Simplified staging laparotomy in FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer: Follow-up and outcomes in South Wales, UK

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (8) ◽  
pp. 888-891
Author(s):  
A. Beena ◽  
R. Howells ◽  
K. Lutchman-Singh ◽  
K. Dhar ◽  
K. Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Staging Laparotomy ◽  
South Wales ◽  
Stage 1

A new prognostic model for FIGO stage 1 epithelial ovarian cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 104 (3) ◽  
pp. 607-611 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Obermair ◽  
Arlan Fuller ◽  
Elisa Lopez-Varela ◽  
Toon van Gorp ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Stage 1

scholarly journals Predictors of Survival Outcomes After Primary Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer in Lagos, Nigeria

2021 ◽  
pp. 89-98
Author(s):  
Kehinde Sharafadeen Okunade ◽  
Adebola A. Adejimi ◽  
Ephraim O. Ohazurike ◽  
Omolola Salako ◽  
Benedetto Osunwusi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Longitudinal Research ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

PURPOSE This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathologic predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) following primary treatment in Lagos, Nigeria. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from a retrospective cohort of 126 patients who received treatment for EOC between 2010 and 2018, we identified 83 patients with a complete clinical record for subsequent data analysis. Patients' demographics and updated 2-year follow-up status were abstracted from medical records. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were compared using the log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models were used for multivariate analysis to identify independent predictors of survivals following treatment in EOC patients. RESULTS The median PFS and OS were 12 and 24 months, respectively. After adjusting for covariates in the multivariate analysis, younger age ≤ 55 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.74; P = .01) and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I/II (HR = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.08; P = .01) were independent predictors of improved PFS, whereas being premenopausal (HR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.75; P = .02) was an independent predictor of reduced OS after 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION PFS could be predicted by the age and FIGO stage of the disease, whereas menopausal status was predictive of OS in patients with EOC. This knowledge should form the basis for counseling patients with ovarian cancer during their primary treatment and lend support to the importance of aggressive follow-up and monitoring for the older, premenopausal patients and those with an advanced stage of epithelial ovarian cancer. However, robust longitudinal research should be carried out to provide additional reliable insight to this information.

scholarly journals Biomarkers of Central Nervous System Involvement from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 3408
Author(s):  
Giulia Scotto ◽  
Fulvio Borella ◽  
Margherita Turinetto ◽  
Valentina Tuninetti ◽  
Anna A. Valsecchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Central Nervous System Involvement ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
The Central Nervous System

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the leading cause of death among women affected by gynaecological malignancies. Most patients show advanced disease at diagnosis (FIGO stage III-IV) and, despite the introduction of new therapeutic options, most women experience relapses. In most cases, recurrence is abdominal-pelvic; however, EOC can occasionally metastasize to distant organs, including the central nervous system. The incidence of brain metastases (BMs) from EOC is low, but it has grown over time; currently, there are no follow-up strategies available. In the last decade, a few biomarkers able to predict the risk of developing BMs from OC or as potential therapeutic targets have been investigated by several authors; to date, none have entered clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to offer a summary on the role of the most relevant predictors of central nervous system (CNS) involvement (hormone receptors; BRCA; MRD1; PD-1/PD-L1) and to highlight possible therapeutic strategies for the management of metastatic brain disease in EOC

ESGO Statement on the Role of CA‐125 Measurement in Follow-Up of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 175-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Gerald Gitsch ◽  
Nicolas Reed ◽  
Frederic Amant ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ca 125

scholarly journals Clinical Practice of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Early-Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Chemotherapy ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 61 (6) ◽  
pp. 287-294
Author(s):  
Lindy M.J. Frielink ◽  
Brenda M. Pijlman ◽  
Nicole P.M. Ezendam ◽  
Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Selective Treatment ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Practice Methods

Background: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy improves survival in women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Yet, there is a wide variety in clinical practice. Methods: All patients diagnosed with FIGO I and IIa EOC (2006-2010) in the south of the Netherlands were analyzed. The percentage of patients that received adjuvant chemotherapy was determined as well as the comprehensiveness of staging and outcome. Results: Forty percent (54/135) of the patients with early-stage EOC received adjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with FIGO stage, clear-cell histology and nonoptimal staging. Optimal staging was achieved in 50%, and nonoptimal staging was associated with advanced age, comorbidity and treatment in a non-referral hospital. Overall, there was no difference in outcome between patients with and without adjuvant chemotherapy. Yet, in grade 3 tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy seems beneficial. Conclusions: Selective treatment of patients with early-stage EOC might reduce adjuvant chemotherapy without compromising outcome.

scholarly journals The FIGO Stage IVA Versus IVB of Ovarian Cancer: Prognostic Value and Predictive Value for Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvin Tajik ◽  
Roelien van de Vrie ◽  
Mohammad H. Zafarmand ◽  
Corneel Coens ◽  
Marrije R. Buist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Figo Staging ◽  
Stage Ivb

ObjectiveThe revised version of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system (2014) for epithelial ovarian cancer includes a number of changes. One of these is the division of stage IV into 2 subgroups. Data on the prognostic and predictive significance of this classification are scarce. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) versus primary debulking surgery (PDS) in relation to the subclassification of FIGO stage IV is also unknown.MethodsWe used data of the EORTC 55971 trial, in which 670 patients with previous stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to PDS or NACT; 160 patients had previous stage IV. Information on previous FIGO staging and presence of pleural effusion with positive cytology were used to classify tumors as either stage IVA or IVB. We tested the association between stage IVA/IVB and survival to evaluate the prognostic value and interactions between stage, treatment, and survival to evaluate the predictive performance.ResultsAmong the 160 participants with previous stage IV disease, 103 (64%) were categorized as stage IVA and 57 (36%) as stage IVB tumors. Median overall survival was 24 months in FIGO stage IVA and 31 months in stage IVB patients (P = 0.044). Stage IVB patients treated with NACT had 9 months longer median overall survival compared with IVB patients undergoing PDS (P = 0.025), whereas in IVA patients, no significant difference was observed (24 vs 26 months, P = 0.48).ConclusionsThe reclassification of FIGO stage IV into stage IVA or IVB was not prognostic as expected. Compared with stage IVA patients, stage IVB patients have a better overall survival and may benefit more from NACT.

Laboratory cross-comparison of homologous recombination repair mutation analysis in tumor in a multicenter epithelial ovarian cancer series: The BORNEO GEICO 60-0 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17550-e17550
Author(s):  
Ignacio Romero ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
Zaida Garcia-Casado ◽  
Raul Marquez ◽  
Alfonso Yubero Esteban ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Parp Inhibitors ◽  
Homologous Recombination Repair ◽  
Recombination Repair ◽  
Class 1 ◽  
Uncertain Significance

e17550 Background: In epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the identification of mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes on tumor is prognostic, predictive of response to PARP inhibitors, and a tool to identify individuals at genetic cancer risk. The aim of this study is to compare the concordance between two laboratories in identifying and classifying genetic variants in HRR genes. Methods: In a multicentre ambispective series of unselected, non mucinous EOC of all stages formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tumors were collected. These samples underwent the same mutational analysis of 15 HRR genes ( ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL, PALB2, PPP2R2A, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, RAD54L) in two different Laboratories (Lab1, Lab2) that used their own validated multi-gene NGS panels. Variant allele frequency (VAF) threshold was 5% for single nucleotide polymorphism and 10% for indels. Large rearrangements were not analyzed. Variants were classified into three categories based on ACMG criteria: non-mutated (class 1-2), Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS: class 3) and likely pathogenic/pathogenic (class 4-5). Results: A total of 81 cases were sent for the analysis. One had low DNA quality and therefore 80 cases were finally studied (85% high grade serous and 74% FIGO stage III-IV). Results reported by Lab1 and Lab2 (lab1/Lab2) were the following: 21/19 (26%/24%) cases had BRCA1/2 mutations, 7/8 (8.7%/10%) mutations on other HRR genes including two in ATM and RAD51D, one in CHEK1, CHEK2, and FANCL and one RAD51C reported in Lab2 only while the rest were either VUS 23/27 (29%/34%) or non-mutated 29/26 (36%/33%). Concordance between laboratories in classifying patients was 93.75% (kappa coefficient 0.86). Discrepancies (DC) on variants were classified into arbitrary categories, namely 0= complete concordance, category 1 meaning DC in detection assumed to be due to tumor heterogeneity (VAF nearby the threshold) or technique (1A), or caused by laboratories performance and avoidable (1B) and the category 2 identified DC in interpretation without clinical relevance (2A) or clinically relevant (2B), the results of total number of variants are shown in table. Overall, regarding clinically relevant DC in HRR genes, 9 DC in variants were observed including six 2B, two 1A and one 1B and they affect 5 (6.3%) patients since some were overlapping. Conclusions: In our EOC series the concordance of two Laboratories in the identification of clinically relevant HRR mutations on tumor is high but discrepancies in interpretation remain a challenge that needs further harmonization.[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document