scholarly journals Imunitas Hukum Bagi Notaris Yang Membuka Rahasia Jabatan

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 25
Author(s):  
Rita Permanasari ◽  
Akhmad Khisni
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Political ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Law Regulation

ABSTRAKKetentuan Pasal 4 dan Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf f Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris mewajibkan notaris untuk menjaga kerahasiaan segala sesuatu mengenai akta yang dibuatnya dan segala keterangan yang diperoleh guna pembuatan akta sesuai dengan sumpah janji jabatan kecuali undang-undang menentukan lain. Kemungkinan terhadap pelanggaran kewajiban tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 16 ayat (11) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris, seorang notaris dapat dikenai sanksi berupa teguran lisan sampai dengan pemberhentian dengan tidak hormat. Terlebih lagi dengan adanya putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia dengan Nomor: 49/PUU–X/2012 memutuskan telah meniadakan atau mengakhiri kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) yang tercantum dalam Pasal 66 ayat (1) UUJN membuat notaris seakan-akan tidak ada perlindungan hukum bagi notaris dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI) harus berusaha menjalankan peranan pembinaan dan perlindungan meningkatkan pengetahuan, kemampuan dan keterampilan para notaris. Demikian juga menjalin hubungan dengan para penegak hukum lainnya, agar penegak hukum lainnya yang ada hubungan dengan notaris dapat memahami kedudukan notaris sesuai UUJN.Berangkat dari pemikiran inilah kewajiban ingkar notaris masih tetap dipertahankan oleh pembuat undang-undang dalam revisi Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Tahun 2014 yang merupakan konfigurasi kekuatan perlindungan terhadap profesi dan jabatan notaris dari sisi politik.Kata Kunci : Jabatan Notaris, Hak Ingkar, Perlindungan Hukum.ABSTRACTThe provisions of Article 4 and Article 16 paragraph (1) sub-paragraph f of the Notary's Office Law require a notary to maintain the confidentiality of all matters concerning the deeds it has made and all the information obtained for the deed in accordance with the oath of pledge of office except the law otherwise. The possibility of breach of such obligation under Article 16 paragraph (11) of Notary Law Regulation, a notary public may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral reprimands until dismissal with disrespect. Moreover, with the decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia with the number : 49 /PUU-X/2012 deciding to have canceled or terminated the authority of the Regional Supervisory Board (MPD) listed in Article 66 paragraph (1) UUJN made a notary as if there was no legal protection for a notary in performing duties. The Indonesian Notary Bond (INI) should endeavor to undertake the role of guidance and protection to increase the knowledge, abilities and skills of the notaries. Likewise establish relationships with other law enforcers, so that other law enforcement who has relationship with the notary can understand the position of notary under the UUJN.Departing from this thought the obligation of notarization is still maintained by the lawmakers in the revision of the Law Regulation of Position Notary on Year 2014 which is the configuration of the strength of the protection of the profession and the notary's position from the political side.Keyword : Position of Notary, Right of Remedy, Legal Protection.

scholarly journals PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP NOTARIS PENERIMA PROTOKOL DALAM HAL TERJADI PELANGGARAN AKTA NOTARIS OLEH NOTARIS PEMBERI PROTOKOL YANG TELAH MENINGGAL

NOTARIUS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Melita Trisnawati ◽  
Suteki Suteki
Keyword(s):  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public

The notary public as the general official has the authority to make authentic deed in accordance with the norms, the values and the provisions of the applicable legislation so that the law can work in the community. Every deed made by a notary must stored in a notary protocol, and the protocol shall be transferred in the event of a notary passing away. But the problem is when a notary has passed away and his protocol is transferred to another notary, then a dispute arises related to the deed. Notary recipient of the protocol will still be called for questioning if there is a problem related to the protocol that is in his control, because it is one of the responsibility of the recipient of notary protocol. This is where the role of MKN appears to provide protection in the form of inspection or investigation permits by the authorities. And the role of MPD and INI in preventing the occurrence of violations in the deed by the notary in the form of guidance to all members of the notary. Keywords : Notary Protocol, Original Of The Deed, Legal Protection AbstrakPada hakekatnya notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik sesuai dengan norma-norma, nilai-nilai dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku sehingga hukum dapat bekerja dalam masyarakat.. Setiap akta yang dibuat oleh notaris wajib disimpan dalam protokol notaris, dan protokol wajib dialihkan dalam hal notaris meninggal dunia. Namun yang menjadi persoalan adalah ketika seorang notaris telah meninggal dunia dan protokolnya dialihkan kepada notaris lain, kemudian muncul sengketa yang berkaitan dengan akta tersebut. Notaris penerima protokol tetap akan dipanggil untuk diminta keterangan apabila terdapat permasalahan terkait protokol yang ada dalam penguasaannya, karena merupakan salahsatu tanggungjawab penerima protokol notaris. Disinilah muncul peranan MKN untuk memberikan perlindungan berupa ijin pemeriksaan ataupun penyidikan oleh pihak yang berwenang. Serta adanya peranan MPD dan INI dalam mencegah terjadinya pelanggaran dalam pembuatan akta oleh notaris berupa pengayoman kepada seluruh anggota notaris. Kata kunci : Protokol Notaris, Minuta Akta Notaris, Perlindungan Hukum

scholarly journals ПОКРЕТАЊЕ ПОСТУПКА НОРМАТИВНЕ КОНТРОЛЕ ПРАВА У РЕПУБЛИЦИ СРБИЈИ

TEME ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 1419
Author(s):  
Bálint Pásztor
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Democratic Culture ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Institutional Values ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The One

The author of the article analyzes the specificities of the normative control of the law, i.e. the procedure of assessing the constitutionality and legality of the law in the Republic of Serbia, with the aim of detecting historical and legal preconditions of the effective functioning of the rule of law. The historical perspective of the development of the constitutional judiciary in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia and the Republic of Serbia, as well as the analysis of the experiences of various systems of control of constitutionality and legality, open the contextual, scientific-historical and pragmatic dimensions of understanding. The specificity of the system of normative control is reflected in its triplicity, meaning that three institutes are known that characterize different procedural possibilities (to initiate the process of assessing the constitutionality and legality of general acts). The paper is written in order to point out the dichotomy of the proposal and initiative of the procedure of the assessment of constitutionality and legality, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of the ex officio procedure. Furthermore, the author wanted to point out the essential and procedural differences between the proposal, the initiative and the constitutional complaint, especially analyzing the purpose of retaining the institute of the initiative in the light of the existence of the constitutional complaint and the fact that the initiative does not imply the automation of the initiation of proceedings. The dilemma that the article opens concerns the possibility that in the case of abolishing the initiative as an institution accessible to all, is it possible to preserve the democratic culture and the participation of citizens, furthermore is it possible to abolish the fundamental institutional values and freedoms of a legal state and the rule of law? The paper opens other issues of importance for the establishment of an effective constitutional architecture that concern: the width of the circle of authorized proposers of normative control before the Constitutional Court; the dual role of the constitutional judiciary: on the one hand protection of the Constitution, constitutionality and legality, on the other hand effective protection of human and minority rights and freedoms.

scholarly journals KEWENANGAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN NOTARIS WILAYAH DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERSETUJUAN TERHADAP PEMANGGILAN NOTARIS OLEH PENEGAK HUKUM

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 449
Author(s):  
Udi Hermawan ◽  
Munsyarif Abdul Chalim
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
The State ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Laws And Regulations

Referring to the provision of Article 66 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 Year 2014, Assembly Honor Notary is authorized to approve the calling of a Notary by law enforcement. The authority of the Assembly Honor Notary is to replace the authority of the Regional Notary Supervisory Board in the case of giving approval to the calling of a Notary by law enforcement as stated in Article 66 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 Year 2004, which has been abolished by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia through the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 49 / PUU-X / 2012 because it is contradictory to the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. After the enactment of Law Number 2 Year 2014 the authority is reappeared and delegated to the Assembly Honor Notary. The research is empirical juridical research using primary law material, secondary law material, and tertiary legal material. After all the data collected then arranged systematically then analyzed qualitatively, and presented descriptively.The conclusion of this research is that the exercise of the authority of the Assembly Honor Notary in giving approval to the calling of a Notary by law enforcement has been done accordingly in accordance with the provisions of the prevailing laws and regulations and should continue to run as a safeguard against the Notary. A common obstruction is the difficulty of bringing together members of the Assembly Honor Notary when conducting an examination hearing. Related to that, there must be a commitment from each member of the Assembly Honor Notary to be able to perform his / her duties and obligations as a member of the Assembly Honor Notary.Key Words: Authority, Assembly Honor Notary, Calling a Notary.

scholarly journals The Role Of The Supervisory Council Notary Territory In Providing Legal Protection For A Notary Who Have Violated The Law Of The Deed Made

Jurnal Akta ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 445
Author(s):  
Kiki Andriani Samad ◽  
Amin Purnawan
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

The purpose of this study are 1) To clarify the role of the supervisory council notary territory in providing legal protection for a notary who have violated the law of the deed made. 2) To explain the regulatory obstacles and constraints assemblies notary territory in providing legal protection for a notary who have violated the law of the deed made.This research method is a normative juridical research is normative juridical method is the study of writing a good document that we study the norms and principles. Specification used in this study is a descriptive analysis, which is intended to give the data as accurately as possible about a situation or other symptoms. Based on the results of the study concluded thatLegal protection of the Notary, among others in the form of right of refusal, the obligation to reject and exclusive rights when summoned for questioning by investigators, prosecutors or judges, which is subject to approval of Honorary Council of Notaries of Regions as the provisions of Article 66 paragraph (1) of Act No. 2 2014 which has now been changed to Article 66 paragraph (1) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Of 2014 concerning the Amendment to Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. Disagreement about the duties and responsibilities as a Council of Trustees Notary region between elements and bustle of every member of both government, notary, and academics to create obstacles during the examination and supervision of technical and administrative poorly in the recording report came from the community often happen, so data on the notary who has not and has been declared missing by the officials working at the Ministry of Justice and Human rights is also one member of the Supervisory Council of notaries, and only the remaining 1 data is still there on the notary who has been in the process by the Supervisory Council of notaries.Keywords: Regional Supervisory Council; Notary; Legal Protection; Notary; Law Violations; Deeds.

scholarly journals Direct effect of the constitution and its impact on case-law in the Republic of Armenia

2021 ◽  
pp. 53-60
Author(s):  
Anahit Manasyan ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Direct Effect ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Priority Rules ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Direct Implementation

The article considers the issues with regard to the direct effect of the Constitution. The topic is presented by analyzing the techniques for proper implementation of the Constitution and ensuring the constitutionality of the law enforcement/judicial practice. Author differentiates the content of the concepts „direct effect” and “direct implementation” of the Constitution, presenting the essence of each of the notions. Techniques for proper implementation of constitutional norms are suggested by the author, analyzing also the implementation priority rules. According to the author implementing legislative provisions in conformity with their constitutionallegal content is another precondition for ensuring the proper application of the Constitution. The law enforcement/judicial practice can become a subject of consideration by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia if itis not an issue of legitimacy of the mentioned practice, but an issue of constitutionality of the latter, an issue of evaluation of the circumstance whether the legal acts are implemented in conformity with their constitutional-legal content in the frames of the mentioned practice is raised.

Wewenang Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-X/2013 Dalam Rangka Meningkatkan Kualitas Notaris

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1866
Author(s):  
Aryani Witasari
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Judicial Process ◽  
State Official ◽  
The Law ◽  
Notary Public

Abstract               Notary is a state official who works in the lift by the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights, she serves people who need assistance services in terms of making a deed. Deed that has been made by a Notary under the legislation referred to an authentic deed, have the force of law and can be used as evidence when required. In order to conduct guidance and supervision of the performance of the Notary, required an institution assigned by law (UU No. 2 / 2014 on amendments to UU No. 30/ 2004 concerning Notary) , the agency called the Council of Trustees of Regions (MPD). Pursuant to Article 66 of Law No. 30 of 2004 Regional Supervisory Council is authorized to carry out the task of supervision on the performance of the Notary , to the benefit of the judicial process ,investigator , prosecutor or judge must be approved by the MPD and will take a copy of the minutes and certificates or letters attached to the minutes of a notary deed or protocol of storage , as well as when to call the notary to attend the hearings related to the deed prepared or protocols that are in storage Notary Public Notary . Based on the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 49 / PUU - X / 2013 ), the MPD no longer has the authority to give consent to the law enforcement if it will call the Notary related to their work , but by the Law on the switch to the Court of Honor , which until today Court of Honor was not yet in shape. Keywords : Notary, The Council of Trustees of Regions (MPD), Decision of The Constitutional Court Abstrak Notaris merupakan pejabat negara yang bekerja diangkat oleh Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Azasi Manusia, dia melayani masyarakat yang memerlukan bantuan jasanya dalam hal pembuatan suatu akta. Akta yang telah dibuat oleh seorang Notaris berdasarkan undang-undang disebut dengan akta otentik, mempunyai kekuatan hukum dan dapat dijadikan sebagai alat bukti manakala diperlukan. Dalam rangka untuk mengadakan pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap kinerja Notaris, diperlukan suatu lembaga yang ditugasi oleh undang-undang(Undang-undang no 2 tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang no 30 tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris), lembaga tersebut bernama Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD). Berdasarkan Pasal 66 UU Nomor 30 tahun 2004 Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) diberi kewenangan untuk menjalankan tugas pembinaan dan pengawasan terhadap kinerja Notaris, untuk kepentingan proses peradilan, penyidik, penuntut umum atau hakim harus mendapat persetujuan dari MPD manakala akan mengambil fotocopi minuta akta dan atau surat-surat yang dilekatkan pada minuta akta atau protokol Notaris dalam penyimpanan Notaris, begitu pula jika akan memanggil Notaris untuk hadir dalam pemeriksaan yang berkaitan dengan akta yang dibuatnya atau protokol Notaris yang berada dalam penyimpanan Notaris. Berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 49/PUU-X/2013), maka MPD tidak lagi memiliki kewenangan untuk memberi persetujuan kepada para penegak hukum jika akan memanggil Notaris berkaitan dengan pekerjaannnya, tetapi oleh Undang-undang di alihkan kepada Mahkamah Kehormatan, yang sampai saat ini Mahkamah Kehormatan itu belum juga di bentuk. Kata kunci: Notaris, Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD), Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi

scholarly journals The Prosecutor’s Authority to Conduct a Criminal Investigation Based on The Government Administration Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20
Author(s):  
Leonardo Adiguna
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Government Administration ◽  
Normative Approach ◽  
Corruption Case ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic ◽  
The Government ◽  
Coordination Patterns ◽  
Financial Losses

This research uses a normative approach, which is carried out by examining laws and theories. Also, this study uses a case approach, namely the 2017 village fund corruption case in Pekon Sukaratu. The main problem in this res­earch is what is the authority of the prosecutor in conducting investigations into criminal acts of corruption after the passage of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration and whether the investigation carried out by the prosecutor at the Pringsewu District Prosecutor's Office in coordination with the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus or Aparatur Pengawas Internal Pemerintah (APIP) against the allegations a criminal act of corruption in the management of village funds in 2017 in Pekon Sukaratu whose losses to the state have been returned have met the principle of legal certainty. The research results show that the prosecutor has the authority to carry out the law enforcement process, namely the investigation of suspected corruption crimes as stipulated in Article 30 paragraph (1) letter d of the law on the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. Based on the results of the research that has been done, it is better if changes in laws and regulations related to the elements of corruption in Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crime because there is a product of the Constitutional Court with the decision No. 25/PUU-XIV/2016. Besides, there is a need for socialization for prosecutors regarding their authority in TPK investigations and related to coordination patterns with the authority of APIP in carrying out investigations and calculating state financial losses.

scholarly journals The Guarantees of the Human Rights of the Defendant in the Law System in Kosovo

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 7
Author(s):  
Armend Podvorica ◽  
Adelina Rakaj
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Criminal Procedure ◽  
Practical Implementation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Law System ◽  
European Court ◽  
Protection Of Human Rights ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Republic

The paper "The guarantees of the human rights of the defendant in the law system in Kosovo" aims to treat the access of the Republic of Kosovo in the delivery of constitutional guarantees and legal guarantees to protect the defendant in the criminal procedure. Within these guarantees, special emphasis is placed on the judicious acts in force that provide these guarantees in the Republic of Kosovo. A special analysis with regard to this paper is dedicated to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), the practice of European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), the Constitution of the Republic of Kosovo and the Criminal Procedure Code of Kosovo (CPCK). The analysis of those acts clarifies that the guarantees of the Legal System in Kosovo coincide with the rights of the defendant. Another dimension that finds space within the paper is the practical implementation of the guarantees provided by the aforementioned acts in terms of the rights of the defendant. The role of the Constitutional Court in the Republic of Kosovo in the past and now has been mainly analyzed in the formation of the constitutional and international guarantees, applicable in Kosovo concerning the rights of the defendant in the criminal procedure.

scholarly journals Legal Liability of Advocates in Legal Services Contracts

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zamroni
Keyword(s):  
Annual Report ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Legal Services ◽  
Main Role ◽  
Conceptual Approach ◽  
High Expectations ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Right

The main role of an advocate is to help clients get a fair legal process. This role gives birth to high expectations of advocates so that clients give full confidence to advocates to represent their interests. But in practice, it is not uncommon for advocates to abuse the trust given by their clients. As recorded in the 2019 PERADI annual report which shows that advocates reported by their clients to the PERADI Honorary Board are increasing. Avocados do have immunity rights as regulated in Article 16 of Law No. 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates jo. the decision of the Constitutional Court through decision No. 26 / PUU-XI / 2013. But of course, advocates cannot always protect their immune rights, especially if advocates violate the law and harm the interests of their clients. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibilities of lawyers who violate the law while carrying out their profession and are bound in a legal services contract. This research is normative legal research. The approach used in this research is the conceptual approach, the legislation approach, and the case approach. This research concludes that even though law violations were carried out by lawyers while carrying out their profession and based on a contract, advocates remain responsible, both civil and criminal. While the right to immunity can only be used as a basis for legal protection when advocates in good faith in defending the interests of their clients.

scholarly journals Peran Mediator Dinas Tenaga Kerja Kota Medan dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Akibat Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 470-479
Author(s):  
Limrogate Immmanuel ◽  
Taufik Siregar ◽  
M. Citra Ramadhan
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Legal Protection ◽  
Legal Research ◽  
State Apparatus ◽  
The Law

The purpose of this research is to study and analyze the legal arrangements of Industrial Relations Mediators in solving layoffs, the role of the Medan City Disnaker Mediator in providing legal protection for workers' rights due to layoffs and the obstacles faced by the Medan City Manpower Office in providing legal protection for their rights. workers due to layoffs. Research on the role of the Medan City Manpower Office Mediator in providing legal protection due to layoffs is a normative juridical research. Normative legal research aims to examine library legal materials. The results show that the existence of legal arrangements regarding industrial relations mediators which are regulated in the Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 17 of 2014 concerning the Appointment and Dismissal of Industrial Relations Mediators as well as Mediation Work Procedures and Regulation of the Minister for Empowerment of State Apparatus Number 06 of 2009. In the role and process of enforcement the law enforced by the Medan City Manpower and Transmigration Mediators for workers / laborers who have been laid off is influenced by aspects that affect law enforcement, consisting of: legal substance aspects (laws), law enforcement aspects, facilities and infrastructure aspects, community aspects, aspects culture. The obstacles faced by the Mediator of the Medan City Manpower Office for workers or laborers who were laid off can be seen from the aspects that affect law enforcement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document