scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Dalam Sengketa Jual Beli Online

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Ayu Hakiki , Asri Wijayanti, Rizania Kharismasari
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Online Purchase ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
Article 5

In community disputes often occur online purchase adverse buyers. The purpose of this study was to determine the forms of legal protection and remedies for aggrieved buyers in selling and buying online dispute. This research is normative juridical approach to legislation. Results of the first study is a form of legal protection for the buyer in a dispute over online trading that is the rule of law on the rights and obligations of the seller and the buyer (Article 1473-1519 BW), proof of electronic transactions (Article 5 of Law No. 11 of 2008), right to sue tort (Article 1365 BW) if the aggrieved buyer can file a lawsuit based on their default. Results of the second study are legal remedies which can be done by consumers were harmed in selling and buying online dispute consists of litigation (PN, PT, MA Article 48 of Law No. 8 of 1999 jo. Article 38 of Law No. 11 of 2008) and non-litigation through mediation, conciliation or arbitration (Article 39 of Law No. 11 of 2008). The resulting recommendations are needed socialization of legal protection under the Act ITE

scholarly journals ANALISIS PERJANJIAN PARA PIHAK YANG MELAKUKAN TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI BITCOIN YANG MENGGUNAKAN FASILITAS WEBSITE INDODAX

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Teguh Wisnu Wardhana ◽  
Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Futures Trading ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Materials Analysis ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Legal Subjects

<p>Abstract<br />This article writing aims to study the bitcoin buying and selling transactions that are facilitated  by the Indodax website according to the rule of law in Indonesia and protection for those who conduct bitcoin buying and selling transactions in Indonesia.This legal research is normative  legal research that acts prescriptively and applied. Request submitted to the user. The technique  of obtaining legal material used uses basic materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques draw conclusions from a debate that draws general attention to the concrete problems needed.Bitcoin buying and selling transactions facilitated by the first Indodax website are in accordance with the principles of agreement and the legal requirements contained in the Civil Code, the first in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Government Regulations Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Systems and Electronic Transactions, and the third in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. With the issuance of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency Regulation No. 5 of 2019 concerning the Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Market of Crypto Assets (Crypto Assets) on the Futures Exchange, the bitcoin buying and selling transaction has been approved and supported by law in Indonesia. Regulations on how to buy bitcoin, the requirements for establishing the physical market for crypto assets or exchanges, and the procedure for disputing approval. Legal protection of bitcoin buying and selling transactions is divided into several aspects of privacy, the intensity of legal subjects, object transactions, and the responsibility of the parties.<br />Keywords : bitcoin;  buy and sell;  indodax</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan perjanjian transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax menurut kaidah hukum di indonesia dan perlindungan bagi para pihak yang melakukan transaksi jual beli bitcoin di indonesia. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang penulis gunakan yakni dengan cara pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dilakukan secara deduktif yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang bersifat umum terhadap permasalah konkret yang dihadapi.Transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax yang pertama telah sesuai dengan asas-asas perjanjian dan syarat sah perjanjian yang terkandung dalam Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Perdata, yang kedua telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik, dan yang ketiga adalah telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Dengan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Ketentuan Teknis Penyelenggaraan Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset) di Bursa Berjangka, maka transaksi jual beli bitcoin sudah resmi diakui dan mempunyai dasar hukum di indonesia. Peraturan ini memuat berbagai hal tentang tata cara jual beli bitcoin, persyaratan pendirian pasar fisik aset kripto atau exchange, dan prosedur penyelesaian sengketa. Perlindungan hukum transaksi jual beli bitcoin dibagi dalam beberapa aspek meliputi privasi, otentisitas subjek hukum, objek transaksi, dan tanggung jawab para pihak.<br />Kata kunci: bitcoin;  jual beli;  indodax</p>

scholarly journals Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Transaksi Online oleh Anak di Bawah Umur Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Benny Benny ◽  
Finley Larissa Wilhelmina ◽  
Verina Tania Ruandi ◽  
Sonya Airini Batubara
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Electronic System ◽  
Trading System ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Online Transactions ◽  
Internet Media ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Protection Mechanisms ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
New Discovery

This article aims to see the development of online transactions that continue to cause new problems for the rule of law that has been established in a single jurisdiction. Problems that still arise are not only related to the preparation and evidence of contracts but also in other fields. There is a large amount of literature on how existing laws are currently being or might be developed, and how the parties to a contract solve the problems that might be caused by an invasion of online transactions. online transactions are new discovery transactions in the form of trade in which the seller and buyer do not encounter directly but only use the internet media. This study uses a normative juridical research method to address these online transactions operated by minors against the legal arrangement of the online trading system and legal protection mechanisms in which the results of this study indicate that the validity of minors is regulated in article 1320 of the Civil Code. Legal protection for legal events online transactions conducted by minors are racing against the electronic system agreed upon as regulated in article 19 of Act No. 19 of 2016 concerning Information on Electronic Transactions.

scholarly journals A Populist Monster and the future of Constitutional Democracy

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Andraž Teršek
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Eu

Abstract The central objective of the post-socialist European countries which are also Member States of the EU and Council of Europe, as proclaimed and enshrined in their constitutions before their official independence, is the establishment of a democracy based on the rule of law and effective legal protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms. In this article the author explains what, in his opinion, is the main problem and why these goals are still not sufficiently achieved: the ruthless simplification of the understanding of the social function and functioning of constitutional courts, which is narrow, rigid and holistically focused primarily or exclusively on the question of whether the judges of these courts are “left or right” in purely daily-political sense, and consequently, whether constitutional court decisions are taken (described, understood) as either “left or right” in purely and shallow daily-party-political sense/manner. With nothing else between and no other foundation. The author describes such rhetoric, this kind of superficial labeling/marking, such an approach towards constitutional law-making as a matter of unbearable and unthinking simplicity, and introduces the term A Populist Monster. The reasons that have led to the problem of this kind of populism and its devastating effects on the quality and development of constitutional democracy and the rule of law are analyzed clearly and critically.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERBATASAN WILAYAH ANTARA NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN TIMOR LESTE

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Rimbawanto ◽  
Doddy Kridasaksana ◽  
Ariyono
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Timor Leste ◽  
The Republic

<p>Tujuan yang hendak dicapai dari penelitian ini dapat mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste dan kendala dan upaya mengatasi masalah perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste.</p><p>Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti atau mempelajari masalah dilihat dari segi aturan hukumnya, meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder</p><p>Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan secara umum berdasarkan hasil inventarisir peraturan perundang-undangan, pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia tidak dalam posisi untuk mengakui keberadaan masyarakat adat, melainkan untuk membatasi keberadaan masyarakat adat.</p><pre>The objectives to be achieved from this research can be legal protection of the territorial border between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste and the constraints and efforts to overcome the border issues between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste.</pre><pre>               This study uses yuridis normative, namely legal research conducted by researching or studying the problem seen in terms of the rule of law, researching library materials or secondary data</pre><pre>               The results of this study show Generally based on the results of inventory of legislation, the recognition of indigenous peoples in Indonesia is not in a position to recognize the existence of indigenous peoples, but rather to limit the existence of indigenous peoples. </pre><pre> </pre>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum atas Desain Industri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 31 T Ahun 2000

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-301
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Mas lndriani ◽  
Ni Made Jaya Senastri ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Design Law ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Definition Of

Intellectual property rights including industrial designs. The idea of ​​industrial design safety is based on the belief that human imagination, taste and initiative are closely linked to industrial design. The state grants protection against new industrial designs. The definition of the rule of law used in the legal protection of industrial designs is based on Law No. 31 of 2000. One of the components in this case is the protection of human rights which is the guideline for the legal protection of industrial designs. There are two forms of industrial design legal protection, which include preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for industrial designs based on Law No. 31 of 2000 and analyze the legal implications if the design rights holder does not register their industrial designs. This research was designed using normative research with a conceptual approach. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through documentation and recording. The results of the study indicate that preventive legal protection is contained in the Act which is used to prevent violations and a description of the implementation of obligations while repressive legal protection is security in the form of sanctions for violations that have been committed. In view of this and considering the existence of protection in the form of the industrial design law, the designer can prevent the occurrence of plagiarism of his industrial design by registering his industrial design.

scholarly journals El recurso directo: entre protección jurídica y constitucionalidad objetiva = Directation: between legal protection and objetive constitutionality

2014 ◽  
pp. 319
Author(s):  
Otto Pfersmann
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Rule ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Constitutional Judicial Review

La posibilidad de que los individuos dispongan de un «recurso directo» para cuestionar normas del sistema jurídico ante el juez de la constitucionalidad no constituye un elemento necesario del Estado constitucional de Derecho. La institución de los «derechos fundamentales», no requiere, en cuanto tal, que la protección de los mismos deba corresponder al juez de la constitucionalidad de las leyes. Lo que permite distinguir los diferentes modelos es el grado en que concentran y distribuyen estas tareas (protección de derechos fundamentales y control de constitucionalidad de la ley, básicamente). Esto depende de varios factores: el grado de exhaustividad del control de la constitucionalidad de las normas, el tipo de supervisión (preventivo o correctivo), el número de órganos encargados del control y el número de componentes del mismo. Se plantea así el problema de la limitación que aqueja al Estado de Derecho, pues cuanto más exhaustiva pretende ser la realización del mismo, menos intensa resulta produciendo un paradójico debilitamiento del derecho fundamental y del principio de exhaustividad. Asistimos, pues, a una mutación del principio «monomicrodicástico» y exhaustivo de jurisdicción constitucional.The possibility for individuals to have a «direct action» to challenge the norms of the legal system before the judge of the constitutionality is not a necessary element of the constitutional Rule of law. The institution «fundamental rights» does not require, as such, that the judge of the constitutionality of the parliamentary statutes should grant their protection. What allows distinguishing the different models is the degree of the concentration and distribution of these basic tasks: protection of the fundamental rights, constitutional judicial review. This depends upon various factors: how exhaust the constitutional judicial review should be, what kind of constitutional supervision may be (preventive or corrective), the number of the organs charged with this task, and the number of its components. The question of the limitation of the Rule of Law is risen, because the more exhaustive its implementation is intended, the less intense, generating a paradoxal weakness of the fundamental right and the completeness principie. A phenomenon appears: the mutation of the «monomicrodicastic» principie and the completeness of the constitutional judicial review.

Emergency! But What about Legal Protection in the EU?

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom BINDER ◽  
Argyro KARAGIANNI ◽  
Miroslava SCHOLTEN
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Emergency Powers ◽  
Executive Discretion ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Private Actors ◽  
The Eu

AbstractThe EU institutions and agencies have become increasingly involved in enforcing EU law directly vis-à-vis private actors. A number of such EU entities have also acquired the so-called emergency powers, which allow interference with the legal position of a private party. Given the lack of research in this area, the question that this article addresses is whether relevant safeguards have been introduced to ensure the rule of law in such situations to prevent the abuse of executive discretion by public authorities. What are the relevant safeguards in the emergency in the EU in the first place? Having analysed relevant EU legislation and case law, the article offers a complete overview of all the existing EU entities with the emergency powers and shows a great diversity in the extent to which the EU legislator has regulated procedural safeguards in relevant law. The article discusses what safeguards need to be ensured in an emergency and argues for clarity of legislative frameworks in this respect.

Vergaberechtsschutz im Spannungsfeld zwischen Beschleunigungsgebot und Gewährung effektiven Rechtsschutzes

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsi-Ping Chen
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Procurement ◽  
German Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
The One ◽  
Substantive Law ◽  
The Eu

The German Law on public procurement remedies, implementing the EU Remedies Directives into national law, has to engage in a balancing act between effective legal protection of bidders and the necessary acceleration of the award procedure. The book develops solutions for conflicts between the abovementioned opposing interests, which are consistent with the pluralistic paradigm of the European legal area, and the standards of assessment of the EU primary substantive law on public procurement. The Europeanisation of the German Law on public procurement remedies is analysed in detail. The work deals with the establishment and improvement of effective legal protection of bidders on the one hand and, on the other hand, shows that the acceleration of the award procedure within the framework of the procedural system is bounded by the rule of law. The book carves out strengths and deficits of the German Law on public procurement remedies.

scholarly journals La primauté du droit : la situation des immigrants et des réfugiés en droit canadien au regard des Chartes et des textes internationaux

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 585-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Brunelle
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Immigrants And Refugees ◽  
Long Time ◽  
International Obligations ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Discretionary Powers

The « rule of law » which for a long time was considered as an unwritten part of the Constitution now enjoys full constitutional status. Its enshrining in the preamble of the Canadian Charter sheds considerable light on the manner in which the rights and freedoms of the Charter should be perceived. The author opens his discussion by examining the impact that the constitutionalization of the « rule of law » has had on immigrants and refugees in Canada. As the Immigration Act of 1976 confers numerous discretionary powers which could result in their abusive use, the author analyses how the Human Rights charters applicable in Canada and in Quebec can insure the legal protection of immigrants and refugees. In the second part of his study, the author discusses the principal international texts ratified by Canada which have as their purpose the protection of the rights of immigrants and refugees. As international law is not « self-enforcing » in Canada, the author shows how the internal legal community conforms to the international obligations contracted by Canada.

scholarly journals Hukum Agraria Atas Keberadaan Bangunan Pada Ruang Atas Tanah

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Musa Anthony Siregar ◽  
Zulkamaein Koto
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Transfer System ◽  
Real Property ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Shopping Centre ◽  
Agrarian Law ◽  
Theory Of Law ◽  
Legal Consequences

<p>This research aim to examined how the legal protection of the existence of structures built in space on the top land from  perspective of Agrarian Law. And how the legal consequences of structures built in space on the top land by build operate transfer system. The discussion and analysis using the theory of law protection supported  by theory of the rule of law and the principles of land law. The research method is normative legal research to obtain the necessary data in connection with the period issues the data secondary data is consisting of primary legal materials.Second- ary legal materials, tertiary legal materials. Data analysis be done with juridical analysis of qualitative Research object is Senen Multipurpose Bridge that was built in space on the top land not on the land where that right is.That  was located between the two buildings and large shopping centre Pasar Senen and Plaza Atrium. Legal protection for the building space on the ground has not been found on the Agrarian  Law. Legal consequences of build operate transfer (BOT) system for the parties oc- cured namely the Provincial Goverment  DKI Jakarta and PT Jaya Real Property Tbk.</p><p>Keywords: BOT system, space land, agrarian law</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document