◽  
Creative Contribution ◽  
Consistent Solution

Abstract A judgment of the Italian Court of Cassation – No. 17565 of 18 June 2021 – offers an opportunity to investigate the legal protection options applicable to the direction of opera. As this issue is not addressed by EU law, EU Member States have adopted different approaches, from awarding copyright, to neighboring rights, to a mixture of the two. This opinion aims at finding the most consistent solution within the Italian legal framework. After an assessment of the alternative legal options, it argues that opera direction should be eligible for copyright protection via an analogical application of Art. 44 of the Italian copyright law, which indirectly includes cinematic direction within the area of copyrightable works. This conclusion is based on the fact that there are no substantial differences between the two types of direction justifying a diverse treatment. Otherwise, it would result in blatant and unsubstantiated discrimination because both categories of directors set out to convert a text – the dramatic text or the film script – to the medium of theatre or film respectively. Finally, this opinion suggests that even if the other creative roles involved in opera making are not addressed by the law, they too should qualify as co-authors if they make a creative contribution.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP HAK TERKAIT PRODUSER FONOGRAM ATAS MECHANICAL RIGHTS FONOGRAM YANG DIKOMERSILKAN OLEH PIHAK LAIN

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 55
Author(s):  
Usak Usak
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Exclusive Right

<p><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum terhadap hak terkait produser fonogram atas mechanical rights fonogram yang dikomersilkan oleh pihak lain dalam ranah Hukum Hak Cipta di Indonesia. Isu hukum yang sering terjadi adalah mechanical rights milik produser fonogram sering dilanggar oleh pihak lain yang bukan pemegang mechanical rights atau tidak mendapatkan ijin secara langsung dari pemegang mechanical rights. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum. Mechanical rights fonogram terkait dengan penggandaan atau reproduksi fonogram. Produser fonogram mempunyai hak eksklusif untuk memberi ijin reproduksi langsung atau tidak langsung fonogramnya, dengan berbagai cara atau bentuk. Mechanical rights identik dengan Hak Terkait yang merupakan hak eksklusif produser fonogram. Undang-Undang Hak Cipta di Indonesia mampu memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap hak terkait produser fonogram atas mechanical rights fonogram yang dikomersilkan oleh pihak lain.</p><p><strong>Abstract</strong><br />The purpose of this study was about to examine the legal protection of neighboring rights producers of phonograms on phonograms of mechanical rights which commercialized by other parties in the realm of copyright law in Indonesia. Legal issues that often occurs is mechanical rights belong producers of phonograms often violated by others who are not holders of mechanical rights or do not get permission directly from the holders of mechanical rights. This study uses legal research. Mechanical rights on phonograms relating to procurement or reproduction of a phonogram. Producers of phonograms shall enjoy the exclusive right of authorizing the direct or indirect reproduction of their phonograms, in any manner or form. Mechanical rights on phonograms synonymous with “Neighboring Rights” is an exclusive right of producers of phonograms. Copyright Law in Indonesia able to provide legal protection of neighboring rights producers of phonograms on phonograms of mechanical rights which commercialized by other parties.</p>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Karya Cipta Fotografi

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-38
Author(s):  
I Kadek Candra Wisesa ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini ◽  
Luh Putu Suryani
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Property Rights ◽  
Intellectual Property Rights ◽  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Digital Cameras ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Republic

The richness in the diversity of arts and cultures can be found in the Republic of Indonesia. Intellectual property rights obtain protection as stipulated in legislation, including Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The advancement in technology and the increasingly developing world of digital photography by means of digital cameras raises the legal issues of copyright in photographic works. The main issues examined in this paper are: the forms of legal protection of the rights of the creators of photographic works and the resolution of disputes of photographic works that are used without permission. The method used to examine this issue is the normative legal research method with a legislative approach. Copyright Protection of photographic works may be done in two ways, namely preventive in which legal protection given to the creator of photography which the creator shall done by registering the copyright, and repressive protection realised by filing a lawsuit in court if there is a violation of copyright in the photographic work. All rights reserved must always be appreciated by not committing violating actions which are arbitrarily committed especially if it relates to providing benefits for violators.

scholarly journals A legal protection for domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-450
Author(s):  
Ali Osky Murbiantoro ◽  
Rachmad Safa'at ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
The Other ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Wide Scope ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Registered Trademark ◽  
Paris Convention

Indonesia’s trademark law does not provide provision for legal protection to registered mark which is well-known domestically therefore, there is no legal basis in case there is another party to commit in impersonation the said registered mark in the different kind of goods. On the other hand, protection indicates the address of international well-known marks only. Referring to the trademark law regime which is common universally such as can be found in the Paris Convention and TRIPs Agreement. Otherwise, for impersonation in different kinds of goods, the protection is given for a well- known mark only.  However, the said mark must be recognized within the territory where the mark is called as well-known such in certain countries. The purpose of this study is to know the legal protection for the domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law. This study is normative legal research with legislation, concept, and comparative approach. The legal material with technical analysis is done by the method of interpretation. Results of this study, The regulation of legal protection for registered trademark owners of impersonation of different kinds of goods should be reregulated (a reformulation of provisions).  So that which is a well-known trademark can be in the form of domestic and internationally well-known, therefore the requirements for registration and commercializing of a mark in several countries, not as an obligation to obtain the rights and status become a well-known mark. However, when a mark is factually known and used in Indonesia, the wide scope of international well-known is no need as a mandatory.  

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pencipta atas Pencatatan Suatu Ciptaan yang Sama

Lentera Hukum ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riko Sulung Raharjo ◽  
M. Khoidin ◽  
Ermanto Fahamsyah
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Similar Work ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right ◽  
Legal Consequences

Copyright recognizes a declarative system in which the state automatically protects a creation after it was born without having to be preceded by registration. Article 64 of Copyrights Act Number 28 of 2014 (Copyright Act) states the registration even though it is not a necessity for the creator. This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences, forms of legal protection, as well as the future conception of regulations relating to the recording of a work in common by using legal research as its method. The results of the study indicate that the legal consequences on the similar work to the registration, inter alia, the abolition of the power of law for the registration of works, compensation for the creator, and criminal threats. Based on the theory of legal certainty, a provision is a form of legal certainty provided by the Copyright Law. There is a form of legal protection against the creator of the registration of the similar creation, inter alia, the abolition of the power of the law for registration the work by the court, the creator has the right to compensation, and the creator has the right to sue criminal. Based on the theory of legal protection, a provision is a form of protection provided by the Copyright Law. The future conception of the regulation of registration of creation so that it can provide legal protection against the creator through the renewal related to the addition of authority and procedures in conducting checks for ministers in the case of the registration of creation since it was first realized and announced. Based on the theory of legal certainty and the benefits of law, change and renewal can provide legal certainty and legal benefit for the creator and his creation. Keywords: Creator, Recording of Creations, Same Creations

Copyright, Transformativeness, and Protection for internet Memes

2020 ◽  
pp. 107769902095049
Author(s):  
Natalia Mielczarek ◽  
W. Wat Hopkins
Keyword(s):  
Mass Communication ◽  
Theoretical Study ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Digital Culture ◽  
Media Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Media Technologies ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Research Analysis

Internet memes have become popular artifacts of mass communication in digital culture. They are, by definition, reiterative as they remix already existing content to produce new communicative statements. This theoretical study, which lies at the intersection of media technologies, society, and media law, explores the legal implications of such memetic appropriation vis-à-vis the U.S. copyright law. With the help of legal research analysis and theoretical framework of remix culture and internet memes, the study shows how and why memes deserve legal protection as transformative work.

scholarly journals Karya Cipta Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional: Studi Empiris Perlindungan Tari Tradisional Bali di Kabupaten Bangli

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 51
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Sukihana ◽  
I Gede Agus Kurniawan
Keyword(s):  
Cultural Heritage ◽  
Traditional Knowledge ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Deep Understanding ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Cultural Expression ◽  
Traditional Dance

Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expression including traditional dance are constituted as cultural heritage of the ancestor which derived from generation to generation, high value and useful, therefore very important to protect. The purpose of this paper is to elaborate the implementation of Article 38 of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright (Indonesia Copyright Law) related to traditional Balinese dance. This writing uses empirical legal research method. Traditional dance art as part of the traditional cultural expression is protected under Article 38 of Indonesia Copyright Law. In its implementation in Bangli regency, this provision has not been implemented effectively. One of the factors is because the community does not have a deep understanding on the substance specifically the importance of conducting inventory and documentation in the framework of legal protection through government cooperation with the community and related parties. Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional termasuk seni tari tradisional merupakan warisan budaya dari leluhur yang diturunkan dari generasi ke generasi berikutnya, bernilai dan memiliki daya guna yang tinggi, oleh karenanya sangat penting untuk dilindungi. Tujuan tulisan ini untuk mengelaborasi implementasi Pasal 38 Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta (UUHC 2014) berkaitan tari tradisional Bali. Penulisan ini menggunakan metoda penelitian hukum empiris. Seni tari tradisional sebagai ekspresi budaya tradisional dilindungi berdasarkan Pasal 38 UUHC 2014. Dalam implementasinya di Kabupaten Bangli, ketentuan ini belum terlaksana secara efektif. Salah satu faktor penyebabnya adalah masyarakat baru sebatas mengetahui, namun belum memahami substansinya, termasuk pemahaman tentang pentingnya melakukan inventarisasi dan dokumentasi dalam rangka perlindungan hukum melalui kerjasama pemerintah dengan masyarakat serta pihak terkait.

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA ATAS KARYA LAGU DAN MUSIK DALAM BENTUK PENJUALAN VCD ATAU DVD BAJAKAN DI YOGYAKARTA

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 196
Author(s):  
Dewi Prapmasari ◽  
M. Hudi Asrori S.
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Factors ◽  
Inhibiting Factors ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Research Show

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to determine the perceptions of sellers and buyers about the sale of pirated VCD DVDs regulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and to know what factors can improve their legal protection.. The research methodology used is empirical research, namely  secondary data published, for further research on primary data in the field or for the community.  Legal research materials used are primary and secondary legal materials, techniques used in collecting legal materials are observation, interviews and study of documents or library materials. The results of the research show that the Copyright Law makes songs and music works as one of the protected creations, but there are still many people who do copyright by trading pirated DVDs or VCDs. The perception of the seller who is related to the Copyright Law concerning the need for the Act so as not to involve copyrighted parties, but there must also be a policy that<br />no related party sells pirated VCDs or DVDs. In law enforcement the Copyright Act has several inhibiting factors, namely the legal factors themselves, law enforcement factors, facilities factors, community factors, cultural factors.</p><p>Keywords: Offense; Copyright; Pirated VCD or DVD.</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi para pelaku jualbeli mengenai penjualan DVD  atau VCD bajakan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan mengetahui faktor-faktor apa saja yang menghambat perlindungan hukumnya. Metodologi penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian empiris, yaitu meneliti data sekunder pada awalnya,  untuk kemudian dilanjutkan penelitian terhadap data primer di lapangan atau terhadap masyarakat.  Bahan penelitian hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan sekunder, teknik yang digunakan dalam pengumpulan bahan hukum adalah observasi, wawancara dan studi dokumen atau bahan pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Undang- Undang Hak Cipta menjadikan karya lagu dan musik sebagai salah satu ciptaan yang dilindungi, namun masih banyak masyarakat yang melakukan pelanggaran hak cipta dengan memperjualbelikan DVD atau VCD bajakan. Persepsi para pelaku jualbeli terkait Undang-Undang Hak Cipta ialah pentingnya keberadaan UndangUndang tersebut agar tidak merugikan pihak pemegang hak cipta, namun perlu ada kebijakan agar tidak merugikan pihak pelaku jualbeli VCD atau DVD bajakan. Dalam penegakan hukum Undang-Undang Hak Cipta terdapat beberapa faktor yang penghambat yaitu faktor hukumnya  sendiri, faktor penegak hukum, faktor sarana dan fasilitas, faktor masyarakat, faktor kebudayaan.</p><p>Kata Kunci: Pelanggaran; Hak Cipta; VCD atau DVD Bajakan.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document