scholarly journals Limitation of Application of Sharia Principles in Sharia Economic Dispute Resolution in Religious Courts

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 24
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This paper aims to find the basis for the philosophical rationality of applying sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes in religious courts as well as the prerequisites required by religious court judges to apply sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The type of research used is normative legal research to find philosophical rationality and the institutionalization of sharia principles in resolving sharia economic disputes. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. The research results obtained first, the philosophical rationality of the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in line with the first and third principles of Pancasila. Second, the institutionalization of sharia principles becomes effective if there are prerequisites that must be met, firstly enough information for judges to understand sharia principles, secondly the obstacles that come from the judges themselves who are still oriented towards the flow of legism / positivism will have an effect on providing legal basis and third the speed of instilling the institutionalization of sharia principles can be done through education and training organized by the Supreme Court for Religious Court judges.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Materials Processing ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 

scholarly journals PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KUNINGAN

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Fitri Purnamasari, Diding Rahmat Dan Gios Adhyaksa
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Islamic Law ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Negotiation Process ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Access To Justice ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Thesis Writing

AbstractThe author conducted this research with the background of the implementation of Mediation in Kuningan Religious Court in Kuningan. The purposes of writing this paper are to know how the Implementation on Divorce Settlement in Kuningan Religious Court and to know the factors that affect the success of mediation in the Kuningan Religious Court. The method used in this research is with empirical juridical approach using primary data and secondary data and data collection techniques are interviews, observation and literature study. The results of this research are the mediation arrangements set out in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA ) Number 1 Year 2016 about Mediation Procedures in Courts and more specifically stipulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice Number 108 / KMA / AK / VI / 2016 on Mediation Governance at the Court. Mediation is the means of dispute resolution through the negotiation process to obtain agreement of the Parties with the assistance of the Mediator. Mediator is a Judge or any other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party assisting Parties in the negotiation process to see possible dispute resolution without resorting to the disconnection or enforcement of a settlement. Its implementation has been regulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 about concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court RegulationNumber 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure in Court. The conclusion of this thesis writing is Mediation which should be one of the alternative process of dispute settlement which can give greater access to justice to the parties in finding satisfactory dispute settlement and to fulfill the sense of justice, and become one of the effective instrument to overcome the problem of case buildup especially for the case Divorce, in the end has not been effectively implemented.Keywords: Mediation, Divorce, Marriage.�AbstrakPenulis melakukan penelitian ini dengan latar belakang yaitu bagaimana pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Pelaksanaan pada Penyelesaian Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana faktor-faktor yang memepengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder serta alat pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, observasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mediasi diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dan lebih spesifik diatur dalam Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 108/KMA/AK/VI/2016 tentang Tata Kelola Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi adalah cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui proses perundingan untuk memperoleh kesepakatan Para Pihak dengan dibantu oleh Mediator. Mediator adalah Hakim atau pihak lain yang memiliki Sertifikat Mediator sebagai pihak netral yang membantu Para Pihak dalam proses perundingan guna mencari berbagai kemungkinan penyelesaian sengketa tanpa menggunakan cara memutus atau memaksakan sebuah penyelesaian. Pelaksanaannya telah di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkwinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah Mediasi yang seharusnya menjadi salah satu alternatif proses penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat memberikan akses keadilan yang lebbesar kepada para pihak dalam menemukan penyelesaian sengketa yang memuaskan dan mmemenuhi rasa keadilan, serta menjadi salah satu instrumen efektif mengatasi masalah penumpukan perkara khususnya untuk perkara perceraian, pada akhirnya belum efektif dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi, Perceraian, Perdata

scholarly journals REVITALIZATION OF BADAN PENASIHATAN, PEMBINAAN DAN PELESTARIAN PERKAWINAN (BP4) IN PERFORMING COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION FOR MARITAL DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT IN D.I.YOGYAKART

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Haniah Ilhami
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Institutional Transformation ◽  
Legal Basis ◽  
Institutional Form ◽  
National Conference ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Marital Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts

This research identify the revitalization of Badan Penasihatan, Pembinaan dan Pelestarian Perkawinan (BP4) after The 14th BP4 National Conference in 2009, in performing Court-annexed mediation for Marital Dispute at Religious Court in D.I. Yogyakarta. This  research founds several institutional transformation of BP4 including the Legal Basis, Institutional Form, Institutional Relation with Ministry of Religious Affair, Employement/Management Provisions, and Financial Provisions. In Performing Court-annexed mediation. BP4 in D.I. Yogyakarta has been cooperating with 2 (two) Religious Courts, both in Wonosari and Yogyakarta through Memorandum of Understanding in form of cooperation in the placement of certified mediator from BP4 and cooperation in funding the certified mediators. All Mediators are bound by Regulation of The Supreme Court No. 1 year 2016 concerning Procedures of Court-annexed Mediation, related to Types  of  Cases  Mediated,  Mediator’s  Fee,  Venue  of  Mediation,  Period  of  Mediation,  and Mediator’s requirement.

scholarly journals The Problematics of Simple Lawsuit Implementation To Reduce Civil Cases In Supreme Court

AL-HUKAMA ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 171-194
Author(s):  
Bambang Sugeng ◽  
Zahry Vandawati Ch.
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Simple System ◽  
State Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
Court Proceedings ◽  
Court Process

This research has purpose to analyze the implementation of a simple lawsuit settlement to reduce the accumulation of civil cases in the Supreme Court. Also to analyze the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases and investigate the constraints and obstacles in the application of simple claim resolution to reduce the buildup of civil cases. This research is normative legal research that used the approach of statute approach and conceptual approach. The result of this research indicated that the implementation of simple lawsuit mechanismin court process could be quite helpful for citizen to settle the civil cases on state court with a quick process, simple system and low cost. In the context of implementing a simple lawsuit mechanism in court proceedings, there are several obstacles and have not maximally utilized in society, such as the minimum limit for the value of material claims is at most Rp. 200,000,000.00 (two hundred million rupiahs).

scholarly journals Expansion of the Objects of State Administrative Disputes after the Enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 Concerning Government Administration and Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 Concerning Guidelines for the Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies or Officials (Onrechtmatige Overheidsdaad / OOD)

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 383
Author(s):  
Sonyendah Retnaningsih ◽  
Disriani Latifah Soroinda Nasution ◽  
Heryna Oktaviani ◽  
Muhammad Rizqi Alfarizi Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Government Agencies ◽  
Government Action ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
State Administration ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Government

Historically, State Administrative Court (PTUN) has existed since 1986, with the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court which currently has been amended by Law Number 9 of 2004 concerning Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court and amended again by Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Court. The role of the Administrative Court according to the explanation of the law, the PTUN functions as a control or supervisory agency thus legal actions from government officials do not deviate, in addition to protecting the rights of citizens from the actions of officials who abuse their authority or act arbitrarily. Currently, the object of dispute and can be sued at the State Administrative Court is only a State Administration decision reduced by the exceptions stipulated in Article 2 and Article 49 of the PTUN Law. The provisions of Article 3 of the Administrative Court Law No. 5 of 1986 on negative fictitious could potentially no longer be enforced since the enactment of Article 53 of the AP Law which stipulates positive fictitious. Since the promulgation of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration (hereinafter referred to as AP Law) on 17 October 2014, there has been a change in the legal criteria from the government written stipulation (beschikkingen) which was initially restrictive and can be sued to the PTUN, yet it has recently become extensive (which was originally mere beschkking, currently it almost covers all variations of besluiten). With the enactment of the AP Law, there will be an expansion of absolute competence and objects of state administration disputes, as stipulated in Article 87 of the AP Law which includes: first, Government Administration Decrees, as stipulated in Article 1 point 7 of the AP Law; second, Government Administration Actions Based on Article 1 point 8 of the AP Law. Furthermore, with the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and the Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD), the judicial power shall transfer from the General Court to the State Administrative Court. This crucial matter continues to be the groundwork and reason for conducting the current research entitled the expansion of the state administration dispute object after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and the supreme court regulation (Perma) Number 2 of 2019 concerning Guidelines for Government Action Dispute Resolution and Authority to Adjudicate Unlawful Conducts by the Government Agencies and/or Officials (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad / OOD). Conducted through normative juridical research method, this research-based paper examined the interviews through judges at PTUN Jakarta and Bandung and the main data source within this qualitative analysis serves as the secondary data or literature data.

EKONOMI SYARIAH DAN PENYELESAIANNYA DI PENGADILAN AGAMA

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 93
Author(s):  
Wildana Arsyad ◽  
Edi Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Qualitative Method ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Education And Training ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Settlement Of Disputes ◽  
Religious Courts ◽  
And Training

This study aims to provide information about procedure of dispute settlement of sharia economy in the Religious Courts. This research uses qualitative method with juridical approach. The dispute procedure of sharia economic in religious court runs in accordance with the mandate of the Law contained in article 49 to article 53 Act no. 7 years 1989, Law No. 3 year 2006, Law No. 50 of 2009 about Religious Courts. Sharia economic dispute is basically due to three things, namely because one of the parties to break the promise (wanprestasi), due to unlawful acts against the agreements agreed upon and because of coercive circumstances. Settlement of disputes is held with the aim of enforcing the law which contains the value of legal justice, the value of legal certainty, and the value of legal benefit. The settlement of the sharia economic dispute in the Religious Courts is very new, so the Supreme Court up to now still conducts education and training of sharia economic certification for all Religious Court judges.Penelitian ini  bertujuan   untuk memberikan informasi mengenai prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis Prosedur penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di pengadilan agama berjalan sesuai dengan amanat Undang-Undang yang tertera dalam pasal 49 sampai pasal 53 Undang-Undang No. 7 tahun 1989 jo. Undang-Undang No. 3 tahun 2006 jo.Undang-Undang No.50 tahun 2009 tentang Peradilan Agama.Sengketa ekonomi syariah pada dasarnya disebabkan karena tiga hal, yaitu karena salah satu pihak melakukan ingkar janji (wanprestasi), karena perbuatan melawan hukum terhadap perjanjian yang disepakati dan karena keadaan memaksa. Penyelesaian sengketa diadakan dengan tujuan untuk menegakan hukum yang di dalamnya mengandung nilai keadilan hukum, nilai kepastian hukum, dan nilai kemanfaatan hukum.Penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah di Pengadilan Agama merupakan hal yang sangat baru, sehingga Mahkamah Agung sampai saat ini masih melaksanakan pendidikan dan latihan sertifikasi ekonomi syariah bagi seluruh hakim Pengadilan Agama.

scholarly journals Standard Issuance of Circular Letters in The Implementation Of Judicial Power

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 03021
Author(s):  
Rahadi Wasi Bintoro ◽  
Abdul Shomad ◽  
Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
State Institution ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Judicial Power ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
State Institutions ◽  
The Supreme Court

Circular issued by state institutions in the framework of the freies ermessen principle. Circular in administrative law is known as policy regulation/ belleidsregel. The Supreme Court as a state institution also has the authority to issue circular letters. This paper focused on the standard circular issued by the Supreme Court. This paper was legal research that was carried out with the statute approach and conceptual approach. Based on the analysis, circulars issued by the supreme court contained restrictions, namely that they should not influence the judge in examining the case.

scholarly journals PROBABILITAS MEKANISME SMALL CLAIM COURT DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA WARIS DI PENGADILAN AGAMA / PROBABILITY OF SMALL CLAIM COURT MECHANISM IN RESOLVING INHERITANCE DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
Adi Nur Rohman ◽  
Sugeng Sugeng
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Bright Spot ◽  
Analysis Tool ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Small Claim ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Religious Courts

Hukum acara formil yang berlaku di Pengadilan Agama dalam menyelesaikan sengketa waris relatif memakan waktu yang cukup lama. Hal ini mengakibatkan waktu serta biaya yang dikeluarkan menjadi lebih besar. Mekanisme small claim court yang diatur oleh Mahkamah Agung melalui PERMA No. 2 tahun 2015 tentang tata cara penyelesaian sengketa sederhana dalam sistem peradilan umum menjadi titik terang. Konsep small claim court tersebut diharapkan dapat diaplikasikan dalam sistem peradilan agama sehingga mampu memangkas waktu yang lama dalam penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menawarkan terobosan baru dalam sistem peradilan agama di Indonesia khususnya terkait penyelesaian sengketa waris. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan menggunakan studi kepustakaan sebagai alat analisis bahan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa waris di Pengadilan Agama dengan konsep small claim court dipandang mungkin untuk diimplementasikan sebagai bagian dari pembaharuan hukum acara peradilan agama. Namun demikian, hal itu perlu diiringi dengan pengklasifikasian perkara waris ke dalam perkara besar dan kecil dilihat dari nilai harta warisan yang disengketakan. Oleh karenanya, perluasan pengaturan mekanisme small claim court ke dalam sistem peradilan agama menjadi penting guna memangkas mekanisme penyelesaian perkara yang terlalu lama.The formal procedural law that applies in the Religious Courts in resolving inheritance disputes takes a relatively long time. This results in greater time and costs. The small claim court mechanism regulated by the Supreme Court through Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2015 concerning the procedure for resolving simple disputes in the general justice system to become a bright spot. The concept of small claim court is expected to be applied in the religious justice system so that it can cut down the long time in resolving inheritance disputes in the Religious Courts. This study aims to offer a new breakthrough in the system of religious justice in Indonesia, especially in relation to the resolving of inheritance disputes. This research is a normative juridical research with a law and conceptual approach by using literature study as a legal material analysis tool. The results showed that the resolving of dispute of inheritance in the Religious Court with the small claim court concept was considered possible to be implemented as part of the renewal of the religious court procedural law. However, this needs to be accompanied by the classification of inheritance cases into large and small cases seen from the value of the disputed inheritance. Therefore, the expansion of the small claim court mechanism into the religious justice system is deemed necessary in order to reduce the mechanism for resolving cases that are too long.

scholarly journals DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A CAUSE FOR DIVORCE: ARE THERE EFFORTS FOR MEDIATION?

Al-Bayyinah ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-211
Author(s):  
Jasmaniar Jasmaniar ◽  
Sutiawati Sutiawati
Keyword(s):  
Domestic Violence ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Dispute Resolution ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Civil Process ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Civil Cases

AbstractMediation as an alternative to dispute resolution has been integrated in court. Further provisions for mediation as a process that must be carried out are further regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning mediation procedures in court. This means that cases filed in court including cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence are obliged to undergo mediation. This research is a normative legal research that focuses on solving legal problems by providing a basis for theoretical argumentation and adequate concepts. Sources of data in this study came from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The findings of the study indicate that in cases of divorce on the grounds of domestic violence, they still take the path of mediation. This is stated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 which requires mediation in civil cases, even in the Supreme Court Regulation states that in the resolution of a civil case a judge does not take mediation, it is considered to have violated the law. Divorce cases on the grounds of domestic violence cannot be categorized as a criminal act, if the filing process is a civil process (divorce), it is different when the wife makes a complaint (complaint offense) and/or an ordinary offense which results in a violation of the Abolition of Domestic Violence. However, divorce cases are considered civil and processed according to other civil cases and on the grounds of domestic violence they still go through mediation. Keywords: Mediation; Divorce; Violence; Household.

scholarly journals Coherence of the Rules of Sharia Against Pancasila

BESTUUR ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Zaidah Nur Rosidah
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
The State ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Third ◽  
Philosophical Basis

<p>This paper aims to find the coherence of sharia principles towards Pancasila. Pancasila as the philosophical basis of the state has an important role in the life of the nation and state. The principles of sharia are important principles for Muslims in muamalah. The type of research used is normative legal research to find coherence between sharia principles in Pancasila. The approach used is a conceptual approach. Secondary data were collected through literature study. Analyze the data using the syllogism method of deduction and interpretation, where the sharia principle is coherent with Pancasila. The results showed that first, the concept of ownership of property and payment of zakat and justice is coherent with the first, second and fifth precepts of Pancasila. Second, the principle of willingness is coherent with the second principle of humanity which is just and civilized, the principle of equality is coherent with the third principle of Indonesian unity, the principle of honesty and truth is coherent with the principle of the Almighty God and the second principle of fair and civilized humanity, the principle of benefit and mutual advantageous in line with the fifth precepts of social justice for all Indonesian people, the written principle in sharia principles is in line or coherent with the fourth principle of populism, which is led by wisdom in deliberation / marriage.</p><p> </p><p><strong>  </strong><strong>Keywords:</strong> Coherence; Sharia Principles; Pancasila.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document