scholarly journals FARM EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT OF PADDY PRODUCTION IN NORTHERN SRI LANKA USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA) APPROACH

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 164-170
Author(s):  
Ponniah Sivarajah
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Farm Efficiency ◽  
Land Size ◽  
Large Farms

This study analyzed the production efficiency of paddy farms in Northern Sri Lanka using the Data Envelopment Analysis approach (DEA). Farm efficiency has been related to resource use efficiency and achievement of higher productivity. The aim of this study was to study the levels of production efficiency of small paddy farms, and to identify the impacts of land size and extension worker contacts on production efficiency. A total of 120 farmers were randomly selected in the Mannar district in Northern Sri Lanka. The DEA technique was used to measure technical/production efficiency and results were compared for land size and extension contact category of farmers. It was found that more than average of farms had low efficiency scores of below 0.5. Small farms and large farms had a significant difference in efficiency scores. Thus this indicates that there is an impact of land size on farm production efficiency and very small farms and also large farms are inefficient in paddy production the area. There was a significant difference in farm efficiency between farmers with extension contacts and otherwise. The study reinforced the role that can be played by extension workers in pushing the farm efficiency levels higher and helping in better resource use efficiency on farms.

Resource-use maximisation through legume intercropping with maize in the eastern Himalayan region of India

2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. 508 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Choudhary ◽  
Anil Dixit ◽  
Bhagirath S. Chauhan
Keyword(s):  
Resource Use ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Soil Moisture Content ◽  
P Uptake ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
Land Use Efficiency ◽  
Efficient Resource ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Eastern Himalayan Region ◽  
Equivalent Yield

Intercropping provides opportunity to harness available resources. Thus, maize intercropped with soybean or peanut (groundnut) was tested with 1 : 1, 1 : 2, and 1 : 5 row proportions along with sole plantings of each crop to measure resource capture and resource-use efficiency. Results revealed that sole peanut had 60% higher maize-equivalent yield and 55% better production efficiency, followed by the 1 : 5 row proportion of maize–peanut, over sole maize. Intercropping increased land-use efficiency by 17–53% and land-equivalent coefficient by 0.21–0.56. The relative crowding coefficient was 39% higher with 1 : 2 maize–soybean, whereas the monetary advantage index was the highest (US$107) with the 1 : 5 maize–peanut. Nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) uptakes by maize were 42.9% and 38.2%, respectively, higher with 1 : 5 maize–soybean, whereas phosphorus (P) uptake was 64% higher with 1 : 5 maize–peanut. However, the least amounts of N, P and K were mined overall with 1 : 5 of maize–soybean. Soil moisture content was improved by 24% and solar radiation interception by 37.8% with soybean alone over maize alone, and these parameters increased with higher row proportions of soybean. The energy parameters also improved with the 1 : 5 row proportions of maize–soybean or peanut intercropping. This study provides a basis for efficient resource use by maize–soybean (or peanut) intercropping system.

scholarly journals A RESOURCE USE EFFICIENCY OF ORTHODOX TEA IN ILLAM DISTRICT OF NEPAL

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-05
Author(s):  
Dreesti Wasti ◽  
Shiva Chandra Dhakal ◽  
Rishi Ram Kattel ◽  
Suryamani Dhungana
Keyword(s):  
Resource Use ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
Rural Municipality ◽  
Percent Increase ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Tea Production ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Factor Constant

Despite of the high rate of the orthodox tea, the net margin is still below the satisfactory level. Thus, the present research was conducted to estimate the cost and production efficiency of orthodox tea in Ilam district of Nepal. A total of 160 samples were collected, 80 each from organic and conventional tea growing area of Deumai rural municipality, Ilam municipality and two wards of Suryodaya municipality. Similarly, 4 tea processing factories and 5 local traders were selected purposely. The B:C ratio of conventional orthodox tea farming (2.76) was significantly higher organic orthodox tea production (2.07). With 1 percent increase in fertilizer and manure cost would significantly decrease (p<0.05) the revenue from orthodox tea by 0.07 percent keeping another factor constant. Similarly, organic orthodox tea over conventional orthodox tea farming, the revenue will significantly decrease (p<0.01) by 47 percent other factors remaining constant the result indicate that with respect to fertilizer and labor it was found that increase in fertilizer and manure cost would decrease the revenue from orthodox tea.

scholarly journals Financial profitability and resource use efficiency of boro rice production in some selected areas of Mymensingh in Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-300
Author(s):  
Rezoyana Kabir Rasha ◽  
Hafija Akter Liza ◽  
Shirajum Manjira ◽  
Mohammad Mizanul Haque Kazal ◽  
Shah Johir Rayhan
Keyword(s):  
Resource Use ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Function Analysis ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Rice Production ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
Gross Margin ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Boro Rice

Bangladesh is predominantly an agricultural country. Agriculture provides employment to nearly about 47.33 percent of its total labor forces (BER, 2015). Broad agriculture sector which includes crops, livestock, fisheries and forestry contributes 16 percent to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a whole in the FY 2013-14 (BER, 2016). Mymensingh district was selected for the study to calculate the profitability and to assess the resource use efficiency of Boro rice production. Simple random sampling technique had been used for collecting data from 60 sample farmers through interview schedule. Both descriptive studies and functional analysis was done to achieve the objectives of the study. The findings of the study revealed that per hectare gross return, net return, and gross margin were found to be BTD110680.00, BTD 25208.94 and BTD 48158.95, respectively. Total costs of rice production were calculated at BTD 85471.06 per hectare. Benefit Cost Ratio (BCR) was found to be 1.29 for Boro rice production. Thus it was found that Boro rice production was profitable. Production function analysis suggested that, among the variables included in the model, quantity of seed, animal labor and power tiller cost, No. of human labor, quantity of fertilizer, cost of irrigation, had a positive and significant effect on the gross yield of Boro rice production, except for cost of manure and cost of pesticides had an insignificant effect on the gross yield of rice production. Efficiency analysis indicated that most of the farmers inefficiently used their inputs. This study also identified some problems associated with Boro rice production. Problems faced by the farmers were ranked on the basis of corresponding percentages. This study provides appropriate suggestion and policy recommendations which will help the development agencies and policy makers of the country for improving the livelihood of the people in the study area. Res. Agric., Livest. Fish.5(3): 293-300, December 2018

scholarly journals IMPACT OF LAND SIZE ON PRODUCTIVITY, INCOME AND PROFITS FROM PEPPER CULTIVATION IN SRI LANKA

AGROFOR ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ponniah SIVARAJAH ◽  
Randima WICKRAMASINGHE
Keyword(s):  
Sri Lanka ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sri Lankan ◽  
Domestic Consumption ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cost Of Production ◽  
Land Size ◽  
Large Farms ◽  
Poor Management

Pepper is an important spice crop grown in Matale District of Sri Lanka, forexports and domestic consumption. Varieties of pepper grown are Sri Lankan localvariety and ‘Panniyur’. Pepper production had shown variations over the years dueto poor management and low productivity. This study analyzed and compared theproduction levels and costs, income and profitability of pepper cultivation amongsmall and large scale pepper farmers. A stratified random sample of 120 farmers,consisting of 76 small famers (<5 acre farms) and 44 large farmers (>5 acre farms)were selected for study. A pre-tested questionnaire was used for data collection.Descriptive statistics and mean comparisons were performed. The average extentof land under pepper cultivation was significantly different (P<0.01) with 3.49acres for small farms and 8.85 acres for large farms, and 66% of lands were underlocal pepper varieties. Fertilizer was the only input applied by both group offarmers. The mean yield of pepper was 636 kgs and 560 kgs per acre for small andlarge farms respectively and did not differ significantly. Mean comparison showedthat there was a significant difference (P<0.01) in cost of production, income frompepper sales and profits from pepper between small and large farmers. There wereno significant differences in farm gate prices received for raw and processedpepper by small and large scale farmers. It can be concluded that there issignificant differences between small and large scale pepper farmers in the extentcultivated, incomes received, cost of production and profits earned, while there isno differences in the prices received for raw and processed pepper.

Farming systems methodology for efficient resource management at the farm level: a review from an Indian perspective

2008 ◽  
Vol 146 (5) ◽  
pp. 493-505 ◽  
Author(s):  
U. K. BEHERA ◽  
C. M. YATES ◽  
E. KEBREAB ◽  
J. FRANCE
Keyword(s):  
Linear Programming ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Farming Systems ◽  
Farm Income ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
Farm Level ◽  
Integrated Farming ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Large Farms ◽  
Integrated Farming Systems

SUMMARYFarming systems research is a multi-disciplinary holistic approach to solve the problems of small farms. Small and marginal farmers are the core of the Indian rural economy constituting 0·80 of the total farming community but possessing only 0·36 of the total operational land. The declining trend of per capita land availability poses a serious challenge to the sustainability and profitability of farming. Under such conditions, it is appropriate to integrate land-based enterprises such as dairy, fishery, poultry, duckery, apiary, field and horticultural cropping within the farm, with the objective of generating adequate income and employment for these small and marginal farmers under a set of farm constraints and varying levels of resource availability and opportunity. The integration of different farm enterprises can be achieved with the help of a linear programming model. For the current review, integrated farming systems models were developed, by way of illustration, for the marginal, small, medium and large farms of eastern India using linear programming. Risk analyses were carried out for different levels of income and enterprise combinations. The fishery enterprise was shown to be less risk-prone whereas the crop enterprise involved greater risk. In general, the degree of risk increased with the increasing level of income. With increase in farm income and risk level, the resource use efficiency increased. Medium and large farms proved to be more profitable than small and marginal farms with higher level of resource use efficiency and return per Indian rupee (Rs) invested. Among the different enterprises of integrated farming systems, a chain of interaction and resource flow was observed. In order to make farming profitable and improve resource use efficiency at the farm level, the synergy among interacting components of farming systems should be exploited. In the process of technology generation, transfer and other developmental efforts at the farm level (contrary to the discipline and commodity-based approaches which have a tendency to be piecemeal and in isolation), it is desirable to place a whole-farm scenario before the farmers to enhance their farm income, thereby motivating them towards more efficient and sustainable farming.

scholarly journals How to Generate Yield in the First Year—A Three-Year Experiment on Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus (Greef et Deuter)) Establishment under Maize (Zea mays L.)

Agronomy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moritz von Cossel ◽  
Anja Mangold ◽  
Yasir Iqbal ◽  
Jens Hartung ◽  
Iris Lewandowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Use ◽  
Limiting Factors ◽  
First Year ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
High Resource ◽  
Miscanthus Giganteus ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Maize Cultivation ◽  
Biomass Yields ◽  
Use Efficiency

Miscanthus is one of the most promising perennial herbaceous industrial crops worldwide mainly due to its high resource-use efficiency and biomass yield. However, the extent of miscanthus cultivation across Europe is still lagging far behind its real potential. Major limiting factors are high initial costs and low biomass yields in the crop establishment period, especially the first year. This study explores the possibility of establishing miscanthus under maize to generate yields from the first year of cultivation onwards. A field trial with mono-cropped maize and two miscanthus establishment procedures, ‘under maize’ (MUM) and ‘standard’ (REF), was established in southwest Germany in 2016. Annual aboveground biomass was harvested in autumn (2016–2018). In 2016 and 2017, the miscanthus dry matter yield (DMY) was significantly lower in MUM than REF. However, the accumulated DMY of miscanthus and maize was as high in MUM as in maize cultivation alone. In 2018, there was no significant difference between the miscanthus DMY of REF (7.86 ± 0.77 Mg ha−1) and MUM (6.21 ± 0.77 Mg ha−1). The accumulated DMY over the three years was 31.7 Mg ha−1 for MUM, of which 10.1 Mg ha−1 were miscanthus-based, compared to 17.7 Mg ha−1 for REF. These results indicate that miscanthus establishment under maize could compensate for its lack of yield in the first year.

Sustainable diversification of maize (Zea mays L.) -legumes cropping systems for productivity, profitability and resource-use efficiency in West Garo Hills of Meghalaya, India

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mokidul Islam ◽  
L. K. Nath ◽  
T. Samajdar
Keyword(s):  
Land Use ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Production Efficiency ◽  
Cropping System ◽  
Green Gram ◽  
Fertility Level ◽  
Resource Use Efficiency ◽  
System Productivity ◽  
Land Use Efficiency ◽  
Use Efficiency

A field experiment was conducted at Instructional Farm of ICAR- Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tura during kharif, pre-rabi and rabi season of 2011-12 to 2013-14 to determine the suitable production potential, profitability, resource use efficiency and sustainability of diversified maize-legumes cropping system. The five cropping sequences viz., CS1: Maize + Blackgram (1:2) – green gram + maize (2:1) – tomato, CS2: maize + green gram(1:2) – green gram + maize (2:1) – tomato, CS3: maize + groundnut(1:2) – green gram + maize (2:1) – tomato, CS4: maize + Ssybean(1:2) – tomato and CS5: maize sole – green gram – tomato were replicated four times using a randomized block design on sandy loam soil with low to medium fertility level and slightly acidic in reaction. The cropping system “Maize + Green gram(1:2) – green gram + maize (1:1) – tomato” was found to be most remunerative and sustainable with system productivity (175.49 q/ha), net return (Rs.3,38,725/ha), profitability (Rs. 928.01 /ha/day), benefit cost ratio (4.40), sustainable yield index (1.00), production efficiency (Rs.58.30/ha/day), relative economic efficiency (162.72%), except land use efficiency(LUE) which was the highest (85.75%) in “maize + groundnut(1:2) – green gram + maize (1:1) – tomato” cropping system. The lowest system productivity, net returns, profitability, production efficiency, land use efficiency etc was found in maize+ soybean (1:2)- tomato followed by maize-greengram-tomato cropping system. Hence, the cropping sequence maize + green gram(1:2) – green gram + maize (1:1) – tomato and maize + groundnut(1:2) – green gram + maize (1:1) – tomato were found to be the productive, profitable, remunerative, resource use efficient and sustainable in the mid hills sub-tropical regions of India.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document