Aspects of Data Quality in Psychology: Missing Data and Aberrant Responses
Data preprocessing is an integral step prior to analyzing data in the social sciences. The purpose of this article is to report the current practices psychological researchers use to address data preprocessing or quality concerns with a focus on issues pertaining to aberrant responses and missing data in self report measures. 240 articles were sampled from four journals: Psychological Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Developmental Psychology, and Abnormal Psychology from 2012 to 2018. We found that nearly half of the studies did not report any missing data treatment (111/240; 46.25%) and if they did, the most common approach to handle missing data was listwise deletion (71/240; 29.6%). Studies that remove data due to missingness removed, on average, 12% of the sample. We also found that most studies do not report any methodology to address aberrant responses (194/240; 80.83%). For studies that reported issues with aberrant responses, a study would classify 4% of the sample, on average, as suspect responses. These results suggest that most studies are either not transparent enough about their data preprocessing steps or maybe leveraging suboptimal procedures. We outline recommendations for researchers to improve the transparency and/or the data quality of their study.