scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN HUTANG PIUTANG ATAS DASAR KEPERCAYAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR:2683 K/Pdt./2016)

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1090
Author(s):  
Sherry Renata ◽  
Hanafi Tanawijaya
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Accounts Payable ◽  
Research Type

The agreement as described in Article 1313 KUHPer is, an act of mutual adherence to one or more persons. The most common agreement in society is one of the accounts payable receivables. Receivable debt agreements orally are made solely by the words of the parties. The purpose of this writing is to find out how the settlement of the implementation of the loan receivables agreement contains elements of default. This research is a normative legal research. Type of data used is secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary law materials, and non-law material. Technique of collecting data used is study of literature, instrument of research instrument is the decision of Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia No: 2683 K / Pdt.2016. The verdict on the case of default, ie between Soekotjo as Plaintiff and Melyani as Defendant. Claimed suicide on the ground has made a default on the verbal debt receivable agreement. Melyani denied the amount of the loan sued by Soekotjo because it was considered inappropriate. However, the judge decides that Melyani performs torture. Oral agreements have the power of law, as long as they are proved to have been made by the parties and have been in compliance with the legitimate terms of the agreement set forth in Article 1320 of the Civil Code.

scholarly journals Penerapan Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Wanprestasi Hutang Piutang di Pengadilan Negeri Gianyar

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-187
Author(s):  
Putri Anggun Puspasari ◽  
Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati ◽  
Desak Gede Dwi Arini
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
District Court ◽  
Alternative Form ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Third ◽  
Accounts Payable ◽  
Sense Of Justice

Mediation is an alternative form of dispute resolution. Mediation has grown and developed, running fast, the desire of humans or the community to resolve disputes quickly, and satisfying both parties to the dispute, According to PERMA No. 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in the Court determining that Mediation is a way to settle disputes peacefully, quickly, right, and effective, can open wider access to the parties to the dispute to obtain a settlement of the case, and get a sense of justice. Accounts payable is an agreement that creates rights and obligations between creditors and debtors who are reciprocal. Accounts payable is regulated in Chapter Thirteenth of the Third Book of the Civil Code, in Article 1754 of the Civil Code. The problem is how is the application of mediation in resolving disputes over debt defaults in the Gianyar District Court? And what are the factors that influence the success of mediation in the Gianyar District Court? The research used is empirical legal research, which is looking at society in the real sense. And the problem approach used is the approach of cases in the Gianyar District Court. The conclusion obtained from this study is that the application of mediation in the Gianyar District Court is in accordance with Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016, and the factors that hinder the mediation process in the Gianyar District Court, namely both litigants do not come in the mediation process so the mediation process failed.

scholarly journals Pandemi Corona Sebagai Dalil Force Majeure Dalam Pembatalan Suatu Kontrak

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 1096-1104
Author(s):  
Viderina Khotaro ◽  
Vania Zelin Lawrence Simanjorang ◽  
Ronald Hasudungan Sianturi
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Government Action ◽  
Force Majeure ◽  
Business Contract ◽  
Research Type

This article aims to analyze the corona pandemic categorized in Force Majeure in a contract. This problem is focused on the existence of the Corona pandemic, which can make debtors delay in fulfilling achievements or canceling contracts. How to claim Force Majeuree in a business contract. In order to approach this problem, a normative juridical legal research type is used with a descriptive-analytic nature of research aimed at describing it systematically, factually. Data - data collected through secondary data and analyzed qualitatively. Covid-19 can be categorized as force majeure, used as an excuse for the debtor not to fulfill the contract. Force majeure conditions cannot be used as a reason for canceling a contract, but renegotiation can be carried out to cancel or change the contents of a previously agreed contract. With Covid-19 being able to make debtors delay in fulfilling their achievements or canceling contracts, Covid-19 is considered to be a force majeure depending on the meaning of force majeure if it is included in the contract. As long as the affected party is able to prove that the force majeure conditions have been met. How to claim force majeure in a business contract in the Covid-19 era, claim force majeure based on appropriate legal references. The claiming parties must analyze whether a pandemic, disaster or government action applies certain provisions including the scope of force majeure accommodated in the contract.

scholarly journals The Priority Distribution of Wealth the Debtor’s Bankrupt (Boedel Bankruptcy) Towards Separatist and Preferential of Creditor Based on Principles of Fairness and Legal

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
. Yuhelson ◽  
. Maryano
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Community Life ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Distribution Of Wealth ◽  
Colonial Legacy ◽  
The Law ◽  
Principles Of Justice

<p>Indonesia modern civil law development lasted to align with community life progress. In 1998 made bankruptcy laws reform of colonial legacy, which was revised in 2004 by Law No. 37. Additionally, the bankruptcy law instruments sourced on the Civil Code and some other provisions. After the court decision on bankruptcy declaration, bankruptcy process was arrangement and distribution of wealth the debtor’s bankrupt (boedel bankruptcy) by curator. So far, the difficulty legal curator instrument cared and settled bankruptcy estate. The prioritization of splitting on the preference and separatist creditor. This research was classified as a normative legal research. Basically, the research based on secondary data. The research conclusion, first, completion of settlement the boedel bankruptcy arranged which reflected in a series of activities that sequence according to the stages and institutionally involve the creditor committee, curator, and the supervisory judge; second, the principles of justice that could be applied in determining the division of boedel bankruptcy to creditors, particularly the preferred and separatist creditors, namely the principle of pari passu and pro rata, the principle of balance, the principle of proportional, and the principles of fairness; third, instruments of Indonesia bankruptcy law consists of elements of civil law (Civil Code), bankruptcy law and suspension of debt payments (Act No. 37 of 2004), a variety of laws and regulations under the law, occasionally based on the policy elements. This condition reduces the level of security in the application of the law.</p><p>Keywords: bankruptcy, boedel bankruptcy, preferred creditors, separatist creditors <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> </p>

scholarly journals Jurisdiction Analysis of The Distribution of Integrity Children Out of Marriage as Substitute Heritages (Study of The Supreme Court Decision Number: 784 K/Pdt/2014)

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (01) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Gagah Hotma Parulian Siregar ◽  
Widhi Handoko
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Inheritance Law ◽  
Main Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Research Problems

 Many problems regarding inheritance law occur due to distribution that is not in accordance with applicable regulations. In the Supreme Court Decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014, the main research problems are: (1) How is the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs based on the Civil Code study of the Supreme Court's decision number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 . (2) Is the content of the Supreme Court's order Number: 784/Pdt/2014 concerning the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as replacement heirs appropriate or not according to the Civil Code. This type of research is normative juridical. The data used are secondary data, library study data collection and qualitative data analysis and deductive method conclusions. The conclusion of this decision study states that (1) the heirs to the inheritance of the Supreme Court decision study number: 784 K/Pdt/2014 are Dewina Tjandra, Trisnani Tjandra, Patty Tjandra, Sarina Tjandra, Arifin Tjandra, Ony Tjandra, and Fitri Tjandra . (2) The Supreme Court's decision Number 784 K/Pdt/2014 regarding the distribution of the inheritance of children out of wedlock as substitute heirs is not in accordance with Article 842 of the Civil Code.   

scholarly journals PENYELESAIAN DEBITUR WANPRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT JAMINAN FIDUSIA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 42 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG JAMINAN FIDUSIA

Solusi ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-265
Author(s):  
Asuan Asuan
Keyword(s):  
Secondary Data ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Power Of Attorney ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
The Law ◽  
Laws And Regulations

 Type of research in doctrinal law or better known as normative legal research which is also called normative juridical (legal research) concerning the legal issues at hand. The approach to the law (statue approach) is carried out by examining the laws and regulations. In writing with primary and secondary data obtained from library materials namely Law No. 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking, Government Regulations, Civil Code, KUH Trade and literature, lecture materials and other sources related to credit agreements with fiduciary guarantees and problems in particular. In granting credit with fiduciary guarantees through the stages of the procedure for credit application and the making of a fiduciary deed at the notary who is registered with the Office of Fiduciary Registration to provide legal certainty for creditors (banks). Credit settlement process if the debtor is malicious, the bank is based on a substitution power of attorney from the debtor made a notariil Fiduciary deed and registered with the Fiduciary Office, the debtor makes a sale under the hands, the sale of collateral is voluntary, the result is submitted to the bank to repay the loan, the bank can conduct the auction in general and through the Court.

scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals IMPLIKASI PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI TELEPON SELULER ILEGAL (BLACK MARKET)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 117
Author(s):  
Andika Prawira Buana ◽  
Hasnan Hasbi ◽  
Muhammad Kamal ◽  
Aan Aswari
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Cell Phone ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Requirements ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Relationship ◽  
Research Type ◽  
Binding Agreement

An agreement is a legal relationship between one person and another person or several persons in order to accomplish a certain thing that has been agreed upon. The Agreement becomes the Law for the parties who make and comply with the content of the agreement. In principle, the treaty embraces the principle of contractual freedom, but that freedom has certain limitations that cannot be violated for the sake of justice, usefulness and legal certainty. The purpose of this research is to describe juridically the wetness and consequences of the illegal cell phone sale and purchase agreement. This research method uses normative legal research type using secondary data and is analyzed based on juridical descriptive. The results of this study argue that the absence of a mobile phone sale agreement is illegal because it does not meet the legal requirements of the agreement which is lawful under the applicable positive law and that the agreement is declared void by law and is considered to be a non-binding agreement.

scholarly journals Analisis Yuridis terhadap Kasus Gugatan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum atas Ketidakabsahan Peralihan Hak Milik Benda Bergerak (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1081/K/PDT/2018)

Kosmik Hukum ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 21
Author(s):  
Fathalya Laksana
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Supreme Court Decision ◽  
Civil Code ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Analysis Method ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Analytical Research ◽  
The Law

The legal requirements are regulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). If the valid conditions of the promise are not fulfilled, then the law that results is that the agreement can be canceled or null and void. In the Court's practice contained in the Supreme Decision Number 1081K / PDT / 2018, there was a sale and purchase agreement between the Plaintiff's husband and the Defendant, the sale and purchase agreement was made by the Plaintiff's partner without the consent of the Plaintiff as his legal wife. Supreme Court Decision No. 1081K / PDT / 2018 stated that the sale and purchase agreement was invalid and null and void. Apart from that, in its decision, the Defendant's UN Supreme Court had committed an illegal act. The research method used is a normative juridical approach using secondary data obtained from literature studies, namely statutory regulations, legal theories, and the opinions of leading legal scholars. This research uses descriptive analytical research specifications that describe the regulations that are in accordance with legal theories that oversee the implementation practices of the problems under study. The data analysis method used is qualitative normative method. Based on the research results, it can be denied that the sale and purchase agreement in the Supreme Court Decision Number 1081K / PDT / 2018 is not legally valid. The agreement does not fulfill the validity requirements of the agreement in Article 1320 of the Civil Code, namely halal skills and causes because it violates Article 36 paragraph (2) of the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974 resulting in the sale and purchase agreement to be null and void.Keywords: Buying and Selling, Acts against the Law, Agreement, Marriage, Collective Property

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS KEWENANGAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN MENYELESAIKAN PERKARA KONSUMEN (Studi Putusan No 481 K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2015)

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1087
Author(s):  
Takenia Tifany ◽  
Anna Maria Tri Anggraini
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Research Methods ◽  
Consumer Protection ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law

Consumer Protection Law regulates the legal protection of consumer and including Consumer Dispute Completion Firm who autorhized to resolve consumer disputes who feel harmed over the acts of business from people that sometimes arbitrary, but decisions taken by Consumer Dispute Completion Firm often incriminate business actors, and usually seem to exceed the limit of their authority even wrong in applying the law. Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to adjudicate and decide a dispute is induced by Supreme Court’s decision which makes Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority to limited. Therefore, the writer proposed an issue about how are the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority in adjudicate and decide a consumer disputes? And how are the implementation and Supreme Court’s views regarding the limitation of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm’s authority? The writer examines the problem using normative legal research methods that use secondary data. From the results of the research, it can be concluded that the limits of Consumer Dispute Completion Firm authority in solving consumer disputes are limited to the agreement between both parties. In sense the Supreme Court believes that all transactions based on an agreement become the jurisdiction of the court

AKIBAT HUKUM PUTUSAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT PENGADILAN NIAGA NOMOR 03/Pdt/Sus-Pailit/2015/PN.NIAGA.SMG TERHADAP HARTA KEKAYAAN DEBITUR SERTA PERBUATAN HUKUM DEBITUR

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Readytya Aji , ◽  
Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto ,
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Research Instrument ◽  
Analytical Technique ◽  
Study Research ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>Abstract<br />This article aims to know the legal consequences of the verdict of bankruptcy declaration of Debtor’s <br />assets as well as the legal actions of the debtor. The purpose of the legal consequences is the rights and <br />obligations arising after the Debtor has been given the verdict of bankruptcy declaration. This research <br />is descriptive normative legal research. The types and sources of data used are secondary data in the <br />form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection techniques used are <br />document studies and literature study, research instrument is the Commercial Court Judgment Number <br />03 / Pdt.Sus-Bankrupt / 2015 / PN.NIAGA.SMG. The analytical technique used is deductive syllogism. <br />The verdict regarding the bankruptcy lawsuit against PT. Riverside Indonesia as Defendant and 2 of its <br />Creditors as Plaintiff. The result of this research is that there are some legal consequences of the verdict <br />of bankruptcy declaration to Debtor’s property as well as legal actions of Debtor, that is, among others, <br />bankruptcy  decisions  which  can  be  executed  immediately,  public  confiscation  of  Debitor’s  property, <br />loss of Debtor’s authority over the control of his property, legal consequences against the engagement <br />after bankruptcy, the legal consequences for the payment of the debtor’s debtor’s account, the legal <br />consequences of the previous court decision, force the agency / gijzeling, and actio pauliana in bankruptcy.<br />Keywords : Bankruptcy, Legal Consequences, Debtor, The Debtor’s Assets</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan mengetahui akibat hukum putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap harta kekayaan Debitor <br />serta perbuatan hukum Debitor. Maksud dari akibat hukum tersebut yaitu hak dan kewajiban apa yang <br />ditimbulkan setelah Debitor dijatuhi putusan pernyataan pailit. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum <br />normatif yang bersifat deskriptif. Jenis dan sumber data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang <br />berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan <br />adalah studi dokumen dan studi kepustakaan, instrumen penelitian adalah Putusan Pengadilan Niaga <br />Nomor 03/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2015/PN.NIAGA.SMG. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah deduktif silogisme. <br />Putusan tersebut mengenai gugatan pailit terhadap PT. Riverside Indonesia sebagai Tergugat dan 2 orang <br />Kreditornya sebagai Penggugat. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah terdapat beberapa akibat hukum dari <br />putusan pernyataan pailit terhadap harta kekayaan Debitor serta perbuatan hukum Debitor, yaitu antara <br />lain putusan pailit yang dapat dijalankan serta merta, sitaan umum atas harta kekayaan Debitor, hilangnya <br />wewenang Debitor atas penguasaan harta kekayaannya, akibat hukum terhadap perikatan setelah pailit, <br />akibat hukum terhadap pembayaran piutang Debitor pailit, akibat hukum terhadap penetapan putusan <br />pengadilan sebelumnya, paksa badan / gijzeling, dan actio pauliana dalam kepailitan.<br />Kata Kunci : Kepailitan, Akibat Hukum, Debitor, Harta Kekayaan Debitor</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document