scholarly journals Prosedur Penetapan Adanya Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech) Oleh Penyidik/Penyelidik (Studi Kasus Pada Pelaporan Dugaan Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian Di Polda Kalimantan Barat)

Res Judicata ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 140
Author(s):  
Anshari Anshari ◽  
M. Fajrin
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
International Community ◽  
Legal Research

Di tengah lajunya jaringan komunikasi di dunia, segala macam bentuk informasi demikian cepat, mudah, atau gambang didapatkan. Kurangnya filter terhadap informasi yang berkembang mengakibatkan kecemasan masal akan dampak dari benturan-benturan kepentingan (conflict of interest) pada masyarakat dunia (international community). Dampak konkrit dari benturan tersebut adalah stabilitas keamanan dan ketertiban dalam kehidupan masyarakat di suatu Negara, yang mana salah satu penyebabnya adalah Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). Hal ini patut menjadi perhatian serius oleh Pemerintah (Eksekutif, Legislatif, dan Yudikatif) sebagai penjaga pilar demokrasi dalam kehidupan berbangsa. Diskursus soal ujaran kebencian yang menjadi perhatian di Indonesia beberapa tahun belakangan ini semakin krusial, seiring berjalannya penegakan hukum dan perlindungan atas Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) yang merupakan komitmen bersama rakyat Indonesia kepada dunia. Semua pihak sepakat bahwa ujaran kebencian memiliki dampak terhadap harkat dan martabat manusia serta dalam aspek kemanusiaan. Ujaran kebencian bisa mendorong terjadinya kebencian kolektif, pengucilan, penghasutan, diskriminasi, kekerasan, dan bahkan pada tingkat yang paling mengerikan adalah pemusnahan atau pembantaian terhadap suatu kelompok baik itu dalam aspek budaya, etnis, ras, dan agama yang menjadi sasaran ujaran kebencian. Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir (2015-2017) telah terjadi banyak pelaporan terhadap kasus ujaran kebencian, baik di Indonesia secara umum, maupun di Kalimantan Barat. Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Polri) merupakan salah satu institusi penegak hukum di Indonesia yang berkomitmen untuk mencegah dan menegakkan hukum terhadap aspek ujaran kebencian ini. Komitmen tersebut diejawantahkan melalui Surat Edaran Nomor: SE/6/X/2015 tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). Namun, dalam penegakan hukum seringkali ditemukan ketidakseimbangan dalam penanganan sebuah perkara oleh Penyidik/Penyelidik di Institusi Kepolisian. Beberapa kasus yang menjadi konsumsi publik, seringkali ditemukan berhenti di tengah jalan terhadap kasus-kasus tersebut. Tidak lagi terdengar tindak lanjut sampai dengan tahap ajudikasi. Maka dari itu penting untuk dilakukan penelitian terhadap bagaimana proses penetapan tindak pidana ujaran kebencian di Indonesia, khususnya d Kalimantan Barat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana prosedur penetapan adanya tindak pidana ujaran kebencian di Polda Kalimantan Barat, dengan terpublikasinya beberapa kasus pelaporan terhadap dugaan tindak pidana tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang bersifat socio-legal research, dengan menggunakan dan mengkaji norma hukum yang berlaku dihubungkan dengan fakta-fakta yang ditemukan dalam penelitian.

scholarly journals POSSIBILITY TO CORRECT THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH IN INDONESIAN LAW: COMPARISON BETWEEN SINGAPORE LAW AND INDONESIAN LAW ON BROADCASTING

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
Dian Narwastuty ◽  
Christian Nugraha
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Freedom Of Speech ◽  
Comparative Approach ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legal Sanction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Fear Of Retaliation

Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction. This principle is one of the Human Rights principles that are necessary for the progress of humanity itself. But its existence has always triggered a dispute because of the abuse of the right. The abuse of the rights consists of Hate Speech and Hoaxes. This research is normative legal research that uses a comparative approach and conceptual approach. And also, this research will compare the Freedom of Speech and Broadcasting laws in Indonesia and Singapore, especially law in the broadcasting sector. Theoretically, the benefits of this research are to answer the problem of correcting Freedom of Speech, especially in broadcasting law. Practically, it is helpful for society to know much more about hate speech and hoaxes also the possibility to correct the broadcasting law in Indonesia based on the same regulation in Singapore.

scholarly journals Penerapan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Ujaran Kebencian di Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-28
Author(s):  
Fahmi ◽  
Rai Iqsandri ◽  
Rizana
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
District Court ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Law

The problems examined in this study are how to apply the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court and what are the obstacles faced in applying the sanctions against the perpetrators of hate speech in the Pekanbaru District Court. This research method is carried out directly in the field according to the type of sociological legal research. The results of the study show that the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders in the Pekanbaru District Court is not optimal. Factors that hinder the application of sanctions against hate speech offenders do not realize that what they are doing is a criminal act that has a fairly severe sanction in accordance with the law.

scholarly journals Coordination in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)'s Prosecution Tasks Based on Independence Perspective

Corruptio ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-136
Author(s):  
Ndaru Satrio ◽  
Nina Zainab
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Independence Principle ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
Concurrent Events

Coordination of KPK prosecution duties as stated in Article 12A of Law no. 19 of 2019 amending Law No. 30 of 2002 concerning the Commission for the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, or Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK) raises concerns because it creates dependence on other institutions and certainly reduces the independence of the KPK institution. As for some of the problems that need to be known from the existence of this coordination concept, among others: (1) the coordination can be directed towards the form of KPK's subordination to the prosecutor's institution; (2) coordination makes the confidentiality of data held by the KPK not maintained; (3) this coordination is very prone to conflict of interest with the prosecutor's office; (4) this coordination also raises concerns that rotten politics in the resolution of corruption cases may occur. The author uses independence principle analysis. The type of research used in compiling this paper is normative or doctrinal legal research. The research shows that coordination can be done using clear boundaries. First, coordination is still allowed to the extent that it is possible to combine cases that the KPK may not handle. Second, coordination can also be carried out in the event of merging a corruption case that is not the authority of the KPK. Third, the coordination also can be done in the case of the concurrent events. Fourth, the coordination is only related to procedural law.

scholarly journals PRINSIP RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT (R2P) DALAM KONFLIK ISRAEL- PALESTINA: BAGAIMANA SIKAP INDONESIA?

Arena Hukum ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 314-327
Author(s):  
Setyo Widagdo ◽  
Rika Kurniaty
Keyword(s):  
United Nations ◽  
Gaza Strip ◽  
International Community ◽  
Responsibility To Protect ◽  
General Assembly ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Humanitarian Crisis ◽  
Un General Assembly ◽  
The Gaza Strip

This article aims to discuss the Principles of Responsibility to Protect (R2P) that may be applied to the conflict in the Gaza Strip between Israel and Palestine. This normative legal research using a conceptual approach and a case approach indicates that the humanitarian crisis resulting from the conflict needs to be the focus of the international community, and the R2P principle may be applied as an alternative solution. Although the R2P principle is not a legal formulation, R2P plays an important role. It is recognized as an emerging norm or an obligation with a legal significance. R2P has been agreed upon and accepted by most countries globally that are members of the United Nations through UN General Assembly Resolutions. R2P assigns responsibility to the international community to help parties protect populations from the crime of genocide. Ultimately, R2P is expected to encourage states to fulfill their legal responsibilities and obligations, help build capacity to protect populations, and provide assistance to states in emergencies.

scholarly journals PROTECTION OF THE CIVILIAN POPULATION AS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF DISCRIMINATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-104
Author(s):  
Al Qodar Purwo Sulistyo ◽  
Levina Yustinianingtyas
Keyword(s):  
Armed Conflict ◽  
International Community ◽  
International Humanitarian Law ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Humanitarian Law ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Civilian Population ◽  
Object Of Study ◽  
Palestinian Population ◽  
Principle Of Discrimination

Legal research aims to solve the problems that arise in connection with the application of the principle of distinction (distinction principle) in terms of the protection of civilians in international armed conflict between Israel and the Palestinians. The object of study in legal research is devoted to applying the principle of distinction against the civilian population as a victim of war under international humanitarian law in armed conflict international. To solve these problems, they need to be supported by the data in the form of legal material.  The data was obtained through the study of literature and via the Internet. From this legal research to achieve results that provide answers to the problems that exist, the Israeli aggression on Palestine has violated international humanitarian law provisions and has caused misery for the Palestinian population. As a result of these actions, the Israelis may be subject to liability in the form of sanctions or punishment according to international humanitarian law provisions applicable in the international community

scholarly journals The Effectiveness of Criminalizing Hate Speech Through Electronic Media In Dealing With Social Changes of Communicating In Cyberspace

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-90
Author(s):  
Dewa Gede Giri Santosa
Keyword(s):  
Speech Acts ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Electronic Media ◽  
Social Changes ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Electronic Information ◽  
Applicable Law ◽  
The Government

The existence of the internet has a positive impact and has a negative impact, one of which is the rampant hate speech that is spread through social media. The government then issued Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions as amended by Law No. 19 of 2016, which regulates the criminalisation of hate speech conducted via electronic media. Nonetheless, even though there have been criminal threats against acts of hate speech through cyberspace, the number of cases of hate speech handled by the police has increased in years. The research aims to discover social changes' influence in the criminalisation of hate speech through electronic media. Moreover, the research investigates the criminalisation of hate speech's effectiveness through electronic media to tackle the rise of hate speech in cyberspace. This research uses the normative legal research method. The research explains that social changes related to sharing information via electronic media have an impact on applicable law in Indonesia with regulations regarding hate speech through electronic media. However, since the enactment of this regulation, hate speech acts through electronic media has increased. Therefore, the criminalisation policy must pay attention to the principle of subsidiarity. Criminal law must be the last resort in overcoming crimes using a penal instrument. Other efforts needed that should be prioritised apart from punishing the perpetrators of criminal acts.

scholarly journals THE PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS IN NORTH KOREA: INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Yordan Gunawan ◽  
Rima Ayu Andriana
Keyword(s):  
International Law ◽  
Nuclear Weapons ◽  
North Korea ◽  
International Community ◽  
Nuclear Disarmament ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The North ◽  
Compliance Behavior ◽  
The Status

The proliferation issue of nuclear weapons in North Korea is becoming a more serious problem to the international community. North Korea has been manufacturing and developing nuclear weapons technology, which receives many critics by the international community expressing that North Korea is being non-compliance with the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) 1968. The criticism emerged following the North Korea withdrawal from the NPT 1968. Its withdrawal reasoning seems very hard to be justified after series of non-compliance behavior conducted by North Korea and the legitimacy of its withdrawal is being debated. By using normative legal research, the research aims to determine the status of North Korea upon its withdrawal from the NPT 1968 based on the withdrawal procedure that is required in the Article X of the NPT 1968. The result shows that North Korea is still a member and it is bound by the obligations contained in the Treaty and to make progress on a complete nuclear disarmament regime.

scholarly journals Sanksi Pidana bagi Pelaku Penyebaran Berita Hoaks serta Ujaran Kebencian dengan Memakai Akun Anonym

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 178-183
Author(s):  
I wayan Denny Syaputra ◽  
I Made Arjaya ◽  
Diah Gayatri Sudibya
Keyword(s):  
Computer Technology ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Ethnic Discrimination ◽  
The Internet ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Racial And Ethnic Discrimination ◽  
Legal Consequences

Crime in cyberspace is a crime with computer technology, especially the internet. One example is the spread of hoaxes and expressions of hatred. This research was conducted to determine the arrangements for spreading hate speech based on positive law, the legal consequences arising when someone is proven to spread hate speech and spread hoaxes, and efforts and steps taken to prevent the spread of hoax news and hate speech so as not to spread in the community. This research is a type of normative legal research with a statutory approach and conceptual approach. Arrangements for the dissemination of hoax news and expressions of hatred based on positive law have been explicitly regulated in the Criminal Code, which is found in Article 154 of the Criminal Code, Article 154a, Article 156, Article 156a, and Article 157 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2). Besides being regulated in the Criminal Code utterances of hate are regulated outside of the Criminal Code, including in Law No.40 of 2008 concerning the Elimination of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination, which is contained in Article 16, and is also regulated in Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Renewal of Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning ITE has also regulated the distribution of hate speech through cyberspace, which is contained in article 27, article 28 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), article 40 paragraph (2) and article 45 paragraph (2) due to the law incurred if someone is proven to have committed a crime of spreading hoax hoaxes and expressions of hatred can be jailed for 2 years, 3 years and even up to 10 years

scholarly journals Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Melakukan Penahanan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Sosial Media

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 602-606
Author(s):  
Louis Muda Adam Gesi Radja ◽  
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha ◽  
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Hate Speech ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
Legislative Power ◽  
Administrative Power ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Formal Power

Authority is what is called formal power, power comes from legislative power (given by law) or from executive administrative power. Authority, which usually consists of several powers, is power over a certain group of people or power over an area of ​​government. The purposes of this study are to analyze the arrangement of the prosecutor's authority in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media and the prosecutor's obstacles in detaining the perpetrators of hate speech crimes on social media. The research method applied in this research is normative legal research with a statutory and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials is done by means of a literature study. The of used are primary, secondary, and tertiary sources of legal materials. After the legal material has been collected, it will then be processed and analyzed using the method of processing legal materials systematically and presented descriptively. The results of the study reveal that the prosecutor's authority is regulated in the criminal procedural law code, the prosecutor's authority law. Which includes several laws, among others, Law no. 16 of 2004 which regulates the prosecutor's office, so that from the law it can be ascertained about the rights and powers of the prosecutor so that law enforcers, especially the prosecutor's office, can make detentions in accordance with the rules that have been in force, so that there is no abuse of authority by law enforcers, especially prosecutors and as The prosecutor's office should be obliged to realize equality for all Indonesian citizens who are being entangled in criminal, civil and other cases.

Professionalism and Conflict of Interest

ASHA Leader ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 8 (14) ◽  
pp. 25-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan O. Diefendorf
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Interest
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document