scholarly journals ANALISIS PERJANJIAN PARA PIHAK YANG MELAKUKAN TRANSAKSI JUAL BELI BITCOIN YANG MENGGUNAKAN FASILITAS WEBSITE INDODAX

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 283
Author(s):  
Teguh Wisnu Wardhana ◽  
Yudho Taruno Muryanto
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Futures Trading ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
Materials Analysis ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Legal Subjects

<p>Abstract<br />This article writing aims to study the bitcoin buying and selling transactions that are facilitated  by the Indodax website according to the rule of law in Indonesia and protection for those who conduct bitcoin buying and selling transactions in Indonesia.This legal research is normative  legal research that acts prescriptively and applied. Request submitted to the user. The technique  of obtaining legal material used uses basic materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal materials analysis techniques draw conclusions from a debate that draws general attention to the concrete problems needed.Bitcoin buying and selling transactions facilitated by the first Indodax website are in accordance with the principles of agreement and the legal requirements contained in the Civil Code, the first in accordance with Law No. 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and Government Regulations Number 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Systems and Electronic Transactions, and the third in accordance with Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. With the issuance of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency Regulation No. 5 of 2019 concerning the Technical Provisions for the Implementation of the Physical Market of Crypto Assets (Crypto Assets) on the Futures Exchange, the bitcoin buying and selling transaction has been approved and supported by law in Indonesia. Regulations on how to buy bitcoin, the requirements for establishing the physical market for crypto assets or exchanges, and the procedure for disputing approval. Legal protection of bitcoin buying and selling transactions is divided into several aspects of privacy, the intensity of legal subjects, object transactions, and the responsibility of the parties.<br />Keywords : bitcoin;  buy and sell;  indodax</p><p>Abstrak<br />Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keabsahan perjanjian transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax menurut kaidah hukum di indonesia dan perlindungan bagi para pihak yang melakukan transaksi jual beli bitcoin di indonesia. Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang penulis gunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang penulis gunakan yakni dengan cara pengumpulan bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Teknik analisis bahan hukum dilakukan secara deduktif yakni menarik kesimpulan dari suatu permasalahan yang bersifat umum terhadap permasalah konkret yang dihadapi.Transaksi jual beli bitcoin yang difasilitasi website Indodax yang pertama telah sesuai dengan asas-asas perjanjian dan syarat sah perjanjian yang terkandung dalam Kitab UndangUndang Hukum Perdata, yang kedua telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik serta Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 82 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyelenggaraan Sistem dan Transaksi Elektronik, dan yang ketiga adalah telah sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. Dengan dikeluarkannya Peraturan Badan Pengawas Perdagangan Berjangka Komoditi Nomor 5 Tahun 2019 tentang Ketentuan Teknis Penyelenggaraan Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset) di Bursa Berjangka, maka transaksi jual beli bitcoin sudah resmi diakui dan mempunyai dasar hukum di indonesia. Peraturan ini memuat berbagai hal tentang tata cara jual beli bitcoin, persyaratan pendirian pasar fisik aset kripto atau exchange, dan prosedur penyelesaian sengketa. Perlindungan hukum transaksi jual beli bitcoin dibagi dalam beberapa aspek meliputi privasi, otentisitas subjek hukum, objek transaksi, dan tanggung jawab para pihak.<br />Kata kunci: bitcoin;  jual beli;  indodax</p>

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERBATASAN WILAYAH ANTARA NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA DENGAN TIMOR LESTE

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Rimbawanto ◽  
Doddy Kridasaksana ◽  
Ariyono
Keyword(s):  
Indigenous Peoples ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Timor Leste ◽  
The Republic

<p>Tujuan yang hendak dicapai dari penelitian ini dapat mengetahui perlindungan hukum terhadap perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste dan kendala dan upaya mengatasi masalah perbatasan wilayah antara Negara Republik Indonesia dengan Timor Leste.</p><p>Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti atau mempelajari masalah dilihat dari segi aturan hukumnya, meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder</p><p>Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan secara umum berdasarkan hasil inventarisir peraturan perundang-undangan, pengakuan masyarakat adat di Indonesia tidak dalam posisi untuk mengakui keberadaan masyarakat adat, melainkan untuk membatasi keberadaan masyarakat adat.</p><pre>The objectives to be achieved from this research can be legal protection of the territorial border between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste and the constraints and efforts to overcome the border issues between the Republic of Indonesia and Timor Leste.</pre><pre>               This study uses yuridis normative, namely legal research conducted by researching or studying the problem seen in terms of the rule of law, researching library materials or secondary data</pre><pre>               The results of this study show Generally based on the results of inventory of legislation, the recognition of indigenous peoples in Indonesia is not in a position to recognize the existence of indigenous peoples, but rather to limit the existence of indigenous peoples. </pre><pre> </pre>

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pembeli Dalam Sengketa Jual Beli Online

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditya Ayu Hakiki , Asri Wijayanti, Rizania Kharismasari
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Online Purchase ◽  
Legal Remedies ◽  
Electronic Transactions ◽  
Online Trading ◽  
Article 5

In community disputes often occur online purchase adverse buyers. The purpose of this study was to determine the forms of legal protection and remedies for aggrieved buyers in selling and buying online dispute. This research is normative juridical approach to legislation. Results of the first study is a form of legal protection for the buyer in a dispute over online trading that is the rule of law on the rights and obligations of the seller and the buyer (Article 1473-1519 BW), proof of electronic transactions (Article 5 of Law No. 11 of 2008), right to sue tort (Article 1365 BW) if the aggrieved buyer can file a lawsuit based on their default. Results of the second study are legal remedies which can be done by consumers were harmed in selling and buying online dispute consists of litigation (PN, PT, MA Article 48 of Law No. 8 of 1999 jo. Article 38 of Law No. 11 of 2008) and non-litigation through mediation, conciliation or arbitration (Article 39 of Law No. 11 of 2008). The resulting recommendations are needed socialization of legal protection under the Act ITE

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum Atas Perbedaan Luas Faktual Dengan Surat Ukur Pada Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atindriya Hastungkara
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Land Rights ◽  
Legal Issues ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Logic Of Science

This journal is entitled Legal Protection of Actual Land Differences With Land Rights Certificate. This journal examines the function of the letters in the registration of land rights and how the legal safeguards for the holders of land rights in terms of factual land differences with the letters on the land certificate. The type of research used is normative legal research, which is a process to find the rule of law, legal principles, and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced in accordance with the characteristics of prescriptions of jurisprudence. This normative legal research is a procedure and way of scientific research to find the truth based on the logic of science in terms of normatifnya. So that it can answer the legal issues posed. Further said in doing research law. Approach to the problem of statutory approach (Statute Approach) based on the Act, conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach) based on theories and concepts, and the case approach (Case approach).Keywords: Legal Protection of Land Rights Holder, Land Certificate, Land Factual Difference With Measure Letters.

KEWENANGAN OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN TERHADAP GANTI KERUGIAN NASABAH BANK YANG BELUM DIBAYAR PIHAK BANK

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Bahir Mukhammad ◽  
M.Hudi Asrori S
Keyword(s):  
Financial Services ◽  
Legal Reasoning ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Financial Service Authority ◽  
Materials Analysis ◽  
Services Sector ◽  
Part C ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Prudence Principle

<p align="center"><strong><em>Abstract</em></strong></p><p><em>This article aims to</em><em> </em><em>know Bank rensposible for deposan customer compensation because of bank officer do violation of law. This type of research used by the authors to draw up legal research are doctrinal legal research. </em> <em>The author uses the approach of statue (statue approach), that is by analyze regulations which are related on cases pertaining who already have permanent legal force. Legal materials analysis techniques used by the author is to use legal reasoning by deduction. All activities of bank itself can pose a particular risks. Risks which may arise in banking operations include liquidity, market risk , credit risk , operational risk , and the risk of the owner or caretaker. The risk of the owner or caretaker often happens because of lack of maximum application of the prudence principle (prudence banking principle). Bank X sued by the plaintiff for violation of the law for the withdrawal of funds without permission of a plaintiff. Disbursement of funds done by a defendant III who is employees from the bank X. Based on Act 9 Part c UU OJK, it said that in carrying out supervisory duties Financial Service Authority (OJK) has authority of “supervise, examine, investigate, do consumer protection, and other action towards financial services institutions, doer, and/or supporting activities financial services as referred to in legislation in the services sector financial”. The existence of ojk as an institution supervisor in the financial sector is expected to protect consumers of an offender financial services considered can harm the interests of consumers, in this case the consumer bank.</em></p><p><strong><em>Keyword</em></strong><em>: financial services authority, legal protection, bank costumer </em></p><p align="center"><strong>Abstrak</strong></p><p>Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tanggung jawab Bank atas ganti kerugian terhadap nasabah deposan yang disebabkan perbuatan melawan hukum pegawai bank. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan oleh penulis untuk menyusun penelitian hukum ini adalah penelitian hukum doktrinal. Penulis menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (<em>statue approach</em>), yaitu dilakukan dengan menelaah semua undang-undang dan regulasi yang bersangkut paut dengan isu hukum yang ditangani. Teknik analisis bahan hukum yang digunakan penulis adalah dengan menggunakan penalaran hukum dengan metode deduksi. Setiap pelaksanaan kegiatan perbankan sendiri dapat menimbulkan risiko-risiko tertentu. Risiko yang mungkin timbul dalam operasional perbankan meliputi risiko likuiditas, risiko pasar, risiko kredit, risiko operasional, risiko hukum dan risiko pemilik atau pengurus. Risiko pemilik atau pengurus sering terjadi karena kurang maksimalmya penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian (<em>prudence banking principle</em>). Bank X digugat Penggugat melakukan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum atas pencairan dana tanpa izin dari Penggugat. Pencairan dana dilakukan oleh Tergugat III yang merupakan Pegawai dari Bank X. Berdasarkan Pasal 9 huruf c UU OJK dikatakan bahwa dalam melaksanakan tugas pengawasan OJK memiliki kewenangan “melakukan pengawasan, pemeriksaan, penyidikan, perlindungan konsumen, dan tindakan lain terhadap lembaga jasa keuangan, pelaku, dan/atau penunjang kegiatan jasa keuangan sebagaimana dimaksud dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di sektor jasa keuangan”. Keberadaan OJK sebagai lembaga pengawas di sektor jasa keuangan, diharapkan mampu melindungi konsumen dari pelaku jasa keuangan yang dinilai dapat merugikan kepentingan konsumen, dalam hal ini konsumen Bank.</p><p><strong>Kata Kunci: </strong>Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, Perlindungan Hukum, Nasabah Bank</p>

scholarly journals A Populist Monster and the future of Constitutional Democracy

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-100
Author(s):  
Andraž Teršek
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Constitutional Democracy ◽  
Council Of Europe ◽  
Constitutional Courts ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Eu

Abstract The central objective of the post-socialist European countries which are also Member States of the EU and Council of Europe, as proclaimed and enshrined in their constitutions before their official independence, is the establishment of a democracy based on the rule of law and effective legal protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms. In this article the author explains what, in his opinion, is the main problem and why these goals are still not sufficiently achieved: the ruthless simplification of the understanding of the social function and functioning of constitutional courts, which is narrow, rigid and holistically focused primarily or exclusively on the question of whether the judges of these courts are “left or right” in purely daily-political sense, and consequently, whether constitutional court decisions are taken (described, understood) as either “left or right” in purely and shallow daily-party-political sense/manner. With nothing else between and no other foundation. The author describes such rhetoric, this kind of superficial labeling/marking, such an approach towards constitutional law-making as a matter of unbearable and unthinking simplicity, and introduces the term A Populist Monster. The reasons that have led to the problem of this kind of populism and its devastating effects on the quality and development of constitutional democracy and the rule of law are analyzed clearly and critically.

scholarly journals Perlindungan Hukum atas Desain Industri Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No 31 T Ahun 2000

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 297-301
Author(s):  
Ida Ayu Mas lndriani ◽  
Ni Made Jaya Senastri ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Industrial Design ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Implications ◽  
Design Law ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
Definition Of

Intellectual property rights including industrial designs. The idea of ​​industrial design safety is based on the belief that human imagination, taste and initiative are closely linked to industrial design. The state grants protection against new industrial designs. The definition of the rule of law used in the legal protection of industrial designs is based on Law No. 31 of 2000. One of the components in this case is the protection of human rights which is the guideline for the legal protection of industrial designs. There are two forms of industrial design legal protection, which include preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection for industrial designs based on Law No. 31 of 2000 and analyze the legal implications if the design rights holder does not register their industrial designs. This research was designed using normative research with a conceptual approach. The data used are primary and secondary data obtained through documentation and recording. The results of the study indicate that preventive legal protection is contained in the Act which is used to prevent violations and a description of the implementation of obligations while repressive legal protection is security in the form of sanctions for violations that have been committed. In view of this and considering the existence of protection in the form of the industrial design law, the designer can prevent the occurrence of plagiarism of his industrial design by registering his industrial design.

scholarly journals Akibat Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Arisan Online Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 296-302
Author(s):  
Erlin Kusnia Dewi ◽  
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi ◽  
I Made Minggu Widyantara
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Research Problem ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Literature Study ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Online Transactions ◽  
Criminal Sanctions ◽  
Research Problems ◽  
Social Gathering ◽  
Legal Subjects

The 2008 ITE Law regulates fraudulent acts that are applied online. The researcher wrote a scientific article with the title Legal Impacts on the Implementation of Online Arisan Based on Law No. 19 of 2016. There are two formulations of this research problem How is the Legal Protection for Parties Conducting Online Arisan based on Law Number 19 of 2016? and What are the Criminal Sanctions Against BandarArisanOnlinein the event of Default? Normative legal research is a method applied by the author in this scientific article. The author carries out a literature study by collecting legal material to answer the formulation of research problems. The author carries out a literature study by collecting legal material to answer the formulation of research problems. This study's findings explain that there are legal protections for parties who carry out online social gathering criminal sanctions against online social gathering based on ITE Law No. 19 of 2016 against online social gathering fraud perpetrators focused on individual legal subjects. This finding is supported by Article 28 paragraph (1), which explains that consumers who get losses due to online transactions can obtain legal protection.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN FACTOR DALAM PENAGIHAN PIUTANG DAGANG PADA TRANSAKSI ANJAK PIUTANG (FACTORING)

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
I Dewa Ayu Dwi Mayasari
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Research Literature ◽  
Legal Interpretation ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
Accounts Receivable ◽  
Analysis Techniques ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
The Law

Research in connection with jurnal writing thesis takes the theme the protection of the law against companies factor in billing accounts receivable factoring transactions. Problems studied involves two things; the first what factors the company’s legal position as a buyer on receivables in factoring and financing institution both what form of legal protection that can be given to companies factor of a possible failure of the trade receivables collection. This includes research conducted legal research categories, namely normative legal research literature or legal research based on secondary data. The approach used is the approach ot the laws and facts approach. Next to for further analysis techniques use the description legal interpretation techniques based argumentative theory, principles, and concepts relevan laws. The results showed that the company,s legal position as a purchaser of  factoring receivables is very weak and vulnerable than risk the possibility of failure of collection of accounts receivable due to non fulfillment of the achievements by the customer. In this context there is no guarantee of  legal protection for the company for the payment or refund factor its receivables in full. The next from legal protection that can be given to the factor as a buyer of receivables is; a) apply the type of recourse factoring in the factoring agreement with the burden of responsibility is on the client in case of failure of collection of accounts receivable, b) implement a system of personal/corporate guarantees, and c) apply the prudential banking principles

scholarly journals El recurso directo: entre protección jurídica y constitucionalidad objetiva = Directation: between legal protection and objetive constitutionality

2014 ◽  
pp. 319
Author(s):  
Otto Pfersmann
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Judicial Review ◽  
Direct Action ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Constitutional Rule ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Constitutional Judicial Review

La posibilidad de que los individuos dispongan de un «recurso directo» para cuestionar normas del sistema jurídico ante el juez de la constitucionalidad no constituye un elemento necesario del Estado constitucional de Derecho. La institución de los «derechos fundamentales», no requiere, en cuanto tal, que la protección de los mismos deba corresponder al juez de la constitucionalidad de las leyes. Lo que permite distinguir los diferentes modelos es el grado en que concentran y distribuyen estas tareas (protección de derechos fundamentales y control de constitucionalidad de la ley, básicamente). Esto depende de varios factores: el grado de exhaustividad del control de la constitucionalidad de las normas, el tipo de supervisión (preventivo o correctivo), el número de órganos encargados del control y el número de componentes del mismo. Se plantea así el problema de la limitación que aqueja al Estado de Derecho, pues cuanto más exhaustiva pretende ser la realización del mismo, menos intensa resulta produciendo un paradójico debilitamiento del derecho fundamental y del principio de exhaustividad. Asistimos, pues, a una mutación del principio «monomicrodicástico» y exhaustivo de jurisdicción constitucional.The possibility for individuals to have a «direct action» to challenge the norms of the legal system before the judge of the constitutionality is not a necessary element of the constitutional Rule of law. The institution «fundamental rights» does not require, as such, that the judge of the constitutionality of the parliamentary statutes should grant their protection. What allows distinguishing the different models is the degree of the concentration and distribution of these basic tasks: protection of the fundamental rights, constitutional judicial review. This depends upon various factors: how exhaust the constitutional judicial review should be, what kind of constitutional supervision may be (preventive or corrective), the number of the organs charged with this task, and the number of its components. The question of the limitation of the Rule of Law is risen, because the more exhaustive its implementation is intended, the less intense, generating a paradoxal weakness of the fundamental right and the completeness principie. A phenomenon appears: the mutation of the «monomicrodicastic» principie and the completeness of the constitutional judicial review.

Emergency! But What about Legal Protection in the EU?

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-119 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tom BINDER ◽  
Argyro KARAGIANNI ◽  
Miroslava SCHOLTEN
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Emergency Powers ◽  
Executive Discretion ◽  
Legal Position ◽  
Private Actors ◽  
The Eu

AbstractThe EU institutions and agencies have become increasingly involved in enforcing EU law directly vis-à-vis private actors. A number of such EU entities have also acquired the so-called emergency powers, which allow interference with the legal position of a private party. Given the lack of research in this area, the question that this article addresses is whether relevant safeguards have been introduced to ensure the rule of law in such situations to prevent the abuse of executive discretion by public authorities. What are the relevant safeguards in the emergency in the EU in the first place? Having analysed relevant EU legislation and case law, the article offers a complete overview of all the existing EU entities with the emergency powers and shows a great diversity in the extent to which the EU legislator has regulated procedural safeguards in relevant law. The article discusses what safeguards need to be ensured in an emergency and argues for clarity of legislative frameworks in this respect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document