scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA TERHADAP COVER VERSION LAGU DI YOUTUBE

Author(s):  
Anak Agung Mirah Satria Dewi

Protection of copyright law against cover version of song on youtube. Copyright protection only extends to the “expression” of the creator, and not to the “idea” or information derived from a work. This is what happens in cover songs, others have the freedom to express the same idea or reuse the information gained from the creation or work that is protected into the work afterwards as long as the idea is expressed in a different way. The formulation of the problem in this research is 1. Does making cover versions of songs belonging to others and uploading to youtube social media is a form of copyright infringement? and 2. What is the legal protection of the copyright holder for copyright infringement in the field of music and song in the form of commercial cover version?. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research. The conclusion of the results of this research is in making cover versions of songs and uploading to youtube social media in general do not violate the Copyright when the making and announcement is done by not violating the exclusive rights of copyright holder and legal protection against the copyright holder over copyright infringement in the field of music and songs in the form of commercialized version cover can be done through two ways, namely preventive efforts and repressive efforts. Abstrak Perlindungan hukum hak cipta terhadap cover version lagu di youtube. Perlindungan hak cipta hanya mencakup kepada “ekspresi” pencipta, dan bukan kepada “ide” atau informasi yang didapat dari suatu ciptaan. Hal inilah yang terjadi dalam kegiatan cover lagu, pihak lain memiliki kebebasan untuk mengekspresikan ide yang sama atau menggunakan kembali informasi yang diperoleh dari ciptaan atau karya yang dilindungi kedalam karya sesudahnya selama ide tersebut diekspresikan dengan cara yang berbeda. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah 1. Apakah membuat cover version lagu dan mengunggah ke media sosial youtube merupakan suatu bentuk pelanggaran hak cipta ? dan 2. Bagaimanakah perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak cipta atas pelanggaran hak cipta di bidang musik dan lagu dalam bentuk cover version yang di komersilkan ?. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif. Kesimpulan dari hasil penelitian ini yaitu membuat cover version lagu dan mengunggah ke media sosial youtube secara umum tidak melanggar Hak Cipta apabila pembuatan dan pengumuman tersebut dilakukan dengan tidak melanggar hak-hak eksklusif pemegang hak cipta dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak cipta atas pelanggaran hak cipta dibidang musik dan lagu dalam bentuk cover version yang dikomersilkan dapat dilakukan melalui dua cara yaitu upaya preventif dan upaya represif.

Yurispruden ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Lully Tiyas Junita

ABSTRACTCopyright is an exclusive right that arises automatically based on declarative principles after the creation is in real or visualized form. Legal protection for songwriters is regulated in Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. This research covers two main problems. First one, how is the implementation of copyright infringement on the song "Lagi Syantik" which is sung without permission from the copyright holder? The second, how is the legal protection of authors for songs whose lyrics have been changed without the permission of the copyright holders? This paper uses normative juridical research. This research uses 2 types of approaches, such as the statute approach and the case approach. The result of the research were the cover version of the song is not a prohibited activity if it is carried out based on applicable legal regulations and legal protection for copyright holders is regulated in the Copyright Law, Criminal Law, and Civil Law. Keyword: Copyright, The Copyright Holder, Legal Protection, Song. ABSTRAKHak Cipta adalah hak eksklusif yang timbul secara otomatis berdasarkan prinsip deklaratif setelah ciptaan sudah dalam bentuk nyata atau sudah divisualkan. Perlindungan hukum untuk pencipta lagu telah diatur di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Permasalahan penelitian ini meliputi yaitu Pertama, bagaimana bentuk pelanggaran hak cipta atas lagu “Lagi Syantik” yang dinyanyikan ulang tanpa izin dari pemegang hak cipta? Kedua, bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta atas lagu yang diubah lirik tanpa seizin pemegang hak cipta?. Penulisan ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis-normatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan 2 jenis pendekatan, yakni pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah cover version lagu bukan kegiatan yang dilarang jika dilakukan sesuai aturan hukum yang berlaku dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak cipta diatur dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta, Hukum Pidana, dan  Hukum Perdata. Kata Kunci: Hak Cipta, Pemegang Hak Cipta, Perlindungan Hukum, Lagu


Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Satriawan ◽  
Marwanto Marwanto

Animated cartoon character is a character created or depicted in an animated story with the aim of supporting the story in an animated film. Currently, many children's clothes, bags, shoes or accessories include animated pictures from cartoons with the aim of attracting buyers' attention to increase sales of these products. The purpose of this writing is to identify, analyse and elaborate legal protections for animated cartoon characters based on the provisions in the copyright law, as well as legal protection for animated cartoon characters used as brands. This was normative legal research using a statutory, conceptual and analytical approaches. Animated cartoon characters as one of the objects of copyright protection, namely images, receive automatic protection based on the Copyright Law and can also be registered as Trademarks, as long as the image has distinctive power and has no similarity in substantial or in its entirety. However, if any parties who intend to use the animated cartoon characters that already classified as a well-known trademark, that party can propose a License to the owner of the trademark as regulated under the provision of Article 42 paragraph (1) of Trademark Law


Author(s):  
Ashar Sinilele

AbstractLaw Copyright No. 19 of 2002 put copyright infringement as an ordinary offense no longer an offense. So that peraktis includes crime offenses. In the Copyright Act there are additional minimum and maximum criminal provisions, which are intended to counteract copyright infringement. The creator or heir has the right to sue the copyright holder to be included in his creation. A work must not be changed even though the copyright has been handed over to another party, except with the consent of his heirs in terms of creation has died. The provisions as referred to in paragraph (2) also apply to changes in the title and subhead of the creation, inclusion and alteration of the name or pseudonym of the creator.Keywords: Legal Protection, Intellectual Property RightsAbstrakUndang-undang Hak Cipta No. 19 Tahun 2002 menempatkan pelanggaran hak cipta sebagai delik biasa bukan lagi delik aduan. Sehingga peraktis termasuk delik-delik kejahatan. Dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta tersebut terdapat penambahan ketentuan pidana minimal dan maksimal, yang dimaksudkan untuk menangkal terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta. Pencipta atau ahli warisnya berhak menuntut pemegang hak cipta tetap dicantumkan dalam ciptaannya. Suatu ciptaan tidak boleh diubah walaupun hak ciptanya telah diserahkan kepada pihak lain, kecuali dengan persetujuan ahli warisnya dalam hal penciptaan telah meninggal dunia. Ketentuan sebagai mana dimaksud dalam ayat (2) berlaku juga terhadap perubahan judul dan anak judul ciptaan, pencantuman dan perubahan nama atau nama samaran pencipta.Kata Kunci : Perlindungan Hukum, Hak Atas Kekayaan Intelektual


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 541
Author(s):  
Damaris Eka Wijaya ◽  
Gunarto Gunarto

Technology is in progress increasingly sophisticated, enables everyone to explore and showcase her work in a variety of ways, one of which is now very easy to find is to upload video footage in a private channel on the YouTube site. However, disputes arise when recording on the channel associated with copyright issues. One of them is the activity of singing songs of others. The problems discussed in this study is how the Top Tracks Copyright Protection “Akad” Created by Payung Teduh In Case Cover Version By Hanin Dhiya Seen From the Copyright Act. The research approach is Normative legislation reviewing Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The results of this study explains that the song “Akad” is the creation of Payung Teduh, and copyright is protected by the Copyright Act, in order to perform a cover of the song, so it needed permission from Payung Teduh, as a tribute to the work of someone else's copyright. If this right is violated, the creator has the right to prosecute the song cover both civil and criminal.Keywords : Protection Law, Copyright, Cover Songs.


Author(s):  
Putu Prashanti Vahini Kumara ◽  
I Ketut Westra

Dayak tattoos are works of art with tattoo motifs created by the Dayak people from generation to generation so that they can be referred to as Traditional Cultural Expressions, but now these tattoo motifs are widely used by modern society and are considered as art. The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and elaborate the legal protection arrangements for modern tattoos based on the provisions of the copyright law in Indonesia, as well as the protection of Dayak tattoos from a copyright perspective. This paper is a normative legal research with descriptive analysis technique. The results show that tattoos are one of the objects of copyright protection in the form of images that receive automatic protection as stipulated in Article 40 letter f UUHC. Regarding the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe, it should be protected as one of the Traditional Cultural Expressions as stipulated in Article 38 paragraph (1) UUHC. Protection is given considering that the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe is closely related to the values ??that live in the community that bears it, including customs, customary law norms, and other noble norms that are upheld by the Dayak community. Therefore, the State is obliged to carry out an inventory, maintain and preserve the existence of the tattoo motif of the Dayak Tribe. Tato Suku Dayak merupakan karya seni motif tato yang diciptakan oleh masyarakat suku Dayak secara turun-menurun sehingga dapat disebut sebagai Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional, namun kini motif tato tersebut banyak digunakan oleh masyarakat modern dan dianggap sebagai hal yang seni. Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi, menganalisis dan mengelaborasi pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap tato modern berdasarkan ketentuan undang-undang hak cipta di Indonesia, serta perlindungan terhadap tato Suku Dayak dalam perspektif hak cipta. Tulisan ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan tehnik deskriptif analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tato merupakan salah satu objek perlindungan hak cipta berupa gambar mendapat perlindungan secara otomatis atau automatically protection sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Pasal 40 huruf f UUHC. Berkaitan motif tato Suku Dayak sepatutnya dilindungi sebagai salah satu Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional sebagaimana ditentukan dalam Pasal 38 ayat (1) UUHC. Perlindungan diberikan mengingat motif tato Suku Dayak memiliki keterkaitan erat dengan nilai-nilai yang hidup dalam masyarakat pengembannya, antara lain adat-istiadat, norma hukum adat, dan norma-norma luhur lain yang dijunjung tinggi oleh masyarakat Suku Dayak. Maka dari itu, Negara wajib untuk melakukan inventarisasi, menjaga dan melestarikan keberadaan motif tato Suku Dayak.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 417-422
Author(s):  
Made Yunanta Hendrayana ◽  
Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya

Tiktok is a popular application, lots of videos from the Tiktok application are becoming famous. There are people who take advantage by uploading the famous TikTok video on other social media and receiving endorsement for the account. As for the formulation of the problem (I) How are the Copyright protection arrangements for content in the Tiktok application? (2) What is the responsibility of the owner of tiktok content whose content is distributed without the permission of the creator or creator? This journal uses normative legal research methods. The results of the study state that the regulation of copyright protection for content in the Tiktok application is regulated in Law umber 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and Terms of Service for the Tiktok Application which prohibits someone from distributing and reproducing Tiktok content for commercial purposes. For the accountabi I ity of the owner of tiktok content that is disseminated without permission, namely sanctions for the distribution oftiktok videos according to Article 113 paragraph 3 of the Copyright Law and the tiktok application can demand compensation and stop distribution of tiktok content in accordance with Article 96 paragraph (I) of the Copyright Law


Author(s):  
Konstiantyn Zerov

Zerov K. Copyright protection for computer programs. The article discusses the main approaches to the legal protection of software, particularly computer programs, in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine and foreign practices. It is concluded that copyright allows to adequately protect the forms of expression of a computer program: object and source codes of the program. It is noted that a computer program shall be protected if it is original in the sense that it is the author's own intellectual creation, and no other criteria shall be applied to determine its eligibility for protection in Ukraine. Like any other copyright object, a computer program has «legally indifferent» and «legally significant» elements of the form of expression. The legally indifferent elements of a computer program should include a) elements dictated by the efficiency of a computer program; (b) elements that are dictated by external factors; and (c) elements that the original programmer had taken from the public domain. The main approaches to the use (copying) of the source or object code of computer programs as part of other computer programs are given: «literal copying» and «non-literal copying.» It is concluded that «non-literal copying» of a computer program cannot violate the copyright law in Ukraine since the ideas and principles on which any element of a computer program is based are not protected by copyright. It is assumed that the modification of a computer program by eliminating technical means of protection and further use of computer program gives grounds to qualify such actions as two separate types of copyright infringement: infringement of the copyright holder's property rights and deliberately circumventing technical means of copyright protection. It is noted that in some scenarios, theuse of works under the limitation of copyright without circumvention of technical means may be impossible. The proposal to legislatively provide for the possibility of a person who has the right to freely use work to contact the copyright holder with a request to remove technical means solely for such use, as well as cases of permissible circumvention of technical means, has been made.Keywords: computer program, copyright, literal copying, non-literal copying


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Komang Ariadarma Suputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

The use of music as video background sound is currently rife on social media Youtube. This is inseparable from the moral and economic benefits that users get through the features offered by Youtube. Therefore, as a state of law, Indonesia should appropriately provide legal protection for Music Creators whose works are used. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal protection of music creators as a background voice on Youtube and find out the sanctions imposed on Youtube channels that commit copyright infringement. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results showed that music is the result of human expression that has an element of beauty in it. Thus, the need for legal protection is given to the Creator. Legal protection is preventive, namely the formulation of the exclusive right of a Music Creator to Article 5 and Article 9 of Law no. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright and repressively, the Music Creator can fight for his rights that have been violated through the courts and outside the court. As for the sanctions against violations of music copyright as the background sound of videos on Youtube, namely sanctions in the form of compensation for damages that have been caused as stipulated in Article 99 of Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Criminal sanctions are regulated in Article 113 paragraph (4) of Law no. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright in the form of a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and / or a maximum fine of Rp. 4,000,000,000.00


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (01) ◽  
pp. 37-54
Author(s):  
Elly Hernawati

Copyright is one of the Intellectual Property Rights components and should be paid attention to. Even more in technology era that developing, copyright protection needed to be enhanced, so that the right of creator, Copyright holder or owner of relevant rights can be protected and urge people to create. Indirectly, good and healthy business climate could be fostered.  Not all people have skill to create, that is why those people who have skill to create must be protected and even awarded, hoping that people urged to create. One of the creations that protected are song and music. In creating song or music, creator involve recording producer, music director or arranger. Regarding the creation, creator holds moral and economy rights, while parties involved hold the relevant rights to it. Collective Management Agency is an agency that help creator or relevant rights owner in managing and distributing the creation which is song or music that being commercialized. Yet the creator must be the member of the agency beforehand. Commercialization of a song or music by user can rise problem. Protection to the song or music is for the whole thing, including lyric, notation, arrangement and song title. The utilization of a song or music should be still protecting the parties that hold the copyright and the relevant right to it.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document