THE PROBLEM OF EXPRESSION NON-CATEGORICAL STATEMENTS IN LINGUISTIC TEXTS

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-97
Author(s):  
Nigora Mukhamedova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Content ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Scientific Text ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Evaluative Attitude

The article deals with the issues based on the study of non-categorical statements in a linguistic text in modern English. The essence of scientific communication is a message, or the transmission by means of language of some mental content, including the expression of an intellectual-evaluative attitude to the subject of speech. The content of intellectual assessments is conditioned by knowledge and experience of intellectual and material activities of people.In a scientific text, this attitude can be the result of verifying the truth of what is expressed by the author himself or by another scientist or a team of researchers, as well as confirmation or refutation of apreviously formed assessment that served as the basis for further discussion

Davidson on Pure Intending: A Non-Reductionist Judgement-Dependent Account

Dialogue ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Ali Hossein Khani
Keyword(s):  
Mental Content ◽  
First Person ◽  
The Subject

Abstract I will argue that Davidson's account of pure intending can be construed as a first-person-based judgement-dependent account of intention. For Davidson, pure intending to do φ is to make an all-out judgement that φing is desirable. On this anti-reductionist account, intention is treated as an irreducible state of the subject. I will draw a comparison between this account and Wright's and I will show that Davidson's account can be viewed as a non-reductionist judgement-dependent account along the lines suggested by Wright. I then explain how this account can help deal with various perplexities in Davidson's later view of meaning and mental content.

scholarly journals Subject category oncology in journal citation reports 2000-2006: Analysis of impact factor distribution and publishing data

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 85-87
Author(s):  
Stela Filipi-Matutinovic ◽  
Aleksandra Popovic ◽  
Sanja Antonic
Keyword(s):  
Great Britain ◽  
Open Access ◽  
Impact Factor ◽  
English Language ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Subject Group ◽  
Adequate Measure ◽  
Subject Category ◽  
Journal Citation Reports ◽  
The Subject

Impact factor (IF) of journals is assumed an adequate measure of its importance in the scientific communication of a defined subject. It is important to have in mind that IF is varying very much in time. The range of IF for journals classified in the subject group ONCOLOGY is analyzed for the period 2000-2006. There are only seven of 127 journals in year 2006 which have IF higher than 10. The highest impact in the analyzed period has the journal CA-CANCERJ CLIN, varying from 24,674 to 63,342, but the important fact about that journal is that it publishes very small number of articles annually. The number of journals on the list also changed from 103 in 2000 to 127 in year 2006. Only one journal from the list is published in German and five are multilingual, all the rest are published in English language. Besides US (66), Great Britain (29), Holland (7), and Switzerland (6), all other 11 countries have few journals, mostly situated in the last part of the list ranked by IF. When choosing where to publish their results, scientists should consider all available facts about a journal - from its IF and the way it changes with time, to its openness, availability in libraries and on the WWW, possibility to keep author rights and put the article in an open access repository, where it will get more attention from authors that do not have access to that journal, etc.

scholarly journals Compreensão textual de artigos originais de pesquisa por graduandos em química

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. e8
Author(s):  
Flávia Gabriele Sacchi ◽  
Salete Linhares Queiroz
Keyword(s):  
Oral Presentation ◽  
Text Comprehension ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Chemistry Students ◽  
Undergraduate Chemistry ◽  
The Subject

Reading and comprehension of research articles (RA) by undergraduate chemistry students provides a greater ability to develop criticism and establish links between scientific contents. Even being such a relevant skill, research on the subject is scarce, especially in the Brazilian context. From this perspective, this paper aims to investigate the text comprehension of RA about the topic of biofuel, extracted from the “Química Nova” journal, by undergraduates from the area, in the context of a scientific communication discipline.  Therefore, we initially analyzed the retextualization carried out by a group of students from RA for corresponding oral presentation, and then established links between retextualization operations and text comprehension. The analysis was based on studies on retextualization operations and text comprehension, from the perspective proposed by Marcuschi.  The results indicated that the development of the oral presentation component slides took place without impairing the communicative purpose established by the RA authors, suggesting the undergraduates understood it.

scholarly journals Predatory Journals as a Threat to Science, Scientific Communication, and Author’s Reputation

2018 ◽  
pp. 33-40
Author(s):  
Svitlana Fiialka
Keyword(s):  
Academic Integrity ◽  
Random Number ◽  
Random Number Generator ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Image Manipulation ◽  
Predatory Journals ◽  
Low Level ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Scientific Results

In the study, the features of predatory journals are highlighted; the threats from them for science, scientific communication and authors have been identified. Methodology. To find out the reasons for which authors are published in predatory journals, we have selected 30 journals from various fields of knowledge included in the Bill`s list. Then, 200 articles, published in these journals, were selected by the method of simple random selection using the random number generator. The authors of the articles were sent a Google form for the survey. As a result, responses from 148 respondents were received and processed. Due to the analytical method, the invitations to publication received by the author of this article during the period from September 2018 to February 2019 were investigated, and thus the signs of predatory journals were summarized: multidisciplinarity of the journal, urgent publication of the article, distribution of spam messages, no review, publication of articles without any changes, discounts system for repeat publications, errors on the site of the journal, sending a review together with the article, the discrepancy of the editorial board with the subject matter of the articles, the lack of quotations of articles included to international scientometric databases. Results. The poll revealed reasons for publishing in the predatory journals: pressure of leadership, uncertainty, low level of English, low level of financial support, ignorance of research methodology, as well as the prejudice of the reputable journals to the scientific results achieved by scientists from certain countries. The proliferation of predatory journals is a significant threat to science, scientific communication, and authors. Such journals discredit scientific knowledge, because lack of evaluation can lead to conscious violation of the rules of academic integrity, including plagiarism, data tampering and image manipulation, and therefore to promote the dissemination of pseudo-science, unjustified theories. These publications exist mostly due to the low scientific level of publication and destroy the reputation of the authors and institutions in which they work. To factors that influence why some Ukrainian scientists choose the predatory journals for publication of articles, are normative-legal and material-technical.

The Scientific Communication Process in Homoeopathic Toxicology

2022 ◽  
pp. 26-42
Author(s):  
G. Ramadhas ◽  
A.S. Suman Sankar ◽  
N.V. Sugathan
Keyword(s):  
United States Of America ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
The United States ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Communication Process ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Prolific Author ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Subject ◽  
University Of Massachusetts

The present chapter evaluates the growth of literature of Toxicology in Homoeopathy. The Scopus database is used as source for the study. Data pertaining to toxicology in homoeopathy for the period 1963 to 2017 is retrieved and analyzed. The study reveals that toxicology literature grows rapidly in the later stages than in the earlier period. The United States of America is the leading contributors at the global level and India is in second position. Among the contributors, E.J. Calabrese, Professor of Toxicology, University of Massachusetts is the most prolific author for Toxicology in Homoeopathy literature. University of Kalyani and University of Massachusetts are the leading institutions, majority of the records are published in the journal ‘Homoeopathy', which is published from the USA and major contributions are in the subject domain ‘medicine' (65.4 per cent). Most frequently repeated keywords in toxicology of homoeopathy literature are: homoeopathy, humans, non-human, unclassified drug and animals.

Dwight Atkinson, Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1999. Pp. xxxi, 208.

2000 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-432
Author(s):  
Greg Myers
Keyword(s):  
Royal Society ◽  
Social Institutions ◽  
Scientific Communication ◽  
Scientific Discourse ◽  
Research Articles ◽  
Communicative Practices ◽  
Language Of Science ◽  
Scientific Institutions ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Sociohistorical Context

The language of science has been extensively studied by linguists and rhetoricians – as a distinctive register, as a set of genres that students and academics need to master, and as a discourse of powerful social institutions. Most of these studies have been synchronic, focusing on the structures or styles of more or less contemporary texts, particularly research articles. But if we rely on such studies, we may tend to reify some features of text (such as the Introduction–Methods–Results–Discussion form, or the tendency to passive constructions and nominalizations) as inevitable features of scientific communication. We may also treat scientific institutions – such as the lines between disciplines, or between professionals and amateurs – as given by the subject matter, rather than seeing them as changing and as constituted in part by their communicative practices.

Dretske on Naturalizing Experience

Dialogue ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 561-566
Author(s):  
Irene Sonia Switankowsky
Keyword(s):  
Mental Content ◽  
External World ◽  
Perceptual Content ◽  
States Of Affairs ◽  
Conceptual Content ◽  
Content Externalism ◽  
Secondary Qualities ◽  
Physical Conditions ◽  
The Subject

Many theorists in epistemology and mind accept externalism with respect to content–namely, the claim that the conditions that individuate mental content are external to the occurrence of that content as a mental fact. Whatever it is that distinguishes a pain in the knee from a pain in the toe—or, alternatively, whatever it is that makes it possible for the subject to discriminate this pain as a pain in the knee from that pain as a pain in the toe—are factors and conditions located in the physical and external world. This much externalism seems to be required even if one is a thoroughly entrenched mentalist. This “content externalism” is captured, fairly effectively, by the more traditional distinction between concepts and percepts. What is then asserted by the mentalist is that concepts have their source or origin in the external world, but the perceptual content does not. Perceptual content can be identified in different ways which are: (1) the view that identifies the distinguishing feature of the perceptual with qualia, a position not far removed from the Lockean distinction between Primary and Secondary qualities; or, (2) the perceptual might also be characterized in terms of representationalism, where qualia are an essential part of the representational medium, but where the representational medium contains conceptual content as well. In either case, the perceptual is Type and/or Token distinct from whatever is the external physical conditions or states of affairs causally responsible for the occurrence of either the conceptual content or the perceptual content. An argument for the claim that percepts (colours, sounds, smells, touches, and so on) are essential and necessary is that, without such percepts, there can be no experience.

scholarly journals Analysis of grammatical means for the expression of reason in German, Italian and Russian scientific text of the XXI century

Litera ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 127-143
Author(s):  
Igor' Sergeevich Kalyatin
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Semantic Category ◽  
Semantic Field ◽  
Contrastive Analysis ◽  
Comparative Linguistics ◽  
Scientific Text ◽  
Russian Scientific ◽  
The Subject

The goal of this work lies in definition and scientific description of combination of the basic grammatical means for expression of category of reason in a scientific text (on the material of German, Italian and Russian languages). The subject of this research is a comparative analysis of the structural and semantic peculiarities of grammatical means for the expression of reason in a scientific text of the XXI century (on the material of German, Italian and Russian languages). The relevance is substantiated by insufficient study within comparative linguistics of the ways to represent the category of reason on grammatical level by comparing several languages (in this case, German, Italian and Russian). The scientific novelty of consists in conducting comparative analysis of grammatical language means for the expression of semantic category of reason in German, Italian and Russian scientific text of the XXI century. Within the framework of contrastive analysis, the author revealed the peculiarities of structuring the functional-semantic field of reason on the example of the texts under consideration. The acquired results allow concluding that in such type of texts the functional semantic field of causality is represented by grammatical means that express reason in a general form or with additional connotation. The presented materials can be applied in the course of lectures on comparative typology of the German, Italian and Russian languages.

scholarly journals Terminological nomination in modern fields of knowledge

2020 ◽  
Vol 210 ◽  
pp. 21012
Author(s):  
Irina Valujtseva ◽  
Olga Ivanova ◽  
Ilya Khukhuni ◽  
Anna Fedosova
Keyword(s):  
Sampling Method ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Subject Area ◽  
Development Project ◽  
Common Type ◽  
Scientific Text ◽  
Continuous Sampling ◽  
Gas Processing ◽  
Research Material ◽  
The Subject

The purpose of the study is to consider the features of the terminological nomination using the example of multiword terms of the English sublanguage of oil and gas processing. The oil and gas glossary Kashagan Development Project Glossary that comprises 1200 units has been used as the research material. Multiword terms have been selected with the application of the continuous sampling method. As a result of the employment of the method of linguistic statistics, it was discovered that, in the sub-language of oil and gas processing, the multiword terms constitute 73% of the entire termbase of the subject area. The structural analysis of terminological phrases demonstrated that the most common type of multiword terms is the two-word terms, comprising 45.2% of the total number of poly-lexemic constructions in the studied sample. This result is consistent with the data obtained by other authors, namely, the information concerning the fact that two-word combinations prevail in various term systems. As the number of components in a multiword term increases, the number of such word combinations in a scientific text decreases. The most common patterns of two-word terminological combinations are N + N and A + N. Three-word terms compose 40% of the total number of the studied terminological phrases. The following patterns of three-word terms are productive: N + N + N and A + N + N. Four-word terminological phrases constitute 12.3%. The most frequently used pattern of four-word combinations is N + N + N + N. Five-word terms comprise 2.4% of the total number of terms. The most common patterns of five-word terms are N + N + A + N + N and A + N + N + N.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document