scholarly journals Pengadilan Sebagai Lembaga Penegakan Hukum (Perspektif Civil Law dan Common Law)

2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 134
Author(s):  
Anna Triningsih

Law, as an justice institution run its functions through a specific process towards a certain direction in order to achieve justice. Justice now a days is needed as something concrete as the fulfillment of the most basic needs of the community. Law enforcement, in parliamentary life is run by the Government (the executive organs) and through the courts (judicial organ).There are different approaches in law enforcement. The rule of law in the Civil Law System which is shared by the countries in the European continent or land use law, also known as legal approach. In the Common Law System which is shared by the United Kingdom and the United Kingdom speaking countries, using the administration approach of the Administration, called the administration of justice. Implementation of the fundamental principles of the law, or because of its emphasis on the steps of a procedure in the event properly can make the law as an unrealistic myth, inefficient and far from the purpose of    the law and implies the occurrence of loss of trust from the community, while the basic principles of administration, because of its emphasis on the achievement of business objectives efficiently will have implications for the lack of certainty in law enforcement that is essential for the achievement of Justice for everyone. Besides that addition, it also can be an opportunity for the Court arbitrariness because discretion has its wide open room. Every Legal Approach has its own advantages and disadvantages. Making option to choose which legal approach as an appropriate and good policy in law enforcement is related to the characteristics and level of knowledge of the community also the environment where these law applied.

Author(s):  
Ирина Филипова ◽  
Irina Filipova

Two basic models of legal regulation of labour relations exists in the world practice. Each of them has its advantages and disadvantages. The European model is taken as the basis for legal regulation of labour relations in the Russian Federation. The same model is used in France. The USA and the United Kingdom created Common law system of legal regulation of labour relations. Common law and Continental European systems were adopted by most countries, however in some countries such as China and Latin America countries both models are used combining. Labour laws of the countries using the same model have some similarities. Thus the labour laws of France and the labour laws of Russia have a strong social orientation; they include many of the same rules. However employment law in the states of Common law system is so flexible that it allows more freedom to build employment relationships. It contributes to the development of the labour market and to high achievements in the country’s economic development.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Steven Gow Calabresi

This book is about the stunning birth and growth of judicial review in the civil law world, since 1945. In Volume I of this two-volume series, I showed that judicial review was born and grew in common law G-20 constitutional democracies and in Israel primarily: (1) when there is a need for a federalism or a separation of powers umpire, (2) when there is a rights from wrongs dynamic, (3) when there is borrowing, and (4) when the political structure of a country’s institutions leaves space within which the judiciary can operate. The countries discussed in Volume I were the following: (1) the United States, (2) Canada, (3) Australia, (4) India, (5) Israel, (6) South Africa, and (7) the United Kingdom....


2020 ◽  
pp. 336-355
Author(s):  
Ian J. Lloyd

Databases form a vitally important part of the information society. The traditional approach in the United Kingdom has been to protect their contents as compilations under the law of copyright. This contrasts with the approach adopted in civil law states which have historically required a more significant qualitative element as a condition for the award of copyright than has been the case in the United Kingdom. Databases would not meet this requirement – although many states would offer protection under unfair competition laws. The European Union’s database directive strikes something of a compromise between the two approaches. The chapter will consider the extent of the sui generis database right and consider its practical application in the, albeit limited, number of cases in which it has been considered by the courts.


2019 ◽  

The interactions between law and culture in addressing the legal problems at the end of a life are currently being discussed in many countries. The discourse on this issue should be multidisciplinary, taking into account its legal, medical, ethical, philosophical and anthropological aspects. The concepts designed to manage the legal problems that occur when a life comes to an end are closely linked to the culture of each country. For this reason, countries with different cultural backgrounds have been selected for this comparative end-of-life study. In France, Germany and Italy, which have a continental legal system, the United Kingdom, which has a common law system, and India, the various religions and cultures exert an important influence on the modernisation of the legislation in this respect. The book deals with recent legislative changes and developments in the countries surveyed. With contributions by Soazick Kerneis, Guillaume Le Blanc, Jeanne Mesmin d’Estienne, Louis-Charles Viossat, Christophe Pacific, Volker Lipp, Christine Laquitaine, Philippe Poulain, Stephanie Rohlfing-Dijoux, Stefano Canestrari, Kartina A. Choong, Richard Law, Sabine Boussard, Prasannanshu Prasannanshu, Pierre Rosario Domingue, Arvin Halkhoree, Kerstin Peglow, Jörg Luther, Uwe Hellmann, Géraldine Demme, Sabir Kadel, Anja van Bernum, Marie Rossier, Victoria Roux, Charles Walleit, Berquis Bestvater


1999 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  

AbstractWithin the common law world, the use of the term informed consent implies the American doctrine. Informed consent as a doctrine is not part of the law in the United Kingdom. However, it is possible to predict a way forward in disclosure cases yet to be heard in the courts of the United Kingdom. These predictions are based on current developments in the common law in the United Kingdom as well as those in Canada and Australia, on the European convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and on trends within the medical profession itself in the light of the Bolam test.


1975 ◽  
Vol 19 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 52-65
Author(s):  
Margaret Rogers

It is perhaps desirable to start off by reminding ourselves as to what generally is the law which is applicable to bankers in Kenya. We know that the sources of Kenya law as set out in the Judicature Act, 19671 are:“;(a) the Constitution;(b) subject thereto, all other written laws, including the Acts of Parliament of the United Kingdom, cited in Part I of the Schedule to this Act, modified in accordance with Part II of that Schedule;(c) subject thereto and so far as the same do not extend or apply, the substance of the common law, the doctrines of equity and the statutes of general application in force in England on the 12th August, 1897, and the procedure and practice observed in courts of justice in England at that date:…”;


Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 1617
Author(s):  
Siti Rodhiyah Dwi Istinah

AbstrakMembandingkan sistem pemerintahan presidensiil di Indonesia dalam sistem hukum civil law dengan sistem presidensiil Amerika Serikat (AS) dalam sistem hukum common law, dapat dipahami perkembangan karakteristik sistem ketatanegaraan masing-masing negara. Mengikuti perkembangan pemikiran  founding fathers tentang dasar negara, mereka menyatakan pembentukan negara Republik Indonesia didasarkan atas corak hidup bangsa Indonesia yaitu sistem kekeluargaan dan akan menggunakan sistem pemerintahan yang sesuai dengan corak masyarakatnya. Akan tetapi dengan adanya reformasi pada tahun 1998, penegasan sistem pemerintahan presidensiil disepakati dalam agenda sidang MPR yang membahas tentang perubahan UUD 1945. Dalam pelaksanaan sistem presidensiil di Indonesia yang tumbuh dalam sistem civil law terdapat juga pengaruh common law. Dibuktikan dengan dianutnya prinsip-prinsip parlementarian. Ada upaya purifikasi sistem presidensiil, akan tetapi menjadi perlu pembenahan terutama pada infrastruktur politik dan penataan beberapa Undang-Undang (UU) di bidang politik. Sedangkan sistem pemerintahan presidensiil Amerika Serikat sudah menyatu dalam praktek ketatanegaraannya, karena Amerika Serikat merupakan tanah kelahiran sistem presidensiil dan merupakan contoh ideal karena memenuhi hampir semua kriteria yang ada dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensiil. Ada beberapa kelebihan dan kekurangan  di masing-masing sistem pemerintahan presidensiil antara Indonesia dengan Amerika Serikat. Hal ini disebabkan beberapa pengaruh   yang mendukung efektifitas pelaksanaan sistem tersebut antara lain tentang sistem hukum yang mendasarinya, sistem kepartaian, sistem politik dan perkembangan demokrasi yang mewarnai pelaksanaan sistem ketatanegaraannya. Kata kunci: Perbandingan, Sistem Pemerintahan, Common Law, Civil Law, Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensiil AbstractComparing the presidential government system in Indonesia under civil law system with a presidential system of the United States (US) under a common law system, it can be understood from the development of the characteristics of the constitutional system of each country. Following the development of the basic ideas of the founding fathers of the state, they declared the establishment of the Republic of Indonesia based on the style of life of the Indonesian nation that kinship system and will use a system of government in accordance with a pattern of society. However, with the reform in 1998, assertion of presidential government system was agreed on the agenda of the Assembly session that discusses the changes in the Constitution of 1945. In the implementation of the presidential system in Indonesia is growing in the civil law system there is also the influence of the common law. It is proved by the principles espoused of the parliament. There are efforts to purify the presidential system, but it becomes necessary infrastructure improvements, especially in the political and structuring some Act (Act) in politics. While the US system of presidential government are united in the practice of political subdivision, because the United States is the birthplace of the presidential system and is an ideal figure since it meets almost all the criteria that exist in the system of presidential government. There are some advantages and disadvantages of each system of presidential government between Indonesia and the United States. This is due to several influences that support the effective implementation of the system, among others, about the underlying legal system, party system, political system and democratic development that characterizes the implementation of the system of political subdivisions. Keywords: Comparison, System Administration, Common Law, Civil Law, Presidential Government System 


2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 365-395
Author(s):  
Paul F. Scott

AbstractThis article, on the basis of a consideration of the development of the law relating to the use of passports as a tool of national security in the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, challenges the common law conception of passports, arguing that passports effectively confer rights and so, consequentially, that the refusal or withdrawal of a passport represents a denial of rights. From this conclusion a number of points flow. Though these consequences are most acute for the United Kingdom and Canada, in which passports remain regulated by, and are issued under, prerogative powers, there are also a number of points of significance for Australia and New Zealand, where passports have a statutory basis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-80
Author(s):  
James Goudkamp ◽  
Lorenz König

AbstractThis article addresses the principles of tort law that govern claims in respect of lost illegal earnings. It focuses on common law jurisdictions (and the law in the United Kingdom in particular) where such claims, despite apparently being commonplace, have been largely ignored by academics. It describes the existing law and calls in aid in this regard a four-fold taxonomy of cases. The article then turns attention to how claims in respect of lost illegal earnings ought to be decided. At this juncture, the article looks to ideas emanating from German tort law, which has developed a highly sophisticated jurisprudence on the subject of illegal earnings. The German approach, stated simply, requires tort law to defer to rules in other departments of private law. If, for example, contract law would not protect an interest that a claimant has in a particular transaction by reason of the transaction being tainted with illegality, tort law will not allow a claimant indirectly to obtain the benefits of that transaction via a claim for lost illegal earnings. It is argued that the German solution holds considerable promise and merits consideration as a serious alternative to the significantly more complicated principles that the common law courts have developed, which principles currently lack any thoroughgoing rationalisation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document