scholarly journals A legal protection for domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 444-450
Author(s):  
Ali Osky Murbiantoro ◽  
Rachmad Safa'at ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
The Other ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Wide Scope ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Registered Trademark ◽  
Paris Convention

Indonesia’s trademark law does not provide provision for legal protection to registered mark which is well-known domestically therefore, there is no legal basis in case there is another party to commit in impersonation the said registered mark in the different kind of goods. On the other hand, protection indicates the address of international well-known marks only. Referring to the trademark law regime which is common universally such as can be found in the Paris Convention and TRIPs Agreement. Otherwise, for impersonation in different kinds of goods, the protection is given for a well- known mark only.  However, the said mark must be recognized within the territory where the mark is called as well-known such in certain countries. The purpose of this study is to know the legal protection for the domestic well-known mark on impersonation of different kind of goods under Indonesia’s trademark law. This study is normative legal research with legislation, concept, and comparative approach. The legal material with technical analysis is done by the method of interpretation. Results of this study, The regulation of legal protection for registered trademark owners of impersonation of different kinds of goods should be reregulated (a reformulation of provisions).  So that which is a well-known trademark can be in the form of domestic and internationally well-known, therefore the requirements for registration and commercializing of a mark in several countries, not as an obligation to obtain the rights and status become a well-known mark. However, when a mark is factually known and used in Indonesia, the wide scope of international well-known is no need as a mandatory.  

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN MEREK TERKENAL DAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF PARIS CONVENTION, TRIPS AGREEMENT DAN UU MEREK INDONESIA

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dayu Windari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Action ◽  
Criminal Sanction ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Analysis Technique ◽  
Approach Method ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Paris Convention

Legal protection for well-known mark owner is important to study because many well-known mark have been infringed domestically and internationaly causing damage to the well-known mark owner. This research discusses 2 (two) main issues namely the legal protection for well-known mark owner and legal action and sanctions imposed against to the infringer by the Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law. This research applies normative research method. Meanwhile the approach method use statute approach method and comparative approach method which is compares The Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law regarding the protection of well-known mark. Analysis technique use qualitative analysis. The study shows, from the perspective of the Paris Convention, TRIPs Agreement and Indonesia Trademark Law, well-known mark owner have legal protection in the form of exclusive rights through registration process to obtain legal certainty. When well-known mark infringement occured, the legal action can be done are litigation and non litigation process. The form of legal sanction are payment of compensation and criminal sanction, determined by each member state but still refer to the provisions of the Paris Convention and TRIPs Agreement. However, Indonesia set up more details about the sanctions that can be imposed for the infringemer in the form of penalties or criminal sanction ranging from 4 (four) to 5(five) years and a fine of Rp. 800.000.000 up to Rp. 1.000.000.000

The International Registration of Non-traditional Trademarks: Compliance with the TRIPS Agreement and the Paris Convention

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-140
Author(s):  
QIAN ZHAN
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
International Perspective ◽  
Trips Agreement ◽  
Marketing Strategies ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Essential Difference ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
Practical Guidance ◽  
Paris Convention

AbstractContemporary international trademark law is subject to a dynamic process. As communication and marketing strategies steadily evolve, enterprises seek to develop non-traditional signs as trademarks in international trade. Since non-traditional trademarks have received broad protection among WTO Members, the international registration of non-traditional trademarks has raised certain questions. This article focuses on issues of the registration of non-traditional trademarks from an international perspective. With a brief introduction to the new category of trademarks, Section 2 discusses whether non-traditional signs can constitute trademarks by analyzing the trademark definition that is stipulated in Article 15.1 of the TRIPS Agreement and introduces the current status of the legal protection afforded to non-traditional trademarks under the domestic trademark legislations in WTO Member states. Section 3 presents an in-depth analysis of Article 6quinquies of the Paris Convention and aims to address the significance of Article 6quinquies with regard to the international registration of non-traditional trademarks by comparing the essential difference between the two modes of international registration of trademarks. The conclusion provides strategical suggestions and practical guidance for both trademark applicants and competent authorities of WTO Members.

scholarly journals Adopting Passing off Concept of Unfair Competition Into Indonesia’s Trademark Law

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-142
Author(s):  
Ali Oksy Murbiantoro ◽  
Rachmad Safa’at ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati ◽  
Sukarmi Sukarmi
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Unfair Competition ◽  
District Court ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Proper Solution ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Passing Off

The application of the concepts of unfair competition in Indonesia’s Trademark Law is one of the reasons as a proper solution in providing justification and argumentation basis, in terms of to answer the issue of impersonation of trademarks on different kinds goods, particularly for impersonation of domestic well known mark obtains sufficient legal basis due to the existence of protection and legal certainty for the trademark owner which is impersonated thereof. The current Indonesia trademark law basically only provide trademark lawsuit in terms of cancellation for registered mark; legal damages claim. Both lawsuits related to using unauthorized registered mark based on overall or basic similarities in the same kind of goods, although unauthorized use in different kind of good is possible to be sued but it is restricted for international well-known mark only. In addition there is such trademark lawsuit in connection with deletion registered mark means this proceeding enforce when the registered mark does not use for three years as of the mark registered. Considering that actually the concept of unfair competition basically reflect to the understanding of unlawful act (tort) which stating in the article 1365 Indonesia’s Civil Code. However, this understanding is not covered in Indonesia’s Trademark law instead of it is enforced in Indonesia’s civil law and civil procedure. Hence, if there is a trademark impersonation dispute in the different kinds of goods, the resolution of the dispute will refer to unlawful act and that lawsuit will be trialed by regular district court, even though based on trademark law for trademark lawsuit should be trialed by commercial court. Therefore, it is lead to uncertainty in terms of the authorize court which is examined and handled the said case. To include the concept of unfair competition as a part of trademark violation into Indonesia’s trademark law hopefully enable to anticipate in reducing any kind of types trademark violation occurred including in the form of violation such impersonation of domestic well-known mark in different kind of goods. This research is normative legal research with a legislation, concept, and comparative approach. The legal material with technical analysis is done by the method of interpretation. Comparing to the concept of unfair competition, passing off within Indonesia’s trademark law; International Trademark Convention will answers whether the understanding of unfair competition applied in the trademark violation in Indonesia particularly in connection with the issues of impersonation towards registered of well-known mark domestically is already proper either for domestic or worldwide perspective.

scholarly journals Akses Karya Cipta Audiobook Bagi Disabilitas Netra : Perspektif HAM

Acta Comitas ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 433
Author(s):  
Bagus Gede Ari Rama Bagus Gede Ari Rama ◽  
Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Government Regulation ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Blind People ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research

Audiobook access for people with disabilities is very important. Access is the convenience that people get from a service. This study aims to analyze the legal certainty and legal protection of audiobook copyright access for blind people with disabilities. This study uses a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and comparative approach. This research found that access to audiobooks' works has been regulated in the Marrakech Treaty, Copyright Act Number 28 of 2014 and Government Regulation Number 27 of 2019. Akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas sangat penting. Aksesibilitas merupakan kemudahan yang didapat oleh orang terhadap suatu layanan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum serta perlindungan hukum akses karya cipta audiobook bagi disabilitas tuna netra. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan komparatif. Dalam penelitian ini menemukan bahwa akses karya cipta audiobook telah diatur dalam Traktat Marrakesh, UUHC 2014 serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 2019.

scholarly journals PEMBLOKIRAN BUKU TANAH YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PIHAK PEMBELI BERDASARKAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI

NOTARIUS ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 43
Author(s):  
Filzah Azizah Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Other ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
The Status ◽  
Injured Party ◽  
Binding Agreement

Abstract               Blocking of a book of certified land begins with a legal relationship between two or more parties involving the certificate as the object of the dispute. Losses experienced by one party in the process of buying and selling led to the application of blocking the book of land certificate to the office. The significance of this writing is to know and analyze the status of the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement in the process of blocking the land book by the buyer in the land office and the form of legal protection provided by the land office to the injured party due to buyer blocking based on the Deed of Sale and Purchase Agreement. The result of this research is the position of the sale and purchase binding agreement in the process of blocking the land book conducted by the buyer in the land office only as evidence of actual delivery and juridical delivery between the seller and buyer on the object of sale and purchase, not as an administrative requirement blocking at the land office. The Land Affairs Office provides legal protection by implementing the provisions of Article 125 and Article 126 of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs / Head of the National Land Agency Number 3 of 1997 by limiting the party who wishes to file a blocking request to the land office is a party with a strong legal basis to file the request for blocking in an effort defend that right so that it will not harm the other party. AbstrakPemblokiran buku tanah sertipikat diawali oleh suatu hubungan hukum antara dua pihak atau lebih yang melibatkan sertipikat sebagai obyek sengketa.Kerugian yang dialami oleh salah satu pihak dalam proses jual beli memunculkan adanya permohonan pemblokiran buku tanah sertipikat ke kantor. Arti penting dari penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis kedudukan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dalam proses pemblokiran buku tanah yang dilakukan pembeli pada kantor pertanahan dan  bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kantor pertanahan kepada pihak yang dirugikan karena pemblokiran oleh pembeli berdasarkan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah kedudukan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli dalam proses pemblokiran buku tanah yang dilakukan oleh pihak pembeli pada kantor pertanahan hanya sebagai alat bukti telah terjadinya penyerahan secara nyata dan penyerahan yuridis antara penjual dan pembeli atas objek jual beli, bukan sebagai persyaratan administratif permohonan pemblokiran pada kantor pertanahan. Kantor pertanahan memberikan perlindungan hukum dengan melaksanakan ketentuan Pasal 125 dan Pasal 126 Peraturan Menteri Agraria/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 dengan membatasi pihak yang ingin mengajukan permohonan blokir ke kantor pertanahan adalah pihak yang memiliki dasar hukum yang kuat untuk mengajukan permohonan blokir dalam upaya mempertahankan haknya tersebut sehingga tidak akan merugikan pihak lain.

scholarly journals Legal Protection of the Famous Trademarks In Accordance with the Laws in Force in Palestine

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Amjad Hassan ◽  
Hasan Falah
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Property ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Industrial Property ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Special Rules ◽  
International Conventions ◽  
Paris Convention

A trademark is considered to be one of the most important elements of intellectual property for its ability to distinguish goods and services from others, it is the fruit of the effort of the merchant who did the best he could to bring the product to its fame and gained the admiration of the public worldwide. The merchant aims to attract customers, control the market, compete legitimately and takes the trademark as a way to achieve it, the greater the fame of the brand, the greater its popularity and financial value. This leads others to try to take advantage of the reputation and popularity of this brand by simulating, copying or falsifying it, which harms the owners of trademarks and consumers and negatively affects the development of the national economy. The regulation of well-known trademarks is a national necessity and an international requirement, and therefore Arab laws and international conventions "The Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property and the Agreement on the Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights from International Trade" (TRIPS) all implemented special regulations of well-known trademarks. In Palestine, the Jordanian Trademark Law No (33) of 1952 is applicable in the West Bank and the Regulator of Trademarks in general; It did not establish special rules for the protection of well-known trademarks, which imposes on the Palestinian judiciary and specialists the burden of searching for ways to protect these marks in accordance with the provisions of the Trademark Law and the general rules, judicial principles and practical familiarity with reality.

scholarly journals Protection of Animated Cartoon Character: Copyright or Trademark?

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 446
Author(s):  
I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Satriawan ◽  
Marwanto Marwanto
Keyword(s):  
Copyright Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Copyright Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Trademark Law ◽  
Animated Cartoon ◽  
Cartoon Character ◽  
Animated Film ◽  
Cartoon Characters ◽  
Analytical Approaches

Animated cartoon character is a character created or depicted in an animated story with the aim of supporting the story in an animated film. Currently, many children's clothes, bags, shoes or accessories include animated pictures from cartoons with the aim of attracting buyers' attention to increase sales of these products. The purpose of this writing is to identify, analyse and elaborate legal protections for animated cartoon characters based on the provisions in the copyright law, as well as legal protection for animated cartoon characters used as brands. This was normative legal research using a statutory, conceptual and analytical approaches. Animated cartoon characters as one of the objects of copyright protection, namely images, receive automatic protection based on the Copyright Law and can also be registered as Trademarks, as long as the image has distinctive power and has no similarity in substantial or in its entirety. However, if any parties who intend to use the animated cartoon characters that already classified as a well-known trademark, that party can propose a License to the owner of the trademark as regulated under the provision of Article 42 paragraph (1) of Trademark Law

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG HAK ATAS MEREK ASING DI INDONESIA (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264/K/PDT.SUS-HKI/2015)

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Raden Ajeng Cendikia Aurelie Maharani ◽  
Hernawan Hadi
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Geographical Indications ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
National Treatment ◽  
Brand Protection ◽  
Foreign Brand ◽  
Foreign Brands ◽  
Principle Of National Treatment ◽  
Paris Convention

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to legal protection for foreign brands (famous) against the removal of a foreign brand (famous) listed as well as knowing clearly study the sentence “usage” in section 74 subsection (1) of Law Number 20 year 2016 about brands and geographical indications. Legal research this is a normative penilitian or dokterial, and prescriptive in nature. The source of the legal materials that are used in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The method of collecting the material used is the legal syllogism by using deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research and discussion of results that PT Inter IKEA Systems B.V. as famous foreign brands can use brand protection “right Priorities” that bersumberkan to the principles of the Paris Convention effect has been incorporated in the the Treaty of TRIPs, namely with the principle of national treatment. Last usage in section 74 subsection (1) o of Law Number 20 year 2016 about brands and geographical indications stated that the use of the brand in the production of goods or services traded. When the last usage is calculated from the last date of usage even after that the goods concerned are still circulating in the community.<br />Keywords: Legal Protection; Right; Famous Foreign Brands</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk perlindungan hukum bagi merek asing (terkenal) terhadap penghapusan merek asing (terkenal) terdaftar serta mengetahui secara jelas kajian kalimat “pemakaian terakhir” dalam Pasal 74 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penilitian normatif atau dokterial, dan bersifat preskriptif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Tehnik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah silogisme dengan menggunakan pola berfikir deduktif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan ini dihasilkan PT Inter IKEA System BV sebagai merek asing terkenal dapat menggunakan perlindungan merek “Hak Prioritas” yang bersumberkan kepada Konvensi Paris yang asas-asasnya telah digabungkan di dalam perjanjian TRIPs yaitu dengan principle of national treatment. Pemakaian Terakhir dalam Pasal 74 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis menyatakan bahwa Penggunaan merek tersebut pada produksi barang atau jasa yang diperdagangkan. Saat pemakaian terakhir tersebut dihitung dari tanggal terakhir pemakaian sekalipun setelah itu barang yang bersangkutan masih beredar di masyarakat.<br />Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Hak; Merek Asing Terkenal</p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS DATA PRIBADI BAGI KONSUMEN DALAM KLAUSULA EKSONERASI TRANSPORTASI ONLINE

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 68
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saiful Rizal ◽  
Yuliati Yuliati ◽  
Siti Hamidah
Keyword(s):  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Transportation Services ◽  
Legal Uncertainty ◽  
The Government

The exoneration clause is still used in the online transportation agreement clause, when the user registers. This has an impact on the legal uncertainty for consumers in the protection of their personal data managed by the application business actors. This study aims to analyze the presence or absence of violations in Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law related to exoneration clauses in online transportation, and forms of legal protection of consumer personal data in standard contracts. This research is a normative legal research, with a statue approach and comparative approach. The results of this study are that application business actors have transferred the responsibility of protecting consumer personal data which should be the obligation of the application business actor. The application of exoneration clauses carried out by application businesses is very detrimental to consumers by feeling insecure and comfortable in using online transportation services. Forms of legal protection from the government related to consumer personal data in using online transportation services with the obligation of businesses to revise and replace losses suffered by consumers.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Asuransi terhadap Risiko Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-179
Author(s):  
Khairunnisa Noor Asufie ◽  
Yulia Qamariyanti ◽  
Rachmadi Usman
Keyword(s):  
Insurance Coverage ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Insurance Companies ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Public Official ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Conducting Research

A notary is a public official appointed by an authorized official who plays a role in the field of civil law. The authority of the Notary is regulated in Article 15 of Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendment to Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Acts of Notary Position. Regarding the authority of the Notary as a public official (openbaar ambtenaar) who has the authority to make authentic deeds can be burdened with responsibility for the authentic deed he made. The need for legal protection for Notaries against these risks, it is necessary to have an insurance / notary position insurance as a way of transferring risk. The legal problems that occur are the absence of an insurance product / Notary position insurance and the form of insurance / notary position insurance. The purpose of this study is to identify the urgency and form of insurance / coverage of the Notary Position. Legal research conducted is normative legal research by conducting research on the legal system. Legal research conducted by the author using a legislative approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The urgency of the use of insurance protection / coverage of the Notary position is an important one as a way of transferring the risks faced by Notaries and as a form of maximum legal protection for Notaries in the execution of positions. The use of insurance / coverage against the risk of implementing a Notary can be in the form of Professional insurance more specifically in the form of Notary insurance which is part of insurance / general coverage which is insurance / loss coverage in the form of new products made by insurance companies / insurance as fulfillment of insurance / insurance needs for Notary in carrying out the position of Notary

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document