Executive Function Measurement in Urban Schools: Exploring the Links between Performance-Based Metrics and Teacher Ratings
When compared to research centered on the executive function development of white, middle-class children, relatively little is known about their non-white, lower-SES peers. In an effort to harmonize how executive functions are measured within under-represented contexts, the present study compares the utility of computerized performance-based tasks with teacher ratings of children’s classroom behavior using the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC, 2nd edition, Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2004) . The sample included older children who were mostly ethnic minority students from high-poverty backgrounds (N = 243; Mage = 9.28 years, SDage = 0.80; nfemale = 125; nAfricanAmerican = 216, nLatinAmerican = 15, nAsianAmerican = 6). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling tested for links between computerized performance-based executive function tasks and teacher ratings of everyday executive function. The results indicate good reliability for teacher ratings with this sample, with stronger links between a unified conceptualization of executive function compared to a diverse one. The findings suggest that these metrics are appropriate for a wide range of children and that ratings of everyday behavior might tap more into overall rather than specific executive function skills. These findings encourage continued questioning surrounding the organization of executive functions in older children from diverse backgrounds and their utility for general theories of cognitive development.