scholarly journals The Usage of Influenza Vaccine to Prevent Seasonal Influenza during Pandemic COVID-19

Author(s):  
Yelvi Levani ◽  
Ayu Lidya Paramita

Influenza is an acute respiratory disease caused by influenza virus. Influenza can affect million people in every year and causing morbidity. Some of cases can be severe and need hospitalized, especially in elderly people. Influenza is an airborne disease and can spread rapidly. Every seasonal flu can be different because Influenza virus do mutation. Influenza vaccine can reduce morbidity and mortality. There are two types of influenza vaccine; live attenuated influenza virus (LAIV) and inactivated influenza virus (IIV). The newest type of influenza vaccine consists four types of virus (quadrivalent), therefore it gives more protection compared to the older one. Influeza vaccine is still recommended during pandemic COVID-19 because it can prevent co-infection between Influenza and COVID-19. In addition, it can reduce the morbidity and mortality during pandemic COVID-19.

mBio ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teddy John Wohlbold ◽  
Raffael Nachbagauer ◽  
Haoming Xu ◽  
Gene S. Tan ◽  
Ariana Hirsh ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTIn an attempt to assess the cross-protective potential of the influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) as a vaccine antigen, different subtypes of recombinant NA were expressed in a baculovirus system and used to vaccinate mice prior to lethal challenge with homologous, heterologous, or heterosubtypic viruses. Mice immunized with NA of subtype N2 were completely protected from morbidity and mortality in a homologous challenge and displayed significantly reduced viral lung titers. Heterologous challenge with a drifted strain resulted in morbidity but no mortality. Similar results were obtained for challenge experiments with N1 NA. Mice immunized with influenza B virus NA (from B/Yamagata/16/88) displayed no morbidity when sublethally infected with the homologous strain and, importantly, were completely protected from morbidity and mortality when lethally challenged with the prototype Victoria lineage strain or a more recent Victoria lineage isolate. Upon analyzing the NA content in 4 different inactivated-virus vaccine formulations from the 2013-2014 season via Western blot assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay quantification, we found that the amount of NA does indeed vary across vaccine brands. We also measured hemagglutinin (HA) and NA endpoint titers in pre- and postvaccination human serum samples from individuals who received a trivalent inactivated seasonal influenza vaccine from the 2004-2005 season; the induction of NA titers was statistically less pronounced than the induction of HA titers. The demonstrated homologous and heterologous protective capacity of recombinant NA suggests that supplementing vaccine formulations with a standard amount of NA may offer increased protection against influenza virus infection.IMPORTANCEDespite the existence of vaccine prophylaxis and antiviral therapeutics, the influenza virus continues to cause morbidity and mortality in the human population, emphasizing the continued need for research in the field. While the majority of influenza vaccine strategies target the viral hemagglutinin, the immunodominant antigen on the surface of the influenza virion, antibodies against the viral neuraminidase (NA) have been correlated with less severe disease and decreased viral shedding in humans. Nevertheless, the amount of NA is not standardized in current seasonal vaccines, and the exact breadth of NA-based protection is unknown. Greater insight into the cross-protective potential of influenza virus NA as a vaccine antigen may pave the way for the development of influenza vaccines of greater breadth and efficacy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhimin Wan ◽  
Stivalis Cardenas Garcia ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Jefferson Santos ◽  
Silvia Carnaccini ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Influenza virus infections continue to pose a major public health threat worldwide associated with seasonal epidemics and sporadic pandemics. Vaccination is considered the first line of defense against influenza. Live attenuated influenza virus vaccines (LAIVs) may provide superior responses compared to inactivated vaccines because the former can better elicit a combination of humoral and cellular responses by mimicking a natural infection. Unfortunately, during the 2013–2014, 2014–2015, and 2015–2016 seasons, concerns emerged about the effectiveness of the only LAIV approved in the United States that prevented the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) from recommending its use. Such drawbacks open up the opportunity for alternative LAIV strategies that could overcome such concerns. Previously, we developed a combined strategy of temperature-sensitive mutations in the PB2 and PB1 segments and an epitope tag in the C terminus of PB1 that effectively attenuates influenza A viruses of avian and mammalian origin. More recently, we adopted a similar strategy for influenza B viruses. The resulting attenuated (att) influenza A and B viruses were safe, immunogenic, and protective against lethal influenza virus challenge in a variety of animal models. In this report, we provide evidence of the potential use of our att strategy in a quadrivalent LAIV (QIV) formulation carrying H3N2 and H1N1 influenza A virus subtype viruses and two antigenic lineages of influenza B viruses. In naive DBA/2J mice, two doses of the QIV elicited hemagglutination inhibition (HI) responses with HI titers of ≥40 and effectively protected against lethal challenge with prototypical pandemic H1N1 influenza A and influenza B virus strains. IMPORTANCE Seasonal influenza viruses infect 1 billion people worldwide and are associated with ∼500,000 deaths annually. In addition, the never-ending emergence of zoonotic influenza viruses associated with lethal human infections and of pandemic concern calls for the development of better vaccines and/or vaccination strategies against influenza virus. Regardless of the strategy, novel influenza virus vaccines must aim at providing protection against both seasonal influenza A and B viruses. In this study, we tested an alternative quadrivalent live attenuated influenza virus vaccine (QIV) formulation whose individual components have been previously shown to provide protection. We demonstrate in proof-of principle studies in mice that the QIV provides effective protection against lethal challenge with either influenza A or B virus.


2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (22) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Darricarrère ◽  
Svetlana Pougatcheva ◽  
Xiaochu Duan ◽  
Rebecca S. Rudicell ◽  
Te-Hui Chou ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The efficacy of current seasonal influenza vaccines varies greatly, depending on the match to circulating viruses. Although most vaccines elicit strain-specific responses, some present cross-reactive epitopes that elicit antibodies against diverse viruses and remain unchanged and effective for several years. To determine whether combinations of specific H1 hemagglutinin (HA) antigens stimulate immune responses that protect against diverse H1 influenza viruses, we evaluated the antibody responses elicited by HA-ferritin nanoparticles derived from six evolutionarily divergent H1 sequences and two computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA) HA antigens. Humoral responses were assessed against a panel of 16 representative influenza virus strains from the past 80 years. HAs from the strains A/NewCaledonia/20/1999 (NC99), A/California/04/2009 (CA09), A/HongKong/117/1977 (HK77), COBRA X6, or P1 elicited neutralization against diverse strains, and a combination of three wild-type HA or two COBRA HA nanoparticles conferred significant additional breadth beyond that observed with any individual strain. Therefore, combinations of H1 HAs may constitute a pan-H1 influenza vaccine. IMPORTANCE Seasonal influenza vaccines elicit strain-specific immune responses designed to protect against circulating viruses. Because these vaccines often show limited efficacy, the search for a broadly protective seasonal vaccine remains a priority. Among different influenza virus subtypes, H1N1 has long been circulating in humans and has caused pandemic outbreaks. In order to assess the potential of a multivalent HA combination vaccine to improve the breadth of protection against divergent H1N1 viruses, HA-ferritin nanoparticles were made and evaluated in mice against a panel of historical and contemporary influenza virus strains. Trivalent combinations of H1 nanoparticles improved the breadth of immunity against divergent H1 influenza viruses.


2019 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 1119-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenna H. Newman ◽  
C. Brent Chesson ◽  
Nora L. Herzog ◽  
Praveen K. Bommareddy ◽  
Salvatore M. Aspromonte ◽  
...  

Reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to increase immune-mediated responses is currently of intense interest. Patients with immune-infiltrated “hot” tumors demonstrate higher treatment response rates and improved survival. However, only the minority of tumors are hot, and a limited proportion of patients benefit from immunotherapies. Innovative approaches that make tumors hot can have immediate impact particularly if they repurpose drugs with additional cancer-unrelated benefits. The seasonal influenza vaccine is recommended for all persons over 6 mo without prohibitive contraindications, including most cancer patients. Here, we report that unadjuvanted seasonal influenza vaccination via intratumoral, but not intramuscular, injection converts “cold” tumors to hot, generates systemic CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity, and sensitizes resistant tumors to checkpoint blockade. Importantly, intratumoral vaccination also provides protection against subsequent active influenza virus lung infection. Surprisingly, a squalene-based adjuvanted vaccine maintains intratumoral regulatory B cells and fails to improve antitumor responses, even while protecting against active influenza virus lung infection. Adjuvant removal, B cell depletion, or IL-10 blockade recovers its antitumor effectiveness. Our findings propose that antipathogen vaccines may be utilized for both infection prevention and repurposing as a cancer immunotherapy.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3206-3206
Author(s):  
Michael Hahn ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Brunhilde Schweiger ◽  
Cathrin Hollenbach ◽  
Anthony D. Ho ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Immune response to viruses in patients with multiple myeloma can be hampered by both the disease and its treatment with chemotherapy and autologous transplantation. H1N1 or seasonal influenza in myeloma patients is often characterized by severe complications. Influenza vaccination is therefore generally recommended for these patients. Nevertheless, there is evidence that in these patients, the immune response to vaccination is frequently insufficient. Preliminary data suggest that the immune response may be increased by a boost vaccination. Methods Vaccination with a triple-antigen (H1N1, A, B) influenza vaccine (Optaflu(R) from Novartis Ltd.) was administered to patients with confirmed diagnosis of multiple myeloma at our outpatient clinic during the season 2012/13. Humoral response monitoring was performed employing hemagglutination inhibition assays. Titers above 40 U/l were considered as protective against the respective virus strain. Based on published data from smaller cohorts, patients not mounting sufficient immune responses to the first vaccination, but clinically well tolerating the vaccine, were offered a second vaccine. Blood samples were taken prior to immunization and four weeks after each vaccination for titer analysis. Results Forty-eight myeloma patients were vaccinated. None of them showed protective immunity against all of the three antigens Influenza H1N1, A and B before vaccination. Before the seasonal vaccination 2012/13 only 18% (9/48) of the patients had protective titers against H1N1, 10% (5/48) against A and 10% (5/48) against B. After the first vaccination a protective titer against all three antigens was achieved in 14% (7/48) of the patients, in 41% (20/48) against H1N1, in 33% (16/48) against A and 20% (10/48) against B. Twenty-five patients received a second vaccine. After this boost vaccination 33% (8/25) of the patients had protective immunity against all three antigens, 75% (18/25) against H1N1, 58% (14/25) against A and 46% (11/25) against B. Conclusions Antibody protection against influenza virus is extremely poor in myeloma patients. The Federal Committee on Vaccination in Germany termed “Staendige Impfkommission (STIKO)” clearly recommends annual vaccination. In this pilot project we could demonstrate that in myeloma patients a single shot of seasonal influenza vaccine results only in 20-40% of the vaccinees in sufficient titers of neutralizing antibodies to a single antigen. The frequency of protective titers could be roughly doubled by a vaccine boost which is comparable to results reported for other groups of immunocompromised hosts like patients at hemodialysis or with HIV infection. We therefore recommend an influenza vaccine boost for myeloma patients in general. A prospective, randomized study would be highly appreciated to confirm this recommendation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C Rümke ◽  
Jan Hendrik Richardus ◽  
Lars Rombo ◽  
Karlis Pauksens ◽  
Georg Plaßmann ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document