scholarly journals The Complexity Problem on the Law Enforcement by Indonesian Police Agency during the COVID-19 Pandemic

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-122
Author(s):  
Dwi Putri Hardiani ◽  
Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya

In Indonesia, the COVID-19 pandemic can be a fundamental concern if it is not able to overcome its impact. This pandemic considered to be very influential in affecting and disturbing several fundamental aspects of a country, such as health, economic, legal aspect, defense and security, and etc. This study examined the complexity problem of law enforcement by the police officer during the COVID-19 pandemic. The method of this researchusesnormative legal research by prioritizing secondary data that analyzed descriptive qualitative analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the police are referred to the law that lives in the community because of the work of the police plays an important role in maintaining the security and defense of the community, the law enforcement, as well as providing protection, protection, and services to the community. This has placed the police in dealing with various dynamics of social changing including the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the problem with police law enforcement in the current COVID-19 pandemic arises from the implementation of Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB) policy, the complexity problem in law enforcement on PSBB, and the choice to the possible solutions.

Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari

Research in connection with jurnal writing thesis takes the theme the protection of the law against companies factor in billing accounts receivable factoring transactions. Problems studied involves two things; the first what factors the company’s legal position as a buyer on receivables in factoring and financing institution both what form of legal protection that can be given to companies factor of a possible failure of the trade receivables collection. This includes research conducted legal research categories, namely normative legal research literature or legal research based on secondary data. The approach used is the approach ot the laws and facts approach. Next to for further analysis techniques use the description legal interpretation techniques based argumentative theory, principles, and concepts relevan laws. The results showed that the company,s legal position as a purchaser of  factoring receivables is very weak and vulnerable than risk the possibility of failure of collection of accounts receivable due to non fulfillment of the achievements by the customer. In this context there is no guarantee of  legal protection for the company for the payment or refund factor its receivables in full. The next from legal protection that can be given to the factor as a buyer of receivables is; a) apply the type of recourse factoring in the factoring agreement with the burden of responsibility is on the client in case of failure of collection of accounts receivable, b) implement a system of personal/corporate guarantees, and c) apply the prudential banking principles


Acta Comitas ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Raymond Bagus Nurchandra ◽  
Retno Murni

The purpose of this research is to determine the validity of a fiduciary security deed using a motorized vehicle that is still in the indent process as a guarantee. This type of research is empirical legal research which is based on primary data sources and secondary data sources. Then the conclusions are drawn through descriptive analysis techniques. The results show that a motorized vehicle that is still in the pivoting process can be charged with a fiduciary guarantee, but the debtor must attach proof of the order given by the dealer The part that will pay the vehicle in full to the dealer is the bank and after the proof of payment is given in full, the proof must be presented in front of a notary. The debtor must also make his own statement if the BPKB has been issued, it must be immediately submitted to the bank. The validity of a fiduciary guarantee deed that uses a motorized vehicle that is still in the pivot process as evidence is legally recognized because in the provisions of the explanation of article 6 letter c of the Law on Fiduciary Security does not clearly emphasize the existence of BPKB ownership so that proof of purchase orders can already be obtained. used as proof of ownership of a motorized vehicle that is still in the process of being indented.   Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui keabsahan suatu akta jaminan fidusia yang menggunakan kendaraan bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden sebagai jaminannya. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris yang didasarkan pada sumber data primer serta sumber data sekunder kemudian ditarik kesimpulannya melalui teknik analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa kendaraan bermotor yang masih didalam proses inden dapat dibebankan dengan jaminan fidusia namun pihak debitor harus melampirkan bukti pemesanan kendaraan bermotor tersebut yang diberikan oleh pihak dealer. Pihak yang akan membayarkan kendaraan tersebut secara lunas kepada dealer adalah pihak bank dan setelah diberikannya tanda bukti pembayaran secara lunas tersebut maka bukti tersebut harus dipaparkan dihadapan pihak Notaris. Pihak debitor juga harus membuat surat pernyataan sendiri jika BPKB sudah terbit maka harus segara diserahkan kepada pihak bank. Keabsahan suatu akta jaminan fidusia yang menggunakan kendaran bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden sebagai alat bukti diakui sah secara hukum karena didalam ketentuan penjelasan Pasal 6 huruf c Undang-Undang tentang Jaminan Fidusia tidak menekankan secara jelas harus adanya kepemilikan BPKB sehingga bukti purchase order saja sudah dapat digunakan sebagai suatu bukti kepemilikan kendaraan bermotor yang masih dalam proses inden.


2021 ◽  
Vol 317 ◽  
pp. 01062
Author(s):  
Aju Putrijanti

The massive damage to the environment brings loss for society. Meanwhile, development is essential. Act Number 32 the Year 2009 of Protection and Management of Environment regulates the law enforcement in private, penal and administrative law. Law enforcement in environmental cases, some are difficult to implement. This is legal research that uses the secondary data of journals, regulations, judge verdicts, and explanations to use descriptive analysis. Law enforcement is influenced by the environmental system of law consist of structure, substance and culture of law. The environment disputes file to general and administrative court with special regulations because it has to be held in line with other cases and takes more time to proceed. Law enforcement of judge verdict in environment disputes is difficult to implement, because the losing party disobedience to apply. The disobedience factor influences conservation and protection, which is needed by the society affects environmental damage, making regulation of sanctions given to losing party are less power. The high number of environmental disputes needs special environment courts to investigate faster, so there will be a mechanism to supervise law enforcement. Environment special court will only investigate environment disputes and does not interrupt with other cases, and it is expected that the judge will process it immediately.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-101
Author(s):  
Christian A Caesar

Diversion is the settlement of juvenile cases that have been transferred from the criminal justice process to the non-criminal justice process. This is because the child is the party who has not been able to legally account for his dressing. The purpose of the research was to analyse in depth the background execution of the diversion of the dealing with the law and the obstacles affecting the implementation of diversion. This research uses a type of normative empirical legal research by finding the empirical in the field that concerns the problems of primary that is obtained directly from the results of the interviews with respondents and interviewees as well as data secondary data is obtained through literature-literature which deals directly with the issue discussed in this study. The research results give a hint that execution is a form of diversion pemidanaan the more education against children as well as the factors that influence the implementation of restorative justice in the diversion on the criminal justice system, child is a factor the substance of the law, human resource law enforcement officers who have yet to grasp the versioned, support and cooperation among related agencies not optimal, and are also victims/families of the victims have not been able to receive them well on diversion.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 91
Author(s):  
Udin Silalahi ◽  
Priskilla Chrysentia

Tender conspiracy is one of the anti-competition acts prohibited under Article 22 Law No. 5 of 1999 on Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition. As one of the violations which are almost always injurious, tender conspiracy is only regulated by a rule of reasonable approach giving an interpretation room of the consequences of the violation. The tender conspiracy is also proven conducted by reported parties in the case that it had been decided by KPPU, such as in the KPPU Decision Number 06/KPPU-L/2015. The questions arising in connection with the rampant practices of tender conspiracy are how they regulate in the applicable law and how KPPU decides on the practice of tender conspiracy in the case concerned with the law. The aim is to examine the causes of the rampant practice of tender conspiracy in relation to the regulations governing it, as well as to review the KPPU's decision on real tender conspiracy case. For this reason, this research is normative legal research with qualitative analysis techniques on secondary data and uses the statute approach, and case approaches. The results of the study indicate that Article 22  is not sufficient yet to regulate the prohibition of tender conspiracy and often leads to multi-interpretation. the KPPU decided that there is a horizontal conspiracy among defendantsindetermining of the tender winner


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-154
Author(s):  
Edi Tuahta Putra Saragih ◽  
Muhammad Citra Ramadhan ◽  
Isnaini Isnaini

This research aimed to: (a) obtain the forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); (b) understand the role of the police, in this case the Police Precinct, in the law enforcement; (c) identify the factors that influenced the law enforcement. The research method used the normative-empirical legal research, with the initial stages of specifying norms in order to get the proper picture, and then specifying empirical events in order to get the real picture. The research results showed several matters: 1) The forms of copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics) found included: the distribution of the works or the copies, the performances of the works, and the announcements of the works; 2) Police Precinct did notultimately carry out their role as a law enforcer for the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics); and 3) The factors that influenced the law enforcement on the copyright infringement of songs and/or music (with or without lyrics), namely: legislation factor, in the matter of complaint offenses; law enforcement factor, in terms of the capacity of members; less supportive factor of facilities and infrastructure; legal awareness factor, in the problem of the lack of legal counseling; and cultural factor, related to the differences in norms in the copyright law between those in society and those in regulations. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 571
Author(s):  
Sulistyo Utomo ◽  
Ira Alia Maerani

This research aims to identify and analyze the existence of the application of criminal penalties in the handling of criminal cases Child Protection in Indonesia and analyze the effectiveness of criminal fines when viewed from the perspective of children as victims of crime.Method used is socio-juridical using primary and secondary data. Primary data collection technique is done with the interview, and secondary data by reading, reviewing and analyzing primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, tertiary legal materials with qualitative analysis techniques, interpreted logically and systematically and drawn conclusions.Based on the survey results revealed that the existence of the application of criminal penalties in the handling of criminal cases Child Protection in Indonesia criminal fines in criminal prospects are just as an alternative or substitute for imprisonment or confinement. And effectiveness this penalty has not run optimally because the defendant would prefer to replace the criminal penalties to imprisonment.The conclusion of this thesis is that the implementation or execution of criminal penalties in Indonesia have not been effective or not maximized because law enforcement or judges tend to prefer the imprisonment of the criminal finesKeywords: Criminal Fines; Criminal Prison; Children.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33
Author(s):  
Rizana

Law Enforcement of Criminal Forests and Land Fire in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau Forest and land fires are not a rare phenomenon in Indonesia, especially in Riau Province. This study aims to explain the law enforcement of forest and land fire crimes in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau. The method used in this research is sociological legal research. Based on Article 50 Paragraph (3) Letter d of Law Number 41 of 1999 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from burning forests. In line with that, based on Article 69 Paragraph (1) Letter h of Law Number 32 Year 2009 it is stated that everyone is prohibited from clearing land by burning. However, in 2019 there will still be forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir, Province of Riau covering an area of approximately 827 Ha. The implementation of Law No. 41/1999 and Law No. 32/2009 concerning forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir has not run as expected. Burning forests and land is a crime. Law enforcement against forest and land fires in Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir based on Article 78 Paragraph (3) of Law Number 41 Year 1999 states that anyone who intentionally burns a forest can be threatened with a maximum of 15 years imprisonment and a maximum fine IDR 5,000,000,000. Pursuant to Article 108 of Law Number 32 Year 2009 it is also emphasized that everyone who burns a land shall be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of 3 (three) years and a maximum of 10 (ten) years, and a fine of at least Rp. 3,000,000,000.- (three billion rupiah) and a maximum of Rp 10,000,000,000 (ten billion rupiah).


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola

Article 31 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law stipulate that all seizures that have been determined on the debtor's assets are null and void since the bankruptcy verdict is pronounced and since then the only validity is general seizure. However, in its practice various seizures are still stipulated on bankrupt assets ranging from civil, criminal and tax seizures. This paper discusses the forms of seizure in the bankruptcy process, the position of general seizure of other seizures in bankruptcy and the impact of the position of general seizure on debt payments to creditors. The research method used is normative legal research using secondary data collected through library studies and document studies. The various data were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This writing found that there are rules in other laws such as Article 39 paragraph (2) KUHAP and Article 6 paragraph (1) Law No. 19 of 2000 that have ruled out the position of general seizure. The experts in each field of science also have different views regarding the position of general seizure. This condition has resulted in the emergence of friction between law enforcement, inconsistency of judges’ decisions, length of bankruptcy proceedings, injustice, unclear data on bankruptcy assets and reduced bankruptcy assets. Therefore, the understanding of law enforcement regarding legal principles, especially the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis, needs to be improved. The use of prejudgment seizure in the bankruptcy process must be socialized to maximize control over bankrupt assets. To avoid prolonged process of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy law should limit the time period for the settlement of assets to the curator.AbstrakPasal 31 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Kepailitan mengatur bahwa segala sita yang telah ditetapkan atas harta kekayaan debitor menjadi hapus semenjak putusan pailit diucapkan dan semenjak itu satu-satunya yang berlaku adalah sita umum. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya berbagai sita tetap ditetapkan atas harta pailit mulai dari sita perdata, pidana dan pajak.  Tulisan ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk sita dalam proses kepailitan, kedudukan sita umum terhadap sita lainnya dalam kepailitan dan dampak dari kedudukan sita umum terhadap pembayaran utang kepada para kreditor. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan studi perpustakaan maupun studi dokumen. Berbagai data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Penulisan ini menemukan bahwa adanya aturan dalam UU lain seperti Pasal 39 ayat (2) KUHAP dan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU No. 19 Tahun 2000 telah mengesampingkan kedudukan sita umum. Ahli masing-masing bidang ilmu juga memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait kedudukan sita umum.  Kondisi ini berdampak pada munculnya pergesekan antara penegak hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, lamanya proses kepailitan, terjadi ketidakadilan, ketidakjelasan data harta pailit, berkurang bahkan hilangnya harta pailit. Oleh sebab itu, pemahaman penegak hukum tentang asas hukum terutama asas lex specialis derogate legi generalis perlu ditingkatkan. Penggunaan lembaga sita jaminan dalam proses kepailitan harus disosialisasikan untuk memaksimalkan penguasaan terhadap harta pailit. Supaya proses kepailitan tidak berlarut-larut, UU kepailitan harusnya membatasi jangka waktu penyelesaian aset kepada kurator.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 392
Author(s):  
Samuel Samuel ◽  
Siti Nurbaiti

In principle, the resolution of consumer disputes can be pursued peacefully. through an alternative mediation dispute resolution. In Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and Regulation of the Minister of Trade of the Republic of Indonesia Number 6 / M-DAG / PER / 2017 concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body does not impose limits on the authority of BPSK in handling and adjudicating a consumer dispute. However, in reality many times the decisions of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) are submitted to the district court and stated that BPSK is not authorized to handle such disputes. How is the authority of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Board in handling disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli and Sari Alamsyah are the issues discussed. The method used in this research is descriptive normative legal research, using secondary data and primary data as supporting data with the law approach. The results of the study illustrate that BPSK is not authorized to handle disputes between PT. Sinar Menara Deli with Sari Alamsyah, because the business actors in this dispute have submitted a refusal to be resolved through BPSK and not achieving the requirements for consumer disputes. It is recommended that BPSK members pay more attention to the provisions in the Consumer Protection Act and other regulations concerning the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document