Institutional framework for regulating innovative activity of higher education organizations

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (12) ◽  
pp. 2342-2360
Author(s):  
Natal'ya A. YARUSHKINA

Subject. I consider parameters of the condition of higher education organizations that are formed under the influence of institutional impact of the State, in the aspect of giving the former the status of a driver of innovative development. Objectives. The aim of the study is to review the institutional framework for regulating the innovation activity of higher education organizations. Methods. The study employs the method of dialectical cognition, as well as historical, structural-functional, systems research methods. Results. The paper presents an overview of institutional framework for regulating the innovation activity of universities, resulting from the growing importance of higher education organizations in the development of innovative economic relations at the present stage. It analyzes government initiatives aimed at achieving the goals based on national interests. The paper provides a list of councils and funds supporting and stimulating the development of innovative activity of educational organizations in Russia. Conclusions. The innovative development of the national economy as an essential condition for its competitiveness, which is implemented against the background of the growing role of educational organizations in this process, determines the urgency of permanent improvement of the institutional framework for regulating the innovative activity of educational organizations.

Author(s):  
Idelya Badykova

The role of innovation in the economy development is extremely significant. Within the framework of this work, the innovative activity of enterprises and its relation to corporate social responsibility (CSR) is of particular interest. This study is aimed at modeling the project management of corporate innovation activity on the basis of CSR. The results obtained by the author for the Russian economy suggest that there is a positive relationship between the level of innovative development and CSR, both in general and in terms of investments in the transformation of human capital. In this regard, the model of project management of corporate innovation activity based on CSR is proposed. Author suggests, that this model's implementation for companies is promising, since transition to such a model should be resulted in an increase in the innovation activity of companies, regions and the whole country, as well as an increase in the economic, social and organizational effectiveness of innovative activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 157 ◽  
pp. 04015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Morkovkin ◽  
Dmitry Lopatkin ◽  
Manuchehr Sadriddinov ◽  
Tatiana Shushunova ◽  
Arthur Gibadullin ◽  
...  

The purpose of the study is to evaluate innovation activity in the countries of the world. Based on the use of statistical, comparative, systemic and logical methods, an analysis of indicators of innovative activity was carried out, as a result of which it was concluded that Russia lags behind other countries in terms of innovative development. Using methods of economic and factor analysis, a factor model was formed in the work, which included groups of global, national, industry and corporate factors, the management of which will ensure a sustainable transition to innovative technologies of the national economy. In the ending of the study the main conclusions and results of the work are presented.


Author(s):  
Оксана Іллівна Дмитрієва

The article seeks to develop a model for evaluating the innovative development of the national transport infrastructure in the context of globalization. In order to evaluate the innovative development of the transport infrastructure of Ukraine, the innovation activity of the transport sector of the economy is analyzed. It is argued that innovation activity is a quantitative and qualitative characteristic of innovation performance that refers to the degree of innovation capacity realization. To assess the level of innovative development of transport infrastructure, a three-component system has been suggested which includes the following groups of indicators: indicators of innovation activity, indicators of innovation capacity and innovation efficiency indicators. Innovation activity is proposed to be considered as a characteristic of the dynamism of innovative activity of transport infrastructure objects which is assessed by the speed and scale of generating innovations, their market promotion and implementation in the activities of transport enterprises. Innovation capacity is associated with the perspectivism of innovative activity of transport infrastructure objects and is evaluated by potential opportunities that shape the innovative development prospects and trends, as well as strategic guidelines for the transport companies. Innovative efficiency is an indicator of innovation feasibility with regard to the two-way effects of economic, social, environmental and information factors on the level of innovative development of transport infrastructure. The key advantage of the proposed model for assessing the level of innovative development of transport infrastructure is the ability to take into account the principles of dynamism, perspectivism and expediency which contributes to provide comprehensive evaluation of the basic processes of innovative development.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetiana Zaiats ◽  

The article identifies the problems of state regulation of innovation in construction and substantiates the main directions of improving its efficiency. The Bloomberg Innovation Index was used to assess the general state of innovation in Ukraine. Dynamic analysis of Ukraine's position in the ranking of the Bloomberg Innovation Index as a whole and by individual sub-indices of 2018–2020 revealed such problems as the reduction of production of high-tech goods, labor productivity, intensity of research and development. The study of innovation management was performed using a situational approach. It is established that the state regulation of innovation is mainly based on the methods of indirect influence. It is emphasized that in the conditions of economic crisis it is expedient to prefer methods of direct state regulation. The analysis revealed a range of problems related to forecasting and programming of innovation development, organization and coordination of relevant bodies in the implementation of innovation policy, regulation, financial and investment support for innovation, insufficient stimulation of demand for innovative products, unsatisfactory state of protection of intellectual property rights. The problems of state management of innovation activity are specified. The imbalance of the branch, national and regional programs of innovative development coordinating was revealed. Problems and directions of development of infrastructure of innovative activity are defined. Perspective directions of technological renewal of construction are defined, in particular development of resource-saving, energy-efficient technologies, introduction of Building Information Modeling technologies. The organization of public and private mortgage funds is offered, which will allow to receive financial resources at a low interest rate. It is established that the underdevelopment of the financial market of Ukraine most slows down the solution of problems of financing innovative activities in construction through the attraction of credit, venture capital, state budget funds for innovative development of the construction sector.


2020 ◽  
pp. 146-156
Author(s):  
E. O. Butova

Innovation-driven development of the Russian economy requires a consistent national policy aimed at boosting scientific and innovative activity in the regions, which would facilitate the development of entrepreneurship and technology. It also plays an important role in ensuring the socio-economic progress of the regions and efficiency of income distribution.Aim. The presented study aims to examine the potential directions for optimizing scientific and innovative activity in regional socio-economic development and to identify factors that facilitate the intensification of innovative activity in the regions.Tasks. The authors conduct a correlation analysis between scientific and economic development of the regions with allowance for such factors as the level of education of the population and the number of researchers engaged in research and development (R&D). They also assess the current state of scientific and innovative activity and the national policy on the formation of the scientific and innovative potential of the regions.Methods. The methodological basis of the study of the scientific and innovative aspects of regional economic development includes correlation-regression analysis and abstract logical methods.Results. This study substantiates the role of scientific and innovative activity in regional economic development; determines a positive correlation between regional economic growth and the number of researchers; establishes an inverse correlation between scientific and economic development based on the dependence of innovative activity in the regions on the accumulated scientific potential; empirically assesses the impact of innovative factors on regional economic growth and proposes directions for improving the efficiency of the regional system of science and innovation.Conclusions. Concentrations of knowledge are analyzed as agglomerations of expenses on research and development, science and technology. This leads to an increase in the number of scientists, engineers, scientific and technological personnel of innovative enterprises in various Russian regions. A correlation analysis between scientific and economic regional development shows that per-capita GRP growth rate by the number of researchers is statistically significant, which means there are several factors affecting this dependence: geographical accessibility of higher education, university expenses on infrastructure and services, job creation, additional revenue from students from other countries and regions. It is established that efficient regional higher education systems and innovative development have a positive effect on regional economic development. The conducted analysis shows that a policy on the innovative development of resource regions should be based on government support that would facilitate the creation of innovations and strengthening of scientific potential.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Ya. KAYLI ◽  
◽  
S. Yu. STAROSTIN ◽  

The purpose of the article is to determine the innovative direction of the development of foreign economic relations in the region. The article emphasizes the essence and importance of innovation, innovative activity for the development of regional business, highlights the stages of foreign economic innovation processes, emphasizes problems, constraints and measures to overcome obstacles to innovation. To eliminate limiting problems and constraints, recommendations and measures to overcome obstacles to the innovative focus of regional business are summarized, conditions for innovative development and the goals of creating scientific and technological parks in the regions are outlined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
B.S. Akhmetov ◽  
◽  
I. Karlov ◽  
A.A. Zhilkishbayev ◽  
T.K. Serikbayev ◽  
...  

The article presents an analysis of five international and national framework models for digital transformation of higher education organizations, identifies priority areas of university transformation in the context of an evolving digital environment, identifies typical deficiencies found in national programs and strategies for digital transformation of higher education organizations. The article is aimed at identifying the main directions of changes in the activities of educational organizations provided for in these frameworks, as well as correlating them with the activities provided for in national programs and strategies for digital transformation of higher education organizations and identifying systemic deficits. The article describes the digital strategies of individual universities, which are developed in accordance with the goals and objectives of a particular university, its competencies and deficits, as well as the expectations of its main stakeholders.


2021 ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Gennady Androschuk

Problem setting. The current state of the world economy is characterized by large-scale transformations, which are manifested in the development of key technologies of Industry 4.0, smart specialization, increasing international competition, accelerating all processes that become global and more open. For developing countries, including Ukraine, innovation is particularly important as it underpins industrialization, which plays a key role in diversifying the economy and overcoming its structural weakness. Industry is the engine of innovation, productivity growth and exports. Аnalysis of recent researches and publications. Numerous works by well-known foreign economists have devoted to the issues of innovative development of economic systems, research of innovations as a factor of sustainable growth and increase of competitiveness of the country in the conditions of globalization, digital transformation of economy: P. Drucker, M. Castells, F. Nixon, P. Fischer, J. Schumpeter, K. Schwab, L. Abalkin, A. Aganbegyan, A. Warsaw, L. Gokhberg, R. Greenberg, M. Delyagin, V. Inozemtsev, N. Ivanova, B. Kuzyk, D. Lviv. Also these issues were researched by Ukrainian specialists: G. Androschuk, L. Antonyuk, Y. Atamanova, Y. Bazhal, V. Bazylevych, O. Butnik - Siversky, V. Geets, V. Gusev, O. Zhilinska, I. Egorov, O. Kuzmin, L. Ligonenko B Malitsky, I. Makarenko, V. Muntiyan, V. Parkhomenko, S. Prilipko, V. Solovyov, V. Sidenko, O. Simson, N. Chukhrai, L. Fedulova, A. Yakovlev and others. At the same time, the multifaceted and complex nature of this issue, the dynamics of change in the world, especially during the pandemic COVID-19, require further research. The purpose of this research is to research the dynamics of innovation activity on an international scale based on the consolidated indicators of the Global Innovation Index for 2020, to determine the place of Ukraine in it. Article’s main body. Based on the consolidated indicators of the Global Innovation Index for 2020, the dynamics of innovation activity on an international scale is considered, a comparative analysis is conducted, the relative advantages and weaknesses of national innovation systems are identified, and Ukraine’s place is determined. In GII, Ukraine ranks 45th out of 131 countries, showing an overall increase in the ranking of the innovation index and in the sub-indices: + 20 positions in education and +10 in R&D. Ukraine also retained 2nd place among countries with below-average income. It is noted that the coronavirus pandemic has had a negative impact on innovation and caused a significant decline in national and global economies. At the same time, by affecting some industries, COVID-19 stimulates the development and funding of innovation in others, especially in the areas of computer technology, digitalization, and healthcare. The study confirmed the stability of innovative development of countries that have traditionally been leaders in this index in previous years. The crisis caused by COVID-19 can be a catalyst for innovation in many traditional industries, such as tourism, education and retail. It can also stimulate innovation in the organization of work processes at the level of enterprises and individual employees, as well as in the (re) organization of production locally and globally. Today, it is extremely important to unleash this potential, which requires government support, as well as models of interaction and further private sector investment in innovation. Conclusions and prospects for the development. In conclusion, it should be noted that GII continues to support and stimulate innovation in an era of change. The purpose of the next 13th analytical report is to provide meaningful data on innovations and thus help the representatives of policy-making bodies in assessing the effectiveness of innovation activities of their countries, making informed decisions on further state innovation policy. At this stage, with increasing one-sidedness and nationalism, it is important to remember that most countries that have improved their positions in GII over time have benefited significantly from integration into global value chains and innovation networks. China, Vietnam, India and the Philippines are good examples.


2019 ◽  
Vol 105 ◽  
pp. 04024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman Islamov ◽  
Oksana Greenwald

Innovative development of mining regions is undoubtedly determined by efficient specialists in mining engineering, ecology and natural resources management. Due to close integration and economic relations of Kemerovo Region, a leading mining region in Russia, with the adjacent states of Central Asia many young people from Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan have chosen Kemerovo Region universities to get higher education necessary to develop mining industry in their native countries. Taking higher education courses there they are to study English via Russian as an intermediate language, both languages being foreign to them. To assist themselves in studying the subject, international students from Central Asia use a “crossover” translation technique by means of machine translation at EFL lessons. The assessment of the technique has been carried out and some advice is given to both international students from Central Asia and teachers of EFL. Practical value of the “crossover” translation technique promotes training efficient specialists for mining industry capable to learn and apply advanced technologies for innovative development of Central Asia mining regions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 244 ◽  
pp. 11028
Author(s):  
Alexander Evmenov ◽  
Eduard Krolivetsky ◽  
Lyubov Sazneva ◽  
Taisiya Sorvina

The article reveals the theoretical and methodological provisions for the formation of the composition of technological elements of the strategic planning system, their interaction with the resource components of the organization of higher education (on the example of Voronezh and St.Petersburg universities) to achieve generalizing and specific targets of quantitative and qualitative nature of the strategic the goal of long-term development of a higher education institution. The concepts of “strategy”, “strategic vision”, “mission of the organization of higher education” are defined. The possibility of optimizing resource consumption in the process of implementing complex measures within the framework of federal, regional, sectoral and local programs and projects of social, economic and innovative development of higher education organizations is substantiated. The priority directions in the development strategy of the analyzed universities are highlighted. The necessity of including such technological elements as strategic analysis, mission, strategic vision, strategic goal, generalizing (basic) strategy, functional (private) strategies in the system of strategic planning of socio-economic and innovative development of the studied universities is substantiated.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document