scholarly journals Emerging regulatory issues: intellectual property and global value chains

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Susy Frankel

Intellectual property includes several areas of regulation which govern access to and uses of knowledge, information and technology. In addition to having many cultural and social benefits, knowledge, information and technology are key building blocks of an innovative economy. The central and perpetual challenge of intellectual property law and policy is to ensure that there are both adequate incentives for innovators and creators to generate these building blocks, and that those incentives do not overreach so as, in fact, to inhibit innovation. This description, however, no longer tells the whole intellectual property story. This article discusses the emergence through trade and investment agreements of a changed approach to the objectives of intellectual property protection, and the challenges that approach presents for knowledge-based and innovation development of New Zealand interests.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah Gleeson ◽  
Joel Lexchin ◽  
Ronald Labonté ◽  
Belinda Townsend ◽  
Marc-André Gagnon ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Trade and investment agreements negotiated after the World Trade Organization’s Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) have included increasingly elevated protection of intellectual property rights along with an expanding array of rules impacting many aspects of pharmaceutical policy. Despite the large body of literature on intellectual property and access to affordable medicines, the ways in which other provisions in trade agreements can affect pharmaceutical policy and, in turn, access to medicines have been little studied. There is a need for an analytical framework covering the full range of provisions, pathways, and potential impacts, on which to base future health and human rights impact assessment and research. A framework exploring the ways in which trade and investment agreements may affect pharmaceutical policy was developed, based on an analysis of four recently negotiated regional trade agreements. First a set of core pharmaceutical policy objectives based on international consensus was identified. A systematic comparative analysis of the publicly available legal texts of the four agreements was undertaken, and the potential impacts of the provisions in these agreements on the core pharmaceutical policy objectives were traced through an analysis of possible pathways. Results An analytical framework is presented, linking ten types of provisions in the four trade agreements to potential impacts on four core pharmaceutical policy objectives (access and affordability; safety, efficacy, and quality; rational use of medicines; and local production capacity and health security) via various pathways. Conclusions The analytical framework highlights provisions in trade and investment agreements that need to be examined, pathways that should be explored, and potential impacts that should be taken into consideration with respect to pharmaceutical policy. This may serve as a useful checklist or template for health and human rights impact assessments and research on the implications of trade agreements for pharmaceuticals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-783
Author(s):  
Mark Davison ◽  
Patrick Emerton

Abstract This article considers the interpretation of provisions in international economic agreements that protect intellectual property as they relate to public health measures, and in particular to restrictions on the use of tobacco trademarks. A series of decisions, most recently the World Trade Organization (WTO) panel decision holding that Australia’s plain packaging measures for tobacco products comply with WTO obligations, allow for some generalisations. These include: (1) the nature of intellectual property rights is to confer a privilege of exclusive use on the rights-holder; (2) the interpretation of generally-worded treaty provisions is apt to be informed by recognition of the power of States to regulate for the purposes of public health; and (3) where provisions contain their own specifically-worded balancing tests, any direct or indirect reference to regulation for public health contained in the treaty is likely to be treated as weighing very heavily in favour of the legality of regulatory measures.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benn McGrady

In November 2010, 171 Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) unanimously adopted the Punta del Este Declaration on implementation of the Convention. The Declaration follows the filing of an international investment claim against Uruguay by Philip Morris Products (Switzerland) and related companies. The Declaration reaffirms the commitment of the 171 WHO FCTC Parties to implementation of the Convention and addresses the relationship between the WHO FCTC and international trade and investment agreements, particularly in the context of intellectual property rights. This article outlines the Request for Arbitration, sets out the Declaration and the broader normative context in which it arose before touching briefly on the implications of the Declaration.


2021 ◽  
pp. 89-97
Author(s):  
Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger

This chapter briefly reviews, in the context of extensive literature, how the principle of integration has been applied by the European Union (EU) in its trade and economic decision-making in accordance with the EU’s agreed sustainable development objective. It considers what the European law and policy experience with integration can tell us about how the three tensions identified earlier in this volume may be addressed in international economic agreements. The chapter draws three key insights vis-à-vis integration of environmental and social concerns to address the tensions occasioned by new economic liberalization rules: first, increases in the scale or scope of trade and investment flows are not meant to cause direct material environmental damage through increases in unsustainable economic development activities; second, economic policies and agreements are not intended to create incentives for trade and investment led economic growth that will exacerbate serious environmental and social problems; and third, evolving trade and investment policies and treaties are not intended to encourage unsustainable growth.


2021 ◽  
pp. 313-323
Author(s):  
Marie-Claire Cordonier Segger

This chapter summarizes the findings of the research and draws together the explanations of these findings explored throughout the volume. Key findings include; the observation that States are adopting sustainable development as part of the ‘object and purpose’ of trade law, both in the World Trade Organization (WTO) and in many regional trade agreements (RTAs); the observation that States are also adopting innovative operational provisions to prevent trade and investment law from constraining legitimate new environment and social development measures and the enhancement of trade and investment in more sustainable sectors; as well as the observation that that there is an important procedural aspect to the integration of environmental and social development concerns in trade and investment law and policy. Drawing on these findings, the chapter summarizes opportunities for States to address key tensions between trade, environmental and social development regulations through the adoption of integration measures for sustainable development in the treaties, and three steps that States can take towards meaningful integration.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 (6) ◽  
pp. 81-100
Author(s):  
Oleg Marin ◽  
Oleg Karasev

The article studies the role of energy complex in modern innovative economy, major directions of sectorial innovation development in the context of modern networking concepts based on value chain. The creation of innovation integrators in energy sector is proposed with the aim to implement the principles of open innovations that optimizes competence management within the framework of complex project related to innovation technologies creation and application in different value chains. The authors identify the objectives and functions of the innovation integrators and offer the scheme to fund them. The given recommendations are intended for oil & gas companies in order to improve the effectiveness of innovative activity planning and organization.


Author(s):  
Pratyush Nath Upreti

AbstractThis article analyses the role of national and international intellectual property (IP) law in assessing IP as a protected investment. It offers two approaches for controlling investment arbitration related to intellectual property rights (IPRs), followed by an examination of the implications and challenges of those approaches. Its main argument is that even if a dispute arises from an investment (IP as an investment), it does not necessarily fall under the jurisdictional requirements of investment arbitration. Rather, assessing IP as an investment must be done by referring to national laws. This is more relevant in the case of IPRs as they are territorial. This means that rights and obligations are derived from national IP legislation. Essentially, only those IPRs that are “protected” by national regimes should be treated as investments. This article also examines the language used in investment agreements and arbitral awards to analyse the role of national law, particularly in determining the validity and scope of IP investments. Then it examines three IP-related arbitral cases to discuss how arbitral tribunals have used national law. Finally, it suggests approaches for controlling investment arbitration by integrating the territoriality principle and the social objectives and bargains achieved through international IP treaties.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document