scholarly journals Kedudukan Sita Umum Terhadap Sita Lainnya Dalam Proses Kepailitan (The Position Of General Seizure Towards Others In The Process Of Bankrupcy)

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-234
Author(s):  
Luthvi Febryka Nola
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Time Period ◽  
Library Studies ◽  
The Impact

Article 31 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the Indonesian Bankruptcy Law stipulate that all seizures that have been determined on the debtor's assets are null and void since the bankruptcy verdict is pronounced and since then the only validity is general seizure. However, in its practice various seizures are still stipulated on bankrupt assets ranging from civil, criminal and tax seizures. This paper discusses the forms of seizure in the bankruptcy process, the position of general seizure of other seizures in bankruptcy and the impact of the position of general seizure on debt payments to creditors. The research method used is normative legal research using secondary data collected through library studies and document studies. The various data were then analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. This writing found that there are rules in other laws such as Article 39 paragraph (2) KUHAP and Article 6 paragraph (1) Law No. 19 of 2000 that have ruled out the position of general seizure. The experts in each field of science also have different views regarding the position of general seizure. This condition has resulted in the emergence of friction between law enforcement, inconsistency of judges’ decisions, length of bankruptcy proceedings, injustice, unclear data on bankruptcy assets and reduced bankruptcy assets. Therefore, the understanding of law enforcement regarding legal principles, especially the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generalis, needs to be improved. The use of prejudgment seizure in the bankruptcy process must be socialized to maximize control over bankrupt assets. To avoid prolonged process of bankruptcy, the bankruptcy law should limit the time period for the settlement of assets to the curator.AbstrakPasal 31 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UU Kepailitan mengatur bahwa segala sita yang telah ditetapkan atas harta kekayaan debitor menjadi hapus semenjak putusan pailit diucapkan dan semenjak itu satu-satunya yang berlaku adalah sita umum. Akan tetapi pada praktiknya berbagai sita tetap ditetapkan atas harta pailit mulai dari sita perdata, pidana dan pajak.  Tulisan ini membahas tentang bentuk-bentuk sita dalam proses kepailitan, kedudukan sita umum terhadap sita lainnya dalam kepailitan dan dampak dari kedudukan sita umum terhadap pembayaran utang kepada para kreditor. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dikumpulkan melalui kegiatan studi perpustakaan maupun studi dokumen. Berbagai data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif-kualitatif. Penulisan ini menemukan bahwa adanya aturan dalam UU lain seperti Pasal 39 ayat (2) KUHAP dan Pasal 6 ayat (1) UU No. 19 Tahun 2000 telah mengesampingkan kedudukan sita umum. Ahli masing-masing bidang ilmu juga memiliki pandangan yang berbeda terkait kedudukan sita umum.  Kondisi ini berdampak pada munculnya pergesekan antara penegak hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, lamanya proses kepailitan, terjadi ketidakadilan, ketidakjelasan data harta pailit, berkurang bahkan hilangnya harta pailit. Oleh sebab itu, pemahaman penegak hukum tentang asas hukum terutama asas lex specialis derogate legi generalis perlu ditingkatkan. Penggunaan lembaga sita jaminan dalam proses kepailitan harus disosialisasikan untuk memaksimalkan penguasaan terhadap harta pailit. Supaya proses kepailitan tidak berlarut-larut, UU kepailitan harusnya membatasi jangka waktu penyelesaian aset kepada kurator.

scholarly journals MERINTANGI PENGUBURAN JENAZAH COVID-19 DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 178 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA

LEGALITAS ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 104
Author(s):  
Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy Dan Syamsudin
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
The Body ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Corona Virus ◽  
The World ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
The Impact

Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.

scholarly journals Position of Tax Debt and Labour Right: Legal Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sonya Liani Ramadayanti
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Special Treatment ◽  
Tax Law ◽  
Bankruptcy Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Labour Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Rules ◽  
The Right

This study aims to explain the position of tax debt and labour right in bankruptcy. The legal research method used in this research using normative research, the legal rules and legal principles used related to bankruptcy law, tax law and labour law will be a reference in describing the problem of the position of tax debt and labour right in bankruptcy cases. The Taxation Law gives a special treatment and higher position on which the tax debt is first to be paid by the debtor and followed by the right borne by the separatist creditor. On the other hand, Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment also regulates that the labour of the wages and other rights of the labour and positioned the labour as preferred creditor on which the privilege is given by the law. However, there are no statements in the Employment Law that stated the position of labour as a preferred creditor is higher than separatist creditor in the matter of bankrupt as what the Taxation Kaw expressed creditor is higher than the separatist creditor within the matter of tax payment. That distinction seems positioned the preferred creditor status of labour is lower than the position of separatist creditor on the matter of right fulfillment in bankruptcy. It is certainty that the statement which stated that the collection of tax debts have the right to preceded than other debts does not fit in this matter. Eventually, there is a decision of Constitutional Court Number 67/PUU-XI/2013 that provides a change within the position labour’s right on the matter of bankruptcy.

scholarly journals COUNTERMEASURE POLICY ON MINING CRIME UNDER THE LEGAL PROGRESSIVE PERCEPTIVE

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 226
Author(s):  
Faisal Faisal ◽  
Derita Prapti Rahayu
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Secondary Prevention ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Criminal Policy ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Mining Areas ◽  
Mining Law ◽  
Basic Ideas ◽  
Rational Actions

<em>The complexity of mining business governance affects rational actions to tackle mining crime using the criminal policies in a progressive legal dimension. This research focuses on dealing with mining crime using criminal policies and rational efforts in the progressive legal dimension. It was conducted using normative legal research method using secondary data obtained from primary and secondary legal materials. The urgency of this research is to provide guidance towards the application of appropriate rules of mining for the actors in the business. It was also directed to provide references in mining law enforcement through an integral policy. The results showed that criminal policy through penal means in the formulation stage has the ability to regulate licensing crimes, corporate crimes, crimes against reclamation, and criminal obstruction of mining businesses. Moreover, the application stage involves the legal construction of material and formal offenses while the execution stage requires integral law enforcement. It is also important to note that the non-penal means which focuses on prevention maps potential actors with the ability to create the victims while the secondary prevention maps the mining areas with potential conflicts. This means the progressiveness of mining criminal policies rationally in the progressive law dimension enforces certainty and basic ideas underlying the norms.</em>

scholarly journals ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PORNOGRAFI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 44 TAHUN 2008 DI ERA DIGITALISASI

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 169
Author(s):  
Andri Winjaya Laksana ◽  
Suratman Suratman
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Research Library ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Public ◽  
Criminal Investigations ◽  
Library Research

Pornography is a crime that is privacy so that enforcement against the eradication of pornography there are many difficulties. One of the factors inhibiting the eradication of pornography among others due to lack of cooperation from the public and the various parties in reporting this crime. Criminal law enforcement have a tendency to be influenced by the structure of society, that is a constraint that allows the criminal law enforcement can be run and can provide barriers that lead to the enforcement of criminal law can’t be started or can't be maximize. As happens to the pros cons on current legislation Law No. 44 Year 2008 concerning the Crime pornography. This research method using normative juridical approach. Normative juridical research also called legal research library research is done by checking library materials or secondary data. The results of the study refers to Article 34 in conjunction with Article 8 of Law No. 44 Year 2008 on Pornography, (1) that the elements of the crime of pornography consists of Subjective elements that error, which means intentionally or consent was committed and objective elements that act ( be) which means that objects or models that contain pornographic content. (2) In the process of criminal investigations conducted pornography remains based on Criminal Procedure unless otherwise provided in the Act No. 44 of 2008

scholarly journals PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DAN PEDOMAN PERILAKU HAKIM

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Imran Imran
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research

ABSTRAKDalam sistem peradilan pidana penanganan suatu kasus dimulai sejak kasus itu muncul, kemudian ditangani oleh polisi, hingga proses akhir dari penegakan hukum terletak pada putusan hakim. Putusan hakim dapat berupa menjatuhkan hukuman ataupun membebaskan seorang terdakwa. Dalam putusan hakim akan terlihat kemampuan hakim dalam mengonstruksi kasus sejak dakwaan dibacakan hingga pledoi diucapkan. Semua konstruksi hakim tersebut akan tergambar dalam pertimbangan-pertimbangan. Dalam pertimbangan tersebut akan terlihat apakah suatu putusan tersebut melanggar kode etik atau tidak. Apa yang terlihat dalam dua putusan hakim yang dikeluarkan oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tobelo, mencerminkan adanya persoalan ketika seorang terdakwa dua kali dihukum oleh majelis hakim yang sama untuk perbuatan yang sama pula. Hal inilah yang kemudian menjadi rumusan masalah, apakah putusan tersebut melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim atau tidak? Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang memfokuskan kajian pada data sekunder, maka akan terlihat bagaimana sesungguhnya dua putusan tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan telah terjadi pelanggaran Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim yang dilakukan oleh majelis hakim.Kata kunci: kode etik dan pedoman perilaku hakim; sistem peradilan pidana; profesionalisme.  ABSTRACT In the criminal justice system, the handling of a case starts since the claim arises, then is handled by the police, until the final process of law enforcement, which lies in the judge's decision. Judges' decisions can be in the form of sentencing or acquitting a defendant. The ability of a judge to construct a case will appear in the decision from the time the indictment is read until the plea is pronounced. In these considerations, it will be seen whether the judge's decision violates the code of ethics or not. Two judges' decisions issued by the Tobelo District Court reflect the problem in which a defendant was twice sentenced by the same panel of judges for violating the same law. This is what then becomes the formula of the problem, whether the decision violates the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges or not. By using normative legal research method focusing on secondary data construing, it will expose the fact of these two decisions. The results of this analysis indicate that there are violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct of Judges been committed by the panel of judges examining the case. Keywords: code of ethics and code of conduct of judges; criminal justice system; professionalism. 

scholarly journals Community Rights Facing Criminal Law in a Human Rights Perspective

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-119
Author(s):  
Harisman Harisman
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Law ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Assistance ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Community Rights ◽  
The Impact

Legal protection is one form of human rights that must be obtained by everyone, especially with regard to the application of criminal law that can have the impact of violations and restrictions on the freedom of others as a form of human rights. It is not uncommon for people's rights to be questioned or even contested when dealing with criminal law. To answer this problem, a study was conducted using the legal research method through a normative jurudical approach which was intended to collect secondary data obtained from the literature in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The materials collected were analyzed qualitatively descriptive. Based on the analysis conducted, it is clearly seen that people's rights in criminal law are part of human rights that must get respect and protection in order to maintain human dignity through efforts that include: equality before the law, presumption of innocent, non-retroactive and legal assistance, and not tortured, punishment or cruel, inhumane treatment, degrading human dignity and dignity, and not treated arbitrarily.

scholarly journals Banking credit restructuring policy amid COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hari Sutra Disemadi ◽  
Ali Ismail Shaleh
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Current Policy ◽  
Economic Stability ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
National Economic ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Banking Credit

In Indonesia, the spread of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects economic stability. The problem faced by Indonesia today is that the performance and capacity of debtors in carrying out their credit obligations have been disrupted by the spread of COVID-19, which has the potential to disrupt banking performance in credit management. Encouraging the optimization of the banking intermediary function a policy is needed in tackling the impact of the spread of COVID-19. The research method used is a normative legal research method using secondary data. The results of this study indicate that policy settings in overcoming economic instability due to the spread of COVID-19 are the issuance of policies to provide national economic stimulus through the application of Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 11/POJK.03/2020. This policy regulates the existence of credit restructuring, namely the quality of restructured loans can be determined smoothly if given to debtors identified as being affected by the spread of COVID-19. The implementation of the restructuring scheme can vary and is determined by the policies of each bank depending on the assessment of the debtor's profile and capacity to pay. We emphasize that amid uncertainty, such as the current policy will be truly useful if each party takes the process carefully and responsibly.

scholarly journals KEBEBASAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PERDAGANGAN ORANG DIKAITKAN DENGAN PARADIGMA POSITIVISME HUKUM

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratiwi Suci Rosalin
Keyword(s):  
Human Trafficking ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Code Of Ethics ◽  
Code Of Conduct ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Personal Factors ◽  
Trafficking In Persons ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Court Proceedings

ABSTRAKTindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang telah meluas dalam bentuk jaringan kejahatan baik terorganisir maupun tidak terorganisir. Indonesia sebagai Negara hukum telah memiliki paying hukum terkait dengan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang yaitu UU No. 21 tahun 2007 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang. Aturan tersebut sebenarnya telah mengatur mengenai pidana minimal khusus, namun kenyataannya masih ada hakim yang memutus di bawah pidana minimal khusus, salah satunya adalah Putusan Nomor 475/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Bkn jo Putusan Nomor 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan mengetahui kebebasan hakim dalam mengambil putusan terhadap tindak pidana perdagangan orang berdasarkan UU No. 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang dengan ancaman pidana minimum khusus pada saat inisert auntuk mengkaji dan mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan hakim memutus perkara di bawah sanksi minimum. Metode penelitian pada tesis ini menggunakan jenis penelitian digunakan dalam penulisan hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu pendekatan yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder terhadap azas-azas hukum serta studi kasus yang dengan kata lain sering disebut sebagai penelitian hukum kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian dapat dibagi menjadi dua, yaitu: pertama, kebebasan hakim dalam mengambil putusan terhadap tindak pidana perdagangan orang berdasarkan UU No. 21 tahun 2007 tentang Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang dengan ancaman pidana minimum khusus menurut Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim, dapat dilakukan karena hakim harus berperilaku adil. Sedangkan dalam Putusan Nomor 475/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Bkn jo Putusan Nomor 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR dikaitkan dengan paradigma positivisme sangatlah bertentangan, sebab tidak memebuhi prinsip bebas nilai serta menjawab pertanyaan why, sehingga jauh dari aturan yang ada. Kedua, Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan hakim memutus perkara di bawah sanksi minimum ada tiga, yaitu: faktor hukum, faktor pribadi hakim, sertafaktorfaktahukumpersidangan. Terkait Putusan Nomor 475/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Bkn jo Putusan Nomor 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR yang diputus di bawah aturan minimum khusus disebabkan karena terdapat keadaan yang meringankan dalam fakta hukum persidanganKata Kunci: kebebasan hakim; tindak pidana perdagangan orang; paradigma positivisme.ABSTRACTHuman Trafficking has expanded in the form of organized and unorganized crime networks. Indonesia as a state of law already has a legal umbrella related to the Law on Elimination of Human Trafficking Crimes (Law No. 21/2007). The regulation has actually regulated the special minimal criminal law, but in reality there are still judges who decide under the special minimal criminal, one of which is Decision Number 475/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN.Bknjo Decision Number 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR. This study aims to examine and find out the freedom of judges in making decisions against trafficking in persons based on Law on Elimination of Human Trafficking Crimes (Law No. 21/2007) with specific minimum criminal threats at present as well as to examine and find out the factors that have caused judges to decide cases under minimum sanctions.The research method in this thesis uses the type of research used in writing this law is normative legal research, which is an approach carried out by examining library materials or secondary data on legal principles and case studies which in other words are often referred to as library law research. The results of the study can be divided into two, namely: first, the freedom of judges to take decisions on trafficking in persons based Law on Elimination of Human Trafficking Crimes (Law No. 21/2007) with specific minimum criminal threats according to the Code of Ethics and the Code of Conduct for Judges, can be done because judges must behave fairly. Whereas in Decision Number 475/Pid.Sus/2018/ PN.Bknjo Decision Number 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR is associated with the positivism paradigm is very contradictory, because it does not fulfill the principle of free values and answer the question why, so far from the rules which exists. Second, there are three factors that cause judges to decide a case under a minimum sanction, namely: legal factors, personal factors of judges, as well as legal facts in court proceedings. Regarding Decision Number 475/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Bknjo Decision Number 72/Pid.Sus/2018/PT PBR which was decided under a special minimum rule is due to a mitigating situation in the legal facts of the trial.Keywords: freedom of judges; criminal trafficking in persons; positivism paradigm.

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 101
Author(s):  
Mardalena Hanifah
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Materials Processing ◽  
Mediation Process ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Religious Courts

Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges. 

scholarly journals THE LEGAL ACT ON COUNTERFEITING THE COVID-19 VACCINE IN INDONESIAN HEALTH LAW

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 273
Author(s):  
Sahuri Lasmadi
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Research Method ◽  
International Criminal ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Health Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Global Warning ◽  
Law Enforcement Officials ◽  
Online Form

The International Criminal Police Organization has officially issued a global warning to law enforcement officials in 194 member countries to prepare to prevent and deal with various world criminal networks that will seek to utilize the Covid-19 vaccine, both physically. The online form is counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine. This study aims to analyze the criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine from the Health Law in Indonesia. The research method used is the Normative Law research method, which examines library materials or secondary data. Normative legal research is also called doctrinal legal research.  The criminal act of counterfeiting the Covid-19 vaccine is generally regulated in Article 386 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code relating to acts of fraud and forgery. However, it is specifically regulated in the provisions regarding penalties for distributing fake vaccines in Indonesia as regulated in Articles 196, 197, 198, and 201 Act No. 36 of 2009 concerning health. The ingredients are everyone deliberately and producing and circulating counterfeit vaccine preparations. For the criminal act ofCovid-19 vaccine counterfeiting corporate, the corporation can be subject to additional penalties in the form of revocation of business licenses and revocation of legal entity status.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document