scholarly journals COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF OCCLUSIVE DRESSING AND OPEN WOUND TREATMENT IN PREVENTION OF SURGICAL SITE INFECTIONS

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 88-91
Author(s):  
Arvind Srivastava ◽  
Prakshi Solanki
Keyword(s):  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Nursing Time ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Occlusive Dressing ◽  
Occlusive Dressings ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are defined as infections of the tissues, organs, or spaces exposed by surgeons during performance of an invasive procedure. Motivation/Background: A lot of expense both with regards to nursing time and dressing material costs is invested in prevention of SSI using occlusive surgical incision site dressing. But to what extent is this beneficial over open wound treatment? In the present study, we have compared the incidence of SSIs in surgical wounds treated with occlusive dressings versus those treated with open wound treatment to find out the same. Method: The study was conducted on 860 patients of General Surgery wards. Patients were categorized under two groups of cases where (1) Dressing was opened after 24 hours and then only open wound treatment by cleaning with Betadine 12 hourly was done till stitch removal and (2) Dressing was opened after 48 hours and then again after every 2 days occlusive dressing was done until stitch removal. Result: A Chi-Square Test was performed to understand if Occlusive dressings have an added advantage over Open Wound Treatment in prevention of SSIs. Conclusion: Occlusive Dressings have no added advantage over Open Wound Treatment in the prevention of SSIs and hence Open wound treatment can be taken as an alternative for occlusive dressings.

scholarly journals Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanna C. Wagner ◽  
Anja Wetz ◽  
Armin Wiegering ◽  
Johan F. Lock ◽  
Stefan Löb ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Skin Closure ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Abstract Purpose Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds “preconditioned” with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. Methods Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). Results One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013–2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. Conclusion Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.

Peri-operative Adverse Outcomes in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Taking Warfarin or Edoxaban: Analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (06) ◽  
pp. 1001-1008 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Douketis ◽  
Sabina Murphy ◽  
Elliott Antman ◽  
Laura Grip ◽  
Michele Mercuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Systemic Embolism ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Post Procedure ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Background Peri-operative management of anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is challenging. To gain information on the peri-operative management of edoxaban, we compared outcomes in patients on warfarin or edoxaban enrolled in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 who underwent a surgery or invasive procedure. Methods Data from patients undergoing their first surgery/procedure were analysed and results compared by anticoagulant (warfarin vs. higher- or lower-dose edoxaban regimen [HDER and LDER, respectively]). Patients were classified by procedural management: anticoagulant interrupted (last dose 4–10 days pre-procedure) or anticoagulant continued (last dose ≤ 3 days pre-procedure). Stroke/systemic embolism (SSE), major bleeding (MB), MB or clinically relevant non-MB (CRNMB) and death were assessed from 7 days pre- until 30 days post-procedure. The chi-square test was used to compare outcomes across treatment groups. Results A total of 7,193 patients (34%) underwent surgery/procedure: 3,116 had anticoagulant interrupted, 4,077 had anticoagulant continued. Among patients on warfarin, HDER and LDER who had anticoagulant interrupted, rates of SSE were 0.6, 0.5 and 0.9% (p = 0.53), rates of MB were 1.0, 1.2 and 1.1% (p = 0.94) and rates of MB or CRNMB were 3.9, 4.2 and 3.6% (p = 0.78); among patients on warfarin, HDER and LDER who had anticoagulant continued, rates of SSE were 1.1, 0.7 and 0.9% (p = 0.51), rates of MB were 3.6, 2.6 and 2.4% (p = 0.13) and rates of MB or CRNMB were 8.5, 7.9 and 6.6% (p = 0.17). Conclusion In patients requiring surgery/procedure in ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48, peri-operative rates of SSE, MB and death were not significantly different in patients who received edoxaban or warfarin.

scholarly journals Surgical Site Infections (SSI) and factors associated in a private tertiary care teaching hospital in Raichur, Karnataka, India

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 2899
Author(s):  
Prashanta Swami Pujar ◽  
K. B. Phuleker ◽  
Nagaraj Bhalki
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Research Centre ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
College Hospital ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
A Prospective Study

Background: Prevention of Surgical site infection (SSI) remains a focus of attention because wound infections continue to be a major source of expense, morbidity, and even mortality. Three quarters of deaths of surgical patients with SSIs are attributed to nosocomial infections, nearly all of which are organ/space infections. The objective of the present study was to estimate the incidence of SSI and to study the various risk factors associated with SSI.Methods: This is a prospective study of 180 eligible cases eligible subjects, who underwent various surgeries in the department of General Surgery after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study conducted at the Navodaya Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Raichur. The tenure for the study was April 2017 to June 2017. Data was collected using pretested proforma. Data was analysed using SPSS version 16. Chi -square test and multiple logistic regression was applied to know the association between various risk factors and occurrence of SSI.Results: Among 180 patients 33 (18.33%) developed surgical site infections (SSI). Among 33 SSIs 25 (75.76%) were grade 3 and 8 (24.24%) were grade 4 infections. SSIs were found more commonly among patients over 50 years, diabetics, HIV infected patients, patients with longer duration of surgery and associations with these factors were found statistically significant.Conclusions: The incidence rate of SSI was quite high, and its end results will have a greater impact on patients as well as on healthcare systems. Prevention of SSI requires multipronged approach targeting both patient related and procedure related risk factors in pre- operative, intra-operative, and post-operative period.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Systemic Effects of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Open Wound Treatment in Dogs

VCOT Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 02 (02) ◽  
pp. e1-e8
Author(s):  
Rebecca Albert ◽  
Sven Reese ◽  
Mirja C. Nolff ◽  
Andrea Meyer-Lindenberg
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Total Protein ◽  
Wound Closure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Systemic Effects ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Characteristic Analysis ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the systemic effect of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) on the treatment of complicated wounds in dogs. Materials and Methods Dogs undergoing open wound treatment were randomly assigned to one of two groups: NPWT (n = 11) or polyurethane foam dressing (n = 11). Rectal temperature, heart rate as well as haematocrit, thrombocytes, leucocyte count, band neutrophils, C-reactive protein (CrP), total protein and albumin were recorded daily from the beginning of therapy (day 0) until day 5, as well as on day 10. The effect of treatment on systemic parameters was evaluated as well as the prognostic power of the individual parameters with regard to successful wound closure. Results A more profound systemic decrease was found in total protein under NPWT. This difference was non-significant. Patients with non-successful closure displayed a non-significant trend towards lower initial leukocyte and thrombocyte counts and significantly higher CrP values on days 4, 5 and 10 (p < 0.05) compared with successfully treated patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an optimal cutoff value of 70.2 mg/L at day 4 (sensitivity 80; specificity of 85.7). Conclusion There might be an increased loss of protein in NPWT-treated patients, which does not affect albumin levels, otherwise no systemic effects were detected compared with the control treatment. The parameter with the best sensitivity and specificity to detect serious complications (no wound closure achieved) was CrP at day 4.

scholarly journals Retrospective comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and silver-coated foam dressings in open-wound treatment in cats

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-630 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mirja Christine Nolff ◽  
Michael Fehr ◽  
Sven Reese ◽  
Andrea E Meyer-Lindenberg
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Antiseptic Treatment ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

Objectives The objective of this study was to evaluate negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for the treatment of complicated wounds in cats. Methods Twenty cats undergoing open-wound treatment in two clinics were classed according to treatment method: NPWT (group A, n = 10) and polyurethane foam dressing (group B, n = 10). Pairs of patients from each group were matched based on wound conformation, localisation and underlying cause. Cats from both groups were compared in terms of duration of previous treatment, time to closure and complications. Results Signalment, duration of previous treatment, antibiotic and antiseptic treatment, and bacterial status were comparable between groups. Total time to wound closure was significantly shorter ( P = 0.046, strong effect size; Cohen d = 0.8) in group A (25.8 days, range 11.0–57.0 days) compared with group B (39.5 days, range 28.0–75.0 days). NPWT-treated wounds suffered fewer complications and became septic less frequently during treatment compared with wounds treated with a foam dressing. The progression of fat tissue necrosis was particularly well controlled under NPWT, resulting in fewer deaths due to this condition in this group. However, although a strong effect of NPWT on the progression of infection, fever and sepsis was detected (Cramer-V 0.5), this difference was not significant. Conclusions and relevance This study demonstrated that time to healing was considerably shorter, and complication rate lower, in NPWT-treated animals compared with foam dressing-treated cats. In particular, the effective management of infection by NPWT emphasises the value of NPWT in the treatment of cats suffering from infected wounds.

scholarly journals Comparative evaluation of the modified Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading system on breast carcinoma aspirates and histopathology

CytoJournal ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cherry Bansal ◽  
U. S. Singh ◽  
Sanjeev Misra ◽  
Kiran Lata Sharma ◽  
Vandana Tiwari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Invasive Procedure ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Lower Grade ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Fine Needle Aspirates ◽  
Peripheral Portion ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Tissue Specimens

Background: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a quick, minimally invasive procedure for evaluation of breast tumors. The Scarff-Bloom-Richardson (SBR) grade on histological sections is a well-established tool to guide selection of adjuvant systemic therapy. Grade evaluation is possible on cytology smears to avoid and minimize the morbidity associated with overtreatment of lower grade tumors. Aim: The aim was to test the hypothesis whether breast FNA from the peripheral portion of the lesion is representative of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade on histopathology as compared to FNA from the central portion. Materials and Methods: Fine-needle aspirates and subsequent tissue specimens from 45 women with ductal carcinoma (not otherwise specified) were studied. FNAs were performed under ultrasound guidance from the central as well as the peripheral third of the lesion for each case avoiding areas of necrosis/calcification. The SBR grading was compared on alcohol fixed aspirates and tissue sections for each case. Results: Comparative analysis of SBR grade on aspirates from the peripheral portion and histopathology by the Pearson chi-square test (χ2 =78.00) showed that it was statistically significant (P<0.001) with 93% concordance. Lower mitotic score on aspirates from the peripheral portion was observed in only 4 out of 45 (9%) cases. The results of the Pearson chi-square test (χ2 = 75.824) with statistically significant (P=0.000). Conclusion: This prospective study shows that FNA smears from the peripheral portion of the lesion are representative of the grading performed on the corresponding histopathological sections. It is possible to score and grade by SBR system on FNA smears.

Negative pressure wound therapy, silver coated foam dressing and conventional bandages in open wound treatment in dogs

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (01) ◽  
pp. 30-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Fehr ◽  
A. Bolling ◽  
R. Dening ◽  
S. Kramer ◽  
S. Reese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Negative Pressure ◽  
Negative Pressure Wound Therapy ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Wound Treatment ◽  
Open Wound ◽  
Wound Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Open Wound Treatment

SummaryObjectives: To evaluate negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for treatment of complicated wounds in dogs.Study type: Retrospective multicentre study.Materials and methods: Dogs (n = 50) undergoing open wound treatment were classified according to treatment method used: bandage (Group A, n = 7), NPWT (Group B, n = 18), and foam dressing (Group C, n = 25). Pairs of patients matched based on wound conformation, localization, and underlying cause were compared between Group A and C (n = 7 pairs) and between groups B and C (n = 18 pairs) in terms of duration of previous treatment, time to closure, and complications.Results: Signalment, antibiotic medications, antiseptic treatment, and bacterial status of wounds were comparable between groups. The duration of previous treatment was significantly higher in patients assigned to Group B (p = 0.04) compared to Group C, while no significant difference was found between groups A and B. Total time to wound closure was significantly shorter in Group C compared to Group A (p = 0.02) and in Group B compared to Group C (p = 0.003). Wounds treated with NPWT suffered significantly less complications (p = 0.008) and were significantly less septic during treatment (p = 0.016) than wounds treated with a foam dressing.Conclusion: This study shows that time to healing was halved in NPWT treated patients compared to foam dressing treated patients, which in turn healed faster than patients treated with conventional bandage, underlining the value of NPWT therapy for the treatment of complicated wounds.

scholarly journals Risk of surgical site infection in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1362-1368 ◽  
Author(s):  
Flávia Falci Ercole ◽  
Lúcia Maciel Castro Franco ◽  
Tamara Gonçalves Rezende Macieira ◽  
Luísa Cristina Crespo Wenceslau ◽  
Helena Isabel Nascimento de Resende ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Historical Cohort ◽  
Surgical Site Infection Incidence ◽  
Chi Square Test

This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with surgical site infections in orthopedic surgical patients at a public hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil, between 2005 and 2007. A historical cohort of 3,543 patients submitted to orthopedic surgical procedures. A descriptive analysis was conducted and surgical site infection incidence rates were estimated. To verify the association between infection and risk factors, the Chi-square Test was used. The strength of association of the event with the independent variables was estimated using Relative Risk, with a 95% confidence interval and p<0.05. The incidence of surgical site infection was 1.8%. Potential surgical wound contamination, clinical conditions, time and type of surgical procedure were statistically associated with infection. Identifying the association between surgical site infection and these risk factors is important and contributes to nurses’ clinical practice.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document