scholarly journals Pengaruh Good Corporate Governance, Reputasi Underwriter Dan Roa Terhadap Underpricing Tahun 2016-2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Jazzlin Marvella Gunawan ◽  
Kazia Laturette
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Secondary Market ◽  
Financial Variables ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
High Level

One of the phenomena that occur in Indonesia capital market is underpricing. The underpricing phenomenon occurs when IPO shares are priced lower in the primary market than the closing price on the secondary market. The high level of underpricing can be detrimental to the company because the additional capital obtained through the IPO is not optimal, while the beneficiaries are investors because they get the initial return. This study purpose was to examine the influence of the components of Good Corporate Governance which include the board of commissioners, the independent board of commissioners, the board of directors and ownership concentration, non-financial variables, namely underwriter reputation and financial variables, namely Return On Assets (ROA) on underpricing. Samples were taken using the purposive sampling method. The number of samples finally used was 123 companies from all company sectors that conducted IPOs on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the 2016-2019 period and experienced underpricing. This study used secondary data obtained from the prospectus, annual report, e-bursa and IDX Factbook in 2016-2019. The results of the multiple linear regression test show that variables including the board of commissioners, independent board of commissioners, board of directors and ROA have a significant negative effect on underpricing which means the larger/higher these variables can minimize underpricing. While the concentration of ownership and underwriter’s reputation did not influence underpricing.

scholarly journals Effect of Good Corporate Governance on Profitability

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 90-96
Author(s):  
Devina Subarnas ◽  
Yuliana Gunawan
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Data Analysis ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

The research aims to decide the effect of good corporate governance on profitability in banking companies listed on Indonesia stock exchange from 2016 to 2017. This researchwas an explanatory research, using secondary data. The sample was selected using the purposive sampling method, which resulted in a total of 28 sample companies. The data analysis used was multiple linear regression. The results show that the board of directors significantly affect profitability and independent commissioners does not significantly affect profitability. Simultaneously, board of directors and independent commissioners significantly affect profitability.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENERAPAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PADA PERUSAHAAN PERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA PERIODE 2014-2017

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (02) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadya Ayu Saputri ◽  
Rochmi Widayanti ◽  
Ratna Damayanti
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Simultaneous Application ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect

The purpose of the study was to analyze the effect of the application of good corporate governance, which was governed by the board of commissioners, board of directors, audit committee and institutional ownership of financial performance which was interpreted by the return on asset ratio in banking companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2014-2017. The total population is 43 companies, using purpose sampling techniques obtained by a sample of 25 companies. While the analysis technique used is multiple linear regression. The results show that only the audit committee that has no significant effect, the board of commissioners has a significant negative effect on the board of directors and institutional ownership has a significant positive effect on financial performance. Other results show that simultaneous application of good corporate governance has a significant influence on financial performance. Keyword: good corporate governance, financial performance.

scholarly journals Analysis of The Good Corporate Governance Effect on Profitability in Registered Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-48
Author(s):  
Sutri Handayani
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

This study aimed to find out the effect of Good Corporate Governance toward profitability of listed manufacturer companies in Indonesian stock exchange in 2012-2016 periods. The proxies of Good corporate governance are board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee. Moreover, the profitability is measured by Return On Equity (ROE). Population in this study were  registered manufacturer companies in Indonesian stock exchange in 2012-2016 periods. The sampling technique is purposive sampling method. Based on this method, it is obtained 29 companies. The type of data is secondary data. The data processing uses SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) v.20. The data analysis technique used multiple linear regressions. The result of this study showed  that partially, the Board of Commissioners and the Audit Committee have no significant effect on profitability while the Board of Directors has a significant influence on profitability. Simultaneously the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee had a significant influence on profitability.

Pengaruh Dewan Direksi, Dewan Komisaris Independen. Kepemilikan Manajerial, Kepemilikan Institusional, Dan Dewan Pengawas Syariah Terhadap No Performing Financing (Studi Kasus Pada Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar Di OJK Periode 2015-2019)

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yugi Maheswari ES ◽  
Iwan Fakhruddin ◽  
Azmi Fitriati ◽  
Bima Cinintya Pratama
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Commercial Bank ◽  
Financial Services ◽  
Supervisory Board ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaruh penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) yang diproksikan oleh dewan direksi, dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah terhadap risiko pembayaran yang diukur dengan rasio Non Performing Financing (NPF) pada Bank Umum Syariah. Populasi penelitian adalah Bank Umum Syariah Yang Terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa laporan tahunan Bank Umum Syariah periode 2015-2019. Sampel yang dikumpulkan adalah 14 bank syariah sebayak 70 data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dewan direksi berpengaruh negative erhadap NPF. Dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, kepemilikan institusional, dan dewan pengawas syariah tidak berpengaruh terhadap NPF.  The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) which is proxied by the board of directors, the board of independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and the sharia supervisory board against payment risk as measured by the Non Performing Financing (NPF) ratio at the Bank Sharia General. The study population was a Sharia Commercial Bank Registered at Financial services Authority. The data used was secondary data in the form of reports annual Sharia Commercial Bank for the period 2015-2019. The samples collected were 14 Islamic banks as much as 70 data. The results showed that the board of directors has a negative effect on NPF. Independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and sharia supervisory board have no effect on NPF.

scholarly journals ANALISIS PENGARUH CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TERHADAP TAX AVOIDANCE DENGAN DIMODERASI GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (02) ◽  
pp. 211-234
Author(s):  
Levi Martantina ◽  
R. Soerjatno
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Corporate Social Responsibility ◽  
Social Responsibility ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Tax Avoidance ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
Corporate Social

This study aims to examine the effect  of Corporate Social Responsibility on Tax Avoidance in which Good Corporate Governance is moderating variable. Corporate Social Responsibility is independent variable whereas dependent variable is Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the first hyphothesis found that Corporate Social Responsibility has a negative effect on Tax Avoidance. In other words, the company that does extensive disclosure, the company does not practice Tax Avoidance. The result of testing the second hypothesis found that the exixtence of Good Corporate Governance in the board of directors mediate the influence of Corporate Social Responsibility with Tax Avoidance. So that the existence of the board of directors is able to contribute in making extensive disclosure towards Corporate Social Responsibility and practice of Tax Avoidance.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MEKANISME GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE TERHADAP KINERJA KEUANGAN PADAPERBANKAN YANG TERDAFTAR DI BURSA EFEK INDONESIA (BEI)

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Mira Diyanty ◽  
Meina Wulansari Yusniar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors

<em><span lang="EN-US">The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of the Good Corporate Governance mechanism on the board of commissioners, the board of directors, the proportion of independent commissioners, the audit committee, CAR on ROA. This study also uses a purposive sampling method for sampling. The analysis test used is multiple linear regression analysis. The population used by companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2011 - 2013 and which meet the sample selection criteria. The sample used was 25 companies. Data is collected through secondary data collection in the form of the company's annual report for the period 2011 - 2013 which is published on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The research hypothesis was tested by multiple linear regression which had met the testing of classical assumptions. The results of the analysis show that the board of commissioners, the proportion of independent commissioners, audit committees, CAR does not significantly influence ROA while the board of directors has a positive and significant effect on ROA.</span></em>

scholarly journals Effect Of Good Corporate Governance On Company Profitability RE & Property Sector In Indonesia

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17
Author(s):  
Ahmad Azmy, Dea Restiya Anggreini, Mohammad Hamim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
Panel Data Regression ◽  
The Board Of Directors

This study aims to examine the effect of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) on company profitability. The dependent variable are Return On Assets (ROA) and Return On Equity (ROE). The independent variable are Good Corporate Governance (GCG) represented by the Board of Commissioners, the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee. This study uses secondary data from audited financial statements of Real Estate and Property companies in 2013-2017. The analytical tool used in this study uses panel data regression. Based on the results of the study it is known that the Board of Directors and Audit Committee variables have a significant positive effect on ROA and ROE. The Board of Commissioners variable has no influence and negative relationship to ROA and ROE.

scholarly journals PERAN GOOD CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DALAM MEMINIMALISIR TERJADINYA FINANCIAL DISTRESS

BISMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Wulan Maulidiss Sa’diah ◽  
Mohamad Nur Utomo
Keyword(s):  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Agency Conflicts ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Negative Effect

This study aims to determine the effect of managerial ownership, independent board of commissioners, board of directors, and audit committee on financial distress in banking companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2019. This research used the purposive sampling method with a sample of 41 companies consisting of 205 observational data. Data were analyzed using logistic regression. The results showed that independent board of commissioners and board of directors had a significant and negative effect on financial distress. However, managerial ownership and audit committee did not have a significant effect on financial distress. This study supports the agency theory, which states that the monitoring role of the independent board of commissioners and the board of directors can minimize the occurrence of agency conflicts in a company. Keywords: audit committee, board of directors, financial distress, independent board of commissioners, managerial ownership

scholarly journals The Effect of Good Corporate Governance Mechanism On The Financial Performance of Banking Companies Listed In Stock Exchange Indonesia 2012-2016

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-287
Author(s):  
Desi Pipian Pujakusum
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Governance Mechanism ◽  
Return On Assets ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanism

This study aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance mechanism on the financial performance of banking companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange 2012-2016 period. The corporate governance mechanism is proxied by the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, audit committee size, the board of director's education, and the board of commissioner’s education. The company's financial performance is proxied by return on assets (ROA). Samples were taken by using purposive sampling. The total number of samples used in this study amounted to 180 research samples. This study was tested with SPSS 20 program. Data analysis technique used in this research is simple regression analysis.  The results showed that the size of the board of directors, the size of the board of commissioners, and audit comitee size have a significant effect on return on assets. These three factors have a significant effect on return on assets, while the board of commissioners education and the board of director's education have no significant effect on return on assets.

scholarly journals The Influence of the Size of the Board of Commissioners, Size of the Board of Directors, Size of the Audit Committee, and Company Size on Banking Performance at Indonesian Regional Development Banks in 2015-2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 311-322
Author(s):  
Ifadatul Musdalifah ◽  
Risdiana Himmati
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Regional Development ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Board Of Directors ◽  
Development Banks ◽  
Regional Development Banks

This research is motivated by the fact that the ROA of Regional Development Banks in 2015-2019 fluctuated, this shows that there are factors that influence it, one of which is Good Corporate Governance. By implementing Good Corporate Governance and supported by the mechanism will improve banking performance. Banking performance is influenced by the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company. The formulation of the problem in this study is how do the size of the board of commissioners, the size of the board of directors, the size of the audit committee, and the size of the company affect banking performance at the regional development banks of Indonesia in 2015-2020?. By using a quantitative approach and the type of secondary data as well as the number of samples of 12 banks were taken using the purposive sampling technique. Data processing using E-Views10 with panel data regression analysis techniques. The results of this study are partially the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, and the size of the company have no significant effect on banking performance. Meanwhile, the size of the Audit Committee has a negative and significant effect on banking performance. Simultaneously the size of the Board of Commissioners, the size of the Board of Directors, the size of the Audit Committee, and the size of the company have a significant effect on banking performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document