CLINICAL AND PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA FOR THE COMPLICATED COURSE OF NEW CORONAVIRUS INFECTION (COVID-19).

2021 ◽  
pp. 147-153
Author(s):  
Sycheva A.S. ◽  
Kebina A.L. ◽  
Vertkin А.L.
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Severe Disease ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Disease Course ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Renal Disorder ◽  
Coronavirus Infection ◽  
Disorder Type ◽  
Very High

Relevance. The pandemic of new coronavirus infection COVID-19 is the main topic and problem of modern medicine associated with the necessity of rapid diagnostics and medical care rendered to such patients Nowadays, individual pathogenetic mechanisms of infection COVID-19 are determined, however, clinical and epidemiological particularities of the disease are being intensively investigated, and new agents for prevention and treatment of infection COVID-19 are being developed. The determination of predictors of the severe disease course and exposure methods is definitely important. The studies have shown that the presence of various concurrent comorbid diseases in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 negatively affects the disease course and its prognosis. Study objective: the analysis of the observation results and clinical outcomes of clinical course (clinical masks) of new coronavirus infection COVID-19 with the distribution by age, gender and incidence of somatic diseases, identification of the pattern of visceral organ damages in coronavirus infection caused by virus SARS-CoV-2. Materials and methods: 110 patients with virus pneumonia caused by COVID-19 were enrolled to the study. The presence of risk factors of the severe disease course variants and intensity of the somatic disorder in necropsy of patients died were evaluated. Study results: The found analysis data suggest that the most significant predictors of the severe course of COVID-19 are arterial hypertension with a high and very high cardiovascular risk, followed by a renal disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hepatic and heart failure. Conclusion. The found analysis data suggest that the most significant predictors of the severe course of COVID-19 are arterial hypertension with a high and very high cardiovascular risk, followed by a renal disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, hepatic and heart failure.

scholarly journals Clinical profiles and quality of care of subjects with type 2 diabetes according to their cardiovascular risk: an observational, retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Basilio Pintaudi ◽  
Alessia Scatena ◽  
Gabriella Piscitelli ◽  
Vera Frison ◽  
Salvatore Corrao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Factors ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

Abstract Background The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. Methods The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD Annals initiative. Patients with T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. General descriptive indicators, measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. Results Overall, 473,740 subjects with type 2 diabetes (78.5% at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and 0.6% at moderate risk) were evaluated. Among people with T2D at very high risk: 26.4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors. The use of DPP4-i markedly increased as cardiovascular risk increased. The prescription of secretagogues also increased and that of GLP1-RAs tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i was still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. The overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased. Conclusions A large proportion of subjects with T2D is at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to their potential advantages in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care.

scholarly journals Patterns of care of subjects with type 1 and type 2 diabetes according to their cardiovascular risk

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 30
Author(s):  
Pintaudi, B.
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Very High

AIM OF THE STUDY To explore the distribution by cardiovascular risk groups according to the classification promoted by the ESC (European Society of Cardiology) of subjects with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes cared for by Italian diabetologists and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN AND METHODS The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 diabetes centers participating in the Annals AMD initiative and active in the year 2018. Patients with T1D or T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk, in accordance with the recent ESC guidelines. General descriptive indicators and measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 29,368 adults with T1D and 473,740 subjects with T2D were evaluated. Among subjects with T1D: 64.7% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 28.5% at high risk and the remaining 6.8% at moderate risk. Among subjects with T1D at very high-risk: 54.7% had retinopathy, 29.0% had albuminuria, 7.3% had a history of major cardiovascular event, 47.3% had organ damage, 48.9% had three or more risk factors, and 70.6% had a diabetes duration of over 20 years. Among subjects with T2D: 78.5% were at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and the remaining 0.6% at moderate risk. Among those with T2D at very high risk: 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 26,4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria. With regard to the glucose-lowering drugs: the use of DPPIV-i increased markedly as cardiovascular risk increased; the use of secretagogues also increased and, although within low percentages, also the use of GLP1-RA tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i is also still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. In both types of diabetes, the overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score values, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular riskincreased. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of a large population such as that of the AMD Annals database allowed to highlight the characteristics and quality indicators of care of subjects with T1D and T2D in relation to cardiovascular risk classes. A large proportion of subjects appear to be at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to the potential advantages in terms of reduction of cardiovascular risk of some drug categories (GLP1-RA and SGLT2-i) and, conversely, with respect to the potential risks related to the use of other pharmacological classes (sulfonylureas). Several actions are necessary to optimize care and improve the quality of care for both subjects with T1D and T2D. KEY WORDS type 1 diabetes; type 2 diabetes; cardiovascular risk; quality indicators of care.

scholarly journals Pharmacological therapy and cardiovascular risk reduction for type 2 diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
pp. 1283-1288
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bello Martins ◽  
Eduardo Gomes Lima ◽  
Fábio Grunspun Pitta ◽  
Leticia Neves Solon Carvalho ◽  
Thiago Dias de Queiroz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
High Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Cardiovascular Risk Reduction ◽  
Drug Classes ◽  
Clinical Benefits

SUMMARY The pharmacological therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus has presented important advances in recent years, which has impacted the treatment of patients with established cardiovascular disease or with high cardiovascular risk. In this scenario, two drug classes have emerged and demonstrated clear clinical benefits: SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists. The present review discusses the pharmacology, adverse effects, and clinical trials that have demonstrated the benefits of these medications in reducing cardiovascular risk.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document