scholarly journals Automated Prognostic Modelling of Alzheimer’s Disease Prediction based on Machine Learning over Brain Networks

Author(s):  
Ramesh P. S.
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanming Li ◽  
Jian Kang ◽  
Chong Wu ◽  
Ivo Dinov ◽  
jinxiang Hu ◽  
...  

Introduction: A computationally fast machine learning method is introduced for uncovering the whole-brain voxel-level connectomic spectra that differentiates different status of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The method is applied to the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) imaging and clinical data and identified novel AD/MCI differentiating connectomic neuroimaging biomarkers. Methods: A divide-and-conquer algorithm is introduced for detect informative local brain networks at voxel level and whole-brain scale. The connection information within the local networks is integrated into the node voxels, which makes detection of the marginally weak signals possible. Prediction accuracy is significantly improved by incorporating the local brain networks and marginally weak signals. Results: Brain connectomic structures differentiating AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), AD and healthy, and MIC and healthy were discovered. We identified novel AD/MCI-associated neuroimaging biomarkers by integrating local brain networks and marginally weak signals. For example, network-based signals in paracentral lobule (p-value=6.1e-5), olfactory cortex (p-value=4.6e-5), caudate nucleus (1.8e-3) and precentral gyrus (1.8e-3) are informative in differentiating AD and MCI. Connections between calcarine sulcus and lingual gyrus (p-value=0.049), between parahippocampal gyrus and Amygdala (p-value=0.025), between rolandic opercula and insula lobes (p-values=0.0028 and 0.0026). An overall prediction accuracy of 95.3% was achieved by integrating the selected local brain networks and marginally weak signals, compared to 84.0% by not considering the inter-voxel connections and using marginally strong signals only. Conclusion: (i) The connectomic structures differentiating AD and MCI are significantly different to that differentiating MCI and healthy, which may indicate different neuronal etiology for AD and MCI. (ii) Many neuroimaging biomarkers exert their effects on the outcome diseases through their connections to other markers. Integrating such connections can help identify novel neuroimaging biomarkers and improve disease prediction accuracy.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 498-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Vigneron ◽  
A. Kodewitz ◽  
A. M. Tome ◽  
S. Lelandais ◽  
E. Lang

Processes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 1071
Author(s):  
Lucia Billeci ◽  
Asia Badolato ◽  
Lorenzo Bachi ◽  
Alessandro Tonacci

Alzheimer’s disease is notoriously the most common cause of dementia in the elderly, affecting an increasing number of people. Although widespread, its causes and progression modalities are complex and still not fully understood. Through neuroimaging techniques, such as diffusion Magnetic Resonance (MR), more sophisticated and specific studies of the disease can be performed, offering a valuable tool for both its diagnosis and early detection. However, processing large quantities of medical images is not an easy task, and researchers have turned their attention towards machine learning, a set of computer algorithms that automatically adapt their output towards the intended goal. In this paper, a systematic review of recent machine learning applications on diffusion tensor imaging studies of Alzheimer’s disease is presented, highlighting the fundamental aspects of each work and reporting their performance score. A few examined studies also include mild cognitive impairment in the classification problem, while others combine diffusion data with other sources, like structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (multimodal analysis). The findings of the retrieved works suggest a promising role for machine learning in evaluating effective classification features, like fractional anisotropy, and in possibly performing on different image modalities with higher accuracy.


Author(s):  
M. Tanveer ◽  
B. Richhariya ◽  
R. U. Khan ◽  
A. H. Rashid ◽  
P. Khanna ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document